Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Eulogies to Margaret Thatcher at the Pub (and the Cathedral)
Eulogies to Margaret Thatcher at the Pub (and the Cathedral)
Jan 21, 2026 11:32 PM

The Pavilion End pub with St. Paul’s Cathedral in the background

Last week followingActon’s seminar on morality, virtue, and Catholic social teaching with a group of financiers, bankers, and other business executives in London, I was invited to attend a private eulogy service organized by the Freedom Association for the late Lady Margaret Thatcher.

The eulogy service was organized in “proper British fashion” while sharing memories and more over ales at a pub—The Pavilion End—located right behind St. Paul’s Cathedral where Britain’s conservative elite gathered for formal prayer, hymns, and a sermon given by the Bishop of London at Margaret Thatcher’s elaborate state funeral.

A few hundred in attendance at The Pavilion End pub listen to the impressive speakers

I joined this unique opportunity, of course, to pay my own international respects as an adopted American son of Britain’s great Mother of Liberty. It was during my 1980s Catholic conservative upbringing that I gained immense respect for the Iron Lady, who joined forces with our own President Ronald Reagan and Rome’s John Paul II. In the end, this powerful triumvirate won the Cold War and effectively rolled back the Iron Curtain toinspireunprecedentedeconomic growth and human flourishing in the modern world.

The many prestigious speakers (which included parliamentarians from London and Brussels, academics, activists, and several Ciceronian-trained orators) roundly praised Margaret Thatcher’s legacy of individual moral responsibility, passionate distrust of the Orwellian Big Brother state, wasteful welfare spending, ongoing corruption, and inefficiency of government institutions in the British Isles and throughout continental Europe.

Dan Hannan, the popular Euroskeptic andConservative member of European Parliament, reminisced of Lady Thatcher’s deeply spiritual and practical roots in Methodism and loathing of wasting time watching television. Hannan, however, reminded all of us at the pub of the one show the former Prime Minister did make time for and tuned in to on the BBC just before she passed—“Songs of Praise”, a program dedicated to the kind of traditional religious hymns and choir music she grew up with going to church three times a day on Sundays.

Hannan said he was particularly delighted by the funeral service in which the Anglican Bishop of London and old friend of Lady Thatcher, Richard Chartes, delivered an inspiring sermon (see full text and video). Bishop Chartes, in fact, gave a telling account of personal anecdotes and articulated to the world Margaret Thatcher’s special synthesis of Christian faith and Hayekian economics into her political worldview.

Chartes said her Methodist theology and Austrian economic philosophy influenced profoundly her beliefs on human liberty and dignity, virtue as moral capital, as well as how she saw the political ends of democratic society:

She was very aware that there are prior dispositions which are needed to make market economics and democratic institutions function well: the habits of truth-telling, mutual sympathy, and the capacity to cooperate. These dispositions are incubated and given power by our relationships. In her words, “the basic ties of the family are at the heart of our society and are the very nursery of civic virtue”. Such moral and spiritual capital is accumulated over generations but can be easily eroded. Life is a struggle to make the right choices and to achieve liberation from dependence, whether material or psychological.

This genuine independence is the essential pre-condition for living in an other-centered way, beyond ourselves. The word Margaret Thatcher used at St Lawrence Jewry was “interdependence”. She referred to the Christian doctrine “that we are all members one of another, expressed in the concept of the Church on earth as the Body of Christ. From this we learn our interdependence and the great truth that we do not achieve happiness or salvation in isolation from each other but as members of Society.”Her later remark about there being no such thing as “society” has been misunderstood and refers to some impersonal entity to which we are tempted to surrender our independence.

Because of Thatcher’s classical liberal training in Austrian free market economics and traditional Christian social teachings, Dan Hannanreminded ushow Thatcher rescued her country from “sheer [the] awfulness . . . of price policies, trade union barons, . . . power cuts, . . . shortages” and, in general, economic and moral “calamity” at the end of the 1970s “when Britain was reduced to begging, borrowing, and praying until the North Sea Oil receipts came in”.

Nowadays, Hannan said, there seems to be a “collective amnesia” for the Lady’s legacy of goodness and caring for the well-being of Britain, a once ailing nation she raised to back good health—from “the sick man of Europe” to being one of the world’s most powerful industrial nations in by the close of 1980s.

Matthew Sinclair, CEO of Britain’s influential Tax Payers’ Alliance which lobbies to reduce wasteful public spending in parliament and city councils, agreed that Thatcher’s legacy should not be thrown to the wayside by unappreciative masses discontent with today’s social and financial crises.

Sinclair said that her greatest legacy was teaching Britons that however “grim, corrupt and lost [in] relative decline . . .” they are nowadays, “no one should ever see [it] as inevitable.”

According to Sinclair Thatcher’s other great legacy, was her fundamental fiscal wisdom, namely that “there is no such thing as public money.” He said that this philosophy, like her other controversial statement on social values (i.e., “there is no such a thing as society”) is “really saying the same thing.”

“There is no society that is going to step in and solve our problems. There is no society which is going to turn things around. It’s us. It’s us doing what we can to support ourselves, support our families, support munities, support our nation. And now that is what we have to try and do again. . . as we face disastrous mistakes . . . which have put this country again in a position of decline,” Sinclair said.

One of other speakers, an Oxford University academic named Adrian Hilton, spoke of the Iron Lady’s unbreakable Christian faith. He recalled the liberal British politician, Florence Anderson, saying two yeas ago that Lady Thatcher “was going to hell”.

“That’s the problem with socialists,” Hilton said. “They are not content with ordering our lives in the local town hall. They [further] presume to play God and tell where peoples’ souls are going to end up!”

Hilton, whose research is educational reform and school choice policy, said the late prime minister was an mitted Christian and was not afraid to put her neck on the line when running against the tide of secular socialistideology that had inculturated her country.

“She was a non-conformist revolutionary because Jesus was a non-conformist revolutionary. She spoke up for the ordinary individual and against the privileged elites because her Savior did precisely that.”

Regarding Thatcher’s controversial statement “there is no such a thing as society”, Hilton said her words were not that of a godless anarchists, but were inspired by a deepsense of personal and responsible love forher neighbors mitment to the classical Christian social teaching of subsidiarity.

“Society is made up of individuals who are individually accountable before God for their actions. These individuals make up families. Those families make munities. That is the society [Lady Thatcher] believed in.”

What a wonderful wayto say goodbye. God be with ye, m’Lady!

Watch the full eulogies below delivered by Dan Hannan, Matthew Sinclair and Adrian Hilton.

Dan Hannan

Matthew Sinclair

Adrian Hilton

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Mandating Monolithic Medicine
Among the warnings sounded as the Democratic health care reform bill was being debated was that the federal insurance mandate included in the bill—even though not national health care per se—would essentially give the federal government control of the insurance industry. The reason: If everyone is forced to buy insurance, then the government must deem what sort of insurance qualifies as adequate to meet the mandate. This piece of Obamacare promises to turn every medical procedure into a major political...
Envy: A Deadly (Economic) Sin
Victor Claar, Acton University lecturer and professor of economics at Henderson State University, will give a talk tonight in Washington, D.C., hosted by AEI, “Grieving the Good of Others: Envy and Economics.” If you are in the area, you are encouraged to attend and hear Dr. Claar as well as two respondents discuss the topic of envy and its moral and economic consequences. Here’s a description of the event: Critics of capitalism often argue that this economic system is irretrievably...
Journal of Religion and Business Ethics
The latest issue of the newly launched Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is now available (vol. 1, no. 2). Check out the contents at their website. From the journal’s about page: “The Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is a peer-reviewed journal that examines the ethical and religious issues that arise in the modern business setting. While much attention has been given to the philosophical treatment of business ethics, this is the first journal to address the more inclusive...
The Daily Show Takes on a Union
The Daily Show exposes some union hypocrisy (HT). In the words of the union local head, es down to greed”: ...
The Politics of Crony Unionism
Last week’s Acton Commentary and blog post focused on my claims about “crony unionism” and how the intimate relationship between Big Labor and Big Government corrupt both. Here’s another instance of the kinds of gross conflicts of interest produced by this relationship: It’s hard to see this as anything but partisan pandering on the part of the largest public sector union, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). Meanwhile, the Washington Post asks, “Was politics behind the...
Explaining the New Democratic Logo
“The new Democratic logo is so bad that the intellectual rot in the official announcement went largely unnoticed.” The rest of my piece is here at The American Spectator. ...
Rev. Sirico: Respect others’ rights, but also their values
A new column by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, was published today in the Detroit News. This column will also be linked in tomorrow’s Acton News & Commentary. Sign up for the free weekly Acton newsletter here. +++++++++ Faith and policy: Respect others’ rights, but also their values FATHER ROBERT SIRICO If such an award were to be given for the Most Contentious Religious Story of 2010, the two main contenders would undoubtedly be...
A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I take a look at the prospects of “right-to-work” legislation in Michigan, “A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism.” One of the things that disturbs me the most about what I call “crony unionism” is the hand-in-glove relationship between the labor unions and big government. We have the same kind of special pleading and rent seeking in this system as we do in crony capitalism, but the labor unions enjoy such special protection...
Radio Free Acton: The Stewardship of Art, Part 2
Last week, we posted part 1 of our podcast on the proper Christian stewardship of art; for those who have been waiting for the conclusion, we’re happy to present part 2. David Michael Phelps continues to lead the discussion between Professors Nathan Jacobs and Calvin Seerveld, who previously debated this topic in the Controversy section of our Journal of Markets & Morality. The first portion of that exchange is available at the link for part 1; the remainder of the...
Work as if It Mattered
The conversations over the last few weeks here on work have raised a couple of questions. In the context of criticisms on the perspectives on work articulated by Lester DeKoster and defended by menter John E. asks, “…what is it that you hope readers will change in their lives, and why?” I want to change people’s view of their work. I want them to see how it has value not simply as a means to some other end, but in...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved