Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Deregulation: When to wash a pig
Deregulation: When to wash a pig
Jul 18, 2025 7:47 PM

You could be prosecuted on the federal level if you “make any incision” on hog carcasses before all “hair, scurf and dirt, including all hoofs and claws, (is) removed from hog carcasses and the carcasses thoroughly washed and cleaned.” In January, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13771, pledging to reduce regulation, which initiated the recall of the Hog Carcass Cleaning Rule. It turns out that there were two rules on the books, the first states to wash the hog carcasses before the first incision; the second states to wash them after the first incision. On May 16th, the Department of Agriculture revisited their policy and removed the regulation.

The Hog Carcass Cleaning Rule is evidence of the myopic nature of the current regulatory climate. Reading the regulations is designed to make you drowsy, typed in Courier New on poorly built websites. In the Federal Register, the Department of Agriculture took 3000 words to say that they realized they had two conflicting rules on pig washing and were pitching one of them. Regulations are rules, often made by unelected bureaucrats, that restrict how businesses operate. The original goal of regulation was health and safety, but as the United States moved towards more and more specific rules, it found itself encoding into law precisely when to wash a pig.

The Brookings Institute, a center-left policy research group, has built a tracker for the regulations which the Trump administration has repealed or suspended. Brookings found that under Trump, the rate of rulemaking by federal agencies has decreased. Yet this decreases only the rate of regulations being written, not the overall amount of regulation. Trump has not been able pletely halt the regulatory crawl. Why is regulation so sticky?

Deregulation is, by definition, a boring task. It requires peeling back years of unnecessary rules that do little but hold back business. Furthermore, regulatory agencies are slow moving mammoths. For instance, the Department of Agriculture, author of the famed Hog Carcass Cleaning Rule, has a waiting period of 60 days before they will repeal any regulation. Effectively, this means that no president can remove any regulation in the last 60 days of his administration. The process of eliminating unnecessary rules is halted by even more unnecessary rules.

At the same time, regulation is no laughing matter. Regulations increase plexity in the market, making it harder for businesses, especially small and new businesses, to jump the hurdles created by rules. This process of slowing business creation impinges on economic growth. The Mercatus Institute released a report which said that the economic impact of the regulations added since 1980 alone is a whopping $4 trillion, nearly a quarter of the entire U.S. economy!

The core issue at stake is that regulation addresses problems that aren’t there. In Regarding the Problem of Newborn Piglets in Winter, Chinese satirist Chen Rong parodies the Communist Government. In her short story, leading party officials worry about the fate of farmers in the winter and order farmers to keep their pigs indoors during the cold months. The narrator follows the directive as it passes through the bureaucracy: from national, to state, to parochial party officials. The twist of the story is that, while the officials were planning, the farmer had been already safe inside with her pigs. She needs no directive from the government because she cares about her property! The motives of profit and self-interest will ensure that farmers do not squander their resources.

This brings us back to the Hog Carcass Cleaning Rule. Of course the farmer will clean the pig before he butchers it! He wouldn’t want it to be wasted after all his work. Myopic regulations are nothing more than the government saying, “We know how to run your business better than you do.” The United States has opted for a government in which every detail of a business is preordained.

During the tedious task of deregulation, policy makers must remember the real impact of these rules on business. Trump’s new Supreme Court pick, Brett Kavanaugh, has been an avid opponent of the regulatory reach of government. His possible appointment may push agencies towards a more balanced approach to regulation. The Trump administration has chosen a worthy goal in eliminating some of the barriers to entry for business; let’s hope they don’t succumb in this often boring task.

Photo Source: Carol M. Highsmith – Library of Congress Catalog (Public Domain)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Is it really ‘aid’ if it goes to relatively wealthy nations?
Alan Duncan, an aid minister in the UK, says his government is “forced” to hand over large amounts of money to the EU’s foreign aid budget, but has no say in how the money is spent. The problem is that much of the $2 billion+ “aid” money (one-sixth of the British budget) goes to projects such as making a Moroccan water park more eco-friendly, an art project in St. Petersburg, and building a hotel and plex in Barbados. Britain’s International...
Want to Help the Poor? Promote a Free Market in Health Care
Want to help the poor? Promote a free market in health care. That’s the argument made by John C. Goodman, author of the new book Priceless: Curing the Healthcare Crisis. Timothy Dalrymple recently talked with Goodman about the best approach for restoring free-market pricing mechanisms into the market for medical care and health insurance: Aren’t there some people, however, who have little of money and lots of time, and would prefer to wait in order to receive cheaper care? There...
Dodd-Frank: The Other Serious Threat
At least es at us head on. The greater legislative threat may be the one that most Americans have never heard of. Economist Scott Powell and Acton friend Jay Richards explain in a new piece in Barron’s: While Obamacare received more attention, the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, also known as Dodd-Frank after its Senate and House sponsors, … unleashed a new regulatory body, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, to operate with unprecedented power. Dodd-Frank became law in...
Stop Apologizing for Our Liberties
You cannot apologize to a fanatic, says Lee Harris. It only serves to convince him that he was right all along: The last few weeks have witnessed a peculiar and disturbing spectacle: An American administration that has spent a great deal of time and energy apologizing for our liberties—in particular, for what many would regard as the foundation of all our other liberties, namely, the freedom to express our minds as we see fit. This signature freedom, of which Americans...
Markets and culture: A time to play, a time to pray
Faced with the prospect of a professional athletic career, a nearly-half million dollar salary, and a perfect lady, what’s not to like? Apparently, for Grant Desme, it was the noise and unrest of the world. Can a culture of life and the noise and tumult of the marketplace co-exist? Rev. Robert Sirico, reflecting on this, says they can, so long as it is not a place where: [C]apitalism…places the human person at the mercy of blind economic forces…What we propose,...
On Call with Dr. Pamela Casson
Dr. Pamela Casson, a pediatrician in Colorado Springs, knows what it means literally to be “On Call.” This week she shares with us in this video interview with Jon Hirst how she sees God working through her in her work with families, children and the world around her. Thank you Pamela for giving us an inside look at how you see your work as blessing the world. ...
Counting the Profit of a Third Party Choice
Joe Carter recently highlighted the discussion at Ethika Politika, the journal of the Center for Morality in Public Life, about the value of (not) voting, particularly the suggestion by Andrew Haines that in some cases there is a moral duty not to vote. This morning I respond with an analysis of the consequences of not voting, ultimately arguing that one must not neglect to count the cost of abstaining to vote for any particular office. One issue, however, that I...
Rev. Sirico on Life, Work, and Human Flourishing
J.Q. Tomanek of Ignitum Today interviewed Rev. Sirico about life, work, human flourishing, and his new book, Defending the Free Market: JQ Tomanek: Back in the day, holiness was misinterpreted as a cleric or religious life thing. How can a lay Catholic practice their faith? What are some ways to sanctify our work as lay Catholics? Is “ora et labora” just a monk thing? Reverend Sirico: Yes, religious people are often tempted to e so “heavenly minded they are no...
How were people On Call in Culture 165 years ago?
What is so special about 1837? That was the year Abraham Kuyper was born. September 29th is his 165th birthday. So we thought we would go back to 1837 and see how people were being On Call in Culture back then. We don’t know if they were all believers on a mission to bless the world, but by seeing what was going on 165 years ago, we hope you are encouraged to engage your world in 2012! How did people...
Did 2,362 Millionaires Get Unemployment Checks in 2009? (Answer: Yes they did.)
The Congressional Research Service (CRS), a group that works exclusively for the U.S. Congress, issued a report with one of the greatest titles I’ve ever seen on a government document: Receipt of Unemployment Insurance by e Unemployed Workers (“Millionaires”) Now the first nine words are nothing special, typical policy-wonk speak. But whoever added in the word “millionaires” with scare quotes and parentheses is a genius. Most people would have been nodding off around the word “Insurance” but seeing millionaires (that’s...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved