Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Erasing the cross: Public vs. private sector
Erasing the cross: Public vs. private sector
Mar 16, 2026 1:00 PM

The European discount grocery chain Lidl stirred controversy by removing the cross from its products’ labels, so as not to give offense. Eagle-eyed consumers noticed that Eirdanous, its Greek food line, featured a picture of a blue-domed Greek Orthodox Church by the sea – but unlike every other such church, its cupola was not topped by a cross. pany Photoshopped the symbol of Christ’s victory over death and Hell off of the Anastasi(in Greek, literally, “resurrection”) Church inSantorini.

Perhaps to its surprise, the move created a massive backlash against the grocery giant, which generated $102 billion in sales in the last fiscal year. pany responded that it “respects diversity” and “avoid[s] the use of religious symbols on our packaging to maintain neutrality in all religions.” However, Gregorios, the Greek Orthodox archbishop of Thyateira and Great Britain, called the decision “immoral,” adding, “I hope that many others will protest against this silly decision.” Many consumers have taken to Lidl’s Facebook page to do just that.

Among the critics, Prague’s Catholic archbishop, Cardinal Dominik Duka, has proven most prescient. “So far, ‘only’ falsification of photos occurs, but there are the fears that soon real crosses may be removed,” he wrote in a letter to the Greek ambassador to the Czech Republic. (The same letter showed his appreciation of Greek culture and cognizance of its place in the West, stating, “Our European civilization is created by a number of roots, with Greek democracy and philosophy being one of the most important ones.”) Contemporary events show how right he is.

The cross and the Berlin Palace

At the same time, a public debate roils Germany over plans to rebuild the historic Berlin Palace, known as the Stadtschloss. The fifteenth-century landmark was ordered destroyed by the Socialist Unity Party of Germany in 1950 after receiving extensive damage during World War II. Authorities rebuilt it for the first time in the 1970s. After having served as the East German parliamentary building, the asbestos-laden structure was demolished in 2009.

The city’s plans to rebuild the structure a second time to house the Humboldt Forum, a cultural institution modeled after the British Museum. Those designs have caused a nationwide row.

The reason? The original structure was topped with a golden cross, which some Germans do not want restored.

Critics say a Christian symbol would be inappropriate on a building intended to showcase the artifacts of multiple world cultures. The city’s atheists proposed replacing the cross with a microscope, the emblem of science’s triumph over religion.

But replacing history with the prevailing zeitgeist has had painful consequences in the past, as when the cross atop Wartburg Castle was briefly replaced…with a swastika. The coalition to preserve historic memory has united unlikely partners. “The cross belongs on the cupola, because the building has a historical context and that’s related to Christianity,” said Aiman Mazyek, who chairs the Central Council of Muslimsin Germany.

Its defenders say that Christian influence is inseparable from the German spirit. Culture Ministry Monika Grütters, a conservative, told Die Welt, “Our culture of openness, freedom, and sympathy with others has its roots in our Christian ideas of humanity.” The Christian spirit led the early church to preserve ancient treasures, including pagan literature, often repurposing or reimagining them in the process.

As a Christian, it pains me to see the cross of Jesus Christ subjected to the same debate in Europe as the Confederate flag and statues of Klansmen in this country. Unlike those symbols, the cross has built, rather than destroyed, civilizations. The Catholic historian Christopher Dawson described how the restless spirit of Christianity leavened and vivified every facet of Western culture. “In the West the spiritual power has not been immobilized in a sacred social order like the Confucian state in China and the Indian caste system,” he wrote. “It has acquired social freedom and autonomy, and consequently its activity has not been confined to the religious sphere but has had far-reaching effects on every aspect of social and intellectual life.” Even more than philosophy and democracy, Western civilization is inconceivable apart from Christianity.

How themarket solves social tensions

Of these two cultural flashpoints, the Lidl brouhaha is more likely to resolve peacefully for one reason: As a marketing issue, it places power in the hands of the consumer. Czech Agriculture Minister Marian Jurecka summarized the solution by saying the people can decide for themselves “whether to support the campaign … [by] shopping there this week,” or abstaining from shopping at Lidl.

The image of the cross was unlikely to offend Greeks. A Pew poll released in February found that of all European nations, in Greece alone did a majority agree that being Christian is a “very important” part of national identity. (The percentage is 32 percent in America.) Another poll found that more than 10-times as many people were offended by Lidl’s campaign as supported it. By Friday, some of pany’s employees seemed to get the message. Lidl’s Czech Republic spokeswoman Zuzana Holá said, “We apologize for this incident, and you may be sure that we shall learn from this mistake.”

Any campaign appealing for consumers’ dollars must cater to their sensibilities. If Lidl does not respond, Christians can patronize another brand. The market gives the buyer ultimate power to align consumption with his or her values.

The fate of the Berlin Palace, on the other hand, remains clouded. As a political decision, it will be made largely outside the purview of the public. Its future will be hostage to bureaucratic regulations, the influence of politically powerful coalitions, and the whims of central planners. The public role heightens conflict, as only one group can prevail.

If the West is wise, it mit the greatest number of decisions possible to consumers, especially fractious culture wars over symbolic interpretation. Each person can then decide whether he finds the cross of Christ inviting or exclusionary. Social tensions will ebb, and individual utility will increase. And the holy cross will continue to be a sign of contradiction in the world.

(Photo credit of Anastasi Church: George M. Groutas.CC BY 2.0. Berlin Castle: Public domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The 3 most important things today (so far): Asia Bibi, Royal baby, Hayek birthday
This morning three events took place that deserve the attention of those who support a free and virtuous society: Persecuted Christian Asia Bibi has received asylum in Canada, the royal baby’s name has been revealed, and it is the birthday of one of the greatest economic theorists of our time. 1. Asia Bibi arrives safely in Canada Asia Bibi, the Pakistani convert to Christianity who spent years on death row for “blasphemy,” has arrived safely in Canada to be with...
German churches will lose half their members in 40 years: Report
The membership of the Roman Catholic and Lutheran churches will fall by half in Germany by 2060, experts forecast. Most of that will be due less to Germans’ low birth rate than to Christians actively renouncing their religion. The number of Catholics and Lutherans will drop from 45 million today to 22.7 million in a generation, according to a new missioned by the Catholic German Bishops Conference and the Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD). The writing has been on the...
How can Christians shift moral consensus?
“Moral Consensus is a great goal for the moral fabric of a nation, except for one slight problem,” says Kyle Ferguson, “moral consensus tends to shift over time.” How then do Christians shift the moral consensus back in our direction? Fersuson argues that the answer lies in the gospel: Debate is a start but it will be ineffective to bring about moral change. Politics will certainly fail as has been demonstrated time and time again over the last century. The...
Why capital markets matter
Of all the ponents of a market economy, I don’t think that any are as misunderstood — or reviled — as capital markets. They have never been held in high esteem, and the financial crisis of 2008 did enormous damage to their already low reputation. Yes, there has been, is, and will be considerable bad behavior in financial markets. That also happens to be true of all sectors of the economy. I also know that without capital markets, all of...
How we benefit from billionaires
mon claim made by those who focus on economic inequality is that if business people have acquired massive wealth they must have done so at the expense of others. The solution, they claim, would be a tax on wealth that allows could be redistributed to the working poor. A key problem with this line of thinking is that the business rich aren’t as rich as we may assume. The reality, as economist Timothy Terrell explains, is that most business wealth...
When the Fed does too much
Note: This is post #122 in a weekly video series on basic economics. If you think through all of the variables that shape a country’s economy, it’s no wonder that monetary policy is difficult, says economist Alex Tabarrok. It should e as no surprise that the Federal Reserve doesn’t always get it right. In fact, sometimes the Fed’s actions have made the economy worse off. Prior to the Great Recession, and in response to the recession of 2001, the Fed...
Catholic ‘anti-liberalism’ – a response to Dan Hugger
My colleague Dan Hugger’s latest post on the PowerBlog titled “The dangers of Catholic anti-liberalism” got me thinking about a subject that has always intrigued me: The relationship between the Catholic Church and liberalism. In my view, there are at least two problems in the argument presented by Hugger in his article and the discussion developed by Korey D. Maas on anti-Catholicism—fully adopted by Hugger. In the first place, there is no precise definition of the nature of liberalism, and...
Acton Line podcast: Andrew Klavan tackles AOC propaganda film; Rev. Robert Sirico on religious left
On the episode of Acton Line, Andrew Klavan, award winning novelist, screenwriter, and regular host at the Daily Wire, joins the show to talk about the new Netflix documentary, “Knock Down the House.” The new political documentary follows four far left-leaning women during their run for congress in 2018, eventually leading up to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s congressional win. Klavan explains the ideas under girding the movie and why he defines it as propaganda. After that, Acton’s co-founder and president, Rev. Robert...
7 quotations: John Lukacs on capitalism, racism, bureaucracy, and faith
John Lukacs, the renowned historian who munist tyranny in his native Hungary in 1946, passed away this morning at the age of 95. Lukacs was born Lukacs Janos Albert on January 31, 1924, to a Roman Catholic father and a Jewish mother and raised in the Catholic faith. After settling in the United States, he taught at Chestnut Hill College for 48 years, chairing the college’s history department for 27 years. He wrote more than 30 books dealing munism, fascism,...
Is behavioral economics blind to its blindness?
I find some of the work of behavioral economists, especially that of Daniel Kahneman to be very interesting and important. Thinking Fast and Slow is essential reading. His distinctions between what he calls Type I and Type II thinking is very insightful, and the broad critique that human beings don’t always act like rational maximizers is a correct. Jennifer Roback Morse deals with this issue well in her excellent book, Love and Economics. Yet despite many good elements of behavioral...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved