Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Earth Day and Asceticism
Earth Day and Asceticism
Jan 27, 2026 8:57 AM

It is ing mon for theologians to mend asceticism as a more eco-friendly lifestyle, as Fr. Michael Butler and Andrew Morriss note in their recent monograph, Creation and the Heart of Man. And that, no doubt, it can be.

However, as Butler and Morriss point out, it is very important, from an Orthodox perspective at least, to understand precisely what asceticism is. Rightly understood, they note, “to be ascetic is to learn to live rightly on the earth with God, our neighbor, and creation.”

They continue,

The ascetical tradition of the Orthodox Church includes many practices: prayer, fasting, almsgiving, keeping vigil, inter alia. They are the active part of the spiritual life, our voluntary cooperation with the grace of God. As such, it is important that we not be tempted to use the ascetical practices of the Church for ends they were not designed to serve. Thus, we need to be careful of “environmental consciousness” masquerading as authentic spiritual practice.

Similarly, at The Federalist today Jordan Ballor warns of the dangers of having a misconstrued view of the natural world: “The natural world is not, on the Christian view, simply a wilderness to be preserved but is instead both a garden to be cultivated and a city to be constructed.”

Again, Butler and Morriss emphasize that true asceticism transforms our relationships to God, our neighbors, and the world. But how does it do this? What would an authentically ascetic outlook toward the world look like?

Asceticism, as I have written elsewhere, follows a logic of life, death, and resurrection. That is, we first must know ourselves, then deny ourselves, then we find ourselves transformed, risen to new life.

As Pope St. Leo the Great put it in a sermon on Easter,

when a man is changed by some process from one thing into another, not to be what he was is to him an ending, and to be what he was not is a beginning. But the question is, to what a man either dies or lives: because there is a death, which is the cause of living, and there is a life, which is the cause of dying.

The ascetic and sacramental life of the Church is that “death, which is the cause of living.” Crucified and risen with Christ through the sacraments, through asceticism we put our own wills to death daily that we might rise daily to new heights of love.

“[W]hoever loses his life for my sake,” says Jesus, “will find it” (Matthew 16:25). There is a sort of spiritual self-destruction involved in asceticism, a denial of every thought, conception, desire, fear, and so on, in order that they all would be rightly ordered toward God and what is God’s will of love for our neighbor and the world. As a result, we are better able to approach our neighbors in loving service and better able to approach the world with a disposition of thankfulness and a desire not simply to preserve it, as Ballor has noted, but to be cultivated for both the kingdom of God and mon good.

As such, if we are to apply the logic of asceticism to our engagement with the natural world, it ought to mirror the way in which we cultivate our own selves. As scandalous as it may sound, in order to make the world a better place, we must destroy it as it is. That is, to quote St. Leo again, just as “when a man is changed by some process from one thing into another, not to be what he was is to him an ending, and to be what he was not is a beginning,” so also to make the worldbetter, we must not fear its destruction but rather destroy it, so-to-speak, in such a way that it rises anew.

For example, think of all the materials used to make a single solar cell:

Industrial photovoltaic solar cells are made of monocrystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon, amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride or copper indium selenide/sulfide, or GaAs-based multijunction material systems.

Silicon, to look at only the monly used material, is mined from sand. Sand mining has its own ecological consequences:

Sand mining is a direct cause of erosion, and also impacts the local wildlife.[2] For example, sea turtles depend on sandy beaches for their nesting, and sand mining has led to the near extinction of gharials (a species of crocodiles) in India. Disturbance of underwater and coastal sand causes turbidity in the water, which is harmful for such organisms as corals that need sunlight. It also destroys fisheries, causing problems for people who rely on fishing for their livelihoods.

This, of course, does not even factor in the tools and vehicles used in the mining process, which likely run on fossil fuels. Furthermore, silicon must be refined to be usable. We could add as well numerous opportunity costs and the ultimate net cost of solar pared to other forms of energy, many of which are far more affordable for the worlds poor, as I have noted in the past.

The point of this, however, is not to say that solar panels are actually ecologically evil. As Ballor pointed out, “Not all fuels are created equal, but there is a continuum rather than a dichotomy between more or less clean, sustainable, and affordable sources of energy.” Rather I simply point out that all cultivation of the earth requires some destruction of the earth and its ecosystems.

This Earth Day, as many no doubt will amp up their activism for their favorite method of environmental care, I would pose the following ascetic question: Is our destruction of the earth transformative — for the glory of God, the good of our neighbor, and the care of creation — or is it ultimately wasteful or, worse, harmful?

This does not leave us in a place to make simplistic pontifications in the rhetoric good vs. evil, but, asked continually, it would make us more prudent stewards of God’s creation. As Butler and Morriss write,

A steward’s task is much harder than either digging up every last lump of coal or refraining from touching any of it. In entrusting us with responsibility for the natural world, God gave us opportunities to exercise judgment, not a simplistic recipe. While life would surely be simpler if he asked less of us, it would leave us as less than he intended us to be.

Christ is risen! May we, and the earth with us, die and rise with him daily to newness of life.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Virtuous Capitalism and the Financial Crisis
The Acton Institute recently hosted a conference in California with David Bahnsen and the Center for Cultural Leadership. Conference audio is now available online via YouTube. You can learn more about the event here. Listen to Rev. Sirico’s talk, “Can We Be Free Without Economic Freedom,” below. Other speakers included: Dr. P. Andrew Sandlin on “The Theological Roots of the Financial Crisis“Mr. David L. Bahnsen on “What Caused the Financial Crisis: The Left AND Right Have It Wrong” (Part I...
Prof. Hunter Baker, 2011 Novak Award recipient, featured on Research on Religion podcast
Professor Hunter Baker recently appeared on the Research on Religion podcast to discuss, among other things, his latest book, The End of Secularism. Baker’s book, like much of the podcast’s discussion, centers on the treatment of religious matters within the public square. In doing so, the podcast covers a broad range of relevant topics and is worth a listen. Baker is an associate professor of political science and the associate dean of Arts & Sciences at Union University. In recognition...
Video: Rev. Sirico on Mammon and the cultural left
In The Daily Caller, Rev. Robert A. Sirico is interviewed by Ginni Thomas about a graphic in the March/April edition of the radical magazine Adbusters mocks people who throw off all moral restraint in the pursuit of wealth. Adbusters is an anti-capitalist magazine founded by Marxist Kalle Lasn and was instrumental in fueling the similarly anti-capitalist Occupy Wall Street movement. “You notice that they are precisely the ones who don’t tell us what personal responsibilities we have,” Rev. Sirico said....
Rev. Sirico talks to Human Events about ‘Defending the Free Market’
David Harsanyi of Human Events has shared a couple of videos of Rev. Robert Sirico discussing “Paul Ryan, Ayn Rand, Jane Fonda, Obamacare and the — sometimes unseen — morality of free markets.” He also touches on the core principles of his new book, Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for a Free Economy. Part 1 Part 2 ...
Get a Free Chapter of ‘Defending the Free Market’
Acton Institute has crafted a website for Rev. Robert Sirico’s new book, Defending the Free Market. With this you can give the web address to your friends for an easy-to-remember access point to the book. Other notable things about the site include: Free introduction chapter to Defending the Free Market.List of press mentions for the book from the Acton PowerBlogA video message from Rev. Robert Sirico What are you waiting for? Find out more about Defending the Free Market at...
Rev. Sirico on Research on Religion podcast
Acton Institute president and co-founder Rev. Robert Sirico’s Research on Religion podcast went live today. In it, Rev. Sirico sits down with host Tony Gill to discuss his new book, Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for Capitalism, and a range of other topics, including the morality of capitalism, faith-based initiatives, and Austrian economics. The podcast is available to listen to or download online and regularly offers fresh perspective on relevant topics. Today’s is no exception. Check it out....
Are There Rights We Can’t Give Away?
If inalienable rights are, as many people seem to believe, rights which the government cannot take away, does it follow that government can then take away rights that are alienable? As James Rogers explains, it is no less wrong for the government to take away an “alienable” right than it is for the government to take away an “inalienable” right. The difference between the two isn’t that one can be taken away while the other cannot but that an inalienable...
When is a Catholic College Not Catholic Enough for the Government?
What happens if a Catholic college doesn’t require students to attend Mass, doesn’t engage in “indoctrination” or “proselytizing”, and hires non-Catholic faculty? As John Garvey, president of the Catholic University of America, says, the government will likely determine the school is not “Catholic” enough for religious liberty protections: There is a pattern to these cases. The government has been eager to regulate the behavior of churches in ways more to its liking. It does this by defining religion down, so...
Women in the World On Call
Elizabeth Knox is passionate about supporting women in their faith and their work, especially when the two overlap. She regularly interacts with women on this topic through her Women of the World Bible study she began over two years ago. Her book also called Women in the World is due e out early 2013 Follow her blog to learn more about her passion for women in faith and work as well as the writing process. You can also follow her...
Sirico: The Great Lie of Socialism
Socialism, despite its deficiencies, still has its fans. “Visit the philosophy and English departments on most college campuses, and you will still find intellectuals waxing eloquent on the glories of socialist theory. Students are still encouraged to imagine that it could work,” says Fr. Robert Sirico, in Crisis Magazine. However, Pope Benedict XVI is not one taken in by the great lie of socialism: History is strewn with intellectuals who imagined that they could save the world–and created hell on...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved