Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Cronyism vs. free markets in ‘Stranger Things’
Cronyism vs. free markets in ‘Stranger Things’
Mar 24, 2026 6:36 AM

The newest season of Netflix’s sci-fi horror series Stranger Things released on July 4, and I’m happy to report that season 3 has a new hero, and her name is Erica.

(This post focuses entirely on episode 4 of the new season, so anyone who hasn’t watched up to that point yet should beware of spoilers.)

Erica is the younger sister of Lucas, one of the four D&D-playing boys at the center of the series. This isn’t her first appearance in the 1980s-nostalgia-laced show, but in this season she’s given a bigger role as the show’s undisputed hero, or at least that’s my major takeaway from episode 4.

To set the scene, Dustin, Steve, and Robin (new to the series), have uncovered what they believe is a secret Russian plot playing out at Hawkins’ own Starcourt Mall, where Steve and Robin work in the ice cream shop and Erica regularly abuses their free tasting policy.

The trio observed a suspicious shipment to a storage room guarded by a (presumably Soviet) man with a rifle, and they want to see what was in the boxes.

They have a plan: They can get there through the ventilation system.

They also have a problem: None of them are small enough to fit through the vents.

Thus, in the scene below, they attempt to enlist Erica’s help:

Erica’s “You-can’t-spell-America-without-Erica” speech, as it will no doubt go down in history, calls back to Adam Smith’s famous observation for why people trade in his Wealth of Nations:

Whoever offers to another a bargain of any kind, proposes to do this: Give me that which I want, and you shall have this which you want, is the meaning of every such offer; and it is in this manner that we obtain from one another the far greater part of those good offices which we stand in need of. It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own necessities but of their advantages.

So also, Erica points out, “The problem is, I still haven’t heard what’s in this for Erica.” Dustin later tries to appeal to her humanity and patriotism, then gets a lesson from Erica on what really makes America great, the free market system:

Know what I love most about this country? Capitalism. Do you know what capitalism is? … It means this is a free market system. Which means people get paid for their services depending on how valuable their contributions are. And it seems to me, my ability to fit into that little vent is very, very valuable to you all.

Thus, she is teaching them an elementary lesson about economics. As the economist Paul Heyne put it, “if I think you’ll smile at me, I’ll talk a little longer.” Free exchanges are positive-sum endeavors. They work because both parties — in their own estimation — benefit. This is how wealth is increased through production and exchange.

But wait! Not all exchanges are “free.” The United States has enjoyed the benefits of free markets since its founding, but it has also had to deal with the scourge of cronyism at the same time. Not everyone, like Erica, gets to grill the other party about all the risks involved or have the option of just walking away from the deal if they don’t get an offer that is worth it to them. As it turns out, this episode covers that too.

Adam Smith warned of how business interests can collude with governments to close markets and increase their own advantage to the disadvantage of everyone else. In a parallel plot line, we see this cronyistic capitalism — as opposed to the free market system — on display too.

Starcourt, pany that owns the mall whose creative destruction has been shaking up the local economy, has genuinely sinister schemes, the full nature of which are yet to be fully disclosed by episode 4. What we do learn, however, is that in order to expand its property holdings, Starcourt has been lobbying — and perhaps even threatening — the local mayor Larry Kline (played by Cary Elwes of Princess Bride fame).

Joyce Byers and police chief Jim Hopper confront Kline about a suspicious motorcyclist Hopper saw at the mayor’s office the previous day, and Hopper coerces a confession from Kline through questionable methods after the latter threatens to blackmail him:

I don’t know his name, I swear…. He gives me things sometimes … money, presents, gifts…. Starcourt, he works for Starcourt…. I swear! I swear! Starcourt — they own the mall. They want to expand to east Hawkins. They needed property, some land. People didn’t want to sell, so I leaned on them a little.

Today, people see mega-malls in disrepair and get nostalgic about a bygone era, but at the time (the season is set in 1985) the malls — sometimes rightly, sometimes not — were viewed by some as the bad guys, pushing local stores out of business. In Stranger Things, it turns out the mall isn’t just offering a better deal to consumers, but unjustly striking deals with City Hall in order to ensure their market position through special favors rather than petition. Furthermore, what might be thought of by some as an iconic picture of capitalism in the 1980s is revealed — so far as viewers know — to be a front for nefarious Soviets!

Who can save Hawkins from these cronyistic fakers and their evil plans? Who can stand for freedom, justice, and the American way?

I don’t know the final answer to those questions yet (I’m still watching!), but I know one thing: You can’t spell America, without “Erica.”

Image via IMDB, scaled down to adapt for this post.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Saving the Free Market
The famous Austrian economist, Joseph Schumpeter, despaired for the future of the free market system. The reason for this despair was that the excess wealth of the system would create educated folks who would turn on the very system that created them. Their education would make them into anti-capitalist ideologues, who would then kill the goose that laid the golden egg. He did not think that those who participated in the creation of such enormous wealth would be in any...
Birth of Freedom Shorts Series: How did Christian slave owners justify slavery?
This week’s Birth of Freedom Video Short features Susan Wise Bauer, author of The History of the Ancient World. She addresses the question, “How did Christian slave owners justify slavery?”, describing how slave owners operated under a false (prescriptive instead of descriptive) understanding of the New Testament’s teaching concerning slavery. Remember, if you haven’t seen the other 7 video shorts, you can check out the rest of the series, learn about premieres in your area, and discover more background information...
Nationalization. Catch the Fever!
Everyone seems to be going ga-ga over nationalization in the US these days, and why not? Heck, it seems to be working pretty well for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. Blast from the not-so-recent past: Maxine Waters on the domestic oil industry… ...
Obama Reparations Radio Interview Begs a Question: Does Wealth Redistribution Actually Help the Poor?
A 2001 radio interview of Barack Obama surfaced yesterday in which he said that “one of the tragedies of the Civil Rights movement,” and one of the limitations of the Warren Supreme Court, was that although they won such formal rights as the right to vote and “sit at the lunch counter and order,” they “never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth.” A caller to the station, WBEZ Chicago 91.5 FM, then asks if the courts are “the...
Saving Capitalism
While efforts to explain the financial crisis will continue for years (historians are still debating the causes of the Great Depression, eight decades later), it seems certain that its genesis cannot be fully understood without some recourse to the moral dimension of human action in the economy. Acton mentators—Jonathan Witt, David Milroy, Sam Gregg—have already weighed in on the question. Economists have long deplored the poor savings rate in the United States, arguing that our ever-increasing debt load (national and...
New Video Short: How Not to Help the Poor
New from Acton Media, this video short titled “How Not to Help the Poor” discusses the root causes of poverty and how even the best of intentions can go wrong in dealing with and trying to help those in need. ...
Fleeing the World’s Eighth Largest Economy
Lawrence J. McQuillan offers a less than surprising economic assessment for the Golden State in the City Journal, causing people to flee for better opportunities elsewhere. McQuillan states: California continues to be burdened with high taxes, punitive regulations, huge wealth-transfer programs, out-of-control spending, and lawsuit abuse. And there’s no end in sight to the state’s fiscal madness. Some entrepreneurial minded residents are finding states like Nevada more hospitable for economic opportunity. Nevada ranks second when es to inbound migration. The...
Is John Wesley’s Economic Advice Sound?
Writing mentary for the United Methodist News Service, J. Richard Peck encourages readers to heed John Wesley’s advice on economic policy. “In short, Wesley called for higher taxes upon the wealthy and laws that would prohibit the wasting of natural products,” says Peck. He notes that the cure for economic troubles relating to the poor was to repress luxury. While some of Wesley’s economc advice is certainly sound, especially his views on the danger of debt, his understanding of basic...
Thoughtful and Reflective Environmentalism
There are two basic errors that entrap discussants on issues related to environmental stewardship. The first error is that of the uncritical activist, who is always ready to embrace whatever faddish innovation or practice the green intelligentsia casts as the latest solution. The problem with this approach is that in it often results in negative unintended consequences. Call this the error of the “early adopter.” On the other extreme is that of the reactive critic, who is only too willing...
Political Science
Although many scientists cultivate the popular image of the benevolent, detached savant toiling away for the betterment of mankind, the fact remains that Ph.D.s in physics or genetics are subject to the same weaknesses as the rest of us. The image has some currency because there is an element of truth in it: scientists in many fields have contributed in remarkable ways to the material progress of humanity. That contribution should not be underappreciated. Yet scientists are not immune to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved