Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: The Historic Meeting Between the Pope and the Russian Orthodox Patriarch
Explainer: The Historic Meeting Between the Pope and the Russian Orthodox Patriarch
Dec 4, 2025 12:56 AM

What’s going on?

Tomorrow, for the first time in history, a Roman Catholic pontiff and the leader of the Russian Orthodox Church will meet face to face. According to the joint press release of the Holy See and of the Patriarchate of Moscow:

The Holy See and the Patriarchate of Moscow are pleased to announce that, by the grace of God, His Holiness Pope Francis and His Holiness Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia will meet on February 12. Their meeting will take place in Cuba, where the Pope will make a stop on his way to Mexico, and where the Patriarch will be on an official visit. It will include a personal conversation at Havana’s José Martí International Airport, and will conclude with the signing of a joint declaration.

The meeting is scheduled to last about two hours. Cuba’s President Raúl Castro will join the two religious leaders during the exchange of gifts.

Why are they meeting?

According to Vatican Insider, Metropolitan Hilarion said in a recent press conference that the historic meeting between the Patriarch of Moscow and the Pope “had been in the making for about 20 years” but was speeded up by the “Christian genocide” being caused by terrorists. In the face of what is going on and is “causing concern” to both Churches, the two spiritual leaders simply “had to meet.”

Vladimir Legoida, head of the Synodal Department for Church-Society Relations and the Mass Media, said the meeting is called for by the need to exert joint efforts in giving help to munities in the Middle East countries.

Although many problems in relations between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church remain unresolved, the protection of Christians in the Middle East against the genocide is a challenge that requires urgent united efforts.…The exodus of Christians from the Middle East and North Africa countries is a catastrophe for the whole world.

Why are they meeting in Cuba?

Cuba was reportedly chosen because it’s a “neutral territory” and a place where “Christianity is developing.”

Why have the leaders of each church never met before?

Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches split and munion in the 11th century. The reason for the East–West Schism (sometimes referred to as the Great Schism) plicated, but as George T. Dennis, professor of history at Catholic University of America, explains:

The eleventh-century reform in the Western Church called for the strengthening of papal authority, which caused the church to e more autocratic and centralized. Basing his claims on his succession from St. Peter, the pope asserted his direct jurisdiction over the entire church, East as well as West.

The Byzantines, on the other hand, viewed their church in the context of the imperial system; their sources of law and unity were the ecumenical councils and the emperor, whom God had placed over all things, spiritual and temporal. They believed that the Eastern churches had always enjoyed autonomy of governance, and they rejected papal claims to absolute rule. But neither side was really listening to the other.

In addition, since the ninth century, theological controversy had focused on the procession of the Holy Spirit. In the life of the Trinity, does the Spirit proceed from the Father only, or from the Fatherandfrom the Son (Filioquein Latin)? The Western church, concerned about resurgent Arianism, had, almost inadvertently, added the word to the Nicene Creed, claiming that it made more precise a teaching already in the creed. The Greeks objected to the unilateral addition to the creed, and they strongly disagreed with the theological proposition involved, which seemed to them to diminish the individual properties of the three Persons in the Trinity. In 1439 Greek and Latin theologians at the Council of Florence, after debating the issue for over a year, arrived at promise that, while reasonable, has not proven fully satisfactory.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Is it possible for the church to be apolitical?
Weary and wary from the Religious Right’s checkered history of unhealthy political alliances, many pastors and churches have opted for disengagement altogether. Or the illusion of disengagement, that is. As Andrew Walker reminds us, “It is impossible for churches to be apolitical because Jesus is a King. He isn’t a pious emblem to tuck away into our hearts with no earthly effect.” The Gospel we preach is inherently political. Indeed, as Walker continues,“Jesus is Lord” is “the most political statement...
Does the equilibrium model work in the real world?
Note: This is the seventhpost in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. In previous videos in this series from Marginal Revolution University we learned how prices reach equilibrium and how the market works like an invisible hand coordinating economic activity. In the next couple of videos you’ll see why the equilibrium price (he market price where the quantity of goods supplied is equal to the quantity of goods demanded) is the only stable price and whether this model works...
The case for faith and a free market
“In modern times, more and more Americans have unwittingly relinquished their freedoms and self-determination to career politicians,” says Daniel Garza, president and chairman of The LIBRE Institute. “Millions have ceded their fate to a raft of government programs and entitlements administered by a powerful central government.” Fighting poverty through work, generated by a free market economic system, is essential to sustain a free society. Ours is the only system the world has ever known that so effectively improves the human...
Samuel Gregg: The ‘phony war’ between Catholics and libertarians
“Supporting markets as the economic arrangements most likely to help promote human flourishing doesn’t necessarily mean you accept libertarian philosophical premises” says Acton Institute Director of Research Samuel Gregg in an essaypublished today at Public Discourse. es in response to “Koch Brothers Latest Target: Pope Francis,”an Oct. 14article written by John Gehring at the American Prospect that claims the Acton Institute is part of a larger network of organizations behind “a decidedly different message than Pope Francis does when es...
Why coffee tasting matters to God
Does the work of a coffee buyer have an impact that stretches on into eternity? Does coffee tasting matter to God? In a new video from Chapel Hill Bible Church, coffee taster and buyer Jeff McArthur shares how he came to see the deeper meaning of his work, both in the day-to-day trades and exchanges with his customers munity and in the relational ripple effects that reach on into the broader economic order. “I feel like sometimes God has us...
In defense of sweatshops (and proximate justice)
A recent study of Ethiopian workers released last week by the US National Bureau of Economics Research found “sweatshops” were unpleasant, risky, and paid even less than self-employment in the informal sector. But, the researchers also found, countries were still better off than not having those jobs at all. AsMichael J. Coren of Quartz writes, By encouraging mass hiring in the economy, even low-wage factories could lift everyone’s wages. Fewer desperate peting for jobs meant employers must pay more for...
Trump and Clinton are wrong: free trade helps the poor
Imagine if Donald Trump made a campaign promise that he would lower the pay of every American, but would ensure that the poorest 10 percent have their pay lowered the most. Would you vote for him then? Or imagine if Hillary Clinton said she would increase inflation substantially to make the economy more “fair” for everyone. Would she win your support? Neither candidate has made such a claim—at least not directly. TheAmerican people would immediate reject such harmful economic policies,and...
Radio Free Acton: Benjamin Domenech On The Roots And Rise Of American Populism
On this edition of Radio Free Acton, Jordan Ballor – Acton Research Fellow, Director of Publishing, and Executive Editor of the Journal of Markets and Morality – talks with Benjamin Domenech, publisher of The Federalist, about the current populist moment in American politics, the roots of American populism, and what the possible es of the current populist uprising may be for the United States. For more from Ben Domenech, be sure to check out The Federalist Radio Hour, and subscribe...
‘The world has never been less bad’
A new interactive tool shows that men, women, and families from around the world have a lot more similarities than differences. With the U.S. presidential election, confusion over Brexit, and seemingly crumbling international relationships, 2016 feels like it’s been months and months of anger, resentment, and disharmony. Americans—and non-Americans too—are feeling like we have nothing mon with anyone anymore. It’s worth taking a moment to look at the data and realize that just isn’t true. Gapminder recently launched a new...
Why Doug (like other low-income Americans) doesn’t trust authority
This weekend Saturday Night Live had a sketch that set the Internet abuzz and had Slate asking whetherthe skit was the “most astute analysis of american politics in 2016.” The setup was “Black Jeopardy!”,a recurring bit on SNL that normally pits two lower-class black contestants against a wealthier and/or well-educated white contestant who is clueless about African-American perspectives on race and culture. Thistime, though,the white guy is a working-class (presumed)Trump supporter named Doug(played by Tom Hanks)—who isn’t as out of...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved