Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Eulogies to Margaret Thatcher at the Pub (and the Cathedral)
Eulogies to Margaret Thatcher at the Pub (and the Cathedral)
Jan 26, 2026 11:19 AM

The Pavilion End pub with St. Paul’s Cathedral in the background

Last week followingActon’s seminar on morality, virtue, and Catholic social teaching with a group of financiers, bankers, and other business executives in London, I was invited to attend a private eulogy service organized by the Freedom Association for the late Lady Margaret Thatcher.

The eulogy service was organized in “proper British fashion” while sharing memories and more over ales at a pub—The Pavilion End—located right behind St. Paul’s Cathedral where Britain’s conservative elite gathered for formal prayer, hymns, and a sermon given by the Bishop of London at Margaret Thatcher’s elaborate state funeral.

A few hundred in attendance at The Pavilion End pub listen to the impressive speakers

I joined this unique opportunity, of course, to pay my own international respects as an adopted American son of Britain’s great Mother of Liberty. It was during my 1980s Catholic conservative upbringing that I gained immense respect for the Iron Lady, who joined forces with our own President Ronald Reagan and Rome’s John Paul II. In the end, this powerful triumvirate won the Cold War and effectively rolled back the Iron Curtain toinspireunprecedentedeconomic growth and human flourishing in the modern world.

The many prestigious speakers (which included parliamentarians from London and Brussels, academics, activists, and several Ciceronian-trained orators) roundly praised Margaret Thatcher’s legacy of individual moral responsibility, passionate distrust of the Orwellian Big Brother state, wasteful welfare spending, ongoing corruption, and inefficiency of government institutions in the British Isles and throughout continental Europe.

Dan Hannan, the popular Euroskeptic andConservative member of European Parliament, reminisced of Lady Thatcher’s deeply spiritual and practical roots in Methodism and loathing of wasting time watching television. Hannan, however, reminded all of us at the pub of the one show the former Prime Minister did make time for and tuned in to on the BBC just before she passed—“Songs of Praise”, a program dedicated to the kind of traditional religious hymns and choir music she grew up with going to church three times a day on Sundays.

Hannan said he was particularly delighted by the funeral service in which the Anglican Bishop of London and old friend of Lady Thatcher, Richard Chartes, delivered an inspiring sermon (see full text and video). Bishop Chartes, in fact, gave a telling account of personal anecdotes and articulated to the world Margaret Thatcher’s special synthesis of Christian faith and Hayekian economics into her political worldview.

Chartes said her Methodist theology and Austrian economic philosophy influenced profoundly her beliefs on human liberty and dignity, virtue as moral capital, as well as how she saw the political ends of democratic society:

She was very aware that there are prior dispositions which are needed to make market economics and democratic institutions function well: the habits of truth-telling, mutual sympathy, and the capacity to cooperate. These dispositions are incubated and given power by our relationships. In her words, “the basic ties of the family are at the heart of our society and are the very nursery of civic virtue”. Such moral and spiritual capital is accumulated over generations but can be easily eroded. Life is a struggle to make the right choices and to achieve liberation from dependence, whether material or psychological.

This genuine independence is the essential pre-condition for living in an other-centered way, beyond ourselves. The word Margaret Thatcher used at St Lawrence Jewry was “interdependence”. She referred to the Christian doctrine “that we are all members one of another, expressed in the concept of the Church on earth as the Body of Christ. From this we learn our interdependence and the great truth that we do not achieve happiness or salvation in isolation from each other but as members of Society.”Her later remark about there being no such thing as “society” has been misunderstood and refers to some impersonal entity to which we are tempted to surrender our independence.

Because of Thatcher’s classical liberal training in Austrian free market economics and traditional Christian social teachings, Dan Hannanreminded ushow Thatcher rescued her country from “sheer [the] awfulness . . . of price policies, trade union barons, . . . power cuts, . . . shortages” and, in general, economic and moral “calamity” at the end of the 1970s “when Britain was reduced to begging, borrowing, and praying until the North Sea Oil receipts came in”.

Nowadays, Hannan said, there seems to be a “collective amnesia” for the Lady’s legacy of goodness and caring for the well-being of Britain, a once ailing nation she raised to back good health—from “the sick man of Europe” to being one of the world’s most powerful industrial nations in by the close of 1980s.

Matthew Sinclair, CEO of Britain’s influential Tax Payers’ Alliance which lobbies to reduce wasteful public spending in parliament and city councils, agreed that Thatcher’s legacy should not be thrown to the wayside by unappreciative masses discontent with today’s social and financial crises.

Sinclair said that her greatest legacy was teaching Britons that however “grim, corrupt and lost [in] relative decline . . .” they are nowadays, “no one should ever see [it] as inevitable.”

According to Sinclair Thatcher’s other great legacy, was her fundamental fiscal wisdom, namely that “there is no such thing as public money.” He said that this philosophy, like her other controversial statement on social values (i.e., “there is no such a thing as society”) is “really saying the same thing.”

“There is no society that is going to step in and solve our problems. There is no society which is going to turn things around. It’s us. It’s us doing what we can to support ourselves, support our families, support munities, support our nation. And now that is what we have to try and do again. . . as we face disastrous mistakes . . . which have put this country again in a position of decline,” Sinclair said.

One of other speakers, an Oxford University academic named Adrian Hilton, spoke of the Iron Lady’s unbreakable Christian faith. He recalled the liberal British politician, Florence Anderson, saying two yeas ago that Lady Thatcher “was going to hell”.

“That’s the problem with socialists,” Hilton said. “They are not content with ordering our lives in the local town hall. They [further] presume to play God and tell where peoples’ souls are going to end up!”

Hilton, whose research is educational reform and school choice policy, said the late prime minister was an mitted Christian and was not afraid to put her neck on the line when running against the tide of secular socialistideology that had inculturated her country.

“She was a non-conformist revolutionary because Jesus was a non-conformist revolutionary. She spoke up for the ordinary individual and against the privileged elites because her Savior did precisely that.”

Regarding Thatcher’s controversial statement “there is no such a thing as society”, Hilton said her words were not that of a godless anarchists, but were inspired by a deepsense of personal and responsible love forher neighbors mitment to the classical Christian social teaching of subsidiarity.

“Society is made up of individuals who are individually accountable before God for their actions. These individuals make up families. Those families make munities. That is the society [Lady Thatcher] believed in.”

What a wonderful wayto say goodbye. God be with ye, m’Lady!

Watch the full eulogies below delivered by Dan Hannan, Matthew Sinclair and Adrian Hilton.

Dan Hannan

Matthew Sinclair

Adrian Hilton

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Was Gordon Gekko Catholic?
Is greed really good? Does self-interest equal sin? Samuel Gregg takes on these questions at Aleteia.org, in an excerpt from his new book, Tea Party Catholic: the Catholic Case for Limited Government, a Free Economy and Human Flourishing. In many ways, the free economy does rely upon people pursuing their self-interest rather than being immediately focused upon promoting the wellbeing of others. One response to this challenge is to recognize that fallen humanity cannot realize perfect justice in this world....
Does Legalizing Prostitution Reduce Child Sex Slavery?
Would legalizing adult prostitution decrease the demand for child sex slaves? That’s the curious argument made by one of my favorite libertarian economist. Donald J. Boudreaux , a professor of economics at George Mason University, recently wrote: If men can legally buy sex from women 18 years of age or older, men will have less demand to patronize children. And sex entrepreneurs will have less incentive to ‘supply’ children. With all prostitution being illegal, those who demand as well as...
Disability and Discipleship: God Don’t Make No Junk
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “Disability, Service, and Stewardship,” I write, “Our service of others may or may not be recognized by the marketplace as something valuable or worth paying for. But each one of us has something to offer someone else. All of us have ministries of one kind or another. Our very existence itself must be seen as a blessing from God.” During a sermon a couple weeks ago at my church, the preacher made an important point...
Accepting Applications for an ‘Intellectual Retreat’
Looking for a great opportunity to expand your intellectual capacity? We are still seeking applicants for two ing Liberty and Markets conferences: Religion and Liberty: Acton and Tocqueville and Evaluating the Idea of Social Justice. Co-sponsored by the Acton Institute and Liberty Fund, Inc., these conferences offer an excellent opportunity for networking and discussion within a small group environment, with an average faculty/participant ratio of 1:3. Both conferences are free and include single-occupancy lodging, meals, nightly hospitality, book gifts, and...
The Rise of Free-Market Alternatives to Obamacare
Referring to the Affordable Care Act, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Max Baucus (D-Mont.) stated earlier this year, “Unless we implement this properly, it’s going to be a train wreck.” And indeed, from looking at the Obamacare implementation timeline alone, the law seems to have gotten off to a shaky start. The implementation of the so-called employer mandate, which would require businesses with more than 50 workers to offer insurance to all full-time employees, or else pay a fine...
For America’s Elites, Religious Freedom is a Non-Issue
America’s Founding Fathers considered religious liberty to be our “first freedom.” But as Ken Blackwell notes, that view is no longer shared by our media and foreign policy elites: All such understandings of the religious freedom foundation of American civil liberty and foreign policy seem long forgotten by the elites of today. The media cares little about religious freedom. The famous Rothman-Lichter study of 1981 surveyed 240 journalists from the prestige press. Of course, 80 percent of them voted one...
Do the Poor Vote for More Welfare?
A popular saying (often misattributed to Alexis de Tocqueville) states that a democracy can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. If this is always the case then we should expect the poor to vote themselves even more welfare payments. However, as Dwight R. Lee explains, the desire for transfers that others will pay for has almost no effect on people’s voting behavior: This argument that a significant financial gain from...
Spirit-and-Body Economics
Over at the Kern Pastors Network, Greg Forster points to Rev. Robert Sirico’s speech from this year’s Acton University, drawing particularly on Sirico’s emphasis on Christian anthropology.“One may not say that we are spirits inside of flesh,” Sirico said, “but that we are spirits and flesh.” Forster summarizes: Christianity teaches that the human person is, in Sirico’s words, both corporeal and transcendent. We cannot make sense of ourselves if we are only bodies. How could a strictly material body think...
A conflict of Christian visions: Gen. 1-2 vs. Gen. 3 Christianity
There are two prominent schools of thought within conservative Protestant circles that continue to clash over what Christianity is about because their starting prise different biblical theological visions. I use the word “prominent” here because I fully recognize that there are other more nuanced voices in the Christian diaspora. No “binaries” or “false dichotomies” are intended here. This is simply a distinction between the two dominant voices in a choir of others. One begins by constructing an understanding of the...
Dispersing Poor People And Crime
Emily Badger at The Atlantic Wire posts mon sense story regarding the debate about whether or not the dispersing of poor people out of inner-city housing projects into suburban neighborhoods, through government housing voucher programs, increases crime rates. The article reflects recent research by Michael Lens, an assistant professor of urban planning at UCLA. A growing stack of research now supports [the] hypothesis that housing vouchers do not in fact lead to crime. Lens has just added another study to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved