Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Catholicism and the Supreme Court
Catholicism and the Supreme Court
Nov 28, 2025 3:27 AM

Upon Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination to the Supreme Court, a number of voices on the Christian and religious blogosphere wondered about the absence of press attention to the religious makeup of the court. The new court’s makeup, whether or not Sotomayor is ultimately confirmed, is historic. As Terry Mattingly wrote at GetReligion, tongue planted firmly in cheek, “prepare for more headlines about Catholics taking over our nation’s legal discourse.”

A few days later World’s Mickey McLean took note of the issue, and about that same time (after the “early” reports gave way to a bit more in-depth coverage), the mainstream press began to ask of Sotomayor, “Is She Catholic? Does It Matter?”

Martin E. Marty of the University of Chicago Divinity School, wrote the following (HT):

My trained and focused eye — trained to do “sightings” of public religion in the various media, including the internet, and focused on the chosen subject of the week — has been seeking evidence of anti-Catholicism among mainline Protestant and Evangelical leaders, in the form of expressions of worry and prejudice. Unless between Saturday (when I write) and Monday (when readers read) some surprise occurs, public controversies over her appointment will not yet have attracted the voice of any non-Catholic bishops, moderators, denominational presidents, church-body newspapers, or representative columnists.

I hope my piece appearing today on the First Things website doesn’t qualify as “evidence of anti-Catholicism,” so much as a critique of the state of contemporary Protestant moral, legal, and political thinking. Sotomayor’s appointment and the resulting Roman Catholic supermajority on the court ought to be met with some ambivalence among Evangelical Protestants. On the one hand, the bulk of Roman Catholic judges on the court are those most likely to be aligned with traditional Christian moral, legal, and political perspectives, historically shared by Catholics and Protestants alike.

On the other hand, the fact that half of all the Roman Catholics who have ever served will be serving simultaneously, and the fact that there will be only one Protestant on the court, does say something about the declining influence and vigor of Protestantism in the public square. That ought to be cause for concern and worry among Protestants. And that’s the point of departure for my First Things “On the Square” essay, “Sotomayor, Roman Catholic Supremacy, and Protestant Approaches to Law.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The end of Roe is the beginning of new life for citizens and their duties
While many were shocked by the recent SCOTUS ruling that overturned a right to abortion, it should e as no surprise that if you live by the court, you can die by the court. Yet the debate over abortion peting rights has only just begun. Read More… Weeks after the Supreme Court’s landmark 6-3 ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022), which held that the Constitution of the United States does not confer a right to abortion, the...
Is Indonesia’s “Civil Islam” a model for the Muslim world?
Islam patible with democracy and religious pluralism, as the recent cultural and political reformations in Indonesia have proved. Will other Muslim-majority nations take notice? And will Civil Islam help young Muslims stay Muslim? Read More… The rise of “Islamic extremism” in France, the reemergence of the Taliban in Afghanistan, and the recent drift toward Islamist politics—political efforts to enforce an orthodox interpretation of Islam on society—in Turkey have revived the debate about Islam’s relationship with democracy and liberty. French president...
What’s the point of working anymore?
Whatever the reasons behind “The Great Resignation,” Gen Z must keep in mind that we were designed to work, to produce, to create. Read More… Is there any value to work in today’s world? This is a question that many in Generation Z find themselves asking. I started working at a very young age. By 12 years old, I already had two part-time jobs plus a side business of my own. At age 11, I started mowing lawns and doing...
A Reply to David Brooks: Don’t apologize for capitalism
New York Times columnist David Brooks recently admitted to having significant doubts about capitalism, owing to growing wealth inequality. But is greater government intervention the answer, or the problem? Read More… In recent weeks, the New York Times has been running opinion pieces in which various columnists expound on a topic about which they have changed their views. On July 21 it was David Brooks’ turn to lay out his mea culpa. The subject turned out to be capitalism, or...
It’s time to reform foreign aid
When money intended to address immediate international crises e decades’-long dependency projects, it is time to reconsider how taxpayers’ money is spent and on whom. Read More… When we speak of good intentions, foreign es immediately to mind. It e as no surprise to Acton readers that sound economics are not always attached to those intentions. In the U.S., billions of dollars are earmarked annually for foreign aid, and the results are less than satisfactory. Can foreign aid as we...
Dave Chappelle is the greatest comedian in America. Just ask him.
The transgressive stand-up is back with another Netflix special, this time lecturing high school kids on the power of family and education. But is it funny? Read More… The edian America has produced in the post–Cold War era is Dave Chappelle, and if you listen to his new Netflix show, What’s in a Name: Speech at Duke Ellington School of the Arts, he’ll tell you that himself. I suppose it’s not bragging if it’s true, but it’s unusual for celebrities...
The Survivor asks something of its audience
Oscar and Emmy Award–winning writer-director Barry Levinson has adapted the true-life story of Holocaust survivor and professional boxer Harry Haft for HBO. Is this a fitting summation of a long, topsy-turvy career? Read More… Barry Levinson is 80. The Oscar-winning writer-director has played a part in several of the best movies and TV shows of the past half century—and a few of the worst. That pattern of mixing abominable stinkers with memorable successes has continued into the past decade. In...
Abolishing blasphemy laws in Pakistan will lead to more violence
While religious freedom is the ultimate goal in Pakistan and other Muslim-majority countries, singling out blasphemy laws as the problem will only impede the spread of democracy and usher in an unintended violent backlash. Read More… Blasphemy laws pose a real challenge to religious liberty and democracy in several Muslim-majority countries, with 32 nations criminalizing blasphemy; in Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Brunei, Mauritania, and Saudi Arabia, it is punishable by death. In Pakistan alone, according to the National Commission for Justice...
Government regulation of the market is more to be feared than Amazon or Google
A new bipartisan bill in the Senate aims to rein in supposedly monopolistic and unfair business practices. But it will only petition in the long run and hurt the very consumers it’s intended to help. Read More… The popular view of the recent NBA Finals is that the Boston Celtics and Golden State peted for the title of best team. The nation’s best basketball players traded points, victories, and fouls on the way to the Warriors pulling off the final...
After Boris: More of the same or a different direction?
Of the two Conservative Party candidates poised to replace Boris Johnson as prime minister, neither seems particularly, or at least consistently, conservative. Read More… We’re down to the final two candidates: Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak. The next prime minister of the United Kingdom with be either our third female premier (all Conservative) or the nation’s first ethnic Indian (and Hindu) leader. Unlike the U.S. president, the British prime minister is not directly elected. The PM is whoever mand a...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved