Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Don’t write off young ‘socialists’
Don’t write off young ‘socialists’
Mar 15, 2025 8:42 PM

In his State of the Union address this year, president Trump warned of the dangers of socialism. But is there any substance to that worry?

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), a self-declared socialist, has made headlines with her Green New Deal proposal. And more recently, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), who identifies as a democratic socialist, announced he will again be running for the democratic nomination for president.

So perhaps we shouldn’t write off the president’s rhetoric as just a call back to a Cold War trope. Actual socialists are growing in popularity in the US and even winning elections. Sanders is one of the front runners for the democratic nomination in early polls, second only to former vice president Joseph Biden, who has yet to officially declare his candidacy.

But what is socialism?

I know the technical answer to that question. I could ment on varying historical and present-day expressions of it and different degrees mitment to an mand-economy system, labor unions, the dialectic of a class war, and so on. That may not match well with what most supporters of socialism in the US think it is today, however.

As Geoffrey Skelley wrote recently for FiveThirtyEight,

Unlike in the 1940s, Americans today are more likely to identify socialism with “equality” than with “government ownership or control,” according to polling by Gallup.

Thus, while public opinion has softened toward socialism, the public’s perception of what socialism is has shifted. No longer a specific economic system, it has been reduced to an aspiration for certain economic (and other) es, at least for some.

While Sanders seems to be an old-school socialist himself, we can see this more aspirational socialism in the Green New Deal. It is more an ideological litmus test mitment to certain economic and environmental es than anything one could call a policy — not to mention concrete legislation — that would realistically achieve those es.

Now, one could rightly point out that in order to achieve those es, a socialist system may be necessary, even presumed.On the other hand, we can also see this aspirational socialism in popular admiration of the Nordic states, which, whatever one thinks of them, aren’t very socialist today, not in any technical sense anyway. So the shift in focus is notable, and it leads to potential munications. As Alejandro Chafuen put it in Forbes, “Advocates from both sides speak past each other.”

This terminological shift moves the discussion from the mechanics of economic policy to the moral motives used to justify them. Thus, for many to say that they support socialism may mean less that they want the US to be the next Venezuela and more that they simply want more fairness and equality. They perceive our current market economy, to put it in Sanders’ terms, as “rigged” in favor of mega-corporations, millionaires and billionaires, at the expense of small businesses, the poor and the middle class.

The senator’s talk about our economy being “rigged” resonates with the more aspirational conception of socialism, and it isn’t without some truth, depending on the market. As I wrote in my book Foundations of a Free & Virtuous Society,

Even in some of the freest economies there is inequality generated not through the creation of wealth [which I think is fine] but through restricting markets to favor parties with political connections….

Unfortunately, Sanders’ and other socialists’ proposed solutions — when they are concrete at all — tend to boil down to more market restrictions. Such restrictions will just end up favoring those with the resources to navigate the Kafka-esque legal and bureaucratic web such restrictions typically require. You know, like mega-corporations, millionaires and billionaires. They may be different ones than those who currently benefit from where cronyist over-regulation has rigged certain markets, but they won’t be small businesses, not the middle class or the poor. That you can count on. They often can’t afford the legal teams pliance costs new taxes and regulations require. And new barriers to market entry would likely mean greater economic inequality, not less. It would certainly mean less fairness. It jeopardizes the rule of law.

In effect, I think today’s socialism-as-aspiration won’t be satisfied, in the long run, with yesterday’s socialism-as-system — or various watered-down versions thereof. But unless one can get beyond writing people off for the labels they pin on their aspirations, I don’t see how one can ever hope to gain a hearing among them.

Similarly, calls for “free” healthcare, child care, or higher education may be impractical, but critiquing the mechanics of such proposals is not enough. There is nothing wrong with aspirations for more affordable healthcare, child care, or higher education in themselves, is there? Those aspirations and others need to be met with positive, workable alternatives, rather than simply dismissed.

A free and virtuous economy may best serve the moral aspirations of the young “socialists” of today. But writing off such socialists without substantial engagement with what socialism actually means to them is only an invitation to be ignored.

Image attribution: GreenNewDeal_Presser_020719

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Fr. Gregory Jensen: East Meets West: Asceticism and Consumerism
Last Friday at Acton University, Fr. Gregory Jensen gave an engaging lecture on the dual subject of asceticism and consumerism. The “East Meets West” part might not be what many would expect. Rather than contrast a consumerist West with an ascetic East, Fr. Gregory insists that both consumerism and asceticism transcend cultures and traditions. Inasmuch as all people take part in consumption, an ascetic answer to the challenge of consumerism is (or ought to be) where East meets West. The...
How the Quality of Marriages Affects a Country’s Economy
The quality of children and our future society, depends directly on the quality of the marriage of their parents, says Pat Fagan of the Family Research Council speaking at the recent World Congress of Families: Fagan notes that society is made up of five facets: the family, church, school, the marketplace and government. The first three mentioned are the places that “grow the people” so to speak, and are closely interrelated. The last two areas of society are those into...
Natural Resources are Human Resources
If the PowerBlog has a favorite atheist libertarian economist, it’s probably George Mason professor Don Boudreaux. Although he isn’t a believer, he sometimes stumbles upon what I would consider to be Christian insights. Consider, for instance, his take on the term “natural resources”: In nearly all contexts, words and phrases inevitably convey not only information (such as, as Deirdre would say, “telephone numbers”), but also ideas – notions – interpretations – perspectives – biases – prejudices – spins -approval or...
Video: Bill McGurn’s Keynote Address at Acton University
We’re still working on finishing production on the audio and video captured last week at Acton University 2013. Here’s William McGurn, Editorial Page Editor at the New York Post and former speechwriter for President George W. Bush, addressing Acton U participants last Thursday night: ...
Sex Trafficking, China’s One-Child Policy And Gendercide
As reported here last week, the US State Department has released its 2013 “Trafficking In Persons” or Tip Report. In it, China has been reduced to a Tier 3 ranking, the lowest ranking a nation can receive. That means the nation is doing little or nothing ply with international laws regarding the trafficking of persons. According to the Population Research Institute, the State Department acknowledges that China’s one-child policy (which is directly linked to gendercide) has heavily influenced that nation’s...
Are Socially Responsible Businesses Bad for Society?
In Foreign Policy, Daniel Altman argues that over the long-term panies are often better for society than so-called socially responsible business initiatives: As Jonathan Berman and I have written in the past, panies that take a long time horizon in their decision-making are likely to make more social and environmental investments. Things like training workers, munities, and protecting ecosystems can take a long time to pay off for panies. When they do, the return — including a stronger labor pool,...
Acton University on Ancient Faith Radio
The audio of four lectures from Acton University last week focusing on topics related to the Orthodox Christian Tradition — two by Fr. Michael Butler, one by Fr. Gregory Jensen, and one by Fr. Hans Jacobse — is now available to stream free of charge on Ancient Faith Radio (here). The lectures are as follows (click to listen): Fr. Michael Butler, “Orthodoxy, Church, and State” Fr. Michael Butler, “Orthodoxy and Natural Law”Fr. Gregory Jensen, “East Meets West: Consumerism and Asceticism”Fr....
Anthony Bradley on Sustainability and Stewardship
At Acton University last week, Anthony Bradley gave a lecture titled, “Beyond the Sustainability Complex.” In his lecture, he explored Christian stewardship and addressed some mon fallacies about sustainability. Bradley began with this statement: “Being less bad is not good stewardship.” As Christians, we are not called to damage the environment less than our neighbor, but we are called to do good. The main way that we attempt to be “less bad” is through recycling. Bradley spoke at length about...
Video: Samuel Gregg Closes Acton University 2013
Acton’s Director of Research Samuel Gregg took to the podium on the final night of Acton University 2013 to deliver the closing plenary address for the conference. Below, Gregg closes the conference with a reflection on modern threats to religious liberty, and how the faithful can respond. ...
The Rise of the $10 Philanthropist
Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen, a lecturer at Stanford University, on what makes a philanthropist: WSJ: How do you define a philanthropist? Ms. Arrillaga-Andreessen: A philanthropist is anyone who gives time, money, experience, skills, networks [or] passion. The only thing that you need is generosity. For example, [recently] after class I counseled a puter science student who wanted to talk about how he could play a role in changing how engineering is taught globally. So we started developing a strategy for how he...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved