Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: President Trump’s executive order on campus speech, student loans
Explainer: President Trump’s executive order on campus speech, student loans
Jan 11, 2026 1:30 AM

What just happened?

Earlier this month, at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), President Trump announced he would sign an executive order to promote free speech on college campuses.The president is set to sign to sign that executive order today, which he has vowed will require colleges to “support free speech” or face “very costly” penalties.

What does this executive order do?

The title of the executive order is “Improving Free Inquiry, Transparency, and Accountability at Colleges And Universities” with the purpose being to “enhance the quality of postsecondary education by making it more affordable, more transparent, and more accountable.”

Despite the president’s rhetoric, the new order won’t have much effect on campus speech since it simply restates that colleges and universities ply with existing laws regarding free inquiry.

The order directs federal agencies to “take appropriate steps” to ensure that colleges receiving federal research funds “promote free inquiry.” But public colleges are already legally bound by the First Amendment. And private colleges will only be required to ply with their stated institutional policies regarding free inquiry,”an unnamed senior administration official told POLITICO.

The order also directs the Education Department to add program-level es data to the federal government’s “College Scorecard” and produce a report examining “policy options” for the idea of risk sharing on student-loan debt.

What policies does this executive order change?

The order requires the Departments of Defense, the Interior, Agriculture, Commerce, Labor, Health and Human Services, Transportation, Energy, and Education, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to “take appropriate steps, in a manner consistent with applicable law” to ensure institutions that receive federal research or education grants promote free inquiry, including pliance with all applicable federal laws, regulations, and policies.

Under the order, federal research or education grants include all funding provided by a covered agency directly to an institution but do not include funding associated with federal student aid programs that cover tuition, fees, or stipends.

Additionally, the order requires the Department of Education to make available, by January 1, 2020, through the Office of Federal Student Aid, a secure and confidential website and mobile application that informs federal student loan borrowers of how much they owe, how much their monthly payment will be when they enter repayment, available repayment options, how long each repayment option will take, and how to enroll in the repayment option that best serves their needs.

The order also requires the agency to expand and update annually the College Scorecard, or any successor, with program-level data on student loans for each certificate, degree, graduate, and professional program, for former students who received federal student aid.

What is an executive order?

An executive order is an official document, signed by the president,used to manage the Federal Government.

Are executive orders legally binding?

Yes, assuming they are limited to the scope of the executive action allowed by a president, an executive order has the power of federal law. While a president cannot directly create a new law or sign an executive order that violates existing law, he or she can use an executive order to specify how laws will be carried out or direct how a federal agency will carry out a task.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Textual interpretation
A week ago Stanley Fish, a law professor at Florida International University, wrote an op-ed in The New York Times about the principles of constitutional interpretation, especially as represented by Justice Antonin Scalia. Fish takes issue especially with the notion that the text can have meaning “as it exists apart from anyone’s intention.” Fish essentially denies that texts are things that can have meanings in themselves, and it amounts to a philosophical denial of realism. Part of Fish’s problem is...
The hermeneutical spiral
Mr. Phelps takes issue with my characterization of Stanley Fish’s position as amounting “to a philosophical denial of realism.” Let me first digress a bit and place ment within the larger context of my post. My identification of a position that “words and texts have no meaning in themselves” is really just an aside within the larger and more important question about what measure of authority authorial intent has in the interpretation of documents, specifically public documents like the Constitution....
Seeing the trees, missing the forest
The United Nations has released a report on the ongoing upheavals in Zimbabwe, where tyrant Robert Mugabe has been punishing his political opponents under the guise of “cleaning up” the country’s cities. The effect of Operation Murambatsvina (meaning either “Operation Restore Order” or “Operation Drive Out Trash,” depending on who’s translation you believe) has been to leave some 700,000 people homeless, jobless, or both. A downloadable copy of the UN report is available here. While the report does illuminate the...
Animal cruelty?
I’m not quite sure what to make of this local story: “Four people are charged for their alleged involvement in killing two bald eagles.” The details of the alleged crimes are as follows: “Prosecutors say two teenagers shot the eagles in the Muskegon State Game Area with a .22 caliber rifle in April 2004 and then chopped them up with a hatchet.” Since the bald eagle, one of the nation’s revered symbols, is an endangered animal, it is protected by...
Close call on CAFTA
Close at Home The House of Representatives voted early this morning (12:03 am) to approve the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) after weeks of intense lobbying on both sides. The final vote was a close 217-215. My predictions: somehow, any dip in employment (if there is one) in the next six months will somehow be linked to CAFTA by its detractors. Detractors will attempt to take the moral high ground in American politics in ’06 and ’08, and even...
CAFTA/Culture of Life: enemies?
John Paul II gave us all a tremendous gift by endorsing the terms Culture of Life and Culture of Death. But as with all great gifts, we must guard these terms carefully so as not to wear them out with misuse, robbing them of their relevance. Unfortunately, this is precisely what is happening in the current debate over CAFTA. A group called Catholics for Faithful Citizenship (PDF) claims the following: “Clearly, supporting CAFTA is inconsistent with upholding a culture of...
Labor unions and free association
The Service Employees International Union and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters have broken away from the plaining that the federation has focused too much on political activism in the face of declining union membership and influence. Dr. Charles Baird was a featured guest on yesterday’s edition of Kresta in the Afternoon on Ave Maria Radio, discussing Catholic perspectives on unionism and whether the modern American labor union movement patible with church teachings. Dr. Baird is Chair of the Department of...
The school of fish
The recent blogpost by my colleague Jordan Ballor discusses an op-ed written by law professor Stanley Fish. I am more familiar with Stanley Fish from his days as a literary theorist, and perhaps a quick review of a younger Fish will contribute to the conversation. Fish is known for, among other things, an idea of literary interpretation he called munities’ that suggests meaning is not found in the author, nor in the reader, but in munity in which the text...
Great debate
Foreign Policy hosts this exchange on environmental issues and economics. Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, gets the first word and Bjørn Lomborg, adjunct professor at the Copenhagen Business School, gets the last word. ...
ExTORTion
S. T. Karnick over at The Reform ments on a recent suit filed against DuPont over Teflon, claiming that “DuPont lied in a massive attempt to continue selling their product.” Karnick observes that abuse of the tort system is rampant, in part because “it has been perverted into a proxy for the criminal justice system: a means of punishing supposed wrongdoers through the use of a weaker standard of proof—preponderance of the evidence instead of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved