Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Departing in Peace: Economics and Liturgical Living
Departing in Peace: Economics and Liturgical Living
Apr 23, 2026 6:02 AM

In the most recent issue of Theosis (1.6), Fr. Thomas Loya, a Byzantine Catholic priest, iconographer, and columnist, has an interesting contribution on the ing feast of the Presentation of Christ at the Temple (also known as Candlemas or the “Meeting of the Lord”). For many, February 2nd is simply the most bizarre and meaningless American holiday: Groundhog Day. However, for more traditional Christians, this is a major Christian feast day: memoration of the forty day presentation of Christ at the Temple in Jerusalem (December 25 + 40 days = February 2; for the biblical account, see Luke 2:22-40).

In his installment on “Applied Byzantine Liturgy” (pp. 54-56), Loya writes regarding this feast that it, like all liturgy, transforms our vision and thereby ought to be “applied to every aspect of life.” He writes,

When we say, “applied to every aspect of life” we really, really meant it: the economy, the environment, politics, education, healthcare, marriage, family, sexuality, law, work, unions, management, etc, etc. Did you notice how many of the words in this last sentence were some of the “hot button” words of our day? Have you also noticed how none of the areas that these words denote is functioning well today? There is one reason—lack of the correct vision and the application of the correct vision.

He goes on ment on the meeting between Simeon, a “just and devout” old man, who was waiting for the Messiah, and the child Jesus:

Like Peter, James and John, on Mt. Tabor, like the Magi in Bethlehem or the Apostle Thomas in the upper room, Simeon is seeing through this God incarnate in human form, what it really means to be human. He has a clear vision of our glorious origins and of our even more glorious destiny. If this accurate view of the human person es our view (because we went to Church on this Feast Day and learned about this vision) then if we apply this vision to the hot button issues mentioned above the results will be better.

In the space of such a short article, however, he is not really able to explore any of these “hot button” issues in greater depth. Agreeing with his basic premise—that the liturgy of the Church gives us the correct vision of the human person and life by reorienting us toward Christ—I would like to explore some of the insights this feast has for our economic life today.

In the Gospel of Luke, poetry breaks forth from Simeon’s mouth when he holds the child Jesus in his arms:

Lord, now let your servant depart in peace,

According to your word;

For my eyes have seen your salvation

Which you have prepared before the face of all peoples,

A light to bring revelation to the Gentiles,

And the glory of your people Israel. (Luke 2:29-32)

The many hymns of the feast in the Eastern tradition describe the meeting in greater, even midrashic, detail. One vespers hymn of the feast by Andrew Pyros describes the meeting as follows:

Simeon now receives below in his earthly arms

the One Whom the ministers on high entreat with trembling.

He proclaims the union of God with mankind.

He sees the heavenly God as mortal Man.

He prepares to withdraw from earthly things,

and raises his cry in joy:

“Glory to You, Lord, for You have revealed to those in darkness

the Light that knows no evening!”

What is the vision, the paradigm shift, of this feast? When Simeon holds in his arms God incarnate, he proclaims first that parison nothing else in life matters (“let your servant depart in peace”) and second that therein lies our greatest hope (“to those in darkness” has been revealed “the Light that knows no evening”).

Furthermore, this meeting happens in obedience to mandments: “Now when the days of [Mary’s] purification according to the law of Moses pleted, they brought [Jesus] to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord (as it is written in the law of the Lord, ‘Every male who opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord’)” (Luke 2:22-23).

But how might this serve to transfigure our vision in the economic aspect of our lives?

It begins, I think, with a shift in perspective regarding life and death. Often we live as if death did not await us all. Indeed, it is through suchthrough “fear of death” that we so often are “subject to bondage” (see Hebrews 2:15). As the ascetic spiritual tradition of the Church constantly affirms, one of the most important perspectives we can have is to remember the day of our deaths; after all, it is one of the only certainties in life. In doing so, so long as we are looking to Christ, we see that all of our life, including our economic life—our production, distribution, and exchange—can be either tyrannized by purely material concerns, or transfigured by heavenly vision of hope that only the resurrected Christ can give.

In honorable work we produce not only products for bodily consumption but virtue, heavenly treasure, for our souls. In our distribution, that is, in the purpose for which we exchange the products or wages of our work, we broaden our interests to include mon good and the kingdom of God, especially hope for those who live in darkness. And in our exchanges themselves we remember that the goal is mutual benefit and service, shunning the immorality of monopolistic, one-sided, and petitive advantage, remembering that mandment, “You shall not steal” (Exodus 20:15), has broader implications than literal burglary.

Indeed, a life lived in this way, living out the liturgy of the Church in “every aspect of life,” looking to Christ as our model and source of true humanity, “our glorious origins and … our even more glorious destiny,” is a good step forward toward peace when the day of one’s departure arrives.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Chernobyl and Alexander Solzhenitsyn on a culture of deceit
Yesterday, December 11 was the birthday of the great Russian writer, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, born in 1918. The Imaginative Conservative published an essay I wrote on Solzhenitsyn and the HBO series Chernobyl. If you have not seen the series, it is excellent. As a warning, some of the scenes, especially in episode three are tough to watch, but it is incredibly well done. One of the underlying themes of the series is the problem of widespread deceit. This of course was...
The Virtue of Liberalism
Today, Law & Liberty published the text of my lecture for the Philadelphia Society in October: “Why Economic Nationalism Fails.” The topic for the panel was “Conservatism and the Coming Economy.” Since I’m not a determinist and doubt my own powers of prediction, I focused on what political economy conservatives ought to support in the future, despite worrying trends in the present: Conservatives ought to reaffirm the good of economic liberty, both domestically and internationally. Free markets and free trade,...
A bait and switch at Peter’s Pence?
The Wall Street Journal’s recent article on the Vatican’s main charitable appeal landed like a bombshell this week. And it didn’t help that we’re in the midst of the holiday giving season. The Roman Catholic Church conducts an annual collection known as Peter’s Pence, which is touted as supporting mercy ministries and serving those most in need. Shockingly, the Journal has reported that for at least the last five years “as little as 10%” of the approximately $55 million raised...
Wilhelm Röpke on liberalism and Catholic social teaching
This week’s Acton Commentary, adapted from my preface to the newest Acton Institute publication The Humane Economist: A Wilhelm Röpke Reader, illustrates what makes Röpke such an interesting and vital economist: Röpke saw his project in holistic terms involving intersecting and interdependent spheres or orden that to be fully appreciated and understood scientifically must be examined in their economic, social, and moral dimensions. mitments to mainline economic analysis, the importance of social institutions, and the moral and religious framework of...
Artificial Intelligence: A contribution or detriment to human flourishing?
In my recent book, Artificial Humanity. An Essay on the Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (2019, IF Press), I analyze several interesting aspects of artificial intelligence (AI) from a philosophical, anthropological and even ‘futuristic’ point of view. My intention throughout the book is to keep the reader grounded in real expectations about AI and its integration with rational, intelligent and free human living parison with so-called “advanced” machine learning. Therefore, I ask fundamental questions as guidance to readers who have followed...
An encyclical on China and the US?
Sen. Marco Rubio’s recent speech on capitalism and mon good, taking its point of departure in Rerum Novarum, has gotten a good bit of coverage. Yesterday he delivered remarks at the National Defense University and opened with these words: This morning I am honored to speak here at the National Defense University to discuss the defining geopolitical relationship of this century: the one between the United States and China. Unfortunately, I was unable to find a papal encyclical on this...
How would Jeremy Corbyn change the UK?
American observers may know that Jeremy Corbyn wishes to fundamentally transform the British economy and reshape the special relationship between the U.S. and the UK. “Is it moral to confiscate people’s property and deny the elderly the right to control their own property?” asks Rev. Richard Turnbull, as he explores Corbyn’s economic proposals, from providing “free” services to the full nationalization of whole industries. For instance, Corbyn’s economic plan would destroy £367 billion of stock wealth. Turnbull – the director...
Acton Line podcast: Elizabeth Warren wants $3 trillion tax hike; Mark Hall on America’s Christian founding
Massachusetts Democratic Senator and presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren has proposed to increase taxes for big businesses and high earners to rake in nearly $3 trillion per year. Warren plans to use this tax to fund spending in health care, education, and family benefits, and as a result, according to Warren, the economy would grow. Are economists in agreement with Warren? What would increased taxes on the wealthy do for the economy? Dave Hebert, professor of economics and director of the...
Jeremy Corbyn would destroy the US-UK special relationship
Citizens across the UK are casting their votes in the 2019 general election. Jeremy Corbyn “seems in equal parts blind to the violence of socialism, the goodness of the West, and anti-Semitism in his own party,” I write in my new article for The American Spectator. The voters’ decision will have a decisive impact on the United States and the West as a whole. The Labour Party leader would destroy the special relationship of the U.S. and the UK. After...
Trade war hits home: How tariffs disrupt American businesses
Despite the “America-first” claims of trade protectionists and economic nationalists, we continue to see the ill effects of the Trump administration’s recent wave of tariffs—particularly among American businesses, workers, and consumers. Alas, while such controls may serve to temporarily benefit a select number of businesses or industries, they are just as likely to distort and contort any number of other fruitful relationships and creative partnerships across the economic order—at home, abroad, and everywhere in between. In a recent article for...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved