Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Commentary: Is America the Federal Government?
Commentary: Is America the Federal Government?
Dec 30, 2025 3:28 AM

“While president, Calvin Coolidge warned Americans that if it was thefederalgovernment that came to their mind when they thought of ‘the government,’ it would prove costly,” writes Ray Nothstine in this week’s Acton Commentary. But as Nothstine points out,everywhere we turn the federal government is increasingly visible and intrusive.The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publicationshere.

Is America the Federal Government?

byRay Nothstine

Writing about his observations of America in 1835, Alexis de Tocqueville noted, “The people reign over the American political world as God rules over the universe.” To the extent this statement is still true, what’s left of the notion of individual rule and self-government is under attack from centralized power in Washington. Furthermore, America’s identity is being transformed. So much so that in a recent speech Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal had to remind his own Republican Party leaders that, “America is not the federal government.”

But everywhere we turn the federal government is increasingly visible. It can be seen in the multiplication of Homeland Security checkpoints and Washington mandates. Debates in the nation’s capital center upon how much to increase government spending. Lawmakers demand additional taxes and revenue from the productive for the spending binge. The national debt and bureaucratic regulatory maze threaten not only economic prosperity but our inherent rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

The American Framers designed a system of government that divided power. The Tenth Amendment granted to the states any powers that were not specifically enumerated as tasks for the federal government. By itself, the very notion of the Bill of Rights places definitive limitations on government and centralized power. It’s being ignored.

While president, Calvin Coolidge warned Americans that if it was thefederalgovernment that came to their mind when they thought of “the government,” it would prove costly. Thomas Jefferson declared, “What has destroyed liberty and the rights of man in every government which has ever existed under the sun? The generalizing and concentrating all cares and power into one body.”

The concentration of power also increases in the secularized culture. In this society, people look away from the Author of benevolence and look first to government. It’s little wonder that the national debt is greater than the entire American economy and the number of Americans who receive food stamps is greater than the entire population of Spain.

The very fact that there is pushback from states and localities on issues like Medicaid expansion, light bulbs, and new environmental mandates, demonstrates the overreach. States and even sheriffs have declared their intention to nullify any new gun laws that violate the Constitution.

In the federal government’s appetite for overreach, it’s reinforcing the principle enshrined in America’s Founding: that governance at the state and local level is the most well informed and superior servant of the people.

Currently, there is a battle over not just the soul of America, but its image. Does the country want to be known for respect of Constitutional freedom or e a symbol of federal power and decrees?

More and more, even the lines between the private sector and federal bureaucracy are blurred by the ever expansive regulatory state and cronyism. In 2010, Transparency International reported that the only countries where corruption was increasing faster than the U.S. are Cuba, Burkina Faso, and Dominica. The federal government is guilty of the very greed it says is typical of Wall Street as it ups its demands on the citizens.

In the same speech this year to the Republican National Committee, Jindal declared, “If it’s something you don’t trust the states to do, then maybe Washington shouldn’t do it at all.” Coolidge put it even better, saying, “Where the people themselves are the government, it needs no argument to demonstrate that what the people cannot do their government cannot do.”

The federal government has achieved and plished great things throughout American history, but it has done so because the true strength and power resides in the people. Even when the government mobilized armies to defeat totalitarianism or landed on the moon, it required the productivity of the private sector and the ingenuity born of freedom to supply the means for those achievements.

Is America the federal government? No. But as centralization progresses, the American identity will promised as it defers to federal power and control over more and more sectors of our life. The only remedy is a moral and virtuous people exercising their Constitutional rights and extracting the concentrated power entrenched in Washington.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Economic Freedom Isn’t Enough
We know that, for economies to thrive, people must be free to start their own businesses without taxing regulations, that free trade must be the de facto means of doing business, and that cronyism and corruption must be eradicated. But that’s not enough. At the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, blogger (and former Acton intern) Elise Amyx says we have to have human flourishing as well. Economic freedom is only ponent of human flourishing. We should think about it...
Death And Redemption In Ukraine
Bohdan Solchanyk was not a materialistic young man. He did not seek worldly pleasures, but rather took delight in his studies, his fiancee, his faith. What Bohdan wanted -what they both wanted – was live in the Ukraine with dignity and freedom. Bohdan’s dream died last week at a peaceful protest against the government, where he and 80 others were “brutally shot and killed by government snipers in the central square of the capital of Ukraine, as the world’s TV...
Radically Communitarian Islam
Graeme Wood’s excellent piece in The Atlantic has justly been making the rounds for the past week or so. It is well worth reading with a number of insights and points that strike at the heart of the contemporary conflict between modernity and religious violence. mend “What ISIS Really Wants” to your reading. (Rasha al Aqeedi’s “Caliphatalism,” which looks more closely at the situation in Mosul, makes a panion read.) One of the elements of Wood’s piece that stuck out...
Religious Activists Push Back Against ‘Blunt Instrument’ of Fossil Fuels Divestment
Your faithful correspondent last week exposed the fossil-fuel divestment endgame of religious shareholder activists. As You Sow President Danielle Fugere sees her group’s activities as awareness-raising exercises for climate change, but AYS’s alignment with environmentalist and divestment firebrand Naomi Klein suggests they’d settle for nothing less than nationalizing panies. This week, I’m happy to report another group frequently called to task in this space, the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, opposes the AYS divestment onslaught. Reporting in last week’s Wall...
Does Innovation Triumph Over Regulation?
Do government regulations squelch marketplace innovation? A new study from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Nathan Goldschlag and George Mason University’s Alex Tabarrok says, “Not really.” According to Ryan Young at the Competitive Enterprise Institute: …the underlying institutions of social cooperation, market exchange, and dynamism are strong enough that federal regulation has, according to Goldschlag and Tabarrok’s analysis, so far been unable to squelch them. Just as a balloon pressed on one end pushes air to the other end, people will...
How Anti-Catholic Bias From 140 Years Ago Affects Our Religious Freedom Today
Eleven years ago this week, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Locke v. Davey that continues to have a detrimental impact on religious liberty. But the seeds for that ruling were planted 140 years ago, in another attempt to curb religious liberty. When James Blaine introduced his ill-fated constitutional amendment in 1875, he probably never would have imagined the unintended consequences it would have over a hundred years later. Blaine wanted to prohibit the use of state funds...
First Comprehensive Health Study Of Trafficking Victims Reveals Complex Needs
The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and the International Organization for Migration has just published the prehensive study regarding the health of human trafficking victims. The study, which looked at men, women and children, reveals that victims of both labor and sex trafficking have severe plex health concerns. The study was carried out in Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam, working with people who had been rescued and were entering programs for victims of human trafficking. Researchers asked participants about...
Marie Harf May Have Stumbled Into Something
I do not believe Marie Harf is an eloquent speaker, but I did think her “jobs for ISIS” remarks made some sense. We know that in American cities, for instance, if young men do not have education and jobs, they get into mischief. The kind of mischief that includes gangs and drugs and violence. Why would we expect that young men in Libya, Iraq, and elsewhere would be any different? Apparently, I’m not the only one. While others have sneered...
Florist Chooses Conscience Over Settlement
Last year Washington State’s Attorney General sued Arlene’s Flowers & Gifts on the basis of consumer protection. Florist Barronelle Stutzman had refused to sell flowers to a long time customer when the arrangements were to be used for a same-sex marriage ceremony. Although Stutzman did not have any qualms about serving serving gay customers, she “didn’t want to be involved in a same-sex marriage.” “I just put my hands on his and told [the customer who made the request] because...
What Patricia Arquette Should Have Said About the Wage Gap and Women’s Rights
During last night’s Oscar ceremony, Best Supporting Actresswinner Patricia Arquette used her acceptance speech to rail against unfair pay for women: To every women who gave birth to every taxpayer and citizen of this nation, we have fought for everybody else’s equal rights. It’s our time … to have wage equality once and for all and equal rights for women in the United States of America. The wage equality that Arquette is referring to is the gender wage gap—the difference...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved