Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: Apple’s Fight with the FBI Over iPhone Encryption
Explainer: Apple’s Fight with the FBI Over iPhone Encryption
Jul 5, 2025 7:44 PM

What is the issue about?

In December, 14 people were killed and 22 were seriously injured in a terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California. The two terrorists, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, were later killed in a shootout with police. Law enforcement recovered Farook’s iPhone 5c, which they believe may contain information relevant to the terror investigation.

Farook’s iPhone is protected by a passcode set to wipe the contents of the smartphone after 10 attempts to log in with the wrong code. A federal court in California has ordered Apple to “provide reasonable technical assistance” by either creating a special version of the operating system that’s currently on Farook’s phone, in order to disable the 10-try maximum and allow puter to connect to the phone and guess every possible passcode, or to provide an alternative means of accessing the phone.

The Obama administration defended the Justice Department’s request Wednesday, vowing that the government would solely use the new program on Farook’s phone.

Apple is currently refusing ply with the request. Apple CEO Tim Cook issued a statement, “A Message To Our Customers”, in which he says, “The United States government has demanded that Apple take an unprecedented step which threatens the security of our customers. We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond the legal case at hand.”

What is the case plying with the order?

Opponents of the order fear that it gives the government power over the smartphone’s encryption technology by building a “backdoor” to the iPhone. As Tim Cook claims,

The FBI may use different words to describe this tool, but make no mistake: Building a version of iOS that bypasses security in this way would undeniably create a backdoor. And while the government may argue that its use would be limitedto this case, there is no way to guarantee such control.

Some would argue that building a backdoor for just one iPhone is a simple, clean-cut solution. But it ignores both the basics of digital security and the significance of what the government is demanding in this case.

In today’s digital world, the “key” to an encrypted system is a piece of information that unlocks the data, and it is only as secure as the protections around it. Once the information is known, or a way to bypass the code is revealed, the encryption can be defeated by anyone with that knowledge.

The government suggests this tool could only be used once, on one phone. But that’s simply not true. Once created, the technique could be used over and over again, on any number of devices. In the physical world, it would be the equivalent of a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks — from restaurants and banks to stores and homes. No reasonable person would find that acceptable.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai agreed with Cook, saying on Twitter that forcing panies to hack users’ devices “could be a troubling precedent.”

Many privacy rights groups have also weighed in, claiming that, once created, this “backdoor” could be exploited by criminals or abused by the government.

What is the case plying with the order?

Advocates plying with the order claim that the fears of critics are overblown and that Apple is merely grandstanding to ingratiate themselves with privacy-rights advocates.

As Gabriel Malor explains, until this week, no one claimed that removing the auto-erase and delay features of passcodes constituted a “backdoor.” “Uses of the term to refer to the order in this case are thus misleading,” says Malor. “This order does not require Apple to hand over a key to its encryption that could be used on other devices.”

Malor also says this case would not set a new precedent since it already relies on an old precedent:

The All Writs Act derives from the Founders’ acknowledgment that sometimes courts require aid from third parties to administer justice. To the extent that Apple and other phone manufactures worry they may be asked to help law enforcement in the future, the Supreme Court set that precedent in a 1977 case calledUnited States v. New York Telephone Co.

Gus Hurwitz says that Apple’s refusal actually does more harm than good for the privacy-rights cause:

Cook’s concerns at best overstate the threat, and by doing so make it harder rather than easier to get some consensus around legitimately difficult but very important issues: the ongoing technological disruption of the delicate relationship between individuals and the state — between privacy and liberty on the one hand, and security on the other.

Hurwitz also explains why we should not be concerned about this issue:

Contrary to Tim Cook’s concerns, courts do not have plenary authority to “intercept your messages, access your health records or financial data, track your location, or even access your phone’s microphone or camera without your knowledge.” And, where they may have some authority to authorize such conduct, it is limited at least by the 4th Amendment and usually limited even further by statute. The All Writs Act doesn’t expand a court’s authority — it only allows them to exercise what authority they clearly do have, including mandeering the assistance of those who would otherwise deliberately obstruct a lawful court order.

Charles Krauthammer adds,“The grandstanding that Apple is doing I think is deplorable.” He says the solution is simple: “What you do is, you go to Apple and you say, ‘Look, you take this, you take this one phone, you open it wherever you want, in some secret lab, underwater, off the Pacific Isles, all we want is the information. If you like, you can incinerate the phone after all this is done — give us the information.”

Is there a way to resolve the issue?

Apple will appeal the case, but will likely lose the legal battle and may be forced ply with the order.

However, an alternative solution has beenoffered by John McAfee, the controversial cybersecurity expert who is running for president as a member of the Libertarian Party. McAfee says,

So here is my offer to the FBI. I will, free of charge, decrypt the information on the San Bernardino phone, with my team. We will primarily use social engineering, and it will take us three weeks. If you accept my offer, then you will not need to ask Apple to place a back door in its product, which will be the beginning of the end of America.

If you doubt my credentials, Google “cybersecurity legend” and see whose name is the only name that appears in the first 10 results out of more than a quarter of a million.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Acton Line podcast: What is Christian humanism? A conversation with Bradley J. Birzer
Bradley J. Birzer, professor of history and the Russell Amos Kirk Chair in American Studies at Hillsdale College, joins this episode of Acton Line to speak about his newest book, “Beyond Tenebrae: Christian Humanism in the Twilight of the West.” What is Christian humanism and what role does it play in the Republic of Letters? What does it mean to live as a Christian humanist? Birzer helps lay down some of the foundational ideas in his book and explains the...
Rev. Sirico: How central planning created tunnel vision on COVID-19 response
Did central planning in health care and government make the COVID-19 pandemic worse by making the response more ineffective? Rev. Robert Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, offers his thoughts on how centralization in health care and the economy has marginalized other perspectives and pushed aside notions of subsidiarity. ...
The making and unmaking of European democracy
If there is anything that we have learned over the past five years of political turmoil in Western countries, it is that large numbers of people across the political spectrum are increasingly dissatisfied with the workings of modern democracy. These trends reflect, as numerous surveys illustrate, deep distrust of established political parties and, more particularly, those individuals whose careers amount to a series of revolving doors between elected office, government service, the academy, and politically-connected businesses. What’s often missing from...
We must cure the global pandemic of loneliness
Millions of people within our country are experiencing extreme social isolation and loneliness. In a time defined by a pandemic and lockdowns, one would naturally expect people to feel this way, being cut off from family, friends, and neighbors. In actuality, the coronavirus has just exacerbated an existing pandemic that had been plaguing the United States for many years: a broad cultural trend of increased social isolation and alienation. Long before the coronavirus started, large segments of our society were...
Awe and wonder: The keys to curbing COVID-19 hubris
In our information age, armchair economists and epidemiologists are many. Society remains deeply divided—preoccupied with social media squabbles over the credibility of our leaders and the rightness or wrongness of their proposed solutions. Of course, the actual experts are divided, as well. Scientists and researchers are still arguing over the validity of various mathematical models. Inventors, businesses, munity institutions have adopted wide-ranging approaches to adapt to the virus. Governors and legislators remain split on how to interpret the bigger picture—weighing...
For St. John Paul II’s 100th birthday, Italy gets gift of religious freedom
Today, May 18, is a very good day, indeed. It is a heroic day for the Italian Catholic Church on the 100th anniversary of Pope St. John Paul II’s birth. There could not be a better birthday gift from a saint who, fluent in 13 languages, was a veritable Paraclete-on-earth. He spoke courageously and often, raising his voice against persecution of religious freedom. He did so not just in his munist Poland, but throughout the entire secularized world. By the...
How John Paul II reminded us that liberty and truth are inseparable
On the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the late John Paul II’s birth, it’s worth underscoring that one theme which permeated his pontificate from its beginning to the end was that of truth. Many remember Pope John Paul II as playing a crucial role in Eastern Europe’s liberation from Marxist tyranny. But he also insisted that liberty needed to be grounded in and guided by the truth knowable via reason and faith. If freedom and truth e separated—as they...
Rev. Robert Sirico: COVID-19 lockdown orders are the state-mandated ‘marginalization of religion’
Perhaps nowhere is the disconnect between private citizens’ views and those of the government clearer than when es to the role of religion in society. Acton Institute President and Co-founder Rev. Robert A. Sirico told a nationally syndicated radio program that state orders that effectively ban clergy from caring for sick patients represent “the marginalization of religion as a non-essential service,” and this “flies in the face of our entire history as an American republic.” “Who knows best what is...
R.R. Reno, masks, and the vacuity of social media
First Things magazine is no stranger to controversy. In recent years, it has been increasingly critical­ of the market economy, made bizarre defenses of kidnapping in the guise of a book review, and e a clearing house of contrarian and moralistic perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic. Earlier this week, First Things editor R.R. Reno took to Twitter to accuse those who try to avoid the spread of the coronavirus by wearing masks of cowardice. The tweets, since deleted, were widely...
What’s behind COVID-19 racial health disparities?
Soon after COVID-19 infection rates began to skyrocket in New York City and other densely populated urban areas, progressives and Democrats demanded data on the racial disparities of testing, treatments, and deaths. The data showed that blacks and Latinos were much more likely to die from the virus than whites and Asians. As expected, progressives moved to explain these disparities in terms of structural, systemic injustice in America’s health care system: Such injustice follows the country’s material and economic inequality....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved