Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: Federal Government Proposes New Regulations on Payday Lending
Explainer: Federal Government Proposes New Regulations on Payday Lending
Jan 31, 2026 9:46 AM

What just happened?

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the U.S. government’s consumer protection agency, has proposed new regulations that would affect payday lending in an attempt to end payday debt traps by requiring lenders to take steps to make sure consumers can repay their loans.

What loans would the new regulation apply to?

The proposed regulations would cover two categories of loans. The first is loans with a term of 45 days or less. The second is loans with a term greater than 45 days, provided that they (1) have an all-in annual percentage rate greater than 36 percent; and (2) either are repaid directly from the consumer’s account or e or are secured by the consumer’s vehicle.

In other words, the regulation would cover almost all “payday lending” and “car title” loans.

What does the regulation do?

The proposed regulation would have two main effects. The first effect is on lenders, The regulation would require that, before making a covered loan, a lender must reasonably determine that the consumer has the ability to repay the loan. Failure to do so would be considered an “abusive and unfair practice.”

It would also make it an “unfair and abusive practice” to attempt to withdraw payment from a consumer’s account for a covered loan after two consecutive payment attempts have failed, unless the lender obtains the consumer’s new andspecific authorization to make further withdrawals from the account

The second effect is on consumers. They regulation would limit the number of short-term rollover loans borrowers can take in succession.

How would a lender determine the ability of a borrower to repay a loan?

The regulation would require a lender, before making a covered short-term loan, to make a “reasonable determination” that the consumer would be able to make the payments on the loan and be able to meet the consumer’s other major financial obligations and basic living expenses without needing to reborrow over the ensuing 30 days.

The regulation would specifically require a lender to:

• verify the consumer’s net e;

• verify the consumer’s debt obligations using a national consumer report and a consumer report from a “registered information system” as described below;

• verify the consumer’s housing costs or use a reliable method of estimating a consumer’s housing expense based on the housing expenses of similarly situated consumers;

• forecast a reasonable amount of basic living expenses for the consumer— expenditures (other than debt obligations and housing costs) necessary for a consumer to maintain the consumer’s health, welfare, and ability to produce e;

• project the consumer’s net e, debt obligations, and housing costs for a period of time based on the term of the loan; anddetermine the consumer’s ability to repay the loan based on the lender’sprojections of the consumer’s e, debt obligations, and housing costs andforecast of basic living expenses for the consumer.

Why don’t banks simply provide loans for these consumers?

A few of the largest consumer banks in America were reportedly considering going to market with new small-dollar installment loan products. The banks were hoping that the CFPB would offer a “5 percent exemption” as part of the proposed regulations. The American Banker explains how that would have worked:

A mockup of what the product could look like would be a $500 five-month loan for a borrower with an annual e of $30,000 and monthly payments of $125 (or 5% of the borrower’s $2,500 average monthly e). After assuming a 6% loss rate (which would parable to similar installment loans currently on the market), automation expenses and servicing fees, a bank could net roughly $70 while the borrower would be on the hook for $125. The average cost of a similar payday loan product would be closer to $750.

“The 5% payment option is the only part of the CFPB proposal that could save millions of borrowers billions of dollars,” said Nick Bourke, director of the small-dollar loans project at the Pew Charitable Trusts. “It would enhance underwriting while pliance costs by capping the monthly payment at 5% of the borrower’s e with a term up to six months.”

But the new regulation did not include that exemption. “The CFPB’s small-dollar loan proposal misses the mark,” Bourke told The Atlantic. Additionally, Alex Horowitz, the senior officer of Pew’s small-dollar loan project agreed, telling The Atlantic that,

the longer-term, low interest-rate loans are good, but historically the use of those products is much too small to make a real difference. To be truly effective, he said, regulations would need to plish three things for borrowers: lower prices and fees, smaller installment payments, and quicker application processing. The new rules “provide more paperwork for the same 400 percent APR loan,” he says. “That’s not consumer protection.”

Who gave the CFPB theauthorityto make such regulations?

The CFPB is able to make the regulations because of theDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law 111-203). The relevant sections they cite are1022, 1024, 1031, and 1032, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau or CFPB). President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law in 2008 after the financial crisis.

When does the regulation go into effect?

Before issuing any new regulations, federal law requires agencies to solicit feedback from the public. The CFP will ments on the proposal for the next few months and issue the final regulations on September 14. After that, the regulations would likely take effect in early 2017.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Politics and the pulpit
According to The Church Report, a new resource has been released which offers churches guidelines for keeping their activities and functions within the letter of the law. As non-profit organizations, churches are held to the same standard as registered charities and cannot engage in certain forms of public speech. A report by The Rutherford Institute, “The Rights of Churches and Political Involvement” (PDF), examines in detail what the restrictions are for churches. There are two main areas: “first, no substantial...
Today’s “blast from the past”
“It is the highest impertinence and presumption, therefore, in kings and ministers, to pretend to watch over the economy of private people, and to restrain their expense, either by sumptuary laws, or by prohibiting the importation of foreign luxuries. They are themselves always, and without any exception, the greatest spendthrifts in society. Let them look well after their own expense, and they may safely trust private people with theirs.” –Adam Smith It’s nice to know our leaders are no longer...
The crunchiness of factory farming
The CrunchyCon blog at NRO is currently discussing the issue of factory farming, which is apparently covered and described in some detail in Dreher’s book (my copy currently is on order, having not been privy to the “crunchy con”versation previously). A reader accuses Dreher of being in favor of big-government, because “he thinks we ought to ‘ban or at least seriously reform’ factory farming.” Caleb Stegall responds that he, at least, is not a big-government crunchy con, and that this...
The right to die, the duty to live
I take on the current upswing in public support for euthanasia laws, especially among certain sectors of Christianity in a mentary today, “Give Me Liberty and Give Me Death.” I note especially the stance taken by a Baylor university professor of ethics and the student newspaper in favor of legalizing euthanasia. In a recent On the Square item, Joseph Bottum notes a similar trend, as he writes, “Euthanasia has been making eback in recent months, bubbling up again and again...
‘Patrolling the boundaries…of democratic space.’
Maximilian Pakaluk, associate editor at NRO, examines a recent panel discussion given by the New York Historical Society, which included Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, Akhil Reed Amar, Southmayd Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale University, and Benno C. Schmidt Jr., chairman of the Edison Schools and former dean of Columbia Law School. The discussion was entitled “We the People: Active Liberty and the American Constitution.” Pakaluk observes, “The three speakers, but especially Schmidt and Breyer, agreed that...
Government can’t do it alone
The news from across the pond today is that the UK government is announcing that it will miss its target set in 1999 to reduce the number of children in poverty by 1 million. According to the BBC, “Department for Work and Pension figures show the number of children in poverty has fallen by 700,000 since 1999, missing the target by 300,000.” This has resulted in the typical responses when government programs fail: calls to “redouble” efforts and to increase...
There’s no such thing as “free” education
Citing a recent OECD report, the EUObserver says that European schools are falling behind their counterparts in the US and Asia. The main reason: a governmental obsession with equality that prevents investment and innovation in education, especially at the university level. “The US outspends Europe on tertiary level education by more than 50% per student, and much of that difference is due to larger US contributions from tuition-paying students and the private sector,” noted the OECD paper. Here’s how the...
Maximizing wages, minimizing employment
This is probably not the best move for a state that has been among the worst in the nation in terms of unemployment: “Lawmakers in the Michigan House of Representatives are preparing to vote on a proposed hike in the minimum wage to nearly $7 an hour.” The state Senate passed the measure late last week, so the House’s agreement would put the matter into the hands of Gov. Granholm. According to the Office of Labor Market Information, Michigan’s unemployment...
Vatican official flogs “secularized charity”
Archbishop Paul Josef Cordes is the president of the Pontifical Council “Cor Unum,” which coordinates the Catholic Church’s charitable institutions. ZENIT reports on a speech the prelate delivered at a Catholic university in Italy. Archbishop Cordes has previously emphasized the importance of Christian organizations maintaining or recovering their Christian identity, but in this address he drew on Pope Benedict XVI’s encyclical Deus Caritas Est to make his strongest statement yet: “The large Church charity organizations have separated themselves from the...
The price is wrong?
Seth Godin contends today that “most people don’t really care about price.” He uses a couple of arguments that involve aspects of convenience, and so he concludes, “price is a signal, a story, a situational decision that is never absolute. It’s just part of what goes into making a decision, no matter what we’re buying.” He’s right, in the sense that everyone will not choose the service or item with the lower price at all times and in all places....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved