Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: The Obamacare Subsidies Ruling (Halbig v. Burwell)
Explainer: The Obamacare Subsidies Ruling (Halbig v. Burwell)
Mar 30, 2026 12:49 AM

What just happened with Obamacare?

In a two-to-one decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dealt a serious blow to Obamacare by ruling the government may not provide subsidies to encourage people to buy health insurance on the new marketplaces run by the federal government.

What did the court decide?

Section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) makes tax credits available as a form of subsidy to individuals who purchase health insurance through marketplaces—known as “American Health Benefit Exchanges,” or “Exchanges” for short.

This provision authorized e Americans to receive tax credits for insurance purchased on an Exchange established by one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia. (The credits were for household es between 100 and 400 percent of the federal poverty line.) But the Internal Revenue Service interpreted the wording broadly to authorize the subsidy also for insurance purchased on an Exchange established by the federal government.

The court ruled that a federal Exchange is not an “Exchange established by the State,” and section 36B does not authorize the IRS to provide tax credits for insurance purchased on federal Exchanges.

Can you explain that without the legalese?

The federal government tried to say that when they wrote “Exchange established by the State,” they meant established by the individual states or by the federal government. The Court ruled that in the context of the Obamacare law, that reading doesn’t make much sense. The law has to be read as meaning what it says (as written) not as the Obama administration wishes to interpret it after the fact. If the ruling stands, the people receiving subsidies will have to pay for the full cost of their Obamacare premiums rather than having a portion covered by taxpayers.

How much were the subsidies worth?

Approximately $36.1 billion.

How many people does this ruling affect?

Depends on who you ask. According to the Urban Institute, about 7.3 million people would have been eligible for the subsidies in 2016. And according to the Cato Institute, at least 8 million taxpayers will not have to pay the individual mandate penalty tax. Additionally, in the 36 states with federal Exchanges, all employers with more than 50 workers would be free from the employer-mandate penalties.

What happens next?

The Obama administration is requesting that the case be heard before the entire appeals court, rather than the three-judge panel. Ultimately, the Supreme Court will likely decide the case. While the current ruling is a serious setback for the Obamacare law, no clear resolution is likely to occur for several years. In the meantime, the subsidies will continue.

Other posts in this series:

Border Crisis•What’s Going on in Iraq?•EPA’s Proposed New Climate Rule•VA Scandal•What is Going on in Vietnam?•Boko Haram and the Kidnapped Christian Girls•The Supreme Court’s Ruling on Government Prayer•Earth Day?•Holy Week?•What’s Going On in Crimea?•What Just Happened with Russia and Ukraine?•What’s Going on in Ukraine•Jobs Report•The Hobby Lobby Amicus Briefs•Net Neutrality?•Common Core?•What’s Going on in Syria?•What’s Going on in Egypt?

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Religious Liberty and the Regulatory Road to Serfdom
Perhaps for the first time in American history, orthodox and traditional Jews, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and others may need to form a new alliance in order to defend their religious liberties in an America that’s increasingly less tolerant of principled diversity. Religious and cultural progressives, secularists, and militant atheists pose a significant threat to religious freedom all in the name of “fairness.” What is not “unfair” is that munities are not free to not embrace cultural morality. In ing...
Samuel Gregg: Charles Carroll, A Tea Party Thomist
Acton’s Director of Research, Samuel Gregg, discusses Founding Father Charles Carroll at Intercollegiate Review. “A Tea Party Thomist: Charles Carroll” is excerpted from Gregg’s ing book,Tea Party Catholic: The Catholic Case For Limited Government, A Free Economy And Human Flourishing. In the article, Gregg tells of Carroll’s reaction to thePeggy Stewart sailing into Annapolis’ harbor, sparking the controversy regarding the British right to tax the American Colonies. The political point of this exercise was to elicit the American colonists’ implicit...
The Source of Future Wealth: Babies
Would your life be better off if only half as many people had lived before you? That’s the intriguing question Ramez Naam asks in his new book, The Infinite Resource: The Power of Ideas on a Finite Planet. As Ronald Bailey says in a review of the book, In this thought experiment, you don’t get to pick which people are never born. Perhaps there would have been no Newton, Edison, or Pasteur, no Socrates, Shakespeare, or Jefferson. “Each additional idea...
Final Ruling On HHS Mandate: ‘Same Old, Same Old’
On Friday, June 28, the Department of Health and Human Services offered up its final ruling on the mandate for all employers to offer insurance plans covering abortion services and abortificients. The ruling itself is over 100 pages, and will take some time to dissect. However, the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty made this statement: ‘Unfortunately the final rule announced today is the same old, same old. As we said when the proposed rule was issued, this doesn’t solve the...
Making ‘Good Intentions’ Good
I recently wrote on the implications of “pathological altruism,” a term coined by Oakland University’s Barbara Oakleyto categorize altruism in which “attempts to promote the welfare of others instead result in unanticipated harm.” In a segment from the PovertyCureseries,HOPE International’s Peter Greer offers a good example of how this can play out, particularly in and through various outreaches of the church: Oakley’s paradigm depends on whether such harm can be “reasonably anticipated,” and as Greer’s story indicates, far too often...
The benefits of character education
When Jessica Lahey started teaching English at a “core virtues” school she thought it would only require talking about empathy and courage when discussing To Kill a Mockingbird. She soon learned what it really meant — and what it meant for her students: I e on. Character education? Core virtues? I teach English, not Sunday school, and besides, I teach middle school. If I were to walk into my eighth grade English class and wax rhapsodic about prudence and temperance,...
Hobby Lobby Gets 11th Hour Victory Against the Mandate
Hobby Lobby, the privately owned popular craft store chain that filed suit opposing the HHS mandate which forces employers to provide “preventive care” measures such as birth-control and “morning after” pills, won a significant — albeit temporary victory last week when the trial court granted a temporary restraining order against enforcement: Today, for the first time, a federal court has ordered the government not to enforce the HHS abortion-drug mandate against Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. The es just one day...
Family Breakdown, Economic Decline, and the Search for Spiritual Capital
When es to integrating family and vocation, modernity has introduced plenty of opportunity. But it has also produced its own set of challenges. Though our newfound array of choices can help further our callings and empower our contributions to society, it can also distract us away from the universe beyond ourselves. Thus far, I’ve limited my wariness on such matters to the more philosophical and theological realms — those areas where our culture of choice threatens to pollute our thinking...
Only The Federal Government Can Keep Republicans Honest, Says Dyson
Over at we have the opportunity to see one of America’s famed black public intellectuals provide another example of mentary. Michael Eric Dyson, University Professor of Sociology at Georgetown University, in response to the recent Supreme Decision striking down one section of the 1965 Voting-Rights Act said that Clarence Thomas joining the majority opinion is like “A symbolic Jew [who] has invited a metaphoric Hitler mit holocaust and genocide upon his own people.” Dyson also believes it is asinine that,...
Youth Unemployment: Are we Becoming Europe?
Alejandro Chafuen, president and chief executive officer of the Atlas Economic Research Foundation and board member of the Acton Institute, recently wrote a piece for discussing youth unemployment in the United States. According to the latest report, U.S. youth unemployment is at 16.2 percent which is more than double the adult unemployment rate. The unemployment rate for youth in Europe is currently at 24 percent. Chafuen asks, “Can we learn from the European experience?” Using piled by the economic freedom...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved