Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Czech commies want to tax church property stolen by Czech commies
Czech commies want to tax church property stolen by Czech commies
Jan 8, 2026 11:19 PM

Imagine your property is stolen and then having to have this conversation.

Government authorities: “Good news, we recovered your stolen property!”

You: “That’s great! When can I get it back?”

Gov: “Eh, the bad news is we can only give you back 56 percent of what was stolen.”

You: “Well, I guess that’s better than nothing.”

Gov: “The good news is that you’ll receive cash as restitution for the rest.”

You: “Oh wow. That’s incredible!”

Gov: “The bad news is that you’ll get paid the restitution over 30 years.”

You: “That’s a long time to get back what is owed me. Is there more . . . good news?”

Gov: “Why yes, actually, there is. The good news is that you get to pay taxes on the restitution.”

You: “Wait, what? My property was stolen and I’m expected to pay tax on it? How is that good news?”

Gov: “Well, it’s good news for us because it makes the Communists happy.”

That’s the gist of what is going on in Czech Republic.

When the Communists seized Czechoslovakia in 1948, they confiscated all the property owned by churches. After the fall of the Soviet Union, the country became a liberal democracy and in 1993 split into the independent Czech Republic and Slovakia. For years Christians in the country tried to get back their stolen lands. In 2012, the Czech government finally agreed pensate the churches for what was stolen from them by the former Communist government.

Under the plan, according to the New York Times, the nation’s 17 churches, including the Roman Catholic and Protestant sects, would get back 56 percent of their old property now held by the state—estimated at the time to be worth $3.7 billion. Then, over the next three decades, the churches would also get $2.9 billion.

Now, the AP reports that the new Czech minority government led by populist billionaire Andrej Babis has agreed with a proposal to tax pensation that the country’s churches receive for property seized by the former Communist regime.

Not surprisingly, the proposal came from the Communist Party. The Communists steal the property and then, when they are forced to give it back, try to steal some of it back again.

As Father Stanislav Přibyl, the secretary general of the Czech Bishops’ Conference, says in the AP story, the restitution is “not a gift.”

“It is a partial reimbursement for the property confiscated by the Communists which had been intended to support the livelihood of priests and religious in the then Czechoslovakia.” Přibyl says the Communist Party and its allies are trying to justify their original confiscations by “this attempt at taxation.”

Přibyl added that the agreement between the State and Church was signed between the two parties in a treaty, and the present government should respect the rule of law.

The situation in the Czech Republic is outrageous, but not at all surprising. As the old saying goes, “never get involved in a land war in Asia, never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line, and never trust the Commies to respect the rule of law.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Concerns about consensus
George H. Taylor, the State Climatologist for Oregon, writes at TCS Daily, “A Consensus About Consensus.” The article is worth reading. It shows that scientific consensus is often overrated, both in terms of its existence and in terms of its relevance. With resepct to global warming, Taylor looks at some of the claims for scientific consensus, and states, “But even if there actually were a consensus on this issue, it may very well be wrong.” This simply means that the...
Nonprofits beware!
A friend forwarded a Website link for The Nonprofit Congress recently that was downright scary. It appears to be the epitome of good intentions fraught with unintended consequences. Or perhaps the consequences are not unintended. The Congress is an apparent call to advocacy (i.e., political pressuring) within the National Council of Nonprofit Associations. To the group’s credit, the “why” is a forthright statement of their view and values: The time e for nonprofits of all sizes and scope e together....
The dignity of every human being
The February 11 issue of WORLD Magazine includes a culture feature, “Giving their names back.” Profiled in the article is Citizens for Community Values (CCV), a nonprofit in Memphis that does a victim assistance program called “A Way Out.” It’s a reclamation program of sorts, literally reclaiming women ensnarled in the sex trade industry, and giving them back their lives, reclamation evidenced by names. The very nature of the sex industry, be it topless dancing, stripping or prostitution, requires anonymity–no...
Western Europe’s political homogeneity
Western Europeans often talk about the homogeneity of American politics and how the parties hardly differ from one another. One reason why Europeans believe this is because they often pay attention to US politics only during a presidential campaign, so they do have some justification. But while their opinion is understandable not only does it fail to reflect the real difference between the left and the right in America; it obscures the homogeneity of Western European political life. What is...
‘Captialism’ according to the academy
For a quick overview of the current state of appreciation for economics and capitalism among various ‘academics,’ see the newly inaugurated e-journal Fast Capitalism. It might as well be subtitled: Marxism, Alive and Well. Most of the contributors to the first issue are in munications, or political science. Here’s a sampling: In “Beyond Beltway and Bible Belt: Re-imagining the Democratic Party and the American Left,” Ben Agger, who teaches sociology and humanities at the University of Texas at Arlington, writes,...
Stewardship and economics: two sides of the same coin
In yesterday’s Acton Commentary, I argued that the biblical foundation for the concepts of stewardship and economics should lead us to see them as united. In this sense I wrote, “Economics can be understood as the theoretical side of stewardship, and stewardship can be understood as the practical side of economics.” I also defined economics as “the thoughtful ordering of the material resources of a household or social unit toward the self-identified good end” and said that the discipline “helps...
Bonhoeffer’s legacy
Earlier this month, we marked the 100th anniversary of Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s birth on February 4, in what is now Wroclaw, Poland. In a message before the International Bonhoeffer Conference on February 3, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams said, Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a man immersed in a specific cultural heritage, and untroubled by the fact; he was a person of profound and rigorous (and very traditional) personal spirituality; he was mitted to the ecumenical perspective from very early on in his...
Jack Hafer at the Acton Lecture Series
Jack Hafer, the producer of the award-winning film, To End All Wars, will be speaking at the 2006 Acton Lecture Series on Wednesday, February 15. This luncheon (which does include a lunch) will be held in the David Cassard room of the Waters Building in downtown Grand Rapids from 12:00pm – 1:30. Mr. Hafer will discuss the challenges of making movies with profound moral messages in today’s Hollywood culture. He will also talk about plans for future projects that break...
Addicted to influence
A brief but timely editorial appears in this month’s issue of Christianity Today, “We Are What We Behold.” Here’s a taste: “…evangelicals have wrestled with our relationship to power. When in a position of influence (and in our better moments), we leverage power to better the lives of our neighbors. Cultural savvy enables us to successfully translate the gospel for a changing world. But it’s a double-edged sword—influence and savvy can also dull the gospel’s transcendence. We achieve a royal...
Moral posturing on Africa
Over the weekend, the Daily Telegraph’s Charles Moore asked, “Why should the Left win the scramble for Africa?” : [T]he trouble with this subject – perhaps this is why the Left dominates it – is that it attracts posturing. Africa is, among other things, a photo-opportunity. As our own educational system makes it harder and harder to get British pupils to smile at all, so the attraction for politicians of being snapped with rows of black children with happy grins...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved