Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: the ‘global minimum tax’
Explainer: the ‘global minimum tax’
Jan 18, 2026 2:37 PM

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has said she plans to impose a global minimum tax on U.S. corporations, which she will coordinate with global leaders to stop “a destructive, global race to the bottom.” How will this work; what will it do to petitiveness; and is it constitutional? Here are the facts you need to know.

What is a global minimum tax?

A global minimum tax would see wealthy nations agree not to lower their tax rates on corporations that are based, or (in some proposals) do business in, their nations below a specific level. Corporations would then pay a similar or identical amount of taxes regardless of where they are located, discouraging offshoring to low or no-tax nations and encouraging higher taxes and spending. Current proposals make this collaboration between sovereign governments voluntary rather pulsory.

Why do politicians want to impose a global minimum tax?

Corporations respond to tax incentives and disincentives, just as individuals often “vote with their feet” when a state’s taxes e too high. Politicians, especially in high-tax nations, want to prevent low-tax nations from attracting “their” businesses by allowing stockholders to keep more of their profits. Yellen’s former mentor, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, lamented that “every country thinks it can steal business from others by lowering taxes.”

Yellen has also said a global minimum tax would boost U.S. petitiveness” – after redefining the word. “Competitiveness is about more than how panies fare against panies in global merger-and-acquisition bids,” she said. “It’s about making sure that governments have stable tax systems that raise sufficient revenue to invest in essential public goods and respond to crises.” However, the IRS collected more than $3.5 trillion during the booming 2019 fiscal year – more than enough to provide for the delegated powers conferred upon the federal government by the Constitution.

How does the U.S. corporate tax pare to other nations?

Although President Donald Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, bined federal-state corporate tax rate is already higher than the global average of 24%. President Joe Biden’s “infrastructure” plan proposes raising the U.S. corporate tax rate to 28%, with an effective rate of 32% – making the U.S. even petitive in the traditional sense.

What would the global minimum tax rate on corporations be?

No one agrees. The Biden administration wants to set the global minimum tax at 21%, our current level, while European leaders support a rate of 12.5% – the corporate tax rate of its lowest-tax nation, Ireland. European leaders seem to realize the advantage lower corporate taxes give them over the United States and seek to make them permanent.

Do higher corporate tax rates bring greater revenue?

The Laffer Curve also applies to corporate taxes: Lower taxes bring higher revenue. In 1990, the average corporate tax rate was nearly 40%, but the revenue that corporate taxes generated in the 36 wealthiest nations amounted to 2.4% of GDP. Today, with corporate tax levels at nearly half that rate, corporate tax revenues in the same countries amount to 3.1% of GDP. In the UK, corporate tax revenues are as high today as in 1985, when the rate stood at 40%. “Lower rates do not always mean lower collections,” writes Scott Hodge of the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.

How would the ‘global minimum tax’ affect the U.S. economy?

“Raising the U.S. corporate tax rate to 28 percent,as President Biden has proposed, would reduce the long-term size of our economy by 1 percent, reduce wages by 0.8 percent, and eliminate 187,000 jobs,” wrote Hodge.

How do higher corporate tax rates affect consumers and workers?

Corporate taxes get passed on to the consumer in the form of higher prices. Higher corporate tax rates discourage investment, leading employers to fire workers, delay raises, or curtail hiring. A relatively low percentage of corporate tax e from shareholders’ earnings. A team of researchers led by Northwestern University’s Scott Baker found that consumers, workers, and shareholders each absorbed approximately one-third of corporate taxes (31%, 38%, and 31%, respectively).

How would the global minimum tax be implemented?

One proposal would reward confiscatory tax policies while violating national sovereignty. The Washington Post reported in March that one plan would have the OECD establish a global minimum tax rate – and allow high-tax nations to tax overseas earnings in lower-tax nations:

For example, Hungary could maintain its existing 9 percent corporate tax rate even after the new 12 percent minimum is enacted. But under the OECD agreement, France could collect taxes on the e earned by panies in Hungary amounting to the difference between Hungary’s corporate tax rate and the 12 percent global minimum — a measure known as a “top-up” tax.

It is unclear how U.S. politicians would explain their desire to let foreign nations enrich themselves by taxing U.S.-based firms, raising consumer prices, and costing American jobs.

Is the global minimum tax constitutional?

The notion of any policy being set by a supranational governing body is ipso facto unconstitutional. However, the global minimum tax on corporations – at least, as proposed now – is being presented as an informal, voluntary agreement among members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Specific collection mechanisms may well violate the Constitution. Then again, any administration considering a global tax long ago turned its back on constitutional limitations on leviathan government.

How does the global minimum tax affect American democracy and U.S. voters?

Even a “voluntary” global minimum tax harms American democracy and deprives Americans of self-determination. It allows foreign nations – whom U.S. voters have not, and cannot, elected – to set the parameters of policies that could harm hundreds of millions of Americans. It immerses the views of the American people into the sea of “world opinion,” diluting democratic decisions and watering down the will of the American people with those of Eurosocialists.

What should Christians think about this?

“The power to tax is the power to destroy,” said American statesman Daniel Webster. Christians are called to use their creative capacity to build. Corporate taxes destroy jobs, lower wages, and raise prices on average Americans. Meanwhile, American citizens would lose some measure of their control over their own government – a reality alone that makes such a scheme worth opposing.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Winners of 2018 Mini-Grants on Free Market Economics
The Acton Institute Mini-Grants on Free Market Economics program accepts proposals from faculty members at colleges, seminaries, and universities in the United States and Canada in order to promote the scholarship and teaching of market economics. This program allows for collaboration between faculty from different universities, as well as help future leaders to emerge, strengthen, and expand the existing network of scholars within economics. Entrants may submit proposals in two broad categories: course development and faculty scholarship. Here is plete...
Are the culture wars unique to our times?
Culture wars are plex with overlapping conflicts that are often confused and conflated, says John D. Wilsey in this week’s Acton Commentary. For the past five decades, Americans have waged what has monly referred to as a “culture war.” A number of authors have examined the culture wars from philosophical, historical, and sociological standpoints, especially since the early 1990s—Charles Murray, Robert Putnam, James Davison Hunter, Philip Gorski, and Andrew Hartman to name a few. It is tempting to see the...
The NHS and the spell of the White Witch
In The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, C.S. Lewis described the dreary state of Narnia under the curse of the White Witch as “always winter but never Christmas.” His assessment may soon apply to the National Health Service (NHS), whose annually intensifying “winter crisis” threatens to e permanent, according to the UK’s leading doctors’ association. “The winter crisis has truly been replaced by a year-round crisis,” said Dr. Chaand Nagpaul, chairman of the British Medical Association (BMA). Each winter,...
Radio Free Acton: Seeking flourishing in the context of poverty; Upstream on ‘Redeeming Transcendence in the Arts’
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, Andrew Vanderput, PovertyCure strategy and engagement manager at Acton, holds a discussion with Peter Greer, president and CEO of Hope International, on how human flourishing can be brought about in the context of poverty. Then, on the Upstream segment, Bruce Edward Walker talks to author Jeremy Begbie about his new book, Redeeming Transcendence in the Arts. Check out these additional resources on this week’s podcast topics: Learn more about PovertyCure Learn more about...
6 Quotes: G.K. Chesterton on freedom and virtue
Yesterday was the 144th birthday of G.K. Chesterton. In his honor, here are six quotes by the great British writer on freedom and virtue. On defending virtue: “The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.” On modern freedom: “Most modern freedom is at root fear. It is not so much that we are too bold to endure rules; it is rather that we are too timid to endure responsibilities.” On courage:...
Why tariffs and protectionism makes Americans poorer
Earlier today President Trump imposed tariffs on imported steel (25 percent) and aluminum (10 percent) from the European Union, Canada and Mexico. Not surprisingly, the tariffs triggered immediate retaliation from U.S. allies against American businesses and farmers. “This is protectionism, pure and simple,” said Jean-Claude Junker, president of the European Commission.Junker is correct. The tariffs are are a form of protectionism that is frequently proposed by populists and Democrats. But what is wrong with protectionism? The short answer is that...
Unemployment as economic-spiritual indicator — May 2018 report
Series Note: Jobs are one of the most important aspects of a morally functioning economy. They help us serve the needs of our neighbors and lead to human flourishing both for the individual and munities. Conversely, not having a job can adversely affect spiritual and psychological well-being of individuals and families. Because unemployment is a spiritual problem, Christians in America need to understand and be aware of the monthly data on employment. Each month highlight the latest numbers we need...
France’s 200 roads to serfdom
One of Europe’s most robust welfare states may be proving that government intervention and true social solidarity are inimical forces. Many economic interventionists on both sides of the Atlantic cite the Catholic social teaching of “solidarity” – or, at least, their own conception of it – to justify far-reaching government policies of wealth confiscation and redistribution. The British philosopher Julian Baggini wrote in The Guardian that “Tax Freedom Day” should be celebrated as “Social Solidarity Day.” But heavy-handed government policy...
Want to ‘change the world’? Embrace the glories of economic scale
As the latest crop of college graduates enters the workforce, many ing fully loaded with grandiose plans for “social transformation,” “giving back to munities,” and “making a difference.” Unfortunately, such phrases have e slippery slogans based on a cultural imagination that is far too narrow in its basic assumptions. Whether spurred along by the idealism of college professors, the hurrahs of mencement speeches, or the hedonistic calls of cultural tropes (“follow your passion!”), today’s youth are often clouded with a...
An introduction to the Solow Model
Note: This is post #80 in a weekly video series on basic economics. The Solow model was named after Robert Solow, the 1987 winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics. Among other things, the Solow model helps us understand the nuances and dynamics of growth, says Alex Tabarrok of Marginal Revolution University. The model also lets us distinguish between two types of growth: catching up growth and cutting edge growth. As you’ll soon see in this video, a country can...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved