Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Elizabeth Warren’s universal child care proposal: What you need to know
Elizabeth Warren’s universal child care proposal: What you need to know
Jan 24, 2026 9:08 PM

Senator Elizabeth Warren unveiled a plan for universal child care, to be funded by a national wealth tax, late Monday night. Here are the facts you need to know.

What are the details of Warren’s universal child care proposal?

The program’s funding formula resembles ObamaCare for preschool. Warren’s “Universal Child Care and Early Learning Act” would provide daycare services “from birth to school entry” by creating a federally regulated system of “Child Care and Early Learning Centers” and “Family Child Care Homes.”

Families that earn up to twice the poverty level, or approximately $51,200 for a family of four, can access the preschools “free” (or, more accurately, for no cost at the point of service). Parents who exceed those guidelines would pay a sliding fee, but no home could spend more than seven percent of its e on child care.

Elizabeth Warren believes government-funded child care is a “right.”

“High-quality child care should be a right for all of our children and not just a privilege that only the wealthiest families can afford,”said Senator Warren.

Warren estimates this will double the number of children in child care.

Approximately 6.8 million children are currently in child care. An analysis provided by Sen. Warren forecasts, “The proposal would ensure an estimated 12 million children, equal to 60% of those younger than 5, will ultimately receive formal care.” That includes an estimated “8.8 million kids in families below 200% of the federal poverty line [who] would receive free child care.”

How much will it cost, and how will it be funded?

Warren estimates her universal child care program will cost at least $700 billion over 10 years. It will be funded by her proposed wealth tax, which would impose a two percent tax on anyone with an estimated wealth of $50 million, or three percent for those with net assets of more than $1 billion. The tax’s advocates forecast it will raise $2.75 trillion over 10 years. However, their estimates assume the tax will have no impact on economic activity. The wealth tax will likely be struck down as an unconstitutional direct tax.

Does every dollar invested in child care return more than $7 in return?

Proponents of universal child care claim such programs save $7.16 for every dollar invested by reducing the participants’ crime and unemployment rates. These claims are based on two unrepresentative studies: The Perry Preschool Project conducted in Ypsilanti, Michigan, in 1962 and the Abecedarian Program in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 10 years later. The projects – which involved a mere 115 students in the treatment groups (58 at Perry, 57 at Abecedarian) – went well beyond typical daycare by providing weekly in-home visits, individualized programs, even personal nutritional augmentation. “[P]roponents of government preschool programs continue to appeal to findings from 50 years ago that have never been replicated,” concluded Heritage Foundation expert Lindsey Burke.

More typical child care scenarios show increased aggression and anti-social behavior, especially among boys, and flatlined or decreased education levels.

Children in out-of-home daycare fare worse than those raised at the home.

Multiple studies agree with a 2005 analysis that children raised at home by a parent fare better than those raised at home by another relative, who fare better than those raised in an external child care facility.

Numerous studies have found that children who attended child care facilities have higher levels of aggression, hyperactivity, stress, cortisol levels, behavioral issues, impulse control, and poorer physical health. Moreover, the quality of care in the facility seems not to matter much.

These non-cognitive problems increase the more time a child spends in child care and last into adolescence. “The more time children spent in any of a variety of nonmaternal care arrangements across the first 4.5 years of life, the more externalizing problems and conflict with adults they manifested at 54 months of age and in kindergarten, as reported by mothers, caregivers, and teachers,” researchers discovered in a 2003 study. “More time in care not only predicted problem behavior and at-risk levels of problem behavior … as well as assertiveness, disobedience, and aggression.”

This sometimes includes criminal behavior. An analysis of Quebec’s government-funded universal child care found that participants were 4.6 percent more likely to be convicted of a crime, or 17 percent more likely to be convicted of a drug crime.

Some studies find children in universal child care programs fare worse academically.

Studies of the Head Start program have long found any advantages fade out no later than third grade. This is true of universal child care programs, as well. “In August 2013, Vanderbilt University released an evaluation demonstrating that children who went through Tennessee’s Voluntary Pre-K (TN-VPK) Program actually performed worse on cognitive tasks at the end of first grade than did the control group,” noted Burke.

Most women would prefer to raise their children inside their own home.

Gallup has “consistently found that the majority of working mothers would prefer to stay at home and take care of their house and family.” Pew found 80 percent of Americans believe the ideal situation is for one parent not to work (44 percent) or to work part time (36 percent).

Warren’s universal child care proposal would roughly double daycare workers’ salaries – and increase operational licensing laws.

Warren’s proposal stipulates pensation (wages and benefits) for child care workers parable to those of similarly-credentialed local public school teachers.” The average salary of daycare workers is $23,760, and preschool teachers is $33,590. The average public school teacher’s salary was $59,660 in the 2016-2017 school year, according to the NEA. But as the Department of Education states, pensation is more than salary. It is a valuable total package that includes salary, extra pay, benefits, and pension.” Adding this brings the average teacher’s pensation to $87,854, according to Jim Agresti of . Teachers also work an average of 37 or 38 weeks a year, 37 percent fewer hours than those in the private sector, raising their pensation for a full year to $120,578.

The proposal would likely raise costs.

Warren’s press materials claim, “The typical American family with young children currently paying for formal care would see their annual child-care costs decline by 17% to less than $6,000 per year” – an average drop of $1,200 a year, or $100 a month. Barack Obama similarly claimed the Affordable Care Act would reduce insurance premiums by $2,500; instead, premiums rose 105 percent from 2013 to 2017. As noted, the two programs share a similar payment structure. Moreover, massively increasing enrollment and teacher pay is unlikely to hold prices down. Rising costs mean that mothers, who previously did not need federal subsidies, cannot do without them.

Does child care cost more than college tuition?

Randi Weingarten of the American Federation of Teachers said that “child care is more expensive than the cost of college tuition in 28 states.” Yet an analysis of Warren’s plan by Moody Analytics states, “The typical household that has child-care expenses spent $7,200 per year, equal to approximately 10% of their e.” Tuition and fees at four-year public universities average $10,230 in the U.S., according to the College Board.

Targeted interventions would have greater impact at lower cost.

Some studies of universal child care programs in Germany and Georgia find benefits for at-risk children, especially immigrants. A program targeting this demographic could have all of the benefits, and fewer of the side effects, at a much smaller cost.

What does the Constitution say about this federal program?

“The federal government has no constitutional authority to enact a universal preschool program,” notes the Cato Handbook for Policymakers.

Why should people of faith care about this proposal?

Children flourish when raised in a loving home by one of their own parents. This is also the natural and scriptural pattern. “Parents have the first responsibility for the education of their children,” according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church. “Following the principle of subsidiarity, munities should take care not to usurp the family’s prerogatives or interfere in its life.”

While a national child care program hardly creates a totalitarian state, replacing the family with the state has been the dream of statists from Plato to Karl Marx.

Warren’s universal child care program is a step towards a literal cradle-to-grave welfare state that will impose steep costs – both economic and emotional. And the well-being of children is too high a price to pay.

Kimmel. This photo has been cropped. CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Audio: Victor Claar on whether Trump’s budget is un-Christian
Victor Claar speaks at Acton University On Saturday, Victor Claar, Professor of Economics at Henderson State University and Affiliate Scholar at the Acton Institute, joins host Julie Roys and Jenny Eaton Dyer of Hope Through Healing Hands on Moody Radio’sUp For Debateto discuss how Christians should respond to President Trump’s first budget proposal, especially as it relates to proposed cuts in US foreign aid. Dyer argues that Christians should be deeply concerned about the proposed cuts, while Claar argues that...
Acton books distributed to schools by Theological Book Network
The Acton Institute recently donated a number of titles on faith, work, and economics to the Theological Book Network which will distribute them to its partner institutions in what it calls the ‘Majority World’ (‘Majority World’ is a term coined to replace earlier sometimes anachronistic or misleading terms like ‘Third World’ or ‘Developing World’). The Theological Book Network is a Grand Rapids based non-profit, mitted to the creation and development of Majority World leaders by providing access to educational resources...
Why J.D. Vance is bringing venture capital to the Rust Belt
As Americans continue to face the disruptive effects of economic change, whether from technology, trade, or globalization, many have wondered how we might preserve or revivethe regions that have suffered most. For progressives and populists alike, the solutions are predictably focused on a menu of government interventions, from trade barriers to wage minimums to salary caps to a range of regulatory constraints. For conservatives and libertarians, the debate has less to do with policy and more to do with the...
Humans care about economic fairness, not economic inequality
A new study published in the science journal Nature Human Behaviour finds that in most situation people are unconcerned about economic inequality as long as distributions of wealth are fair: There is immense concern about economic inequality, both among the munity and in the general public, and many insist that equality is an important social goal. However, when people are asked about the ideal distribution of wealth in their country, they actually prefer unequal societies. We suggest that these two...
More than compassion needed for Europe’s refugees
“Irrespective of the political forces at play,” says Trey Dimsdale in this week’s Acton Commentary, “there is no arguing with the fact that such a large number of displaced immigrants presents a monumental humanitarian crisis in which survival es the initial, but not final, concern.” Prior to 2014, fewer than 300,000 refugees and migrants arrived in the European Union each year. Due to war and unrest in the Middle East and North Africa, that relatively slow trickle more than quadrupled...
Samuel Gregg on the fracturing of France
With the first round of the French election results in, and no major candidates even managing to get a quarter of the total votes, two candidates remain: Marine Le Pen of the National Front, a populist and nationalist party, and Emmanuel Macron, the center-Left candidate of the “En Marche!” (“On Our Way”) political party. Samuel Gregg covers the current politically disjointed state of Francein a new article for First Things. He maintains an attitude of skepticism and uncertainty towards France’s...
Marine Le Pen’s economics unite populist Right and far-Left
Emmanuel Macron may have won the first round of the French presidential elections on Sunday, but Marine Le Pen won a political victory of her own. The statist undercurrent running through her nationalist and populist policies successfully bridged the gap between France’s “far-Right” and socialist Left, according to Marco Respinti in a new essay for Religion & Liberty Transatlantic. Mainstream French politicians have sought bine disparate ideological strands since at least Charles de Gaulle, who presented his foreign policy as...
Remembering Kate O’Beirne
Longtime Acton Institute friend and supporter Kate O’Beirne passed away this past weekend. Below are Father Robert Sirico’s thoughts on this plished woman: I feel like I have always known Kate O’Beirne, so the passing of this woman of keen intellect, sharp wit and fearless rhetoric in confronting the nostrums of our day leaves me feeling very, very sad. It is painfully sad to think that the occasions of sharing National Review cruises or panel discussions with her or having...
Price Controls and Communism
Note: This is post #30 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. What happens when price controls are used munist countries? As Alex Tabarrok explains, all of the effects of price controls e amplified: there are even more shortages or surpluses of goods, lower product quality, longer lines and more search costs, more losses in gains from trade, and more misallocation of resources. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them at 1.5...
Taxes on unhealthy food do nothing but hurt the poor
Throughout history, societies have found peculiar ways to reinforce social hierarchies and class-based discrimination. mon way is to prohibit certain social classes from being able to purchase a good. These types of laws that regulate permitted consumption of particular goods and services are known as sumptuary laws. A prime example is the 16th-century French law that banned anyone but princes from wearing velvet. Modern America is mitted to the appearance of egalitarianism to make laws that directly ban poor people...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved