Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Commemorating two genocides: Armenian and Communist
Commemorating two genocides: Armenian and Communist
Jan 27, 2026 2:47 AM

Halloween may be fast upon us, but October 29 and 30 have marked the memorations of the year. In the last two days, the world has belatedly remembered the genocide of Armenian Christians and the brutal repression of all dissidents by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).

Last night, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 296, a bill “recognizing and condemning the Armenian Genocide, the killing of 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman Empire from 1915 to 1923.” (Only 11 people voted no and three, including Ilhan Omar, voted “present.”) Despite the bill’s clear geopolitical intent – it came coupled with legislation imposing sanctions against Turkey – this declaration is e and long overdue.

The facts are indisputable. U.S. diplomats thoroughly documented Turkey’s massive kidnapping, sexual abuse, torture, and murder (by axe, starvation, or firing squad) of its Christian minority. Acton Institute Communications Director John Couretas painted a gripping portrait of the Turkish atrocity when he reviewed Benny Morris and Dror Ze’evi’s The Thirty-Year Genocide for a recent issue of Religion & Liberty. Couretas notes:

The problem, as Turkey’s Erdogan shows, is that “successive Turkish governments and the Turkish people have never owned up to what happened or to their guilt,” the authors write. “They continue to play the game of denial and to blame the victims.”

Indeed, Turkish apologists claim “the Armenians were by far the greatest beneficiaries of the opportunities offered by the Ottoman Empire.”

As a result, no U.S. president in a generation has dared to raise Turkey’s ire by calling the systematic slaughter of three-quarters of the Ottoman Empire’s Armenian Christian population a genocide. “Only Reagan didn’t disappoint,” one Armenian-American leader remembered.

Whatever inspired this legislation, and whatever its fate in the legislative process, it is a rare act of political courage in Washington, and a rarer nod to reality. It deserves our praise.

October 30 also marks the day each year when the world pauses to remember the millions of victims of Soviet Communism. Since 1991, October 30 has been known as the Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Political Repressions.

The observance traces itself back to October 30, 1974, when imprisoned Soviet dissents, led by Kronid Lyubarsky, declared the Day of the Political Prisoners in the USSR. Nobel Peace Prize winner Andrei Sakharov promoted their cause. In 1991, it became an internationally recognized event.

Each year, survivors and their families gather in Moscow at the Solovetsky Stone – a stone removed from a monastery the Bolsheviks converted into a gulag – to honor those murdered by socialism. Since 2007, this has sometimes been preceded on October 29 by a ceremony reading victims’ names.

Today even the Kremlin’s official propaganda service, Tass, had to report on the event. However, it stated “[t]he exact number of victims of the Soviet-era political repressions remains unknown, but, according to some estimates, it may be as high as over 10 million people.” In fact, the number is likely closer to 20 million. Old habits die hard.

There is no room for deceit if we hope to prevent future pogroms, genocides, and state-sanctioned mass atrocities.

Madsen Pirie of the Adam Smith Institute notes that the annual day of remembrance falls, by chance or providence, on the same date that the 22nd Soviet Party Congress voted to remove Stalin’s body from Lenin’s mausoleum: October 30, 1961. (One of Lenin’s followers claimed Lenin’s ghost demanded Stalin’s eviction. “He stood before me as if he was alive, and said, ‘I’m fortable being next to Stalin, who brought so much trouble to the Party,’” said 80-year-old Dora Lazurkina.)

The connection between the two dates is more than coincidental. Perhaps the person who best grasped the crimson thread that unifies history’s atrocities was Ronald Reagan, whowrote in his in 1981 orderestablishing the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council that America must never forget the Nazi Holocaust, nor “the genocide of the Armenians before it, and the genocide of the Cambodians which followed it — and like too many other such persecutions of too many other peoples.”

Genocide stems from losing sight of other people’s God-given human dignity and value, out of religious bigotry or collectivist ideology alike. “Forever must we remember just how precious is civilization, how important is liberty, and how heroic is the human spirit,” Reagan wrote. Western civilization must continue to uphold the dignity of human life at all stages, respect freedom of conscience, and limit the size of government to the point that genocide is both unthinkable and impossible.

That begins by removing the idolatrous remains of mummified dictators. It demands that we acknowledge the depths of mitted by human rights abusers, past and present. And it obligates us to expose and resist the collectivist ideologies that fuels barbarism everywhere it rears its head.

In the words of the man who best perforated the tissue of lies that all totalitarian regimes use to insulate themselves, “In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”

of the Armenian genocide, documented by the U.S. government. Public domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Occupational licensing harms the economically vulnerable
Note:This article is part of the ‘Principles Project,’ a list of principles, axioms, and beliefs that undergirda Christian view of economics, liberty, and virtue. Clickhereto read the introduction and other posts in this series. The Principle: #10B — Because it interferes with economic liberty, occupational licensing is almost always unjust and unnecessary. The Definitions:This principle has two key terms that need to be clearly defined: Economic liberty — The freedom to secure and protect one’s labor, resources, and private property...
Conflict and resolution: Charles de Gaulle’s understanding of ‘nation’
In an article written for Public Discourse, Samuel Gregg. Acton’s director of research, reviews Julian Jackson’s recent book about General Charles de Gaulle. The book municates the idea that “de Gaulle’s conception of France as a nation had a very specific character.” “De Gaulle” is a historical biography, not mentary on present-day debates concerning globalization or nationalism. “It’s difficult, however, not to reflect on these matters when reading this book,” writes Gregg, “given the central place accorded by de Gaulle...
How gratitude transforms our perspective on global trade
The Thanksgiving holiday gives us a unique opportunity to reflect on God’s overwhelming grace, abundance, and provision—spiritually, materially, and otherwise. But amid and throughout those reflections, how often do we pause and consider the relationships, channels, and institutions that God uses in the process? Do we acknowledge that the very foods on our Thanksgiving e from an in-depth exchange of human creativity, investment, and daily sacrifice? Are we thankful for the labor it took to grow and harvest, package and...
From Babel to Babylon: How God is redeeming our work
In our Sunday-school retellings of the Tower of Babel, we are often fixated on themes of human pride and failure, shrugging off the aspirations of the builders as frivolous or far-fetched. In a recent series at The Green Room, Greg Forster frames things a bit differently, highlighting the story’s hidden lessons about human destiny and redemptive purpose in a fallen world. Far from being a story about the limitations of human power, Forster argues, Babel is a story about humanity’s...
Russell Kirk: Where does virtue come from?
“How can human society form and raise up virtuous people?” asks Barton Gingerich in this week’s Acton Commentary. As Gingerich notes, Russell Kirk explored this perennial question in a 1982 essay titled, “Virtue: Can It Be Taught?” Kirk defined virtues as “the qualities of full humanity: strength, courage, capacity, worth, manliness, moral excellence,” particularly qualities of “moral goodness: the practice of moral duties and the conformity of life to the moral law; uprightness; rectitude.” Despite modern attempts to supplant vigorous,...
The intellectual maverick behind Brazil’s conservative wave
The recent victory of the conservative populist Jair Bolsonaro in the Brazilian presidential elections brought the name of the philosopher Olavo de Carvalho to the center of Brazilian political debate. Many have since stated that Carvalho is an intellectual precursor to the populist candidate – as someone who was able to reshape the Brazilian political discussion in ways that cleared an intellectual path for Bolsonaro’s electoral victory. It is not a coincidence that when Bolsonaro gave his victory speech, Carvalho’s...
Trade, nations, and war in an enlightened age
Between 1776 and 1815, Britain was at peace for just 10 years, notes Samuel Gregg, Acton’s Director of Research. Reading the Scottish defense of free trade without this in mind is a mistake: It’s easy to forget that the tremendous intellectual creativity flowing from the Scottish Enlightenment occurred against a background of war. These included Britain’s participation in the War of the Spanish Succession (1701–1714), the War of Austrian Succession (1740-1748), the Seven Years War (1756-1763), the American War of...
Debunking the durable Malthusian myths
On his show yesterday, Rush Limbaugh discussed the famous bet between Julian Simon and Paul Ehrlich in 1980 over the question of whether or not the Earth had sufficient natural resources to sustain the growing global population. Erlich — a biologist from Stanford University — had gained some notoriety through his issuance of dire public warnings about the potential catastrophic consequences of continued human population growth, and had authored a book on the subject that was gaining a good deal...
Shenandoah and ‘every good gift’ for which we give thanks
“Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, eth down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning. Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.” I’ll be reading this passage (James 1:17-18) to my congregation on Thanksgiving morning. It’s one of the assigned Propers for Thanksgiving Day according to the 1928 Book of Common Prayer, and...
What is the ‘Norway Option’ for Brexit?
Theresa May has unveiled the withdrawal agreement she negotiated with the EU and, as of this writing, may survive opposition within her own party to see the deal voted on in Parliament. The 585-page agreement satisfied no party: Leavers find it too uncertain and stultifying, Remainers say it strains ties with the nearest proximate trade bloc. All parties agree: There must be other options. Some have inquired about the “Norway Option” – but what is it? Mark R. Royce...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved