Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What did the presidential candidates say about the economy?
Explainer: What did the presidential candidates say about the economy?
Nov 26, 2025 5:07 PM

Last night Chris Wallace moderated the third and final debate of this presidential season. mentators have remarked that it was the most substantial policy debate of the year. But because of the interruptions and recriminations, it can be difficult to ascertain exactly what each candidate was proposing.

Below I’ve summarized the actual policy statements made by each candidate about the economy, and included the verbatim text of their remarks from which the summary is taken. In the summaries (the sections in bold), I’ve stripped away the claims made by each candidate about the other and focused solely on the position they advocated or defended.

Hillary Clinton on the economy:

Create a jobs program that focuses on infrastructure, advanced manufacturing, and clean energy.

Well, I think when the middle class thrives, America thrives. And so my plan is based on growing the economy, giving middle-class families many more opportunities. I want us to have the biggest jobs program since World War II, jobs in infrastructure and advanced manufacturing. I think we pete with high-wage countries, and I believe we should. New jobs and clean energy, not only to fight climate change, which is a serious problem, but to create new opportunities and new businesses.

Proposes to raise the minimum wage and ensure women get equal pay for equal work.

I want us to do more to help small business. That’s where two- thirds of the new jobs are going e from. I want us to raise the national minimum wage, because people who live in poverty should not — who work full-time should not still be in poverty. And I sure do want to make sure women get equal pay for the work we do.

Increase apprenticeships and technical education in high school munity colleges; have the government pay for college for all families that earn less than $125,000.

I feel strongly that we have to have an education system that starts with preschool and goes through college. That’s why I want more technical education in high schools and munity colleges, real apprenticeships to prepare young people for the jobs of the future. I want to make college debt-free and for families making less than $125,000, you will not get a tuition bill from a public college or university if the plan that I worked on withBernie Sandersis enacted.

Increase taxes on corporations and high e on households earning more than $250,000.

And we’re going to work hard to make sure that it is, because we are going to go where the money is. Most of the gains in the last years since the Great Recession have gone to the very top. So we are going to have the wealthy pay their fair share. We’re going to have corporations make a contribution greater than they are now to our country.

[…]

I have said repeatedly throughout this campaign: I will not raise taxes on anyone making $250,000 or less.

Clinton claims her plan would produce 10 million new jobs.

That is a plan that has been analyzed by independent experts which said that it could produce 10 million new jobs. By contrast, Donald’s plan has been analyzed to conclude it might lose 3.5 million jobs. Why? Because his whole plan is to cut taxes, to give the biggest tax breaks ever to the wealthy and to corporations, adding $20 trillion to our debt, and causing the kind of dislocation that we have seen before,because it truly will be trickle-down economics on steroids.

So the plan I have I think will actually produce greater opportunities. The plan he has will cost us jobs and possibly lead to another Great Recession.

Claims that her policies will not add to the national debt.

I also will not add a penny to the debt.

Decrease the national budget deficit by increased government investment (i.e., stimulus spending).

We know how to get control of the debt. When my husband was president, we went from a $300 billion deficit to a $200 billion surplus and we were actually on the path to eliminating the national debt. When President Obama came into office, he inherited the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression. He has cut the deficit by two-thirds.

So, yes, one of the ways you go after the debt, one of the ways you create jobs is by investing in people. So I do have investments, investments in new jobs, investments in education, skill training, and the opportunities for people to get ahead and stay ahead. That’s the kind of approach that will work.

[…]

So what I am proposing is that we invest from the middle out and the ground up, not the top down. That is not going to work.

That’s why what I have put forward doesn’t add a penny to the debt, but it is the kind of approach that will enable more people to take those new jobs, higher-paying jobs. We’re beginning to see some increase in es, and we certainly have had a long string of increasing jobs. We’ve got to do more to get the whole economy moving, and that’s what I believe I will be able to do.

Opposes the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement.

Well, first, let me say, number one, when I saw the final agreement for TPP, I said I was against it. It didn’t meet my test. I’ve had the same test. Does it create jobs, raise es, and further our national security? I’m against it now. I’ll be against it after the election. I’ll be against it when I’m president.

Opposes “illegal dumping of steel and aluminum” into American markets.

And, you know, one of the biggest problems we have with China is the illegal dumping of steel and aluminum into our markets. I have fought against that as a senator. I’ve stood up against it as secretary of state.

Proposes to create a “trade prosecutor” to enforce trade agreements.

We’re going to have trade agreements that we enforce. That’s why I’m going to have a trade prosecutor for the first time in history. And we’re going to enforce those agreements, and we’re going to look for businesses to help us by buying American products.

Increase Social Security contributions (most likely by raising the cap) and tax the wealthy to put more money into the Social Security Trust Fund.

Well, Chris, I am on record as saying that we need to put more money into the Social Security Trust Fund. That’s part of mitment to raise taxes on the wealthy. My Social Security payroll contribution will go up, as will Donald’s, assuming he can’t figure out how to get out of it. But what we want to do is to replenish the Social Security Trust Fund…

Donald Trump on the economy:

Provides an unspecific proposal on helping families pay for college tuition.

Well, first of all, before I start on my plan, her plan is going to raise taxes and even double your taxes. Her tax plan is a disaster. And she can say all she wants about college tuition. And I’m a big proponent. We’re going to do a lot of things for college tuition. But the rest of the public’s going to be paying for it.

Increase free trade by renegotiation of trade agreements with foreign countries.

So my plan — we’re going to renegotiate trade deals. We’re going to have a lot of free trade. We’re going to have free trade, more free trade than we have right now. But we have horrible deals. Our jobs are being taken out by the deal that her husband signed, NAFTA, one of the worst deals ever. Our jobs are being sucked out of our economy.

Plans to renegotiate or terminate NAFTA.

I am going to renegotiate NAFTA. And if I can’t make a great deal — then we’re going to terminate NAFTA and we’re going to create new deals. We’re going to have trade, but we’re going — we’re going to terminate it, we’re going to make a great trade deal.

Proposes to implement substantial tax cuts.

We are going to cut taxes massively. We’re going to cut business taxes massively.

Opposes the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement.

Now she wants to sign Trans-Pacific Partnership. And she wants it. She lied when she said she didn’t call it the gold standard in one of the debates. She totally lied. She did call it the gold standard. And they actually fact checked, and they said I was right. I was so honored.

Supports making it more difficult for American businesses to obtain steel produced overseas.

For 30 years, you’ve been in a position to help, and if you say that I use steel or I use something else, I — make it impossible for me to do that. I wouldn’t mind.

Proposes to increase economic growth to between 4 and 6 percent.

Well, I say they’re wrong, because I’m going to create tremendous jobs.And we’re bringing GDP from, really, 1 percent, which is what it is now, and if she got in, it will be less than zero. But we’re bringing it from 1 percent up to 4 percent. And I actually think we can go higher than 4 percent. I think you can go to 5 percent or 6 percent.

Proposes havingbusinesspeople negotiate America’s trade deals.

We’ve had people that are political hacks making the biggest deals in the world, bigger panies. You take these panies, these trade deals are far bigger than panies, and yet we don’t use our great leaders, many of whom back me and many of whom back Hillary, I must say. But we don’t use those people. Those are the people — these are the greatest negotiators in the world. We have the greatest businesspeople in the world. We have to use them to negotiate our trade deals.

Proposes repealing and replacingObamacare.

And one thing we have to do: Repeal and replace the disaster known as Obamacare. It’s destroying our country. It’s destroying our businesses, our small business and our big businesses. We have to repeal and replace Obamacare.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Prediction Regarding Laudato Si’ Turns Out To Be Accurate
Who could have predicted, six months ago, what the encyclical Laudato Si’, would hold in store? Seems like Jennifer Roback Morse could. In a January 2015 piece for The Daily Caller, Morse made some predictions that turned out to be spot on. I do not know what he is going to say. Neither, dear reader, does anyone else you are likely to read. However, I can tell you two things that he will certainly not say. And those two unsaid...
Video: Rev. Robert A. Sirico Delivers Closing Plenary Address of Acton University 2015
Acton University 2015 came to a close last night with a plenary address from Rev. Robert A. Sirico. We invite you to view the full address via the video player below. ...
Audio: Jordan Ballor on Laudato Si’
Jordan Ballor, editor of the Journal of Markets and Morality, joinedhost Austin Hill on Faith Radio’s Austin Hill in the Morning show on Friday morning to discuss Pope Francis’ new encyclical,Laudato Si’, and its impact in the broader Christian world beyond the Roman Catholic Church. You can listen to the interview via the audio player below. ...
A Guide to Laudato Si: A Section-By-Section Summary of Pope Francis’ Encyclical on the Environment
Pope Francis has released his eagerly anticipated encyclical on the environment, Laudato Si’. While the document deserves a close reading, its extreme length (80 pages/45,000 words) will make it difficult for many people to process. To help highlight some of the key points I’ve produced a section-by-section summary of the entire encyclical. As with any summary, much of the meaning and context will be lost. But I hope this will provide you with a starting point for greater engagement with...
Video: Joel Salatin Speaks at Acton University 2015
Self-described “lunatic farmer” Joel Salatin took over the podium last night at the Thursday night plenary session of Acton University 2015 and delivered an engaging and interesting address to the gathered attendees. We’re pleased to share the video of Salatin’s presentation with you below. ...
Social Justice and the Spirit of Association
What is social justice? Is it a vision of a perfectly just society? Is it an ideal set of government policies?Is it a particular theory or practice? Is it a virtue? A religious concept? A social arrangement? In a lecture at Acton University on his ing book, Social Justice: What It Is, What It Isn’t, Michael Novak soughtto answer somethese questions with a particular framework around intermediary institutions. Offeringa broad survey of the term’s origins, history, and modern use and...
Environment Encyclical Is ‘Well Intentioned, Deeply Flawed’
Samuel Gregg, Acton’s director of research, writes in The American Spectator today about Laudato Si’, Pope Francis’ encyclical which addresses environmental issues. Gregg says that part of the encyclical’s intent is to add to the global discussion regarding the environment and to the climate change debate. However, Gregg believes that the encyclical, rather than enlightening, is muddying the waters. To be sure, there is much about today’s global economy that merits criticism. The encyclical rightly underscores the problem of bailing...
Video: Gregory Thornbury at Acton University 2015
Wednesday was the first full day of Acton University 2015, and it ended with a plenary session featuring GregoryAlan Thornbury, the President of The King’s College in New York City. Thornbury’s address was preceded by an introduction by Acton Institute Research Fellow andassociate professor of theology at The King’s College, Anthony B. Bradley. We’re pleased to present the evening’s program here on the PowerBlog for your edification. ...
Fr. Sirico in the Wall Street Journal: The Pope’s Green Theology
In an op-ed published in theWall Street Journal,Fr. Robert Sirico writes about the encyclical, the role of free markets and the need for continuous conversation about the environment: Let’s cut to the chase: Much of what is in Pope Francis’ encyclical on environmental stewardship, Laudato Si’, poses a major challenge for free-market advocates, those of us who believe that capitalism is a powerful force for caring for the earth and lifting people out of poverty. But one of the most...
Does Pope Blame Free Markets For Environmental Ills?
Today’s Washington Examiner has a piece that says “conservatives” are slamming Laudato Si’, the new papal encyclical released yesterday. “Slam” may be too strong a word; though there is plenty of vigorous discussion regarding the encyclical. Acton’s director of research Samuel Gregg is quoted in the Washington Examiner piece, and while he is clearly concerned about portions of the encyclical, he does not “slam” this work either. It tends to characterize free markets as unregulated, which is simply untrue. It...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved