Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
EU funds ‘the largest source of corruption in Central and Eastern Europe’
EU funds ‘the largest source of corruption in Central and Eastern Europe’
Apr 26, 2025 12:26 AM

A significant fact lies buried inside MEP Richard Sulik’s report on how subsidiarity could save the European Union: EU programs are reinforcing the very Communist-era behaviors they are intended to eradicate. Taxpayer-funded grants from the European Union are fueling cronyism and corruption, especially in its newest and most vulnerable member states.

EU funds inflict the worst corrupting of the political process in former Communist countries, Sulik, an MEP from Slovakia, writes:

Despite the good intention, European funds have e the largest source of corruption in Central and Eastern Europe, from the local level up to the political elite. Due to corruption, resources within the EU are reallocated through the funds in a very inefficient way.

His report highlights two continental programs, in particular: the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) and the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI).

The ESIF is supposed to drive and direct investment throughout Europe as part of its €351.8 billion “cohesion policy,” which turns most of Eastern Europe into net beneficiaries of EU largesse. But Sulik notes:

The problem with this idea is that every single euro invested by ESIF funds into the economy must first be taken out of the economy through taxes. The private sector is then left with fewer resources for its own investments. Decisions on investments from ESIF funds, including those going into the private sector, are made by bureaucrats in the ministries, which leads to distortions of the market environment, selective favouritism of panies, and considerable inefficiency in spending. (Emphasis added.)

In a similar vein:

The EFSI petition on the market, it cannot and does not create new investments and does not support the private sector as a whole. It merely diverts investments, which would have otherwise been created by the private sector, to areas chosen and approved by bureaucrats.

Thus, contract-seekers strive to sway government administratorsand, human nature being what it is, they do not always limit themselves to legal or ethical methods.

Sulik’s findings corroborate numerous other studies about the role EU funds play in enhancinggraft and bribery. For instance, the Corruption Research Centre Budapest (CRCB)foundin 2013 that “EU funds in CEE [Central and Eastern Europe] deteriorate the quality of government and increase corruption.” Transparency Internationaldiscoveredthat, while corruption is rare in Western Europe, bribery rates range as high as 42 percent in Moldova, 34 percent in Albania, 29 percent in Romania, and 24 percent in Lithuania.

As a result, taxpayers in all 27 EU member states shoulder a heavier tax burden than necessary.The Economistreportedthat corruption increased the cost of EU contracts by $5 billion a year. That further diverts productive capital – or family savings – away from useful (and self-directed) goals. It takes money from struggling families munities and places it into the pockets of the well-connected.

However, corruption’s greatest toll is extracted from the justice system. Susan Rose-Ackerman has written that, in a crony or corporatist system of government, “[o]nly those who already have a close trusting relationship with government officials and politicians may enter the bidding.” (Quoted inA Theory of Corruptionby Osvaldo Shenone and Samuel Gregg.)

Thus, EU funds have the opposite of a democratizing effect. They act as a magnet, enticing government figures to engage in bribery with vendors (or vice-versa) in exchange for contracts. Naturally, this violates numerousscriptural injunctionsagainst bribery, as well as classical notions of justice. (For more on the latter, seeShenone and Gregg.) Favoritism violates that Biblical precept that all human beings are endowed with equal dignity and thus deserve an impartial rendering of justice based on their actions.

Yet Sulik’s conclusion will be familiar to those from nations, like his own, that so recently labored under the yoke of Marxism. The greater the level of government intervention in society, the more the weak must curry favor with the powerful. In a Communist system, where the State directs all economic activity, corruption es pandemic.

The ground for bribery is never more fertile than when one’s survival, and that of one’s family, depends upon the sufferance of politicians, bureaucrats, and functionaries.

“Communism created structural incentives for engaging in corrupt behaviors, which became such a widespread fact of life that they became rooted in the culture in these societies,” according to a 2005articlein theInternational Review of Sociology. “The transitions toward democracy and market economies have not yet erased this culture of corruption.”

Far from eliminating this blight, the EU’s pursuit of an“ever-closer union”is making things worse.

Sableman. CC BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
How to Love Liberty More Than a Libertarian Economist
I have a deep and abiding love for liberty—which is why I find myself so often in disagreement with libertarians. Libertarians love liberty too, of course, but they tend to love liberty a bit differently. I love liberty in an earthy, elemental way. I love liberty because I need it—like I need air and food—for human flourishing. In contrast, the libertarians I’ve encountered tend to love liberty primarily as an abstraction. Indeed, the most ideologically consistent libertarians I know seem...
Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Threat to Freedom
Over at the Liberty Law Blog, there is an excellent post titled “Ronald Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Dialogue of Liberty” by Alan Snyder. Snyder delves into the influence Chambers had on Reagan and how their worldviews differed as well. Many conservatives and scholars felt Chambers’ prediction that the West was on the losing side of history in the battle against Marxism collapsed after the fall of the Iron Curtain and the Soviet Union. For many, the ideas of Chambers...
Italy’s Tax Man Takes Aim at the Vatican
Kishore Jayabalan, the Acton Institute’s Rome office director, was interviewed by the Zenit news agency in an article titled, “Is Taxing the Church a Real Solution for Italy?” In the article, Jayabalan discusses the history of the Italian state and its imposition of property taxes on the Roman Catholic Church’s land holdings, residences and non-profit businesses. Sometimes in the past, particularly under Napoleonic rule and before the Lateran Pacts, the institution of property tax was often a subject of state...
Constitutional Cases and the Four Cardinal Virtues
Should virtue be a consideration in judicial decisionmaking? Indiana Law Professor R. George Wright makes an intriguing argument for why the four cardinal virtues could be useful in interpreting constitutional cases: Judges typically decide constitutional cases by referring to one or more legal precedents, rules, tests, principles, doctrines, or policies. This Article mends supplementing this standard approach with fully legitimate and appropriate attention to what many cultures have long recognized as the four basic cardinal virtues of practical wisdom or...
Obamacare’s Religious Rubes
The White House has a plan to mobilize prayer vigils in front of the Supreme Court in defense of Obamacare. It was reported that the administration met with leaders at non-profit organizations and religious officials who support the new health care law. The court takes up the constitutional test of the health care mandate in a couple of weeks. The mandate has now been challenged in 26 states. Cue the same stale big government religious prophets who confuse statism and...
Let’s Change Hearts and Minds (and Laws, Too)
Few clichés are so widespread within the evangelical subculture, says Matthew Lee Anderson, as the notion that our witness must be one of “changing hearts and minds.” In careful hands, the idea is at best ambiguous. At worst it reinforces the sort of interior-oriented individualism that allows for and perpetuates a blissful naivete about how institutions and structures shape our dispositions and thoughts. In less than careful hands, the phrase drives a wedge between law and culture by attempting to...
Lord Acton and the Power of the Historian
Looking through my back stacks of periodicals the other day I ran across a review in Books & Culture by David Bebbington, “Macaulay in the Dock,” of a recent biography of Thomas Babington Macaulay. The essay takes its point of departure in Lord Acton’s characterization of Macaulay as “one of the greatest of all writers and masters, although I think him utterly base, contemptible and odious.” As Bebbington writes, “Acton, a towering intellectual of the later 19th century, was at...
Integral Human Development
The Journal of Markets & Morality is planning a theme issue for the Spring of 2013: “Integral Human Development,” i.e. the synthesis of human freedom and responsibility necessary for the material and spiritual enrichment of human life. According to Pope Benedict XVI, Integral human development presupposes the responsible freedom of the individual and of peoples: no structure can guarantee this development over and above human responsibility. (Caritas in Veritate 17) There is a delicate balance between the material and the...
Is Work a Curse?
Is work a curse, a result of mankind’s fall from grace? Not according to the Book of Genesis. As Hugh Whelchel, Executive Director of the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, explains, what Adam was called to do in the garden is what we are still called to do in our work today: Humanity was created by God to cultivate and keep God’s creation, which included developing it and protecting it. You see, we were created to be stewards of...
How to Steal a Bike in New York City
Edmund Burke didn’t really say it, but it still rings true: All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. In a test of this maxim, filmmaker Casey Neistat tries to steal his own bike in several locations around New York City and finds that most people do nothing about it—even when it’s done right in front of a police station. I recently spent a couple of days conducting a bike theft experiment, which...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved