Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: Federal Government Proposes New Regulations on Payday Lending
Explainer: Federal Government Proposes New Regulations on Payday Lending
Jan 8, 2026 10:47 PM

What just happened?

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the U.S. government’s consumer protection agency, has proposed new regulations that would affect payday lending in an attempt to end payday debt traps by requiring lenders to take steps to make sure consumers can repay their loans.

What loans would the new regulation apply to?

The proposed regulations would cover two categories of loans. The first is loans with a term of 45 days or less. The second is loans with a term greater than 45 days, provided that they (1) have an all-in annual percentage rate greater than 36 percent; and (2) either are repaid directly from the consumer’s account or e or are secured by the consumer’s vehicle.

In other words, the regulation would cover almost all “payday lending” and “car title” loans.

What does the regulation do?

The proposed regulation would have two main effects. The first effect is on lenders, The regulation would require that, before making a covered loan, a lender must reasonably determine that the consumer has the ability to repay the loan. Failure to do so would be considered an “abusive and unfair practice.”

It would also make it an “unfair and abusive practice” to attempt to withdraw payment from a consumer’s account for a covered loan after two consecutive payment attempts have failed, unless the lender obtains the consumer’s new andspecific authorization to make further withdrawals from the account

The second effect is on consumers. They regulation would limit the number of short-term rollover loans borrowers can take in succession.

How would a lender determine the ability of a borrower to repay a loan?

The regulation would require a lender, before making a covered short-term loan, to make a “reasonable determination” that the consumer would be able to make the payments on the loan and be able to meet the consumer’s other major financial obligations and basic living expenses without needing to reborrow over the ensuing 30 days.

The regulation would specifically require a lender to:

• verify the consumer’s net e;

• verify the consumer’s debt obligations using a national consumer report and a consumer report from a “registered information system” as described below;

• verify the consumer’s housing costs or use a reliable method of estimating a consumer’s housing expense based on the housing expenses of similarly situated consumers;

• forecast a reasonable amount of basic living expenses for the consumer— expenditures (other than debt obligations and housing costs) necessary for a consumer to maintain the consumer’s health, welfare, and ability to produce e;

• project the consumer’s net e, debt obligations, and housing costs for a period of time based on the term of the loan; anddetermine the consumer’s ability to repay the loan based on the lender’sprojections of the consumer’s e, debt obligations, and housing costs andforecast of basic living expenses for the consumer.

Why don’t banks simply provide loans for these consumers?

A few of the largest consumer banks in America were reportedly considering going to market with new small-dollar installment loan products. The banks were hoping that the CFPB would offer a “5 percent exemption” as part of the proposed regulations. The American Banker explains how that would have worked:

A mockup of what the product could look like would be a $500 five-month loan for a borrower with an annual e of $30,000 and monthly payments of $125 (or 5% of the borrower’s $2,500 average monthly e). After assuming a 6% loss rate (which would parable to similar installment loans currently on the market), automation expenses and servicing fees, a bank could net roughly $70 while the borrower would be on the hook for $125. The average cost of a similar payday loan product would be closer to $750.

“The 5% payment option is the only part of the CFPB proposal that could save millions of borrowers billions of dollars,” said Nick Bourke, director of the small-dollar loans project at the Pew Charitable Trusts. “It would enhance underwriting while pliance costs by capping the monthly payment at 5% of the borrower’s e with a term up to six months.”

But the new regulation did not include that exemption. “The CFPB’s small-dollar loan proposal misses the mark,” Bourke told The Atlantic. Additionally, Alex Horowitz, the senior officer of Pew’s small-dollar loan project agreed, telling The Atlantic that,

the longer-term, low interest-rate loans are good, but historically the use of those products is much too small to make a real difference. To be truly effective, he said, regulations would need to plish three things for borrowers: lower prices and fees, smaller installment payments, and quicker application processing. The new rules “provide more paperwork for the same 400 percent APR loan,” he says. “That’s not consumer protection.”

Who gave the CFPB theauthorityto make such regulations?

The CFPB is able to make the regulations because of theDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law 111-203). The relevant sections they cite are1022, 1024, 1031, and 1032, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau or CFPB). President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law in 2008 after the financial crisis.

When does the regulation go into effect?

Before issuing any new regulations, federal law requires agencies to solicit feedback from the public. The CFP will ments on the proposal for the next few months and issue the final regulations on September 14. After that, the regulations would likely take effect in early 2017.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Addicted to influence
A brief but timely editorial appears in this month’s issue of Christianity Today, “We Are What We Behold.” Here’s a taste: “…evangelicals have wrestled with our relationship to power. When in a position of influence (and in our better moments), we leverage power to better the lives of our neighbors. Cultural savvy enables us to successfully translate the gospel for a changing world. But it’s a double-edged sword—influence and savvy can also dull the gospel’s transcendence. We achieve a royal...
Nonprofits beware!
A friend forwarded a Website link for The Nonprofit Congress recently that was downright scary. It appears to be the epitome of good intentions fraught with unintended consequences. Or perhaps the consequences are not unintended. The Congress is an apparent call to advocacy (i.e., political pressuring) within the National Council of Nonprofit Associations. To the group’s credit, the “why” is a forthright statement of their view and values: The time e for nonprofits of all sizes and scope e together....
Bonhoeffer’s legacy
Earlier this month, we marked the 100th anniversary of Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s birth on February 4, in what is now Wroclaw, Poland. In a message before the International Bonhoeffer Conference on February 3, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams said, Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a man immersed in a specific cultural heritage, and untroubled by the fact; he was a person of profound and rigorous (and very traditional) personal spirituality; he was mitted to the ecumenical perspective from very early on in his...
The dignity of every human being
The February 11 issue of WORLD Magazine includes a culture feature, “Giving their names back.” Profiled in the article is Citizens for Community Values (CCV), a nonprofit in Memphis that does a victim assistance program called “A Way Out.” It’s a reclamation program of sorts, literally reclaiming women ensnarled in the sex trade industry, and giving them back their lives, reclamation evidenced by names. The very nature of the sex industry, be it topless dancing, stripping or prostitution, requires anonymity–no...
Jack Hafer at the Acton Lecture Series
Jack Hafer, the producer of the award-winning film, To End All Wars, will be speaking at the 2006 Acton Lecture Series on Wednesday, February 15. This luncheon (which does include a lunch) will be held in the David Cassard room of the Waters Building in downtown Grand Rapids from 12:00pm – 1:30. Mr. Hafer will discuss the challenges of making movies with profound moral messages in today’s Hollywood culture. He will also talk about plans for future projects that break...
Concerns about consensus
George H. Taylor, the State Climatologist for Oregon, writes at TCS Daily, “A Consensus About Consensus.” The article is worth reading. It shows that scientific consensus is often overrated, both in terms of its existence and in terms of its relevance. With resepct to global warming, Taylor looks at some of the claims for scientific consensus, and states, “But even if there actually were a consensus on this issue, it may very well be wrong.” This simply means that the...
Western Europe’s political homogeneity
Western Europeans often talk about the homogeneity of American politics and how the parties hardly differ from one another. One reason why Europeans believe this is because they often pay attention to US politics only during a presidential campaign, so they do have some justification. But while their opinion is understandable not only does it fail to reflect the real difference between the left and the right in America; it obscures the homogeneity of Western European political life. What is...
Stewardship and economics: two sides of the same coin
In yesterday’s Acton Commentary, I argued that the biblical foundation for the concepts of stewardship and economics should lead us to see them as united. In this sense I wrote, “Economics can be understood as the theoretical side of stewardship, and stewardship can be understood as the practical side of economics.” I also defined economics as “the thoughtful ordering of the material resources of a household or social unit toward the self-identified good end” and said that the discipline “helps...
‘Captialism’ according to the academy
For a quick overview of the current state of appreciation for economics and capitalism among various ‘academics,’ see the newly inaugurated e-journal Fast Capitalism. It might as well be subtitled: Marxism, Alive and Well. Most of the contributors to the first issue are in munications, or political science. Here’s a sampling: In “Beyond Beltway and Bible Belt: Re-imagining the Democratic Party and the American Left,” Ben Agger, who teaches sociology and humanities at the University of Texas at Arlington, writes,...
Moral posturing on Africa
Over the weekend, the Daily Telegraph’s Charles Moore asked, “Why should the Left win the scramble for Africa?” : [T]he trouble with this subject – perhaps this is why the Left dominates it – is that it attracts posturing. Africa is, among other things, a photo-opportunity. As our own educational system makes it harder and harder to get British pupils to smile at all, so the attraction for politicians of being snapped with rows of black children with happy grins...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved