Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Commentary: A Heart for the Poor — and a Mind for Economics
Commentary: A Heart for the Poor — and a Mind for Economics
Mar 23, 2026 8:38 PM

Isn’t it time that young evangelicals reject economics lessons from “the well-intentioned 38-year-old alum who is super liberal and carries clout with the student body because he listens to the same music as the kids he works with”? R.J. Moeller thinks so, and laments “the staggering lack of serious thought, inquiry, prehension regarding basic economic concepts – many that plainly cry out from the pages of Scripture – among not only the average church-going Christian, but the influential voices in pulpits across the nation.” says Moeller in this week’s Acton Commentary. The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publications here.

A Heart for the Poor — and a Mind for Economics

By R.J. Moeller

And he answered, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” — Luke 10:27

If any of you has confidence in your evangelical pedigree, I have more, being born on the 25th day of March to a pastor of the tribe of Moeller, who was ordained in the Evangelical Free Church of America; a Protestant of Protestants. I’m a graduate of Taylor University and current MDiv student at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. I’ve been to all the popular conferences, read all of John Eldridge’s books, seen all of the cheesy faith-based Kirk Cameron films, made plenty of DC Talk references, and spent most of my Sunday mornings sitting in a church gym for the “Contemporary” service (while the “Traditional” service raged in the pews of the main sanctuary).

But unlike many of the louder, more condescending voices of the “post-evangelical” cabal in and around progressive Christendom these days, I actually enjoyed my upbringing. I actually appreciate the values my parents, pastors, and Christian education instilled in me.

This genuine appreciation I have is precisely why I’m so thoroughly disappointed with the staggering lack of serious thought, inquiry, prehension regarding basic economic concepts – many that plainly cry out from the pages of Scripture – among not only the average church-going Christian, but the influential voices in pulpits across the nation.

A mind is indeed a terrible thing to waste, and as far as self-professed Christians ought to be concerned, it is a sinful thing to waste as well. If behavior follows belief, if our actions emanate from our convictions, and if the “but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened” warning in Romans 1 has any real bearing on our lives, then we would do well to take a long, hard look at how Protestants “do” economics.

Let me quickly reassure those of you who may be worried about my priorities at this point: the Gospel of Jesus Christ is the heart and soul of the Christian’s life and should be our primary concern. The study of economics and the application of economic principles – even those rooted in God’s Word – should not be the number one thing preachers preach about or parishioners spend their devotional times investigating. The proper Biblical response to neglect in one area of our lives is not to rush to the other end of the spectrum and over-indulge in it. If you discover that you have been either neglecting or unaware of your duties as a follower of Christ, the proper Biblical response is something akin to a 12-Step Program.

Acknowledge and accept you’ve been in the wrong. Take some personal inventory of how you got to that point. Make amends to those you’ve let down. Begin to incorporate what God has revealed to you (through His Word and your personal inquiry into the matter) into your daily life as much as possible.

Hi, I’m R.J. and I am a Serial Neglecter.

It shouldn’t be a huge mystery how so many adult Christians end up economically illiterate (and therefore infinitely more susceptible to embracing secular, progressive talking points). Walk with me, if you would, through the hypothetical life-trajectory of the average pastor, whose teaching ends up influencing the thinking and priorities of his congregation (and their families).

He grows up in the church learning all of the “Greatest Hits” Bible stories and the skeleton, platitude-rich message of the Gospel most young people receive. He goes through his K-12 years at either a public or private school with nothing but cynical sneers from his teachers when the topic of es up. In Sunday school and Youth Group, he learns in some very broad, superficial strokes about helping the poor, turning the other cheek, and avoiding the temptation to pursue worldly treasures. Along the way he absorbs pop-culture influences that teach him about the “evils” of Wall Street and the yeoman’s work of all public-sector employees. He waltzes his way through undergrad at a Christian university whose Student Life offices and events are run by the well-intentioned 38-year-old alum who is super liberal and carries clout with the student body because he listens to the same music as the kids he works with. Many “social justice” events ensue with no one adequately representing the case for free enterprise. By the time he reaches seminary, he has e utterly convinced that his progressive, big-government, anti-capitalistic convictions are the product of his “enlightened” upbringing.

Plus, he’s going into ministry, purposely moved into an ethnically-diverse area of town, and has “a heart for the poor.” Good luck convincing him he’s wrong about something!

His professors – godly men and women who have spoken into his life in other, equally important areas – never really mentioned much of anything about the importance of private property, de-centralized power, and historical realities about what awaits nations that embrace social engineering and top-down socialism. His parents – law-abiding, tax-paying, church-going folks who also never really addressed these topics or heard from their pastors that they should – owned their own small business and yet failed to see the importance of connecting the excitement of ethical entrepreneurial activity back to the Biblical precepts and doctrine it emanates from.

This young man has never learned economics, and yet he’s utterly certain that he knows what’s best for the livelihood and economy of 300 million people. Without the same three or four trusty clichés, he’d be lost in an actual discussion of how a local market works (or what a cause like “living wage” or “fair trade” actually translates into).

This young man is the product of a Christian culture that has, on the whole, given itself over to the sound-bite ethos of our age. We think we don’t have time to flesh out economic realities in Scripture, and we buy the lie that “young people” won’t listen to anything that doesn’t sound like something Bono might say at a press conference.

This young man is the product of churches where economics is never discussed, public schools and pop-culture where progressive economic policies are incessantly indoctrinated into him, seminaries that offer no real challenge to those progressive economic policies, and then back to the local church where he es a charismatic voice of condemnation of “the old” (i.e., “conservative”, “Republican”) way of doing things.

Now he’s starting a family and his “heart” has put some serious mileage on it, doing the emotional equivalent of a Cross-Fit workout every day for twenty years. But the “mind” has been wasting away like Jimmy Buffett on a two-decade-long bender in Cancun.

It’s time for parents, pastors, teachers and those of us in the pews to take economic realities more seriously.

If there is something pastors pelled by the Word of God to say when the economy tanks and times are tough, I can guarantee you that this same Book has something for your congregations’ ears in terms of a positive way forward that will gratify the heart and satisfy the mind.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Shane Claiborne’s Budget Babbling
Writing for the Huffington Post, Shane Claiborne is also asking “What Would Jesus Cut?” I’m still opposed to the whole notion of reducing Christ to budget director, as my earlier post points out. But Jesus as Secretary of Defense of the United States or rather, Jesus as secretary of peace as proposed by Congressman Dennis Kucinich is equally unhelpful. Mark Tooley, president of IRD, has already weighed in on Shane Claiborne’s not so brilliant drafting of Jesus for president. As...
‘A Call for Intergenerational Justice’ and the Question of Economic Growth
While there is much to applaud in the Center for Public Justice and Evangelicals for Social Action’s “A Call for Intergenerational Justice,” the lack of discussion of the problem of economic growth is troubling. I believe Don Peck is correct when he writes in The Atlantic: If it persists much longer, this era of high joblessness will likely change the life course and character of a generation of young adults—and quite possibly those of the children behind them as well....
Taking His Name in Vain: What Would Jesus Cut?
Ray’s post pointed to something that’s been bugging me about Jim Wallis’ “What Would Jesus Cut?” campaign. As with the “What Would Jesus Drive?” campaign (“Transportation is a moral issue.” What isn’t these days?), Wallis’ campaign assumes the moral high ground by appropriating the Holy Name of Jesus Christ to advance his highly politicized, partisan advocacy. Jesus es an advertising slogan. And what is implicit here is that those who oppose Wallis are somehow at odds with the Gospel of...
Abortion and Intergenerational Justice
I’m not sure I have ever really encountered the term intergenerational justice before this discussion over “A Call for Intergenerational Justice,” at least in any substantive way. This unfamiliarity is what lay behind my initial caveat regarding the term, my concern that it not be understood as “code for something else.” The Call itself provides a decent definition of the concept, or at least of its implications: “…that one generation must not benefit or suffer unfairly at the cost of...
Audio: Dr. Carl Trueman on Christians and Politics
If you weren’t able to make it to Derby Station on Wednesday for our latest Acton On Tap event, have no fear: we’re pleased to present the full recording of the evening’s festivities featuring Dr. Carl Trueman of Westminister Seminary via the audio player below. If you’re unfamiliar with Dr. Trueman or his work, check out Jordan Ballor’s introduction right here. Considering that the PowerBlog’s focus over the past few days has been on how Christians are approaching the debt...
Archbishop Chaput: The American experience and global religious liberty
A brilliant assessment of where we are. (HT: American Orthodox Institute Observer). Subject to the governor of the universe: The American experience and global religious liberty March 1, 2011 – Most Rev. Charles J. Chaput, O.F.M. Cap., Archbishop of Denver, addressed the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs at Georgetown University. A friend once said – I think shrewdly — that if people want to understand the United States, they need to read two documents. Neither one is...
Opposing Views: America’s Debt Crisis and ‘A Call for Intergenerational Justice’
Last week’s issuance of “A Call for Intergenerational Justice: A Christian Proposal on the American Debt Crisis” has occasioned a good bit of discussion on the topic, both here at the PowerBlog and around various other blogs and social media sites. It has been interesting to see the reaction that ments about the Call have generated. Many have said that I simply misunderstood or misread the document. I have taken the time to reread the document and do some reassessment...
Jesus as Budget Director?
My first reaction to “What Would Jesus Cut?” is that it tends to reduce Christ to a distributor of material goods through government programs. Jesus is not a budget overseer or a dispenser of government largesse. Sojourners founder Jim Wallis has already countered this accusation with his own post saying, “We haven’t been trying to get Jesus to be the head of any mittee, or think that he would ever want that job!” But still, to use Christ as an...
A Response to ‘What Would Jesus Cut?’
Jim Wallis and a number of other Christians involved in politics are trying to gain attention for the question, “What would Jesus cut?” The answer to this question is supposed to be as obvious as it is in other moral contexts. For example, would Jesus lie about the useful life of a refrigerator he was selling for Best Buy? No way. Would he bully a kid into giving away his lunch money? Not a chance. Would you find him taking...
Unintended Consequences and Wind Turbines
With the surge in oil prices, there’s renewed interest in alternative energy options. Numerous countries have gradually taken steps to promoting renewable or clean energy technologies, and it seems the United States is drifting more towards favoring alternative energy options as the Obama Administration is looking at banning off shore drilling along the continental shelf until 2012 and beyond. However, before we move farther down this road, a critical analysis of the pros and cons is a must. A more...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved