Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
DNC makes the case for deregulation and lower taxes
DNC makes the case for deregulation and lower taxes
Apr 4, 2026 11:30 AM

The 2020 Democratic National Convention’s only viral moment to date plished something rare in any political season: It taught sound economic policy. The image of a masked Rhode Island delegate holding a platter of calamari during Tuesday night’s state roll call overshadowed the fact that he promoted the state’s official appetizer while praising deregulation. Further research shows the importance of reducing trade barriers and that high taxes destroy wealth.

“Our restaurant and fishing trade have been decimated by this pandemic,” said State Rep. Joseph McNamara, who is also state party chairman. Restaurants have struggled to adapt their business model, declining tourism has reduced demand, and fish prices have plunged by a dollar a pound.

But state citizens “are fortunate to have a governor, Gina Raimondo, whose program lets our fisherman promote their catches on to the general public. And our state appetizer, calamari, is offered in all 50 states.” He dubbed Rhode Island “the eback state” before casting most of his delegation’s votes for Joe Biden.

Gov. Raimondo temporarily suspended a regulation that bars fishermen from selling their catch directly to the public. Fishermen could already sell to private buyers, but the program lets them sell directly to retailers like local restaurants. Raimondo created an exceedingly narrow program that grants fishermen a temporary license – which is set to expire by August 29.

But there are conditions: They can only sell their fish the same day they caught it, in the same port where they caught it, on the same boat on which it was caught, and the fish must be sold whole instead of in filets.

It seems perplexing that such restrictions existed in the first place – much less that the government only suspended them for 120 days. Much as California politicians have tried to end the nightmare of being your own boss, Rhode Island politicos tried to protect their residents from the horrors of buying same-day fresh seafood. Raimondo deserves credit for repealing yet another never-needed regulation exposed by the crushing weight of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Even such constricted deregulation has put money into the hands of the state’s ailing fishing industry. As of late last month, 15 fishermen had used the app to make $40,000 in sales. The bad news is, more than 160 people applied for the license.

The problem is the law of diminishing returns. The Providence Journal reports:

It’s opened a new market for [Newport fisherman Jon] Kourtesis, but es with a catch. He said he’s working 15- to 16-hour days to make “a few hundred extra bucks.”

“It’s like three jobs for me,” he said. …

Kourtesis believes some of his fellow fishermen were frustrated by regulations and decided against pursuing the dockside sales. The dockside sales also require extra effort on the fishermen’s part to get the word out to potential customers, among other tasks. It’s like running a fish market.

The customers “love being able to buy fish at a reduced price, not market price, and to get the off-the-boat prices,” said University of Rhode Island fisheries scientist Mitch Hatzipetro. But it’s no solution to the fishers’ “problem” of abundance.

Since the governor’s order keeps him bound to just one port, said Kourtesis, “I need people who are willing to buy 50 to 100 pounds” of fish a day. Fishing operations in small towns say the dockside’s limited sales are not worth the endless work hours. Kouretsis said he could make ends meet if he could sail to neighboring cities. But private dock sales are not “going to take care of all of the volume that we land,” said industry expert Patrice McCarron.

This tells us that regulations and other barriers to trade hurt producers – which ultimately reduces the resources available to society. The Christian Science Monitor reports that seasoned fishermen are “torn between wanting to catch more and worrying about flooding the market by catching too much.”

The story underlines one additional economic truth: Increasing the number of hours people must work to turn a profit reduces how much work they are willing to perform. No amount of sales could convince Kourestis to work 17 hours; the toll is simply too great.

But this phenomenon is not restricted to physical exhaustion. People refuse to work when they no longer pensation that they deem worthy of their time. Confiscatory tax rates serve the same function. By robbing a worker of the fruits of his labor, which the Bible deems “his portion,” the government discourages people from working and producing. This, in turn, reduces society’s overall wealth. Economists have even quantified the impact of exorbitant taxation. “[A] one percentage-point increase in the top federal personal e tax rate is associated with a reduction of total taxable e by about 0.50 percent,” according to Canada’s Fraser Institute.

The most viral moment from the Democratic National Convention proves the importance of deregulation, expanded trade, and the Laffer Curve.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Build yourself, build society
One of Christ’s best-known parables is the Parable of the Talents, but its familiarity disguises just how strange and unsettling its message is. It is a parable of a master who departs on a journey and entrusts three servants, each according to his ability, with his property. Each receives five, two, or one talent(s), respectively. The ablest servant departed, immediately put the money to work, and doubled his master’s talents. The servant entrusted with two talents did the same. But...
Lord Acton, Sohrab Ahmari, and the fragility of faith
People have been making some drastic changes to their lives to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic. Some have taken this challenge as an opportunity to grow in wisdom. Others have been called to learn new skills, and still others are doing whatever they can to keep their bearings in a time of crisis. Some are coping in less salutary ways, like spouting anger online. Online debates can be stimulating, sometimes heated, and rarely edifying. This is particularly true of debates...
Cooperation, not coercion, will defeat COVID-19
As the COVID-19 crisis rolls on, many of America’s governors have continued to impose, extend, or add new restrictions to stay-at-home orders. This has led to increasingly arbitrary rule-making and growing criticism over the prudence and practicality of such measures. Thankfully, individuals and institutions rely on more than government diktats to guide their behavior. In turn, amid the government overreach and tense ideological debates, civil society appears to be self-governing rather well—marked by plenty of individual restraint, collective wisdom, and...
COVID-19 reminds us of the humanizing aspect of work
With “shelter-in-place” orders across the country during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, most employees are not allowed to enter their work places unless their work is considered “essential” by their state and local governments. Opportunities for normal employment have been disrupted for millions of people around the world. Sadly, many workers have been furloughed, others laid off entirely, and the fortunate ones, thanks to advances in technology, are able to work from home. Beyond the obvious financial implications for individuals, and...
What to do about China?
Crises are not only opportunities which should, to paraphrase Rahm Emmanuel, never be allowed go to waste. They also serve as clarifying moments. Unexpected events can shatter even the strongest consensus on a given topic. The coronavirus pandemic is such a moment when es to America’s relationship with China. Until relatively recently, most Western policymakers calculated that a steady integration of China into the global economy would be of mutual economic benefit for China and Western nations. Trade with other...
Acton Line podcast: Randy Barnett and David French on ‘common-good Constitutionalism’
On March 31, The Atlantic published an article titled “Beyond Originalism,” written by Adrian Vermeule, professor of Constitutional law at Harvard Law School. In this piece, Vermeule argues that “the dominant conservative philosophy for interpreting the constitution has served its purpose and scholars ought to develop a more moral framework.” Originalist interpretations of the Constitution simply no longer serve mon good, Vermeule says. What does he mean by this, and is he correct? In this episode, we’re featuring two different...
Weekend viewing: Watch ‘America Lost’ for free
For a few moments, filmmaker Christopher Rufo’s documentary America Lost seemed in danger of ing an anachronism. But in the age of coronavirus shutdown orders, his portrait of life in the forgotten, jobless corners of America could not be more timely. Rufo spent years interviewing and documenting the lives of struggling people in the depressed cities of Youngstown, Ohio; Memphis, Tennessee; and Stockton, California. (You can read our review here.) Rufo—who serves as director of theDiscovery Institute’s Center on Wealth,...
COVID-19, socialized medicine and ‘deaths of despair’
The American healthcare industry is undergoing a massive stress test known as the coronavirus. For months and years e, analysts will be issuing their opinions about just how well that industry performed under the incredible, sudden surge of the pandemic. Given the massive influx of stimulus funding for healthcare and programs like Medicare, no one should be surprised about a “barrage” of new lobbying activity and a surge of activism for single payer or universal health care. Getting just ahead...
Cooperation vs. coercion amid COVID-19
As the COVID-19 crisis rolls on, many of America’s governors have continued to impose, extend or add new restrictions to stay-at-home orders, leading to increasingly arbitrary rule-making and growing criticism over the prudence and practicality of such measures. Thankfully, individuals and institutions rely on more than government diktats to guide their behavior. In turn, amid the government overreach and tense ideological debates, civil society appears to be self-governing rather well — marked by plenty of individual restraint, collective wisdom and...
Marx vs. the universal basic income
While a universal basic e has been advocated by everyone from Bernie Sanders to Charles Murray and Pope Francis, the name most associated with wealth redistribution is Marx. However, in a little-known writing Marx specifically opposed the UBI, calling it inefficient and counterproductive. The policy would leave many of its intended beneficiaries worse off, he wrote. Of course, we’re discussing Ive Marx, an economist and sociology professor at the University of Antwerp. Marx’s scholarly work focuses on wealth redistribution and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved