Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
Died: Jürgen Moltmann, Theologian of Hope
Died: Jürgen Moltmann, Theologian of Hope
Feb 15, 2026 7:39 PM

  Jrgen Moltmann, a theologian who taught that Christian faith is founded in the hope of the resurrection of the crucified Christ and that the coming kingdom of God acts upon human history out of the eschatological future, died on June 3 in Tbingen, Germany. He was 98.

  Moltmann is widely regarded as one of the most important theologians since World War II. According to theologian Miroslav Volf, his work was existential and academic, pastoral and political, innovative and traditional, readable and demanding, contextual and universal, as he showed how the central themes of Christian faith spoke to the fundamental human experiences of suffering.

  The World Council of Churches reports that Moltmann is the most widely read Christian theologian of the last 80 years. Religion scholar Martin Marty said his writings inspire an uncertain Church and free people from the dead hands of dead pasts.

  Moltmann was not an evangelical, but many evangelicals engaged deeply with his work. The popular Christian author Philip Yancey called Moltmann one of his heroes and said in 2005 that he had plowed through nearly a dozen of his books.

  Editors at Christianity Today were critical of Moltmanns theology when they first grappled with it in the 1960s but still found themselves commending his work.

  We are brought up short, G. C. Berkouwer wrote, and reminded to think and to preach about the future in a biblical perspective. If this happens, all the theological talks have borne good fruit.

  Today, evangelicals who are ultimately critical of Moltmanns viewsdisagreeing strongly with one aspect or anotherhave still found much to value and frequently encourage others to read him.

  Moltmann was a constant reference point for me, Fred Sanders, a systematic theologian at Biola University, wrote on the social platform X. Last year I taught a little bit from his book The Crucified God, and was struck by how powerful his voice still is for students. And even for me, on the far side of abiding disagreements, re-reading Moltmann means encountering line after line of arresting ways of putting things.

  New Testament professor Wesley Hill said he disagreed with Moltmann on what feels like every major Christian doctrine. And yet few theologians have moved and provoked and inspired me in the way he has. His work is all about the crucified and risen Jesus.

  Moltmann was born into a nonreligious family on April 8, 1926. His parents, he wrote in his autobiography, were adherents of a simple life movement that was committed to plain living and high thinking. They made their home in a settlement of like-minded people in a rural area outside Hamburg. Instead of going to church, the Moltmanns worked in their garden on Sunday mornings.

  The family nonetheless sent their son to confirmation classes at the local state church when he was old enough. It was seen as a rite of passage. Moltmann recalled learning very little about Jesus, the Bible, or the Christian life. The pastor focused his lessons on trying to prove that Jesus wasnt Jewish but actually Phoenician, and therefore Aryan, teaching the children the antisemitic theology promoted by the Nazis.

  It was complete nonsense, Moltmann said.

  At about the same time, in another rite of passage, Moltmann was sent to the Hitler Youth. While the uniforms and anthems made him feel very patriotic, he later recalled, he was bad at marching and hated the military drills. On one camping trip, he was crammed into a tent with ten boys. The experience left him with the strong sense that he enjoyed being alone.

  Despite the rampant antisemitism of the time, Moltmanns childhood hero was Albert Einstein, who was Jewish. Moltmann wanted to go to university and study math. That dream was interrupted by World War II.

  At 16, Moltmann was drafted into the air force and assigned to defend Hamburg with an 88 mm anti-aircraft flak gun. He and a schoolmate named Gerhard Schopper were stationed on a platform set up on stilts in a lake. At night, they looked at the stars and learned the constellations.

  Then the British attacked. They sent 1,000 planes in July 1943 to drop explosives and incendiaries on the city, starting a firestorm that melted metal, asphalt, and glass. Anything organicwood, fabric, fleshwas consumed by a sea of fire. Temperatures rising above 1,400 degrees Fahrenheit sucked the air out of the streets so the city sounded, according to one survivor, like an old church organ when someone is playing all the notes at once.

  The operationwhich didnt target military installations or munitions factories but the morale of the enemy civil populationwas codenamed Gomorrah, after the biblical city destroyed by God in Genesis 19. Around 40,000 people were killed.

  When the attack was over, Moltmann was floating in the lake, clinging to a shattered piece of wood from his exploded gun platform. His friend Schopper was dead.

  He would later describe this as his first religious experience.

  As thousands of people died in the firestorm around me, Moltmann said, I cried out to God for the first time: Where are you?

  He didnt get an answer that day. But two years later, he was captured on the frontlines and sent to a prisoner of war camp in Scotland. A chaplain gave him a New Testament with Psalms and he started reading Psalm 39 every night:

  Hear my prayer, Lord,

  listen to my cry for help;

  do not be deaf to my weeping.

  He read the Gospel of Mark and found himself deeply drawn to Jesus. The crucifixion undid him.

  I didnt find Christ. He found me, Moltmann later said. There, in the Scottish prisoner of war camp, in the dark pit of my soul, Jesus sought me and found me. He came to seek that which was lost (Luke 19:10), and so he came to me.

  When he returned to Germany at 22the country in ruinshe went to school to study theology. The Nazis were pushed out of the universities during the American-led reconstruction, including the University of Gttingen theologian Emmanuel Hirsch, who would hum the Nazi national anthem between classes and once claimed that Adolf Hitler was the greatest Christian statesman in the history of the world.

  At Gttingen, Moltmann studied under people who aligned with the Confessing Church and taught the theology of Karl Barth. He wrote a dissertation about a 17th-century French Calvinist, focusing on the doctrine of the perseverance of the saints.

  While at school, Moltmann fell in love with another theology student, Elisabeth Wendel. They earned their doctorates together and got married in a civil ceremony in Switzerland in 1952.

  After graduating, Moltmann was sent to pastor a church in a remote village in North Rhine-Westphalia. He taught a confirmation class of 50 wild boys, and in the winter made house calls on skis. People asked him to bring herring, margarine, and other food from the store when he came.

  The first question I was asked everywhere was whether I believed in the Devil, Moltmann later recalled. He taught people they could drive the Devil away by reciting the Nicene Creed. He wasnt convinced they listened.

  Moltmanns second church was a challenge too. He was sent to a small village in the north of the country, near Bremen. There were rats in the basement of the parsonage, mice in the kitchen, and bats and owls in the attic. About 100 people attended churchbut not all at once, and not regularly. On Sunday mornings, the young minister would wait at the window, wondering if anyone was going to be there.

  He earned some respect from the farmers for his skill playing the card game Skat, though, and he learned to preach sermons that connected to people. If the older farmers rolled their eyes while he was talking, Moltmann learned, his theology had gotten too detached from their real-life concerns.

  Unless academic theology continually turns back to this theology of the people, it becomes abstract and irrelevant, he later wrote. l was not totally suited to be a pastor, but l was happy to have experienced the entire height and depth of human life: children and aged, men and women, healthy and sick, birth and death, etc. l would have been happy to have remained a theologian/pastor.

  In 1957, Moltmann left pastoral ministry to teach theology. He lectured on a range of topics but grew especially interested in the history of Christian hope for the kingdom of God.

  At the same time, he started to engage with the work of a Marxist philosopher named Ernst Bloch. Moltmann wrote several critical reviews of Blochs books but found his ideas stimulating. Bloch argued life was moving dialectically toward a final utopia. In his three-volume magnum opus, Das Prinzip Hoffnung (The Principle of Hope), he made the case for revolutionary hope, claiming that Marxism was guided by a mystical impulse of anticipation for an ultimate fulfillment.

  Though he was an atheist, Bloch frequently quoted Scripture. He said he was attempting to articulate the eschatological conscience that came into the world through the Bible.

  Moltmann noted that while many theologians had written about faith and love, there was little in the Protestant tradition about hope. Theology had let go of its own theme, he said, and he decided to take up the task.

  He started teaching on the topic first at the University of Bonn and then at the University of Tbingen, where he would spend the remainder of his career.

  Moltmann published Theologie der Hoffnung (Theology of Hope) in 1964. It was met with intense interest. The book went through six printings in two years and was translated into multiple foreign languages. It appeared in English for the first time in 1967 and earned enough attention from theologians to attract the notice of The New York Times.

  In a front page story in March 1968, the newspaper reported that debates over the trendy death of God theology had been replaced by a discussion of the 41-year-old Moltmanns idea that God acts upon history out of the future. Moltmann was quoted as saying that from first to last, and not merely in the epilogue, Christianity is eschatology.

  The newspaper marveled that this theology of hope was founded on belief in the resurrection, which many other theologians now regard as a myth.

  Some critics at the time, however, worried this emphasis on eschatology overshadowed the work of Christ on the cross. They said Moltmanns focus on final things ignored or even downplayed the importance of the crucifixion.

  Moltmann came to think there was something to that criticism during a symposium on Theology of Hope at Duke University in April 1968. During one of the sessions, the theologian Harvey Cox ran into the room and shouted, Martin Luther King has been shot.

  The gathering quickly disbanded as theologians scrambled to get home amid reports of riots across the country. But the students at Dukewho hadnt seemed to care at all about the theology of hopegathered for a spontaneous vigil in the schools quad. They mourned Kings death for six days. On the last day, the white students were joined by Black students from other schools, and together they sang the civil rights anthem We Shall Overcome.

  Moltmann, moved by the transformative power of suffering, started to work on his second book, Der gekreuzigte Gott (The Crucified God). It was published in 1972 and came out in English two years later.

  Christian identity can be understood only as an act of identification with the crucified Christ, Moltmann wrote. The religion of the cross does not elevate and edify in the usual sense, but scandalizes; and most of all it scandalizes ones co-religionists in ones own circle. But by this scandal, it brings liberation into a world which is not free.

  Moltmann united the two ideasChrists suffering and Christians hopeand that became the core of his theology. He taught that people should believe in the resurrection of the crucified Christ and live in the light of his reality and future.

  Or more simply: God weeps with us so that we may someday laugh with him.

  Moltmann retired in 1994 but continued to work with graduate students for many years after. When his wife died in 2016, he wrote a final book on death and resurrection.

  Moltmann is survived by four daughters.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
Does a business corporation have a responsibility to society?
In 1946, Congress enacted changes in the tax code that permitted publicly held business corporations to deduct charitable donations in amounts up to five percent of their federal taxable e. Congress, of course, did not panies to make charitable donations, but it did wish to encourage them to do so. The legislation became one more landmark in a running controversy about corporate social responsibility. Simply put, this controversy concerns the question of whether publicly-held business corporations (sole proprietorships and...
Making Men Moral
Robert P. George is a Princeton professor, first Vice President of the Society of Catholic Social Scientists, and a member of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission. In this book, he has done an admirable job of combining his fields of philosophy (John Finnis was his mentor), law, and political science to analyze the difficult question of how liberal democracy can enact laws that seek to promote civility and personal goodness while upholding basic individual liberties. Although much of the...
A Botched Look at Social Virtues
Francis Fukuyama, author of The End of History and the Last Man, argues that ideological conflicts are over and that the world is converging on democracy-cum-capitalism, with national economies integrated into a global one. However, democracy and capitalism require a healthy civil society, which itself depends on “a people’s habits, customs, and ethics,” which must be “nourished through an increased awareness and respect for culture.” (p. 5) Everyone, Fukuyama maintains, has a deep desire “to have his or her...
Double Agent for the Greens?
As the readers of this publication are probably aware, environmental regulation is a hot subject for conservatives right now. In the battle to reduce the size and scope of the federal government, we are seeing the first counterattacks to what has been a two-decade-old regulatory jihad by the federal government. And to assist in the revolt, a slew of conservative books and pamphlets have e available detailing not only the quasi-religious, socialist nature of the Green worldview, but also...
Hope VI: HUD's Program of false hope
I demand nothing better, you may be sure, than that you should really have discovered outside of us a benevolent and inexhaustible being, calling itself the state, which has bread for all mouths, work for all hands, capital for all enterprises, credit for all projects, ointment for all wounds, balm for all suffering, advice for all perplexities, solutions for all problems, truth for all minds, distractions for all varieties of boredom, milk for children and wine for old age,...
The Futility of Coerced Benevolence
Tibor Machan’s Generosity: Virtue in Civil Society provides a fascinating and thorough treatment of the role of virtue in a society characterized by limited government, freedom of association, and economic liberty. Its thesis, according to Machan, is that “Generosity is a moral virtue that cannot flourish in a welfare state or in any sort mand economy, because to be generous is to voluntarily help others in certain ways. It will flourish in a free society.” Generosity and virtue cannot...
The triple bottom line: Authentic new model or tripartite nonsense?
“It won’t be an pany that will change the world,” declares TV producer Philomena Ryan in splashy, full-page newspaper ads sponsored by BP corporation. “BP” used to stand for “British Petroleum,” but on the ad we are given to understand that “BP” now stands for “Beyond Petroleum.” BP shareholders beware: This ad campaign seems to suggest that BP is flirting with going out of business. The claim “[i]t won’t be an pany that will change the world” is narrowly...
The Pope's Divisions
The collapse of Communism as a world ideological force occasions not only a thorough reassessment of many of the economic and political presuppositions which were fundamental to the post-World War II world, but also a reevaluation of many of the historical interpretations founded on these same presuppositions and widespread during the same period. In fact, one of the major criticisms of the caste of professional historians and political scientists in the United States is their failure as a group,...
Mediating Institutions
One of the most vital insights of modern social thought is the importance of mediating institutions–churches, schools, fraternal organizations, professional associations, and even clubs–for a free society. Not only are they effective, sometimes crucial, in providing services of all sorts, they are, as Tocqueville pointed out, a bulwark of freedom against the encroaching power of the state. The recognition of the consequence of these associations is especially significant for Americans because we have been particularly adept at forming them....
The phenomenon of globalization
Globalization has emerged as a new paradigm for describing the way in which the human family can relate to each other. Globalization is the increased interconnectedness of all peoples on the face of the earth. We can now more easily, rapidly, and cheaply move, and thus share, ourselves, our consumer goods, our material and human capital, and the values prise our respective cultures. Our ever-increasing ability to share our God-given plementary gifts with one another holds with it the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved