Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
Dont You Get It?
Dont You Get It?
Feb 22, 2025 2:42 PM

  Don’t You Get It?

  By Rebecca Barlow Jordan

  Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry. -James 1:19 NIV

  I’ve discovered that married couples must have a lot in common with Jesus’ disciples—at least in one area of their lives.

  Following His miraculous feeding of the 4,000 people listening to Him teach, Jesus encountered another round of testing from the Pharisees, the religious leaders who were always trying to trap Him. Jesus and His disciples left in a boat, but His followers realized they brought no bread with them to eat. Jesus took the opportunity to warn them about the “yeast of the Pharisees and that of Herod.”

  But the disciples thought He was talking about bread. Jesus listened to them arguing for a few minutes, and then challenged them. I can just see Jesus shaking His head at His followers’ lack of understanding. The Message version captures His frustration well: “Don’t you get it at all?”

  That wasn’t the first time Jesus rebuked them for their failure to “get it.” Even when Jesus didn’t use stories or hidden truths to illustrate His point, the disciples still seemed slow and dull in their hearing. They were rarely slow to speak—at least not Peter, Jesus’ most outspoken follower. But Jesus didn’t give up or become angry. He listened, cared, and kept loving and communicating patiently with the ones He loved.

  I smile each time I read about the disciples’ problem. Until, that is, I realize any ordinary married couple could share the same difficulty. We try to understand each other. We really do. But sometimes, we, too, don’t “get each other.” No matter how long we’ve been married, misunderstandings arise. Why?

  One reason could be because we process thingsdifferently; therefore we don’t necessarily communicate the same way. Authors Pam and Bill Farrel refer to those differences as being like waffles (men) and spaghetti (women). They suggest that men process life in boxes like “waffle” compartments. They live in and handle life one box at a time. But women process life more like spaghetti—all issues and thoughts related and touching one another. When the two try to communicate, misunderstanding often occurs.

  Because of that difference, sometimes we really don’t know how to listen or communicate with each other as couples. Too many times, we simply resign with, “You just don’t understand!”

  Larry and I discovered that truth one year when we were crossing the Arizona desert to a California getaway. We had just left a marriage retreat where, as minister and wife, we both had leadership responsibilities, resulting in little time for our own marriage enrichment. Because I had written the marriage questions for the conference, I thought it would be a great time for discussion. So I whipped out those questions and started firing away.

  But that didn’t go over well. I’m sure in Larry’s mind, he had already moved on from that compartment. His need now? To relax. No work. Just play. But in my head, the marriage retreat and our trip were related, and I wanted to join the two together. Not only did I choose lousy timing, but I was also clueless in how to communicate the deeper needs of my heart: I wanted to understand and to be understood.

  Fortunately, as the years passed, we began to work at truly understanding each other. We actually starting trying to see the other person’s viewpoint, instead of shutting down an issue, being defensive, or walking away. Sometimes we had to use word pictures—like a parable--to better describe what we meant. And if one of us didn’t “get it,” we would keep mirroring our words and thoughts to each other as if we were repeating our fast-food orders to the employee in a drive-through lane. We also stopped trying to “guess” what the other meant and started working at expressing our feelings, even when that was difficult.

  A few times we’ve had to use a little more forceful communication and speak the truth in love to each other. While that’s not fun, the key principle is to “speak in love.” Abusive anger or unfair accusations have no place in a marriage relationship. And sometimes we’ve purposely taken turns to simply offer our viewpoints, working more toward understanding than resolving the issue at the time. Listening to another usually takes more work than speaking our own mind.

  We still use those methods in trying to understand each other as marriage partners, and we never want to stop learning. But one of the greatest keys to understanding is to keep patiently communicating—both listening and speaking.

  That’s what Jesus did.

  Rebecca Barlow Jordan is a bestselling inspirational author and day-voted follower of Jesus who loves to paint encouragement on the hearts of others. After five decades of marriage, she and her husband are more passionate about marriage and family than ever. Rebecca has authored and contributed to over 20 books and has written over 2000 other articles, devotions, greeting cards, and other inspirational pieces. She is a regular Crosswalk contributor whose daily devotionalDaily in Your Presence is also available for delivery through Crosswalk.com. You can sign up for Rebecca’s free ebook and find out more about her and her encouraging blog atwww.rebeccabarlowjordan.com.

  Photo credit: ©GettyImages/fizkesRelated Resource: Engaging with God in a Technology-Saturated WorldMany of us feel hurried, and hurry is costing us more than we realize. The Unhurried Living Podcast with Alan and Gem Fadling provides resources and training to help Christian leaders learn to live and lead from fullness rather than on empty. After realizing the toll technology had taken on his connection with God, his community, and even himself, Carlos Whitaker took radical steps to disconnect in order to reconnect. He spent nearly two months living screen-free at a monastery, an Amish farm, and his own home, experiencing profound transformation along the way. If this episode helps you recenter your work and life on God, be sure to subscribe to Unhurried Living on Apple or Spotify so you never miss an episode!

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
Lord Jonathan Sacks: The West’s Rabbi
In October 1798, the president of the United States wrote to officers of the Massachusetts militia, acknowledging a limitation of federal rule. “We have no government,” John Adams wrote, “armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, and revenge or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net.” The nation that Adams had helped to found would require the parts of the body...
How Dispensationalism Got Left Behind
Whether we like it or not, Americans, in one way or another, have all been indelibly shaped by dispensationalism. Such is the subtext of Daniel Hummel’s provocative telling of the rise and fall of dispensationalism in America. In a little less than 350 pages, Hummel traces how a relatively insignificant Irishman from the Plymouth Brethren, John Nelson Darby, prompted the proliferation of dispensational theology, especially its eschatology, or theology of the end times, among our ecclesiastical, cultural, and political...
C.S. Lewis and the Apocalypse of Gender
From very nearly the beginning, Christianity has wrestled with the question of the body. Heretics from gnostics to docetists devalued physical reality and the body, while orthodox Christianity insisted that the physical world offers us true signs pointing to God. This quarrel persists today, and one form it takes is the general confusion among Christians and non-Christians alike about gender. Is gender an abstracted idea? Is it reducible to biological characteristics? Is it a set of behaviors determined by...
Jesus and Class Warfare
Plenty of Marxists have turned to the New Testament and the origins of Christianity. Memorable examples include the works of F.D. Maurice and Zhu Weizhi’s Jesus the Proletarian. After criticizing how so many translations of the New Testament soften Jesus’ teachings regarding material possessions, greed, and wealth, Orthodox theologian David Bentley Hart has gone so far to ask, “Are Christians supposed to be Communists?” In the Huffington Post, Dan Arel has even claimed that “Jesus was clearly a Marxist,...
Adam Smith and the Poor
Adam Smith did not seem to think that riches were requisite to happiness: “the beggar, who suns himself by the side of the highway, possesses that security which kings are fighting for” (The Theory of Moral Sentiments). But he did not mend beggary. The beggar here is not any beggar, but Diogenes the Cynic, who asked of Alexander the Great only to step back so as not to cast a shadow upon Diogenes as he reclined alongside the highway....
Spurgeon and the Poverty-Fighting Church
Religion & Liberty: Volume 33, Number 4 Spurgeon and the Poverty-Fighting Church by Christopher Parr • October 30, 2023 Portrait of Charles Spurgeon by Alexander Melville (1885) Charles Spurgeon was a young, zealous 15-year-old boy when he came to faith in Christ. A letter to his mother at the time captures the enthusiasm of his newfound Christian faith: “Oh, how I wish that I could do something for Christ.” God granted that wish, as Spurgeon would e “the prince of...
Mistaken About Poverty
Perhaps it is because America is the land of liberty and opportunity that debates about poverty are especially intense in the United States. Americans and would-be Americans have long been told that if they work hard enough and persevere they can achieve their dreams. For many people, the mere existence of poverty—absolute or relative—raises doubts about that promise and the American experiment more generally. Is it true that America suffers more poverty than any other advanced democracy in the...
Creating an Economy of Inclusion
The poor have been the main subject of concern in the whole tradition of Catholic Social Teaching. The Catholic Church talks often about a “preferential option for the poor.” In recent years, many of the Church’s social teaching documents have been particularly focused on the needs of the poorest people in the world’s poorest countries. The first major analysis of this topic could be said to have been in the papal encyclical Populorum Progressio, published in 1967 by Pope...
Conversation Starters with … Anne Bradley
Anne Bradley is an Acton affiliate scholar, the vice president of academic affairs at The Fund for American Studies, and professor of economics at The Institute of World Politics. There’s much talk about mon good capitalism” these days, especially from the New Right. Is this long overdue, that a hyper-individualism be beaten back, or is it merely cover for increasing state control of the economy? Let me begin by saying that I hate “capitalism with adjectives” in general. This...
Up from the Liberal Founding
During the 20th century, scholars of the American founding generally believed that it was liberal. Specifically, they saw the founding as rooted in the political thought of 17th-century English philosopher John Locke. In addition, they saw Locke as a primarily secular thinker, one who sought to isolate the role of religion from political considerations except when necessary to prop up the various assumptions he made for natural rights. These included a divine creator responsible for a rational world for...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved