Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: Is there enough time to confirm a Supreme Court nominee before the election?
Explainer: Is there enough time to confirm a Supreme Court nominee before the election?
Jan 20, 2026 11:39 PM

The prospect of appointing a Supreme Court justice so close to a presidential election has roiled political discourse. Is such a move unprecedented? Is it even possible? Here are the facts you need to know.

Background

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died on September 18, just 46 days before the presidential election on November 3. President Donald Trump has said he will fill the vacancy, “most likely” with a female, naming his nominee at a press conference on Saturday at 5 p.m. EDT.

Who will President Donald Trump nominate to the Supreme Court?

The leading candidates are Amy Coney Barrett and Barbara Lagoa, with Allison Jones Rushing as a darkhorse candidate. Other women on President Trump’s 2020 list of potential Supreme Court nominees include Sarah Pitlyk, Joan Larsen, Martha Pacold, Britt Grant, Allison Eid, Kate Todd, Margaret Ryan, and Bridget Bade.

Is it possible to confirm a Supreme Court nominee in so little time?

The timeline is short but not unprecedented. The Senate confirmed Ruth Bader Ginsburg 42 days after her nomination by President Bill Clinton. The Senate gave Ginsburg near-unanimous support after four days of confirmation hearings, which featured the expert testimony of Kay Coles James (now the president of the Heritage Foundation) describing RBG’s “philosophy of judicial activism, most notably with regard to abortion” – a description that proved apt.

How long does the Senate usually deliberate before voting for a Supreme Court justice’s confirmation?

Since the court’s more contentious era began with Robert Bork’s nomination in 1987, the average time between the first day of Senate confirmation hearings and the Senate confirmation vote is 30 days. (These are calendar days, not Senate working days; congressional recesses prolonged certain nominations. The third column includes the number of calendar days between formal nomination and confirmation/rejection.)

Here are the raw data:

Nominee Days of Senate deliberation Total days
Robert Bork 39 days of Senate deliberation 106 days total
Anthony Kennedy 52 days of Senate deliberation 66 days total
David Souter 41 days of Senate deliberation 69 days total
Clarence Thomas 36 days of Senate deliberation 100 days total
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 15 days of Senate deliberation 43 days total
Stephen Breyer 18 days of Senate deliberation 74 days total
John Roberts 17 days of Senate deliberation 63 days total
Samuel Alito 23 days of Senate deliberation 83 days total
Sonia Sotomayor 25 days of Senate deliberation 67 days total
Elena Kagan 39 days of Senate deliberation 88 days total
Neil Gorsuch 91 days of Senate deliberation 66 days total
Brett Kavanaugh 33 days of Senate deliberation 89 days total

A 2020 Supreme Court nomination could take place under this time line.

To provide greater specificity:

Robert Bork was nominated by President Ronald Reagan on July 7, 1987, to replace Justice Lewis Powell Jr. The Senate held 12 days of confirmation hearings for Bork from September 15-30, 1987. The Senate denied Bork a seat on the Supreme Court by a vote of 58-42 on October 23, 1987. The phrase “Borking” entered the political lexicon, as the public square devolved to the new norm of demonizing Supreme Court nominees.

Anthony Kennedy was nominated by President Ronald Reagan on November 30, 1987, to replace Justice Lewis Powell Jr. The Senate held three days of confirmation hearings for Kennedy from December 14-16, 1987, before adjourning for the holiday recess. The Senate confirmed Kennedy by a vote of 97-0 on February 2, 1988. As of this writing, Kennedy is the last justice to be confirmed unanimously, 32 years ago.

David Souter was nominated by President George H.W. Bush on July 25, 1990, to fill the seat of Justice William Brennan. The Senate held five days of confirmation hearings for Souter from September 13-19, 1990. The Senate confirmed Souter by a vote of 90-9 on October 2, 1990.

Clarence Thomas was nominated by President George H.W. Bush on July 8, 1991, to fill the seat of Justice Thurgood Marshall. The Senate held five days of confirmation hearings for Thomas from September 10-16, 1991. However, sexual harassment allegations by Anita Hill touched off a second set of confirmation hearings from October 11-13. The Senate confirmed him by a vote of 53-48 on October 15, 1991.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated by President Bill Clinton on June 22, 1993, to fill the seat of Justice Byron “Whizzer” White. The Senate held four days of confirmation hearings for Ginsburg from July 20-23, 1993. The Senate confirmed Ginsburg by a vote of 96-3 on August 3, 1993.

Stephen Breyer was nominated by President Bill Clinton on May 17, 1994, to fill the seat of Justice Harry Blackmun. The Senate held four days of confirmation hearings for Breyer from July 12-15, 1994. The Senate confirmed Breyer by a vote of 87-9 on July 29, 1994. As of this writing, Breyer is the last justice to have been confirmed with less than 10 votes cast in opposition, 26 years ago.

Chief Justice John Roberts was nominated to fill the seat of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor on July 29, 2005, but President George W. Bush withdrew his nomination on September 6, 2005; the same day, Bush named Roberts to succeed Chief Justice William Rehnquist. The Senate held four days of confirmation hearings for Roberts from September 12-15, 2005. The Senate confirmed Roberts by a vote of 78-22 on September 29, 2005.

Samuel Alito was nominated by President George W. Bush on November 10, 2005, to fill the seat of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. After the intervening holiday recess, the Senate held five days of confirmation hearings for Alito from January 9, 2006. The Senate confirmed Alito by a vote of 58-42 on January 31, 2006.

Sonia Sotomayor was nominated by President Barack Obama on June 1, 2009, to fill the seat of Justice David Souter. The Senate held four days of confirmation hearings for from July 13-16, 2009. The Senate confirmed Sotomayor by a vote of 68-31 on August 6, 2009.

Elena Kagan was nominated by President Barack Obama on May 10, 2010, to fill the seat of Justice John Paul Stevens. The Senate held four days of confirmation hearings for Kagan from June 28-July 1, 2010. The Senate confirmed Kagan by a vote of 63-37 on August 5, 2010.

Neil Gorsuch was nominated by President Donald Trump on February 1, 2017, to fill the seat of Justice Antonin Scalia. The Senate held four days of confirmation hearings for Gorsuch from March 20-23, 2017. The Senate confirmed Gorsuch by a vote of 54-45 on April 7, 2017.

Brett Kavanaugh was nominated by President Donald Trump on July 10, 2018, to fill the seat of Justice Anthony Kennedy. The Senate held four days of confirmation hearings for Kavanaugh from September 4-7, 2018. The Senate convened another one-day hearing on September 27 to discuss allegations that Kavanaugh engaged in sexual misconduct against Christine Blasey Ford when he was a minor. Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., demanded an additional one-week delay for the FBI to investigate Kavanaugh. The Senate confirmed Kavanaugh by a vote of 50-48 on October 2, 2018.

es to a total of 357 calendar days of Senate deliberations between the confirmation hearings and the vote for 12 nominees, or an average of 29.75 days per nominee.

How does pare to the 2020 election?

There are 39 days between Monday, September 28 and election day 2020.

Has any part of the confirmation process changed during this time?

The confirmation process has e streamlined since 2017. In November 2013, then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid effectively eliminated the filibuster for judicial nominees except Supreme Court nominees. This lowered the vote necessary to end debate and proceed to a vote, known as cloture, from 60 votes to 51. In 2017, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell applied that rules to Supreme Court justices beginning in April 2017. One would expect confirmations to take less time as a result.

Bottom line: Beginning the Senate confirmation hearings expeditiously would give senators the same amount of time to deliberate about the nominee’s answers as usual – longer than some, including the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
3 reasons to study the Russian Revolution today, according to Dutch lovers of liberty
The Bolshevik Revolution was one of the epochal events of modern history, continuing to affect the world in which we live 28 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Modern governments and systems of economics were created in imitation, or opposition, of its fundamental tenets. Too much of the memoration of its centenary last week consisted of celebration by its intellectual heirs. However, lovers of liberty across the transatlantic sphere also paused to reflect upon the occasion. On October...
Today: Debate between R. R. Reno and Rev. Sirico on free markets
Conservative Christians are ing increasingly enticed by the idea of socialism. As many people with good intentions are beginning to consider socialism as a beneficial alternative to capitalism, supporters of the free market would beg to differ. Recently the editor of “First Things”, Rusty Reno, voiced his concerns with capitalism in his essay on Michael Novak’s The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism. Reno criticizes Novak’s view of capitalism and proposes a reexamination of socialism. President and co-founder of the Acton Institute,...
5 Facts about veterans
Today is Veterans Day, a U.S. public holiday set aside to thank and honor all those who served honorably in the armed forces both in wartime or peacetime. Here are five facts you should know about veterans in the United States: 1. The Veteran’s Administration estimates there are currently 19,998,799 living veterans (18,115,951 men and 1,882,848 women). Out of that number, 8,876,728 served in the Army, 4,264,809 served in the Navy, 3,476,021 served in the Air Force, 2,213,601 served in...
The Russian Revolution’s rebellion against spirit and man
As we reflect on the impact of the Russian Revolution on its 100th anniversary, we’re bound to hear routine admiration of its goals and ideals, even among those who duly recognize the violence and oppression that followed. It’s mon refrain, whether made by college professors or garden-variety Bernie Sanders activists: Socialism has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and not tried. Indeed, even those who oppose such a system are plicit in this sort of...
How the ‘sheepskin effect’ signals education and affects wages
Note: This is post #56 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Why do wages in America differ greatly among workers? One reason, says economist Alex Tabarrok, includes differences in human capital—tools of the mind. Education is one of the biggest investments people make to increase their human capital. Which college majors offer the greatest returns? And are all returns on education due to human capital? In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Tabarrok explains how a college degree...
Do occupational licensing laws respect human rights?
“Occupational licensing laws harm workers, as well as consumers who purchase services from professionals that require licensure,” says Tyler Bonin in this week’s Acton Commentary. “This harm is disproportionately placed on economically disadvantaged populations. Thus, when examining the effects of excessive occupational licensing in the U.S., it es apparent that these laws present an undue burden on one’s right to livelihood.” In the U.S., the number of occupations requiring licensure from state governments rose by nearly 25 percent between the...
Rev. Sirico and R.R. Reno debate the merits of free markets
Should Christians rethink the merits of free markets? Last night The King’s College hosted a debate on that question between First Things editor R.R. Reno and Acton Institute president and co-founder Rev. Robert Sirico. In his opening statement, Reno admits that free markets have done a great deal to promote human flourishing, but says that “markets are human, and like all things human in our fallen world, markets can also impede human flourishing.” Reno claims this is especially true today...
The Paradise Papers: A moral assessment of tax havens from Richard Teather
To hear politicians across the Atlantic tell it, the dark specter of Paradise is haunting the world. The Paradise Papers reveal precisely how wealthy individuals and corporations – including the Queen of England, U2’ssainted front man Bono, the less-than-saintly Madonna, and scores of others – have used offshore tax havens to limit their tax liability. The papers, which were illegally obtained from Appleby law firm and released by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, include 13.4 million files dating from...
‘Communism is the increase of the search for the Kingdom of God and His righteousness!’
Following its 100th anniversary, Communism is experiencing a public relations boon, and it has just recruited its most significant Spokesman: Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Jesus (Who, one must assume, was not consulted on the sponsorship) is said to have been the first and most vociferous Scourge of free enterprise and Advocate of socialist economics. This is precisely the argument made in France by Falk Van Gaver in his new bookChristianity vs. Capitalism: The Economy According to Jesus Christ.Perhaps Van Gaver’s...
What does the Bible say about wealth creation?
What does the Bible say about wealth creation? Can wealth creation lead to Biblical human flourishing? Earlier this year two evangelical groups, theLausanne MovementandBAM Global, released apaper exploringbiblical perspectives on the theme of ‘wealth creation for holistic transformation’ to address these questions and more. The paper begins by considering the meaning of the terms ‘wealth’ and ‘holistic transformation.’ First, they discuss the concept of wealth: Biblically speaking, wealth is a concept embodying strength, power, riches, and substance. Sometimes ‘riches’ and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved