Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: the ‘global minimum tax’
Explainer: the ‘global minimum tax’
Jan 29, 2026 5:19 AM

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has said she plans to impose a global minimum tax on U.S. corporations, which she will coordinate with global leaders to stop “a destructive, global race to the bottom.” How will this work; what will it do to petitiveness; and is it constitutional? Here are the facts you need to know.

What is a global minimum tax?

A global minimum tax would see wealthy nations agree not to lower their tax rates on corporations that are based, or (in some proposals) do business in, their nations below a specific level. Corporations would then pay a similar or identical amount of taxes regardless of where they are located, discouraging offshoring to low or no-tax nations and encouraging higher taxes and spending. Current proposals make this collaboration between sovereign governments voluntary rather pulsory.

Why do politicians want to impose a global minimum tax?

Corporations respond to tax incentives and disincentives, just as individuals often “vote with their feet” when a state’s taxes e too high. Politicians, especially in high-tax nations, want to prevent low-tax nations from attracting “their” businesses by allowing stockholders to keep more of their profits. Yellen’s former mentor, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, lamented that “every country thinks it can steal business from others by lowering taxes.”

Yellen has also said a global minimum tax would boost U.S. petitiveness” – after redefining the word. “Competitiveness is about more than how panies fare against panies in global merger-and-acquisition bids,” she said. “It’s about making sure that governments have stable tax systems that raise sufficient revenue to invest in essential public goods and respond to crises.” However, the IRS collected more than $3.5 trillion during the booming 2019 fiscal year – more than enough to provide for the delegated powers conferred upon the federal government by the Constitution.

How does the U.S. corporate tax pare to other nations?

Although President Donald Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, bined federal-state corporate tax rate is already higher than the global average of 24%. President Joe Biden’s “infrastructure” plan proposes raising the U.S. corporate tax rate to 28%, with an effective rate of 32% – making the U.S. even petitive in the traditional sense.

What would the global minimum tax rate on corporations be?

No one agrees. The Biden administration wants to set the global minimum tax at 21%, our current level, while European leaders support a rate of 12.5% – the corporate tax rate of its lowest-tax nation, Ireland. European leaders seem to realize the advantage lower corporate taxes give them over the United States and seek to make them permanent.

Do higher corporate tax rates bring greater revenue?

The Laffer Curve also applies to corporate taxes: Lower taxes bring higher revenue. In 1990, the average corporate tax rate was nearly 40%, but the revenue that corporate taxes generated in the 36 wealthiest nations amounted to 2.4% of GDP. Today, with corporate tax levels at nearly half that rate, corporate tax revenues in the same countries amount to 3.1% of GDP. In the UK, corporate tax revenues are as high today as in 1985, when the rate stood at 40%. “Lower rates do not always mean lower collections,” writes Scott Hodge of the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.

How would the ‘global minimum tax’ affect the U.S. economy?

“Raising the U.S. corporate tax rate to 28 percent,as President Biden has proposed, would reduce the long-term size of our economy by 1 percent, reduce wages by 0.8 percent, and eliminate 187,000 jobs,” wrote Hodge.

How do higher corporate tax rates affect consumers and workers?

Corporate taxes get passed on to the consumer in the form of higher prices. Higher corporate tax rates discourage investment, leading employers to fire workers, delay raises, or curtail hiring. A relatively low percentage of corporate tax e from shareholders’ earnings. A team of researchers led by Northwestern University’s Scott Baker found that consumers, workers, and shareholders each absorbed approximately one-third of corporate taxes (31%, 38%, and 31%, respectively).

How would the global minimum tax be implemented?

One proposal would reward confiscatory tax policies while violating national sovereignty. The Washington Post reported in March that one plan would have the OECD establish a global minimum tax rate – and allow high-tax nations to tax overseas earnings in lower-tax nations:

For example, Hungary could maintain its existing 9 percent corporate tax rate even after the new 12 percent minimum is enacted. But under the OECD agreement, France could collect taxes on the e earned by panies in Hungary amounting to the difference between Hungary’s corporate tax rate and the 12 percent global minimum — a measure known as a “top-up” tax.

It is unclear how U.S. politicians would explain their desire to let foreign nations enrich themselves by taxing U.S.-based firms, raising consumer prices, and costing American jobs.

Is the global minimum tax constitutional?

The notion of any policy being set by a supranational governing body is ipso facto unconstitutional. However, the global minimum tax on corporations – at least, as proposed now – is being presented as an informal, voluntary agreement among members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Specific collection mechanisms may well violate the Constitution. Then again, any administration considering a global tax long ago turned its back on constitutional limitations on leviathan government.

How does the global minimum tax affect American democracy and U.S. voters?

Even a “voluntary” global minimum tax harms American democracy and deprives Americans of self-determination. It allows foreign nations – whom U.S. voters have not, and cannot, elected – to set the parameters of policies that could harm hundreds of millions of Americans. It immerses the views of the American people into the sea of “world opinion,” diluting democratic decisions and watering down the will of the American people with those of Eurosocialists.

What should Christians think about this?

“The power to tax is the power to destroy,” said American statesman Daniel Webster. Christians are called to use their creative capacity to build. Corporate taxes destroy jobs, lower wages, and raise prices on average Americans. Meanwhile, American citizens would lose some measure of their control over their own government – a reality alone that makes such a scheme worth opposing.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Video: Samuel Gregg Discusses Tea Party Catholic on EWTN
Acton Director of Research Samuel Gregg joined host Raymond Arroyo last Thursday evening on EWTN’s The World Over to discuss his latest book, Tea Party Catholic, and addressed some of mon objections Catholic proponents of limited government often encounter. [product sku=”1415″] ...
When a Church Matches Missions with Entrepreneurship
Pastor Daniel Harrell had a heart for missions, so upon unexpectedly receiving roughly $2 million from a land sale, his Minnesota church was energized to use the funds accordingly. Though they had various debts to pay and building projects to fund, the church mitted to allocating at least 20 percent to service “outside of their walls.” “The sensible way to spend the 20 percent would have been to find a successful service agency and write the check,” Harrell writes, in...
Why Christians Should Oppose the Debt Ceiling Charade
When es to political policy, Christians in America have a wide-range of opinions about what should be done. Even when we agree on a general principle, we tend to disagree about how that informs our policy choices. We recognize, for instance, that we have an obligation to care for the poor but differ on the type and degree of government involvement. Such differences can lead us to believe that there is nothing we can agree on. But I don’t believe...
‘Okay, We’ll Pay:’ Business Owners Prefer Penalty To Obamacare
, Debbie and Larry Underkoffler, owners of North Georgia Staffing, are considering paying government-imposed penalties rather than offering Obamacare to temporary employees. The couple offers excellent health care to their full-time staff, but with hundreds of temporary employees, the cost of offering health insurance could sink their business. [U]nder ObamaCare, the pany now faces a tough choice — cover all of its temporary workers as well, or pay a hefty fine. Aside from its full-time staff, pany also manages about...
Deneen and Creative Destruction
Among many other bizarre claims in his most recent article at The American Conservative, Patrick Deneen writes, Today’s conservatives are liberals — they favor an economy that wreaks “creative destruction,” especially on the mass of “non-winners,” increasingly controlled by a few powerful actors who secure special benefits for themselves and their heirs…. Pace Inigo Montoya, I actually have no idea what Deneen thinks creative destruction means in this context. Setting aside the question of whether or not it is a...
Greece: Back to the Future
From Australia’s SBS Television: Greeks with Australian citizenship are returning here in the hope of finding jobs and a better life, away from the instability crippling Greece’s economy. Which is why so many Greeks left home and family behind for the American Dream in the early 20th Century: Greeks began to settle in America at the end of the 19th century and the influx of migrants continued up until the 1920s. Around 400,000 Greeks migrated to America at that time,...
Rand Paul on the Global Slaughter of Christians
“From Boston to Zanzibar, there is a worldwide war on Christianity,” declared Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky). He made ments in a speech discussing the slaughter of Christians at the 2013 Values Voter Summit on October 11. The Kentucky Senator added, Across the globe, Christians are under attack, almost as if we lived in the Middle Ages or if we lived under early Pagan Roman rule. . . It’s almost as if that is happening again throughout the Middle East. Last...
The Public Witness Of Adoption
One the best arguments against the growing tentacles of the social assistance welfare state into the lives of people who are suffering is the practice of the Christian practice of adoption and orphan care. Progressives often charge classical liberals and conservatives as being heartless toward the poor because only progressives are willing to make sacrifices for the poor. Of course, the progressive method is usually to use force to solicit the help. Nevertheless, one of the ways in which Christians...
Columbus Day: Why Does It Matter?
The second Monday of October is designated as “Columbus Day” in the United States, ostensibly to give honor and tribute to the man, Christopher Columbus, who “discovered” America. Every American school kid learns to sing-song, “In 1492, Columbus sailed the ocean blue.” Today, the reason most people in the U.S. notice Columbus Day is because they don’t get any mail, and federal workers get the day off. (Of course, with the federal mail system dying a slow death and the...
What the Obamacare Website Failure Teaches Us About Crony Capitalism
As everyone from political pundits to late-night talk show hosts have pointed out, HealthCare.gov, the flagship technology portion of the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare), went live a couple of weeks ago — and was plete failure. A very, very expensive failure. Andrew Couts points out that taxpayers “seem to have forked up more than $500 million of the federal purse to build the digital equivalent of a rock.” Clouts puts that figure in perspective paring it to other websites:...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved