Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Catholic Military Chaplaincy: War-Mongering Or Christlike Service?
Catholic Military Chaplaincy: War-Mongering Or Christlike Service?
Mar 28, 2026 6:32 PM

Mark Scibilia-Carver, in a National Catholic Reporter “Viewpoint” piece, decries the nationwide call ing weekend for Catholics to financially support the Archdiocese for the Military Services, which serves the entire U.S. military. That includes “more than 220 installations in 29 countries, patients in 153 V.A. Medical Centers, and federal employees serving outside the boundaries of the USA in 134 countries. Numerically, the AMS is responsible for more than 1.8 million men, women, and children.”

Why is Scibilia-Carver upset? He believes support of the Archdiocese for the Military Services is tantamount to evil and support of any war (and apparently the men and women who keep our country safe) is always unjust.

Despite its growing influence in the bishops’ conference, the very existence of the military archdiocese hangs by the thread of the possibility of the existence of a just war…

Before Catholics respond to the appeal for money for the military archdiocese, they should consider how well it has preached the Gospel and applied our moral tradition to U.S. wars.

What does the Archdiocese for the Military Services do that requires it be de-funded? According to their website, they do things like baptize the children of service members, offers religious education classes for all ages, provide free Bible studies for military members and their families, and offer support to returning vets and their families, among many other pastoral services. They care for veterans, offering Masses at VA hospitals, along with spiritual support. While there are certainly services unique to the military, most of what they do sounds like your average Catholic parish: sacraments, pastoral support, educational opportunities. But Scibilia-Carver says its very existence is vile:

There is now no possibility of a U.S. war being just. The only role for a chaplain in an unjust war would be to urge refusal of orders to carry weapons or kill. The bishops should have been debating how to dissolve the 28-year-old Archdiocese for the Military Services, not extraordinary ways to fund it.

While most of what the Archdiocese for the Military Services falls into the realm of the ordinary, the existence of this Archdiocese is vital to the men and women who serve bat, protecting the U.S. and its citizens around the world. The priests who serve the military bat literally risk their own lives to bring Christ to them in battle.

Five Catholic priests have been awarded the Medal of Honor, the military’s highest award. One of those men was Chaplain Charles J. Watters, who served troops in Vietnam. He is remembered for his using the front of a Jeep as an altar and for his quiet support of the men he served. He is also remembered for his sheer bravery:

Watters ran to the front to assist the wounded and administer prayers for the dying. While at the front, he saw a wounded soldier standing in the field of fire. The soldier was in shock. Watters rant [sic] to the man, lifted the man onto his shoulders, and carried the man to safety.

As his unit pushed forward, Watters continued his ministry at the front, caring for another wounded man. The unit was forced to pull back. The chaplain was caught between lines while recovering two more wounded soldiers.

Watters pulled the two to safety as his unit was forced to pull back and establish a new perimeter. Against the discouragement of his fellow soldiers, Watters again ran out of the perimeter three more times to recover wounded men.

During the battle, Watters distributed food and water to those who were fighting. He assisted the medics in caring for the wounded. However, Watters was killed when he took a direct hit from a mortar round.

His charred, mangled chaplain’s kit is on display at the Chaplains School, Fort Jackson, SC. For his “conspicuous gallantry….. unyielding perseverance and selfless devotion to rades,” Chaplain Watters was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor on November 4, 1969.

No sane person wants war. The Church’s teaching on just war allows for defense of self, others and country under the strictest of circumstances. To say that there can be no just war flies in the face of Church teaching. Regardless of whether or not the U.S. is involved bat, however, we will always maintain a standing military to protect our national interests at home and abroad. Those men and women who choose to serve deserve the very best we can give them and that includes meeting their spiritual needs.

To de-fund and disband the Archdiocese for the Military Services would mean thousands of military members and their families would be without adequate spiritual education, direction and care. For Catholics, funding this Archdiocese is an act of charity to our brothers and sisters, not a call to arms. Those who serve in the Archdiocese of Military Services are not war-mongerers; they are Christ-bearers to those who serve and protect our nation. Military chaplaincy is a vital Christian service; to suggest otherwise is unthinkable. Scibilia-Carver’s call for the disbanding of military chaplaincy is loathsome and dishonors those who have served and are currently serving our military.

Fr. John Zuhlsdorf suggests Catholics respond to Scibilia-Carver:

The collection to support the Archdiocese for Military Services is important. I suggest that you send a donation when the collection is taken up in your parish. I suggest that you also send a donation right now.

I support the Archdiocese for Military Services and I support Catholic chaplains and I support the bishops who support both becauseI hate war and the suffering it causes. We should pour out our support for chaplains, and therefore all the troops and their dependents, with true generosity.

And if you’re not Catholic, you can donate to the Chaplain Corps. Again, our military deserves the best, and that includes spiritual support for themselves and their families.

Also see “Men of God and Country in World War II.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Wilhelm Ropke for Today
Spurred on by listening to and reading Samuel Gregg, I’ve been making my way through Wilhelm Ropke’s A Humane Economy which is really a special book. The following passage (on p. 69) really caught my attention with regard to our current situation: Democracy is, in the long patible with freedom only on condition that all, or at least most, voters are agreed that certain supreme norms and principles of public life and economic order must remain outside the sphere of...
What can we learn from Gates-gate?
Now that the saga of Dr. Henry Louis Gates Jr. and Officer James Crowley has moved to the back-burner, let’s look at three less obvious lessons from Skip and Jimmy’s not-so-excellent adventure. Understand that government is the use of legitimate force. Not necessarily “legitimate” in terms of morals and ethics, but legitimate in terms of what is legal. Police officers have moral and legal authority to use force in order “to serve and to protect”. At times, they may exceed...
The Healthcare Debate’s False Premise
Everybody realizes that the current healthcare system in the United States has problems. Unfortunately, much of the discussion about what to do rests on a false premise. The argument goes something like this: Our current free market system is not working: health care costs are astronomically high, and close to 50 million people aren’t insured. Maybe it’s time to let the government try its hand. But we don’t have a free market health system; we have a highly managed, bureaucratic...
Healthcare–Don’t Forget the Morality of It
One of the main arguments for nationalized health care is a moral argument: Health care is a right and a moral and just society should ensure that its people are taken care of–and the state has the responsibility to do this. Bracketing for the time being whether health care is actually a right or not–it is clearly a good, but all goods are not necessarily rights–whether the state should be the provider of it is another question. But there is...
Those Seven Deadly Virtues
In the musical Camelot which first appeared on stage in 1960, Mordred — the antagonist, evil traitor and eventual deliverer of a mortal wound to King Arthur — appropriately lauds the antithesis of what good men are to pursue with his signature song titled “The Seven Deadly Virtues” the first line of which ends “those nasty little traps.” The lyrics are clever. “Humility,” Mordred tells us, “means to be hurt. It’s not the earth the meek inherit but the dirt.”...
Radio Free Acton is Back / Perspectives on Health Care Reform, Part 1
The Radio Free Acton crew is back in the studio! On today’s broadcast, Dr. Donald P. Condit and Dr. Kevin Schmiesing join our host Marc VanderMaas for a discussion of the ins and outs of the US health care system. Dr. Condit gives us some background on how the current system came into being, the problems associated with it, and the pitfalls of the current healthcare reform proposals in Washington. Next week RFA will be back for part 2, bringing...
Biblical Reasons to Give
Dr. David Murray of Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary investigates the concept of “biblical fundraising,” reasons to continue to give in the midst of difficult economic times, in the latest edition of his vcast, “puritanPod.” Dr. Murray uses 2 Corinthians 9 as the basis for his brief but valuable message. Check out the video here. ...
Public Discourse: Rethinking Economics in the Post-Crisis World
The Public Discourse recently published my article, Rethinking Economics in the Post-Crisis World. Text follows: In the wake of the financial crisis, we need an economics with greater humility about its predictive power and an increased understanding of plicated human beings who, when the discipline is rightly understood, lie at its center. Apart from bankers and politicians, few groups have received as much blame for the 2008 financial crisis as economists. “Economists are the forgotten guilty men” was how Anatole...
Dalrymple on “the right to healthcare”
[update below] British physician Theodore Dalrymple weighs in on government healthcare and “the right to health care” in a new Wall Street Journal piece. A few choice passages: Where does the right to health e from? Did it exist in, say, 250 B.C., or in A.D. 1750? If it did, how was it that our ancestors, who were no less intelligent than we, pletely to notice it? … When the supposed right to health care is widely recognized, as in...
Five Simple Arguments Against Government Healthcare
The argument from federalism: One of the great benefits of federalism is that the states can act as the laboratories of democracy. If a new public policy is tried in the states and works (as happened with welfare reform in Michigan and Wisconsin), then a similar program has a good chance of succeeding at the national level. The welfare reform went national and proved to be one of the most successful public policy initiatives of the last half century. On...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved