Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Daniel Hannan on the Conservative Case for Brexit
Daniel Hannan on the Conservative Case for Brexit
Jan 27, 2026 5:24 PM

In the hubbub surrounding Brexit, many conservatives have cheered the United Kingdom’s vote to leave the European Union, hailing it as a win for freedom, democracy, and local sovereignty.

Yet forthosewho disagree, support for Brexit is painted as necessarily driven by fear, xenophobia, and protectionism.Although fear of immigrants and narrow nationalism have surelyplayed their part, such sentiments and attitudes aren’t the only driversat play, and they mustn’t be heeded if Brexitis actually going to succeed.

Indeed, for conservatives in the vein of Edmund Burke, the reasons for supporting Brexit are necessarily different. Political withdrawal from the EU needn’t, nay, mustn’t mean isolation from outside markets or a freeze on the movement of labor.

As Hannan outlinesin a marvelous speech given prior to the vote, this isn’t aboutprotectionism, but about preservingatradition of freedom and democracy. It isn’t about a fear of outsiders, butabout a basic belief in the principle of subsidiarity.

Having outlined the dysfunction of the EU’s prevailing bureaucracy and the necessity of paving apath toward freer trade, Hannan concludes by channeling Burke:

Of the many things that I want for that child is the right to grow up in an independent country where we can hire and fire our own lawmakers. Edmund Burke said that a nation is a partnership between the people who have died, the people who are alive now, and the people who have yet to beborn.

Being a nation means that we are not just a random set of individuals born to a different random set of random individuals. It imposes on us a duty to keep intact the freedoms that we were lucky enough to inherit from our parents and pass them on securely to the next generation. My late father, in 1944, volunteered to defend with force of arms our own laws and our own people in our own sovereign parliament. I don’t want his grandchildren to lose that portion of their inheritance.

So don’t let anyone scare you out of voting to do the democratic thing…We are a great country and our song is not yet sung. We still have more to give. Though much is taken, much abides. And though we are not now that strength, which in old days moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are.

The conservative case for supporting Brexit isn’t one of immigrant-fear and narrow nationalism. It’s one based in our core belief that public matters ought to be decided at the lowest and most local level possible, particularly when the Grand Pooh-Bahs of Enlightenment are unelected and unaccountable, proven time and again to bemired in despotic delusions of grandeur.

Is there risk that renewed sovereignty will bewasted on short-termgrievances or unduly punished by theex-overlords? Yes. But is there also opportunity for Britain to right its ship as the rest of the continent continues tosink in itsrange of debilitating fantasies?Yes, indeed.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Video: Sirico on Ayn Rand’s ‘false gospel’
Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico appeared in a a video interview released yesterday by Catholic News Service, following a press conference in Rome last week held to introduce his new book “Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for the Free Economy” to the local media. CNS Rome bureau chief Frank Rocca interviewed Siricoregarding his own moral defense of market economics and asked his opinion of the libertarian novelist and intellectual Ayn Rand, whose philosophy of objectivism and rational-self...
Subsidiarity in the Tradition of Catholic Social Doctrine
Patrick McKinley Brennan, a professor at Villanova University School of Law, has a new paper that considers the place subsidiarity in the tradition of Catholic Social Doctrine: Subsidiarity is often described as a norm calling for the devolution of power or for performing social functions at the lowest possible level. In Catholic social doctrine, it is neither. Subsidiarity is the fixed and immovable ontological principle according to which mon good is to be achieved through a plurality of social forms....
The Catholicity of Subsidiarity
Earlier this week we noted that Patrick Brennan posted a paper, “Subsidiarity in the Tradition of Catholic Social Doctrine,” which unpacks some of the recent background and implications for the use of the principle in Catholic social thought. As Brennan observes, “Although present in germ from the first Christian century, Catholic social thought began to emerge as a unified body of doctrine in the nineteenth century….” Brennan goes on to highlight the particularly Thomistic roots of the doctrine of subsidiarity,...
PBS to Air ‘First Freedom: The Fight for Religious Liberty’
Groberg Films has produced “First Freedom: the Fight for Religious Liberty”, which will be airing on local PBS stations during the month of December. The film is described as portraying the “radical” break America’s Founding Fathers made from religion-by-law to a society that depended upon the morality of its citizenry. Noting that this was a “fundamental shift in human history”, the film seeks to portray the establishment of freedom of religion as a fundamental human right. A preview of the...
Integrating Evangelism and Social Action Across Culture
In the recent issue of Reject Apathy, an off-shoot publication of RELEVANT Magazine, Tim Hoiland explores what he believes to be a tension between “serving justice” and “saving souls”: This [young] generation’s passion for justice is, without doubt, something to celebrate. It’s a breathtaking sign that the Spirit is at work, leading young men and women into lives marked by the reigning belief that all of life matters to God, not just the parts we might call “spiritual.” But in...
The FAQs: What is the Fiscal Cliff?
What is the “fiscal cliff”? The term “fiscal cliff”, which is believed to have originated in Congressional testimony by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, refers to the substantial changes to tax and spending policies that are scheduled to automatically take effect in January 2013. The changes are intended to significantly reduce the federal budget deficit. What are the tax and spending policies that will change? Several major tax provisions are set to expire at year’s end: The 2001/2003 Bush tax...
Cardinal O’Brien on Religious Liberty
Cardinal Edwin F. O’Brien, Grand Master of the Knights of the Holy Sepulcher, talks about the need for vigilance in defending religious liberty around the world. ...
Michael Miller in Legatus Magazine: ‘Community, liberty and freedom’
Acton’s Director of Media, Michael Matheson Miller, discusses the current state of American thought on state, Church, family and liberty in Legatus Magazine. He focuses on the work of two Frenchmen: Alexis de Tocqueville and Jean Jacques Rousseau. Many of the differences can be boiled down to what we mean munity. Rousseau’s vision munity is what the sociologist Robert Nisbet called the munity.” For Rousseau, the two main elements of society are the individual and the state. All other groups...
Commentary: Government Subsidies Not So Sweet for Health
How can we trust a government to tell us what’s best for our healthcare when it’s subsidizing a corn industry that produces a food additive researchers believe may be tied to rising levels of obesity and disease? Anthony Bradley looks at a new study that raises moral questions about the consequences of the corn subsidy.The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publicationshere. Government Subsidies Not So Sweet for Health...
Obama Administration’s Misjudgement of the Nation’s Conscience
Currently, there are forty cases against the Obamacare HHS mandate. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 requires employers to provide, as employee health care, “preventative services” such as abortion and sterilization. John Daniel Davidson, in First Things, says that the president and his administration have grossly misjudged this entire situation. In Davidson’s view, the administration “in their conceit” seemed to think that millions of Americans would simply put aside their deeply held religious and moral convictions and play along with...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved