Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Cooperation vs. coercion amid COVID-19
Cooperation vs. coercion amid COVID-19
Jan 25, 2026 4:02 PM

As the COVID-19 crisis rolls on, many of America’s governors have continued to impose, extend or add new restrictions to stay-at-home orders, leading to increasingly arbitrary rule-making and growing criticism over the prudence and practicality of such measures.

Thankfully, individuals and institutions rely on more than government diktats to guide their behavior. In turn, amid the government overreach and tense ideological debates, civil society appears to be self-governing rather well — marked by plenty of individual restraint, collective wisdom and creative cooperation. To be sure, we’ve had our share of reckless spring-breakers, resistant religious leaders and carefree employers. Yet the bigger story is one of personal responsibility and social innovation. Human cooperation is alive and well, even in a season of heightened coercion and distancing.

As economist Lyman Stone explains on Jonah Goldberg’s latest podcast, people seem to respond more so to information about the virus than edicts from government — proceeding to adjust their habits, behaviors and interactions accordingly. Surely, there are businesses who have closed their doors who would not have done so otherwise, but even amid those frustrations, enterprises and institutions quickly adapted, finding new ways to connect and collaborate while still preserving public safety.

“Many businesses closed down well before they were ordered to,” Goldberg writes, reflecting on Stone’s analysis. “Millions of people practiced social distancing and refused to get on planes not because they manded to, but because they were convinced this was a wise course of action for themselves and their loved ones. People change their behavior when they are given clear information about risks.”

While countries have tried a wide range of containment strategies, “what we’ve seen in every country is that what really does it is information,” Stone says. Indeed, prior to any government lockdowns, we can see a significant voluntary shift in behavior in the early weeks of the pandemic.

Yet the vibrancy of civil society isn’t limited to its ability to “social distance” freely and prudently. With very little organized initiative or central planning, individuals and institutions also jumped into creative service mode — taking strides to create and operate in new and innovative ways, whether to keep businesses afloat, create in-demand products and services or bat the virus itself.

In an essay at Public Discourse, Antony Davies and James Harrigan reflect on this overall trend, noting that, “as we are facing the highest levels of coercion in living memory, we are also seeing a degree of cooperation that is every bit as profound.”

Ironically, even the politicians seem to recognize this power and potential — in their own limited ways and when it serves their own limited purposes. For amid the various state-level cocktails of coercive measures, we have also seen a targeted loosening of other regulations, all in an attempt to incentivize support and assistance — cooperation! — among enterprises and institutions.

As Davies and Harrigan explain:

Vice President Mike Pence recently announced that medical professionals will no longer need separate licenses to practice medicine across state lines. This change has the potential to release medical professionals from areas in which the infection rate is lower to work where rates are higher. The underlying and extremely sane message is that, when es to caring for the sick, doctors are more expert than government regulators. We would be better off cutting through years of built-up red tape to let them ply their craft as they see fit.

Not to be outdone, the Department of Health and Human Services announced that it would waive licensing requirements, thereby permitting physicians to provide telemedicine services across state lines…The Food and Drug Administration has gotten in on the action too, announcing that it is relaxing regulations in order to panies producing COVID-19 test kits to bring them to market immediately. By contrast, the process of navigating a new product through FDA testing usually takes months. And it’s not just medical regulations that are being relaxed. The Department of Transportation has suspended rules limiting the number of hours truckers can drive per day. With these restrictions lifted, truckers can get needed products to their destinations faster. This e as e news to people looking at empty supermarket shelves.

It’s an encouraging sign, and one that clearly affirms the reality that our capacity for cooperation moves well before and beyond what the government does or does not sees — allows or disallows. “While this cooperation is most evident where government relaxes its involvement,” write Davies and Harrigan, “it is most meaningful where government was never involved in the first place.”

“The hallmark of civil society is cooperation, which is what we should all be thinking about at times like these,” they continue. “The coronavirus defines our collective life at present, but cooperation defines our collective life as a rule. Always. When our knee-jerk reaction to immediate problems is to coerce, as is so often the case, we push the obvious solutions to our problems into the background. And still, people cooperate.”

Indeed, in the spaces where barriers never existed, people were already busy realigning their habits and relationships, rethinking business processes, streamlining methods of exchange and adapting supply chains to meet a new set of human needs.

People were already busy cooperating to love and serve their neighbors:

People are offering free babysitting service, sometimes for healthcare professionals, sometimes just generally. People are volunteering to go to grocery stores for the elderly and infirm. People are packaging lunches for students whose only food came from their schools, most of which are now closed. In perhaps the finest PR move of all time, theGrub Burger Barin Atlanta even started offering the modity in the country, toilet paper, to their customers from mercial stocks. The price? A shocking $3 for four rolls.

…Walmart hasn’t closed its doors. The retail giant has instead cut back to essential products and reassigned workers from less important departments to things people need right now. Amazon has added a hundred thousand or so temporary employees to get much-needed food and supplies to customers all over the country. Just a few months ago, politicians were decrying Amazon and Walmart as panies and their founders’ wealth as something that was undeserved and should be redistributed. Yet, in crisis, Amazon and Walmart have e the lifeblood for American households. They are, to say the least, good corporate citizens. Perhaps most surprisingly, professional sports team owners like Mark Cuban continue to pay their employees even as gate receipts have dropped to zero…

As if on cue, grocery stores around the country started reserving their first open hour of the day for the elderly and otherwise promised. Why the first hour? That’s when the stores are cleanest, the shelves are fullest, and the lines are shortest. All of this is happening without a shred of governmental coercion. Left unchecked, this is what “cold-hearted” capitalism leads to, more often than not.

Here at Acton.org, we have highlighted a number of similar examples, from medical-device innovation to creative service among businesses to social and economic action among churches munity institutions.

Through interaction and collaboration with others, we realize our needs and take care of ourselves, but we also meet the needs of others. Through work, we earn daily living, but more importantly, as we have seen, we realize our vocation to serve others and build civilization and culture. In the space between the producer and the consumer, worker and co-worker, the business and the customer, we see a diversity of roles, gifts, and innovations — embodying creativity, wise stewardship, measured risk-taking and creative service for the love of neighbor and the glory of God.

“These are by no means isolated incidents, and they shouldn’t even really be surprising. When times e difficult, e to help each other as a rule,” write Davies and Harrigan. “…Thankfully, for every governor declaring what people can or cannot do, there are thousands of regular people doing what regular people have always done: cooperating.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Parents’ inalienable rights over their children’s education and religious instruction
As children in the U.S. return to school, their European contemporaries have or soon will join them. However, they do so in a context that recognizes fewer of the traditional rights that society has accorded parents over the education of their children, especially whether they are taught to uphold or disdain their family’s moral and religious views. Grégor Puppinck, Ph.D., the director of theEuropean Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ), addressed the rights that parents rightfully exercise over their children’s...
Radio Free Acton: Ismael Hernandez on the recent ‘Detroit’ film and Jacqueline Isaacs on Libertarian Christians
This week on Radio Free Acton, we ask Ismael Hernandez, founder and president of the Freedom and Virtue Institute to give his opinions on the new film “Detroit,” depicting the 1967 12th Street Riots. Hernandez states for listeners how “it is important to know that every time you see a portrayal of a historical event, you need to be able to separate fact from narrative…we have to be able to understand that we are being sold a narrative with the...
Video: Rev. Robert Sirico on the Vatican’s targeting of evangelical and Catholic collaboration
President and Co-Founder of the Acton Institute, Rev. Robert Sirico, was recently interviewed on EWTNby news anchor Raymond Arroyo to discuss a recent controversial article published by La CiviltàCattolica. The article, approved by the Vatican, received much criticism because it targeted “conservative evangelical and Catholic collaboration around social issues.” Sirico parses the issues revolving around the article, stating how the article was “not substantive and did not exhibit any kind of real understanding of evangelicalism or of conservative, traditional Catholicism.”...
Why Christians must get poverty and inequality right
Over the last two decades, global poverty has plummeted and the world’s poorest people have steadily climbed out of the shadow of death. Yet many Christians cannot distinguish between dire poverty and e inequality, falsely believe both are worsening, and oppose the very policies that have lifted the world’s poor out of malnutrition. “Why do we underestimate success?” asks Philip Booth in a new essay forReligion & Liberty Transatlantic. “Why do we accept fake news about these issues?” Booth– a...
Our economic age of anxiety
“Developed nations are increasingly haunted by doubts about the legitimacy of their economic structures,” says Victor V. Claar and Greg Forster in this week’s Acton Commentary. “This paralyzing anxiety crosses all lines of ethnicity, religion, class, party and ideology.” This is not a mere selfish concern about who gets how much of what. It is a moral anxiety, a concern about what kind of people we are ing. Is America still a country where it pays to “work hard and...
The cramped morality of trade protectionism
“If a product is seen only as the opportunity for work, it is certain that the anxieties of protectionists are well founded.” –Frédéric Bastiat, Economic Sophisms Drawing inspiration from a 1847 essay by the inimitable Frédéric Bastiat, economist Donald Boudreauxtackles a popular argument from today’s trade protectionists: namely, “that protectionism is justified if enough consumers or voters are willing to pay higher prices in order to help workers.” The problem, of course, is that such a perspective debases the value...
The socialist threat to Catholic schools in Spain
The Spanish government is currently run by the center-Right People’s Party, led by Mariano Rajoy. However, should Spain’s socialist parties return to power, they have announced their intention to remove Catholic education from the curriculum and replace it with a secular curriculum that teaches fidelity to the government. In place of voluntary religious education, the socialists of Spain would impose secular and progressive “Education for Citizenship and Human Rights” (EfC). In this way, socialism could use government funding to bring...
How the invisible hand reduces industry costs
Note: This is post #45 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. petitive markets, the market price—with the help of the Invisible Hand—balances production across firms so that total industry costs are minimized. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Alex Tabarrok explains petitive markets also connect different industries. By balancing production, the Invisible Hand of the market ensures that the total value of production is maximized across different industries. (If you find the pace of the videos...
Reading ‘Democracy in America’ (Part 4): The long shadow of the French Revolution
This is the fourth part in a series on how to read Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America. Read the Introduction and follow the entire series here. In the previous installment, we considered feudalism as a class system of mutual responsibilities centered on land. Land was the basis of wealth during the medieval period. But by the 12th century, land was slowly being replaced by trade as the main generator of wealth in Europe. That basic shift and the subsequent...
The anti-capitalist roots of American anti-Semitism
Over the past week Americans have been debating the removal of Confederate statues from our public spaces. The discussion was prompted by the white nationalist protest in Charlottesville, Virginia that was supposedly in response to the plan to take down the statue of Confederate general Robert E. Lee. But if the rally was about a statue, why were the protestors shouting about Jews? “Once they started marching, they didn’t talk about Robert E. Lee being a brilliant military tactician,” says...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved