Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Chronological snobbery and the search for the authentic self
Chronological snobbery and the search for the authentic self
Jul 5, 2025 7:45 PM

The project to consign to the trash heap of history many of our most honored national heroes, to dehumanize them, threatens to prevent us from seeing ourselves in our full humanity. We must do better.

Read More…

It has monplace in America’s elite institutions to attack and delegitimize our forebears for various crimes, some of which are undoubtedly real, while others are more imagined and anachronistic. As for the former, we can cite the fact that many Americans—including some of our greatest heroes—were slave owners and exploiters of indigenous Americans. The latter—that they were proponents of an oppressive heteronormativity, for example—consist of allegations that would have baffled them.

Yet even in admitting that some of our ancestors perpetrated real evils against their fellow men, there is a certain simplemindedness in the trendy desire to defame every champion of Western civilization, from Abraham Lincoln to Shakespeare. This tribalism and attempt to see everyone as either victimizers or victims engenders guilt and grievance among many of America’s young, which undermines civic cohesion and promotes resentment. It’s also reductionist: Are our ancestors really to be evaluated primarily, if not solely, based on racial and gender “norms” that would have made little sense to them? And doesn’t judging them according to such norms constitute a failure to capture all that they were in their plexity?

Perhaps this is what C.S. Lewis called chronological snobbery—the tendency to view ourselves as morally superior to our forebears and thus prohibit the full existence of their personhood to weigh upon us. This is something 20th-century French philosopher Gabriel Marcel hints at in his The Philosophy of Existence. Particularly in Marcel’s essay “On the Ontological Mystery,” we discover an unexpected repudiation of modernity’s aversion to its patrimony. But first we must understand Marcel’s indictment of modernity.

Marcel argues that modern man is subject to a variety of “-isms” that severely narrow his imaginative vision: utilitarianism, materialism, scientism. These -isms reflect a secular and scientific attempt to bring happiness and meaning to modern, deracinated man skeptical of traditional mores deemed oppressive and backward, and lead us to view our lives (and the world) through a professional and therapeutic lens. That lens subordinates everything in life to a technocratic careerism that promises we can maximize output and enjoy fulfilling careers as the highest fulfillment of self.

Marcel calls this a misplaced conception of function. He explains:

The individual tends to appear both to himself and to others as an agglomeration of functions. As a result of deep historical causes, which can as yet be understood only in part, he has been led to see himself more and more as a mere assemblage of functions.

Everything in life, including even our pleasure and our sleep, are carefully and clinically examined for the sake of function. In this schema, “it is logical that the weekly allowance of recreation should be determined by an expert on hygiene; recreation is a psycho-organic function which must not be neglected.” We see this with the technocratic class’s obsession with health, manifested in dietary crazes and exercise regimens: Pilates, yoga, Peloton.

While promising freedom, this mentality in fact limits us. “There is the dull, intolerable unease of the actor himself who is reduced to living as though he were in fact submerged by his functions… by an increasingly inhuman social order.” Every food we consume, every activity we perform, even our leisure seems to be carefully ordered to the utilitarian objective of maximizing our output, whatever that is. We are ever on the prowl for new “life hacks.”

And yet modern man feels a certain uneasiness, as if this secular, therapeutic conception of the good life is still missing something. Observes Marcel: “Life in a world centered on function is liable to despair because in reality this world is empty, it rings hollow.” In our obsessive control of every aspect of our lives, we make no room for mystery or transcendence.

What we have excluded, argues Marcel, is a personal detachment that facilitates human recollection and helps us perceive the inestimable value of the presence of another. “For it is in recollection and in this alone that this detachment is plished.” In short, we must withdraw from our world of function into an interior life to better understand both ourselves and others.

Herein lies a paradox: withdrawing into a solitary state of recollection actually facilitates the opposite of self-indulgent narcissism. Rather than viewing all our activities as having some sort of immediate utilitarian end (e.g., career success, personal health, the admiration of our peers), we appreciate that there is a transcendent, eternal quality to our lives. Explains Marcel:

To withdraw into oneself is not to be for oneself nor to mirror oneself in the intelligible unity of subject and object. On the contrary, I would say that here e up against the paradox of that actual mystery whereby the I into which I withdraw ceases, for as much, to belong to itself. You are not your own—this great saying of St. Paul assumes in this connection its full concrete and ontological significance; it is the nearest approach to the reality for which we are groping.

In other words, in the act of withdrawal and reflection, we perceive ourselves more accurately and humbly as participating in something greater than ourselves. Rather than undermining our sense of self, this actually expands it and reinvigorates hope. “Speaking metaphysically, the only genuine hope is hope in what does not depend on ourselves.”

What does this have to do with chronological snobbery? One must remember that the woke historical revisionist project assumes contemporary man’s moral and technical superiority. Our functionally superior lives—no longer beholden to outdated religious beliefs, traditional conceptions of the family, or sexual mores, for example—grant us the authority (and power) to condemn the past. This project, ironically, fails to hear and experience the past as it truly was, “warts and all.”

Marcel’s particular construal of existentialism calls for something else: faithfulness in the one who seeks to make himself present. Faithfulness, says Marcel, is “the active recognition of something permanent, not formally, after the manner of a law, but ontologically; in this sense it refers invariably to a presence, or to something which can be maintained within us and before us as a presence.” And when es to those who are dead and gone, we are presented with a critical choice: Will we allow that person to be made present to us through the act of humble recollection, or through condescending, activist fervor? Will we allow that person to be present as a unique other, or only as the manifestation of some enemy of an identitarian cause that is our personal hobbyhorse?

Our predecessors are more than simply bit characters in our contemporary identitarian skirmishes. They are people who were present, however imperfectly, to their families, friends, and countrymen, and who wished to be made present to their descendants. And, except for those rare sociopathic cases, they yearned to be present because they wanted to love and be loved, and municate their deepest passions, even if inchoately and imperfectly. To treat them according to anachronistic judgments and norms is to subvert their very humanity. It is to repudiate Chesterton’s “democracy of the dead” and Burke’s social contract “between those who are dead, those who are living, and those who are to be born.”

To appreciate this reality requires in subjects a recognition that we are not our own. It also requires viewing our predecessors as offering a gift of themselves to us, who in turn must treat them with empathy and respect. Indeed, Marcel argues that it is in this dying to ourselves in hearing others—even those with whom we might disagree—that is “the starting point of its activity and creativeness.” This is true even for those whom we judge to mitted what we now see as gravely immoral acts—if we extinguish empathy, the dead e crude caricatures, and we assume we ourselves would have been incapable of those very same acts in that very same context.

We must allow those from our past municate themselves—their passions, their dreams, even their flaws and failings—to us in the present. This, says Marcel, is the work of charity. “Love obliterates the frontier between what is in me and what is outside of me, because the thing that is outside es a part of me.” That’s the most healthy (and conservative) way to interpret our past—as an intrinsic, indelible part of ourselves. If we try to violently extricate it like some sort of cancer, we discover we have damaged our own body-soul integrity (and that of our body politic), leaving us hollow and directionless. Only through an honest encounter with the past in its fullness can we have any confidence we are headed to a better country.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Rev. Robert Sirico: COVID-19 lockdown orders are the state-mandated ‘marginalization of religion’
Perhaps nowhere is the disconnect between private citizens’ views and those of the government clearer than when es to the role of religion in society. Acton Institute President and Co-founder Rev. Robert A. Sirico told a nationally syndicated radio program that state orders that effectively ban clergy from caring for sick patients represent “the marginalization of religion as a non-essential service,” and this “flies in the face of our entire history as an American republic.” “Who knows best what is...
Acton Line podcast: What is Christian humanism? A conversation with Bradley J. Birzer
Bradley J. Birzer, professor of history and the Russell Amos Kirk Chair in American Studies at Hillsdale College, joins this episode of Acton Line to speak about his newest book, “Beyond Tenebrae: Christian Humanism in the Twilight of the West.” What is Christian humanism and what role does it play in the Republic of Letters? What does it mean to live as a Christian humanist? Birzer helps lay down some of the foundational ideas in his book and explains the...
How John Paul II reminded us that liberty and truth are inseparable
On the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the late John Paul II’s birth, it’s worth underscoring that one theme which permeated his pontificate from its beginning to the end was that of truth. Many remember Pope John Paul II as playing a crucial role in Eastern Europe’s liberation from Marxist tyranny. But he also insisted that liberty needed to be grounded in and guided by the truth knowable via reason and faith. If freedom and truth e separated—as they...
For St. John Paul II’s 100th birthday, Italy gets gift of religious freedom
Today, May 18, is a very good day, indeed. It is a heroic day for the Italian Catholic Church on the 100th anniversary of Pope St. John Paul II’s birth. There could not be a better birthday gift from a saint who, fluent in 13 languages, was a veritable Paraclete-on-earth. He spoke courageously and often, raising his voice against persecution of religious freedom. He did so not just in his munist Poland, but throughout the entire secularized world. By the...
We must cure the global pandemic of loneliness
Millions of people within our country are experiencing extreme social isolation and loneliness. In a time defined by a pandemic and lockdowns, one would naturally expect people to feel this way, being cut off from family, friends, and neighbors. In actuality, the coronavirus has just exacerbated an existing pandemic that had been plaguing the United States for many years: a broad cultural trend of increased social isolation and alienation. Long before the coronavirus started, large segments of our society were...
Rev. Sirico: How central planning created tunnel vision on COVID-19 response
Did central planning in health care and government make the COVID-19 pandemic worse by making the response more ineffective? Rev. Robert Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, offers his thoughts on how centralization in health care and the economy has marginalized other perspectives and pushed aside notions of subsidiarity. ...
The making and unmaking of European democracy
If there is anything that we have learned over the past five years of political turmoil in Western countries, it is that large numbers of people across the political spectrum are increasingly dissatisfied with the workings of modern democracy. These trends reflect, as numerous surveys illustrate, deep distrust of established political parties and, more particularly, those individuals whose careers amount to a series of revolving doors between elected office, government service, the academy, and politically-connected businesses. What’s often missing from...
What’s behind COVID-19 racial health disparities?
Soon after COVID-19 infection rates began to skyrocket in New York City and other densely populated urban areas, progressives and Democrats demanded data on the racial disparities of testing, treatments, and deaths. The data showed that blacks and Latinos were much more likely to die from the virus than whites and Asians. As expected, progressives moved to explain these disparities in terms of structural, systemic injustice in America’s health care system: Such injustice follows the country’s material and economic inequality....
Awe and wonder: The keys to curbing COVID-19 hubris
In our information age, armchair economists and epidemiologists are many. Society remains deeply divided—preoccupied with social media squabbles over the credibility of our leaders and the rightness or wrongness of their proposed solutions. Of course, the actual experts are divided, as well. Scientists and researchers are still arguing over the validity of various mathematical models. Inventors, businesses, munity institutions have adopted wide-ranging approaches to adapt to the virus. Governors and legislators remain split on how to interpret the bigger picture—weighing...
R.R. Reno, masks, and the vacuity of social media
First Things magazine is no stranger to controversy. In recent years, it has been increasingly critical­ of the market economy, made bizarre defenses of kidnapping in the guise of a book review, and e a clearing house of contrarian and moralistic perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic. Earlier this week, First Things editor R.R. Reno took to Twitter to accuse those who try to avoid the spread of the coronavirus by wearing masks of cowardice. The tweets, since deleted, were widely...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved