Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Earth Day and Asceticism
Earth Day and Asceticism
Jul 11, 2025 11:59 PM

It is ing mon for theologians to mend asceticism as a more eco-friendly lifestyle, as Fr. Michael Butler and Andrew Morriss note in their recent monograph, Creation and the Heart of Man. And that, no doubt, it can be.

However, as Butler and Morriss point out, it is very important, from an Orthodox perspective at least, to understand precisely what asceticism is. Rightly understood, they note, “to be ascetic is to learn to live rightly on the earth with God, our neighbor, and creation.”

They continue,

The ascetical tradition of the Orthodox Church includes many practices: prayer, fasting, almsgiving, keeping vigil, inter alia. They are the active part of the spiritual life, our voluntary cooperation with the grace of God. As such, it is important that we not be tempted to use the ascetical practices of the Church for ends they were not designed to serve. Thus, we need to be careful of “environmental consciousness” masquerading as authentic spiritual practice.

Similarly, at The Federalist today Jordan Ballor warns of the dangers of having a misconstrued view of the natural world: “The natural world is not, on the Christian view, simply a wilderness to be preserved but is instead both a garden to be cultivated and a city to be constructed.”

Again, Butler and Morriss emphasize that true asceticism transforms our relationships to God, our neighbors, and the world. But how does it do this? What would an authentically ascetic outlook toward the world look like?

Asceticism, as I have written elsewhere, follows a logic of life, death, and resurrection. That is, we first must know ourselves, then deny ourselves, then we find ourselves transformed, risen to new life.

As Pope St. Leo the Great put it in a sermon on Easter,

when a man is changed by some process from one thing into another, not to be what he was is to him an ending, and to be what he was not is a beginning. But the question is, to what a man either dies or lives: because there is a death, which is the cause of living, and there is a life, which is the cause of dying.

The ascetic and sacramental life of the Church is that “death, which is the cause of living.” Crucified and risen with Christ through the sacraments, through asceticism we put our own wills to death daily that we might rise daily to new heights of love.

“[W]hoever loses his life for my sake,” says Jesus, “will find it” (Matthew 16:25). There is a sort of spiritual self-destruction involved in asceticism, a denial of every thought, conception, desire, fear, and so on, in order that they all would be rightly ordered toward God and what is God’s will of love for our neighbor and the world. As a result, we are better able to approach our neighbors in loving service and better able to approach the world with a disposition of thankfulness and a desire not simply to preserve it, as Ballor has noted, but to be cultivated for both the kingdom of God and mon good.

As such, if we are to apply the logic of asceticism to our engagement with the natural world, it ought to mirror the way in which we cultivate our own selves. As scandalous as it may sound, in order to make the world a better place, we must destroy it as it is. That is, to quote St. Leo again, just as “when a man is changed by some process from one thing into another, not to be what he was is to him an ending, and to be what he was not is a beginning,” so also to make the worldbetter, we must not fear its destruction but rather destroy it, so-to-speak, in such a way that it rises anew.

For example, think of all the materials used to make a single solar cell:

Industrial photovoltaic solar cells are made of monocrystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon, amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride or copper indium selenide/sulfide, or GaAs-based multijunction material systems.

Silicon, to look at only the monly used material, is mined from sand. Sand mining has its own ecological consequences:

Sand mining is a direct cause of erosion, and also impacts the local wildlife.[2] For example, sea turtles depend on sandy beaches for their nesting, and sand mining has led to the near extinction of gharials (a species of crocodiles) in India. Disturbance of underwater and coastal sand causes turbidity in the water, which is harmful for such organisms as corals that need sunlight. It also destroys fisheries, causing problems for people who rely on fishing for their livelihoods.

This, of course, does not even factor in the tools and vehicles used in the mining process, which likely run on fossil fuels. Furthermore, silicon must be refined to be usable. We could add as well numerous opportunity costs and the ultimate net cost of solar pared to other forms of energy, many of which are far more affordable for the worlds poor, as I have noted in the past.

The point of this, however, is not to say that solar panels are actually ecologically evil. As Ballor pointed out, “Not all fuels are created equal, but there is a continuum rather than a dichotomy between more or less clean, sustainable, and affordable sources of energy.” Rather I simply point out that all cultivation of the earth requires some destruction of the earth and its ecosystems.

This Earth Day, as many no doubt will amp up their activism for their favorite method of environmental care, I would pose the following ascetic question: Is our destruction of the earth transformative — for the glory of God, the good of our neighbor, and the care of creation — or is it ultimately wasteful or, worse, harmful?

This does not leave us in a place to make simplistic pontifications in the rhetoric good vs. evil, but, asked continually, it would make us more prudent stewards of God’s creation. As Butler and Morriss write,

A steward’s task is much harder than either digging up every last lump of coal or refraining from touching any of it. In entrusting us with responsibility for the natural world, God gave us opportunities to exercise judgment, not a simplistic recipe. While life would surely be simpler if he asked less of us, it would leave us as less than he intended us to be.

Christ is risen! May we, and the earth with us, die and rise with him daily to newness of life.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
One More Reason the Government Shouldn’t Subsidize Ethanol
Excerpts from Clifford Krauss’ article in the New York Times (cross-posted at )… The ethanol boom of recent years — which spurred a frenzy of distillery construction, record corn prices, rising food prices and hopes of a new future for rural America — may be fading. Only last year, farmers here spoke of a biofuel gold rush, and they rejoiced as prices for ethanol and the corn used to produce it set records. panies and farm cooperatives have built so...
Faith, Funding, and Substance Abuse
Why might there be “increasing participation by religious organizations in offering substance abuse treatment funded by federal government vouchers”? Perhaps because, at least in part, “A program’s faith element relates to the people they serve and the type of help they provide, as programs with more explicit and mandatory faith-related elements are likely to be substance-abuse programs.” Thus, the more explicitly faith-filled substance abuse programs will increasingly face a special temptation to take federal funds for such purposes. And this...
C.S. Lewis vs. Sigmund Freud
Awhile back, I finished reading Armand Nicholi’s book, The Question of God: C.S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud debate God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life. Dr. Nicholi is an associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard and has taught a seminar on Freud & Lewis at Harvard for the past 35 years. The course eventually led to this book and a PBS series by the same name. The book is an interesting read for anyone modestly interested in one or...
The Uniqueness of Christian Ecology – Abundance
"Here is a boy with five small barley loaves and two small fish, but how far will they go among so many?" [John 6:9] Among all the many good things going on last weekend in Boise, I (and a few others) noticed something a bit disconcerting. The way many of the topics were covered shows how prone Christians are to being consumed by doom and gloom messages of scarcity and lack and overpopulation and an "ever smaller earth." While it’s...
Positive Freedom and Paternal Government
A quote from T. H. Green, refuting the view that the law’s “only business is to prevent interference with the liberty of the individual,” construed as doing what you like as long as it does not infringe on others’ rights to do what they want. Green writes: The true ground of objection to ‘paternal government’ is not that it violates the ‘laissez faire’ principle and conceives that its office is to make people good, to promote morality, but that it...
Clarence Thomas Interviews
You are probably aware by now that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has published a memoir. The interview-avoiding judge has lately been giving, as Kathryn Jean Lopez puts it, “a lifetime of interviews.” Given the controversy surrounding his public life since his nomination to the Court, not much remains to be said about him, good or bad, that has not already been said. Suffice it to say that I draw attention to him now because: 1) My own view is...
Patterson Stops Too Short In Jena Six New York Times Piece
Orlando Patterson, professor of sociology at Harvard University, penned a challenging piece on Jena 6 and our current racial tensions. I have learned much from Patterson over the years. For example, he was the first person to help me realize that we often confuse issues of race and class in America by assuming the race as the single variable accounting for the cyclical plight of poor blacks. In a September 30th New York Times op-ed piece Patterson rightly says that...
Two Perspectives on Climate Change
These two brief essays provide a good juxtaposition of two perspectives that view immediate and mandated action to reduce carbon emissions as either morally obligatory or imprudent. For the former, see Vaclav Havel’s, “Our Moral Footprint,” which states rhetorically, “It is also obvious from published research that human activity is a cause of change; we just don’t know how big its contribution is. Is it necessary to know that to the last percentage point, though? By waiting for incontrovertible precision,...
Mugabe: Rotten from the Start
An interesting article in the Los Angeles Times detailing how badly wrong Robert Mugabe’s supporters in the West have been from the very beginning (requires “free” registration; may I suggest BugMeNot?): From the beginning of his political career, Mugabe was not just a Marxist but one who repeatedly made clear his intention to run Zimbabwe as an authoritarian, one-party state. Characteristic of this historical revisionism is former Newsweek southern Africa correspondent Joshua Hammer, writing recently in the liberal Washington Monthly...
Pentecostalism, Poverty, and the Global South
Related to last week’s post about Reformed education and Pentecostalism, I point you to this post by Rod Dreher, who discusses his interview with Josiah Idowu-Fearon, the Anglican Archbishop of Kaduna state in Nigeria. Dreher relates the following: Pentecostalism is growing like wildfire, but there’s less to it than you might think. He said that in many cases, people are drawn to the emotional experience, and can tell you exactly when they gave their life to Jesus — but can’t...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved