Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Did Florida Disenfranchise African-American Voters?
Did Florida Disenfranchise African-American Voters?
Oct 5, 2024 3:34 AM

For 159 years, the state of Florida attempted to disenfranchise it’s citizens by suppressing voter turnout.At least that’s the logical conclusion that can be drawn from the recent partisan claims about voter suppression in the state.

As part of it’s post-2000 election reforms, Florida officially implemented early voting for the 2004 election. Until then, voters had to vote absentee or on Election Day.

But as a cost-cutting measure, the state legislature passed a law in 2011 reducing the early voting window from 14 days to eight, though it extended the hours during those eight days.

Now, critics of the law are attempting to claim the change was intentionally made to disenfranchise minority voters. Ta-Nehisi Coates, a senior editor at The Atlantic, is a prime example of the type of liberal pundits who are attempting to spark racial animus by implying the law targets African American voters:

We talked yesterday about the kind of substantive reform the GOP could make in order to diversify. Here is a good one: Stop trying to inhibit participation. Stop it. You will not make us lazy. You will only make us angry . . .

Barack Obama knew who he was talking to when he called voting the best revenge. We don’t need no high-faluting reasons to stand in those long lines. We’ll stand there just for the privilege of putting that stutter in Karl Rove’s speech, and that panicked look on his face.

Coates’ attempt to turn this into a racial issue is despicable and sullies the reputation of The Atlantic. But what’s most disgusting about Coates claim is that it condescending to African Americans. The idea that other races and ethnicities are able to make it to the polls during the 8-day early voting window but African Americans are not, is both bizarre and insulting. He never explains why the law disenfranchises only one political party, much less how it hurts one particular race. He also insults civil rights-era leaders who worked so hard to provide equal voting opportunity by making an parison:

People don’t understand that the attempt to disenfranchise broad swaths of the American population is actually in this country’s living memory. People have not forgotten.

No, they have not forgotten. Which is why this particular claim is likely to backfire on those, like Coates, who attempt to confuse this current legislation with actual efforts to disenfranchise citizens. The American people aren’t stupid and they resent efforts to fan racial animus for partisan purposes, as Coates is doing.

Voting is one of America’s most essential liberties, which is why we must protect that liberty for all citizens, regardless of race, creed, or party. Claims about disenfranchisement, therefore, must be taken seriously. That can’t happen when we have influential pundits spreading lies about voter suppression in the African munity. Whether we’re Republican or Democrat, black or white, no American should tolerate such dishonest claims. They are harmful not only to Florida, but to the republic.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Lord Acton on conscience: The light of freedom
In the public imagination, Lord Acton is often restricted to his ubiquitous aphorism about power and corruption. This is a pity, as the nineteenth century essayist, historian, and parliamentarian held wide-ranging views about liberty as well-developed as they were penetrating. Eugenio Lopes explores these views, noting the interrelationship between power and conscience in Lord Acton’s writings. For Acton, “Freedom depends on a well-formed conscience,” Lopes writes. Absolutist political forces continually shape and bend public morality to their own, corrupt vision...
The social welfare of price discrimination
Note: This is post #51 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Is price discrimination bad for society? How does it affect output, and what is its effect on social welfare? If price discrimination increases output, it is likely beneficial for society. If output isn’t increased, social welfare is reduced. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Tyler Cowen consider the effect of price discrimination. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching...
How Christians can bridge the gap between work and wage
As Target races against Walmart to voluntarily raise its minimum wage to $15 per hour, we’re reminded that upward fluctuations in the price of low-skilled labor are more than possible without the blunt interference of government control (and its deleterious side effects). Even still, critics will predictably proclaim that such changes are far too little, too late, arguing that the government plays a valuable role in accelerating these developments when employers fall short. Or, as one of economist Don Boudreaux’s...
6 ways economic freedom benefits the global poor
Even most critics admit the free market is the greatest wealth-generating system in history, but they say the poor benefit more from interventionist economic systems. In fact, economic liberty elevates the least well-off in more laissez-faire nations to a better position than those living in unfree economies based on such factors as average e, life expectancy, literacy, and other forms of personal liberty. The data bearing out each point are contained in theFraser Institute’s most recent“Economic Freedom of the World”...
5 Facts about federal regulations
Vice President Pence will be giving a speech today emphasizing the importance the Trump administration places on reviewing regulatory policy. Today’s date of October 2 was selected to mark the start of the next fiscal year, when federal agencies will be expected to generate below zero dollars in net new regulatory costs. Here are five facts you should know about federal regulations: 1.Regulations are rules that have the force of law and that are issued by various federal government departments...
Sec. DeVos defends school choice in speech at Harvard
In a speech last Thursday at the Harvard Kennedy School, U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos made a powerful defense of school choice: One of the many pernicious effects of the growth of government is that its people worry less and less about each other, thinking their worries are now in the hands of so-called “experts” in Washington. There is perhaps no better example than our current education system. Many inside — and outside — government insist a government system...
Explainer: What you need to know about Catalonia’s independence 1-0 referendum
Voters who took part in yesterday’s national 1-0 referendum overwhelmingly supported Catalonia’s independence from Spain, and images of the Spanish National Police brutally suppressing the election have flooded the international media. But any honest accounting of the 1-0 referendum requires a deeper nuance that leaves no party looking heroic. The 1-0 referendum On October 1, Catalonia held an election asking voters,“Do youwantCatalonia to e an independent state in theform of a republic?” Catalonia, which has seen its autonomy wax and...
Why is health insurance so complicated?
Car insurance and life insurance are rather simple. So why is health insurance plicated? And why can’t it be more like other forms of insurance? Lanhee Chen, a fellow at the Hoover Institution, explains what make health insurance so different—and plex. ...
The cultural connection between economics and belief
Is there a connection between economics and belief? In a recent Karam Forum lecture for the Oikonomia Network, theologian Jay Moon uses a Perplexus ball to explain the overlapping influence and impact of distinct cultural spheres — what anthropologists call the “functional integration of culture.” According to anthropologist Darrell Whiteman, every culture can be understood as having three interconnecting sectors: (1) an economics and technology sector, (2) a social relationships sector, and (3) an ideology and belief sector. “These sectors...
How do Western nations rank on economic freedom?
The Fraser Institute released its annual “Economic Freedom of the World” report this morning. The free market think tank rates every nation based on its “degree of freedom in five broad areas”: Area 1:Size of Government—As spending and taxation by government, and the size of government-controlled enterprises increase, government decision-making is substituted for individual choice and economic freedom is reduced.Area 2:Legal System and Property Rights—Protection of persons and their rightfully acquired property is a central element of both economic freedom...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved