Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Customers put product value ahead of political values
Customers put product value ahead of political values
Feb 25, 2026 9:18 PM

Woke capitalism prioritizes politics. But paying customers always put service and price first.

Read More…

For years American business has allowed itself to be swayed by the push and pull of political culture. Investment decisions, corporate donations, and hiring practices have been made in response to a culture that demands acquiescence or cancellation.

But as Netflix, Disney, and State Farm deal with political and cultural backlash from both sides on a host of issues, and politicians scapegoat businesses large and small, the luxury car industry has reminded us of what used to be Business 101: Provide what consumers want, get it to them on time, and charge the agreed-upon price. Nothing more, nothing less.

panies like Ford, Toyota, and General Motors struggled to meet demand, and some manufacturers ordered dealerships to drop their prices, BMW and Tesla took advantage of excellent chip supply chains to produce record numbers of cars and then deliver those cars to consumers. This disciplined approach to supply chain continuity and customer satisfaction seemed to have been the industry’s top priority.

“Luxury vehicle sales have always tried to set themselves apart with not just a far superior product, but a consumer service that borders on a personal concierge feel,” says automotive entrepreneur James Boening, who has run luxury car dealerships across the country. “People pay for service. Give someone a Ritz Carlton experience when buying a car, and all of a sudden it’s less about the car and more about the personal connection and care.”

Today many businesses make the mistake of appealing to assumed customer political and cultural values instead of creating value for customers—often resulting in in positive headlines but always risking backlash when they land on the “wrong” side of an issue. Starbucks, for example, has received praise from liberals for funding employees’ abortions … but criticism for opposing staff unions. And just last month, State Farm promoted, then canceled, an internal LGBT-support network.

Sometimes the old ways work best, and survey data and consumer anecdotes make clear that customers put pany’s value proposition —getting the right goods or services at the right price on time, and being treated well along the way—ahead of ever-changing cultural and political values. Businesses that want to improve sales, increase profits, and build strong customer loyalty should ignore keyboard warriors on Twitter and pay attention to what real customers say and do.

In Summer 2020, Axios asked 34,000 consumers which corporations they trusted most. The winners weren’t the flashiest or the most political—they simply met customer needs and wants. Clorox was No. 1 because people wanted to be sanitary. No. 3 Amazon kept people’s homes well stocked, and five of the next panies were grocery stores that kept us fed at home and safe in public. Technology firms filled out many of the other top 30 slots, with Netflix and Zoom providing stay-at-home entertainment, work opportunities, and education.

As Axios put it, “Industries with a prominent role in life under quarantine have seen especially big jumps” in consumer trust.

A few months later, research consultancy McKinsey found that the pandemic had radically changed consumer loyalty, but not their priorities. One-third of Americans changed from whom they bought goods, and those changes were made for reasons like value provided, convenience to acquire goods, and availability of goods desired.

A final survey, conducted by accounting powerhouse PwC in Fall 2021, found that businesses earn the most employee and customer trust when they prioritize munication, and owning up to mistakes. In a close fourth, and interwoven into the top three customer priorities, was “delivers consistent customer experience.”

None of this surprises Lee Rashkin, who took Presby Environmental from a pany to America’s second-largest wastewater-treatment manufacturer.

“There are exceptions to every rule, but consumers—and, therefore, sales—are driven less by social activism and far more by timeless core business values,” he told me. “Reliability was Presby’s hallmark. We prioritized never having a backlog, even when we sent millions of units across the country and the world. And distributors often preferred to rely on our trucking capacity instead of a cheaper, outsourced alternative.”

But even as consumers show us what they want, many influential voices say differently. Industry leaders, politicians, and media pundits frequently say that having the “right values” is critical to business survival.

But what are those “right values”? Consumers don’t want politics; just 19% of customers told PwC that left-of-center social values drove the most trust, whereas the universal values of accountability and consistency ranked 50% and 39%, respectively. This is true for people across the political spectrum: Liberals and conservatives alike have made China the world’s leading manufacturer despite China’s positions on key issues like genocide against Muslims and widespread forced abortions, respectively.

Luxury panies are, again, our North Star when es to doing business right. They know that consumers share the same marketplace priorities. We want to be treated well when making a purchase, understand what we’re getting when we make said purchase, and believe that the product or service will be delivered on time for the agreed-upon price. And if something goes wrong, we want munication and accountability to correct the problem.

These critical values supplement pany’s value proposition because they’re universal. There is no brand risk to treating all people as they deserve, paying your staff well, and having a culture of accountability; whereas having the “wrong” opinion about culture and politics can earn bad press and distract senior executives from focusing on growth.

“Senior executives bring the most value by focusing on customer service, high employee retention, and gross and net profit,” says Mike Feuz, an economist who consults for national and multinational corporations. “The best business leaders look long term, beyond the noise of public opinion and quarter-to-quarter performance. They keep critical goals front of mind, which mitigates short-term risk and keeps the pany on track.”

Consumer opinion surveys have made customer priorities clear: They want their orders taken care of first, now and always. It’s why luxury panies like BMW and Tesla shattered records last year.

But the panies go beyond a simple product or service. Despite their political controversies, Chick-fil-A and Starbucks have products their customers want. But they’ve also created environments in which universal values are respected. Chick-fil-A has the most profitable franchise in fast food because of employee politeness: It’s never “You’re e,” but instead “My pleasure”—and it moves drive-thru customers at amazing speeds. And Starbucks prioritizes your name and giving you a relaxing coffee experience with your latte and pastry.

Politically oriented capitalism made huge inroads with corporate America in the years leading up to the pandemic. But as we saw Netflix—hardly a socially pany—defend Dave Chappelle against critics, and the University of Michigan—which explicitly supports legalized abortion—defend a pro-life professor against medical students who walked out on her department e speech, the pendulum may be swinging back the other way.

Historically and today, the panies put customer value before generic, ever-changing social activism, which most consumers don’t care about when making a purchase. This may seem a no-brainer, especially for free-market readers, but it can’t be emphasized enough that, when times get panies that value their customers will thrive by putting their energy into keeping shelves stocked and meeting those customers’ real needs instead of listening to social media activists and cable news talking heads who, deep down, petitive prices and good customer service as much as you do.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Samuel Gregg On The War On Poverty: ‘Pass More Laws And Throw More Dollars At The Problem’
In today’s National Review Online, leading economists are asked ment on the 50th anniversary of Lyndon Johnson’s “War on Poverty.” Acton’s Director of Research, Sam Gregg, weighs in: As we know now, Johnson’s offensive against poverty did not have the impact envisaged by its progenitors. By the early 1970s, the failure was stark. Even today, this failure remains Exhibit A for the ineffectiveness of government intervention when confronting many economic problems. Not that this has led to any major rethinking...
Fatherlessness and the War on Poverty
In addition to reading Joe Carter’s striking by-the-numbers piece on the War on Poverty, and in keeping with Sam Gregg’s reflections on the deeper social and cultural forces at work, I heartily mend taking in Josh Good’s excellent retrospective in AEI’sThe American. Leveraging a lengthy quote from Herman Bavinck’s The Christian Family, one I’ve put to use myself, Good notes the “inverse impact of changing family structure on productive work and a flourishing economy”: The fact is, poverty is not...
Book Review: ‘The New School’ by Glenn Harlan Reynolds
Book information: The New School: How the Information Age Will Save American Education from Itself by Glenn Harlan Reynolds. Jackson, TN: Perseaus Books, 2013. Pp. viii + 106. Paperback. $21.50. Instapundit’s Glenn Harlan Reynolds’ The New School: How the Information Age Will Save American Education from Itself is a clear and succinct, yet thorough, essay on creative destruction and American education. This slim volume (only about 100 pages) is divided approximately into 50 pages on higher education, 25 on secondary...
Is the $17 Trillion Federal Debt Immoral?
Even when we agree on what Biblical principles should guide our political choices, evangelicals from the left and right rarely agree on policy solutions. But there is one area where there appears to be an increasingly significant level of agreement: the immorality of our national debt. At Christianity Today, David P. Gushee — an ethicist and politically progressive evangelical — explains why the $17 trillion national debt is both immoral and unwise: Most progressive evangelicals who address government spending focus...
At-A-Glance: Public Vs. Private Sector Health Care
The Washington Examiner has published a chart that clearly lays out the difference between Obamacare versus private sector health care. Using Walmart as an example (despite the employer’s much-disparaged employee benefits), Elliot Smilowitz at the Examiner shows that the private sector is able to parable health care at much less expense than Obamacare. ...
The Call to Work and the Freedom to Flourish
TheInstitute for Faith, Work, and Economics just released a nice little video that captures the importance of vocation and the beauty of work, elevating freedom as the primary driver of human flourishing. Watch it here: There is a way that leads a man to flourish. It is freedom: the freedom to discover his true potential, to keep the fruits of his labor, to find fulfillment in his work. These freedoms are the right of every person, because e woven into...
Detroit’s ‘Get out of Bankruptcy Free’ Card
Aaron M. Renn’s reflections on the implications of Detroit’s bankruptcy are worth reading, especially as relate to the DIA, a topic of some previous interest over the last year or so: In the case of the DIA, the city owns the museum and the collection. Hence the question of whether or not art should be sold to satisfy debts. If it were typical separately chartered non-profit institution, this wouldn’t even be a question. At this point, I’d suggest cities ought...
By the Numbers: The War on Poverty
Fifty years ago today, President Lyndon B. Johnson gave his 1964 State of the Union Speech, in which he launched the ‘war on poverty.’ Within four years of that speech, the Johnson administration enacted a broad ran of programs, including the the Job Corps, Upward Bound, Head Start, the Neighborhood Youth Corps, the Social Security amendments creating Medicare/Medicaid, the creation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and over a dozen others. Here are a few numbers related to...
The Bond of Fellowship
I was reading an essay that I found in an old book I bought in Vermont. Dr H.J. Laski (Oxford and Yale) wrote, “The less obvious the differences between men in the gain of living, the greater the bond of fellowship between them.” In other words the less we talk about differences between the rich and poor, the better we will all like each other and get along. In the Depression which began as he was writing, nearly everyone was...
Whom Would Jesus Indebt?
Putting ourselves and our children further in debt, notes Timothy Dalrymple, is not the way to help the poor: One of the great difficulties of this issue, for Christians, is that the morality of spending and debt has been so thoroughly demagogued that it’s impossible to advocate cuts in government spending without being accused of hatred for the poor and needy. A group calling itself the “Circle of Protection” recently promoted a statement on “Why We Need to Protect Programs...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved