Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Catholic Military Chaplaincy: War-Mongering Or Christlike Service?
Catholic Military Chaplaincy: War-Mongering Or Christlike Service?
Apr 23, 2026 6:15 AM

Mark Scibilia-Carver, in a National Catholic Reporter “Viewpoint” piece, decries the nationwide call ing weekend for Catholics to financially support the Archdiocese for the Military Services, which serves the entire U.S. military. That includes “more than 220 installations in 29 countries, patients in 153 V.A. Medical Centers, and federal employees serving outside the boundaries of the USA in 134 countries. Numerically, the AMS is responsible for more than 1.8 million men, women, and children.”

Why is Scibilia-Carver upset? He believes support of the Archdiocese for the Military Services is tantamount to evil and support of any war (and apparently the men and women who keep our country safe) is always unjust.

Despite its growing influence in the bishops’ conference, the very existence of the military archdiocese hangs by the thread of the possibility of the existence of a just war…

Before Catholics respond to the appeal for money for the military archdiocese, they should consider how well it has preached the Gospel and applied our moral tradition to U.S. wars.

What does the Archdiocese for the Military Services do that requires it be de-funded? According to their website, they do things like baptize the children of service members, offers religious education classes for all ages, provide free Bible studies for military members and their families, and offer support to returning vets and their families, among many other pastoral services. They care for veterans, offering Masses at VA hospitals, along with spiritual support. While there are certainly services unique to the military, most of what they do sounds like your average Catholic parish: sacraments, pastoral support, educational opportunities. But Scibilia-Carver says its very existence is vile:

There is now no possibility of a U.S. war being just. The only role for a chaplain in an unjust war would be to urge refusal of orders to carry weapons or kill. The bishops should have been debating how to dissolve the 28-year-old Archdiocese for the Military Services, not extraordinary ways to fund it.

While most of what the Archdiocese for the Military Services falls into the realm of the ordinary, the existence of this Archdiocese is vital to the men and women who serve bat, protecting the U.S. and its citizens around the world. The priests who serve the military bat literally risk their own lives to bring Christ to them in battle.

Five Catholic priests have been awarded the Medal of Honor, the military’s highest award. One of those men was Chaplain Charles J. Watters, who served troops in Vietnam. He is remembered for his using the front of a Jeep as an altar and for his quiet support of the men he served. He is also remembered for his sheer bravery:

Watters ran to the front to assist the wounded and administer prayers for the dying. While at the front, he saw a wounded soldier standing in the field of fire. The soldier was in shock. Watters rant [sic] to the man, lifted the man onto his shoulders, and carried the man to safety.

As his unit pushed forward, Watters continued his ministry at the front, caring for another wounded man. The unit was forced to pull back. The chaplain was caught between lines while recovering two more wounded soldiers.

Watters pulled the two to safety as his unit was forced to pull back and establish a new perimeter. Against the discouragement of his fellow soldiers, Watters again ran out of the perimeter three more times to recover wounded men.

During the battle, Watters distributed food and water to those who were fighting. He assisted the medics in caring for the wounded. However, Watters was killed when he took a direct hit from a mortar round.

His charred, mangled chaplain’s kit is on display at the Chaplains School, Fort Jackson, SC. For his “conspicuous gallantry….. unyielding perseverance and selfless devotion to rades,” Chaplain Watters was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor on November 4, 1969.

No sane person wants war. The Church’s teaching on just war allows for defense of self, others and country under the strictest of circumstances. To say that there can be no just war flies in the face of Church teaching. Regardless of whether or not the U.S. is involved bat, however, we will always maintain a standing military to protect our national interests at home and abroad. Those men and women who choose to serve deserve the very best we can give them and that includes meeting their spiritual needs.

To de-fund and disband the Archdiocese for the Military Services would mean thousands of military members and their families would be without adequate spiritual education, direction and care. For Catholics, funding this Archdiocese is an act of charity to our brothers and sisters, not a call to arms. Those who serve in the Archdiocese of Military Services are not war-mongerers; they are Christ-bearers to those who serve and protect our nation. Military chaplaincy is a vital Christian service; to suggest otherwise is unthinkable. Scibilia-Carver’s call for the disbanding of military chaplaincy is loathsome and dishonors those who have served and are currently serving our military.

Fr. John Zuhlsdorf suggests Catholics respond to Scibilia-Carver:

The collection to support the Archdiocese for Military Services is important. I suggest that you send a donation when the collection is taken up in your parish. I suggest that you also send a donation right now.

I support the Archdiocese for Military Services and I support Catholic chaplains and I support the bishops who support both becauseI hate war and the suffering it causes. We should pour out our support for chaplains, and therefore all the troops and their dependents, with true generosity.

And if you’re not Catholic, you can donate to the Chaplain Corps. Again, our military deserves the best, and that includes spiritual support for themselves and their families.

Also see “Men of God and Country in World War II.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Jeremy Corbyn would destroy the US-UK special relationship
Citizens across the UK are casting their votes in the 2019 general election. Jeremy Corbyn “seems in equal parts blind to the violence of socialism, the goodness of the West, and anti-Semitism in his own party,” I write in my new article for The American Spectator. The voters’ decision will have a decisive impact on the United States and the West as a whole. The Labour Party leader would destroy the special relationship of the U.S. and the UK. After...
Acton Line podcast: Elizabeth Warren wants $3 trillion tax hike; Mark Hall on America’s Christian founding
Massachusetts Democratic Senator and presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren has proposed to increase taxes for big businesses and high earners to rake in nearly $3 trillion per year. Warren plans to use this tax to fund spending in health care, education, and family benefits, and as a result, according to Warren, the economy would grow. Are economists in agreement with Warren? What would increased taxes on the wealthy do for the economy? Dave Hebert, professor of economics and director of the...
The Virtue of Liberalism
Today, Law & Liberty published the text of my lecture for the Philadelphia Society in October: “Why Economic Nationalism Fails.” The topic for the panel was “Conservatism and the Coming Economy.” Since I’m not a determinist and doubt my own powers of prediction, I focused on what political economy conservatives ought to support in the future, despite worrying trends in the present: Conservatives ought to reaffirm the good of economic liberty, both domestically and internationally. Free markets and free trade,...
Trade war hits home: How tariffs disrupt American businesses
Despite the “America-first” claims of trade protectionists and economic nationalists, we continue to see the ill effects of the Trump administration’s recent wave of tariffs—particularly among American businesses, workers, and consumers. Alas, while such controls may serve to temporarily benefit a select number of businesses or industries, they are just as likely to distort and contort any number of other fruitful relationships and creative partnerships across the economic order—at home, abroad, and everywhere in between. In a recent article for...
Artificial Intelligence: A contribution or detriment to human flourishing?
In my recent book, Artificial Humanity. An Essay on the Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (2019, IF Press), I analyze several interesting aspects of artificial intelligence (AI) from a philosophical, anthropological and even ‘futuristic’ point of view. My intention throughout the book is to keep the reader grounded in real expectations about AI and its integration with rational, intelligent and free human living parison with so-called “advanced” machine learning. Therefore, I ask fundamental questions as guidance to readers who have followed...
Wilhelm Röpke on liberalism and Catholic social teaching
This week’s Acton Commentary, adapted from my preface to the newest Acton Institute publication The Humane Economist: A Wilhelm Röpke Reader, illustrates what makes Röpke such an interesting and vital economist: Röpke saw his project in holistic terms involving intersecting and interdependent spheres or orden that to be fully appreciated and understood scientifically must be examined in their economic, social, and moral dimensions. mitments to mainline economic analysis, the importance of social institutions, and the moral and religious framework of...
How would Jeremy Corbyn change the UK?
American observers may know that Jeremy Corbyn wishes to fundamentally transform the British economy and reshape the special relationship between the U.S. and the UK. “Is it moral to confiscate people’s property and deny the elderly the right to control their own property?” asks Rev. Richard Turnbull, as he explores Corbyn’s economic proposals, from providing “free” services to the full nationalization of whole industries. For instance, Corbyn’s economic plan would destroy £367 billion of stock wealth. Turnbull – the director...
Chernobyl and Alexander Solzhenitsyn on a culture of deceit
Yesterday, December 11 was the birthday of the great Russian writer, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, born in 1918. The Imaginative Conservative published an essay I wrote on Solzhenitsyn and the HBO series Chernobyl. If you have not seen the series, it is excellent. As a warning, some of the scenes, especially in episode three are tough to watch, but it is incredibly well done. One of the underlying themes of the series is the problem of widespread deceit. This of course was...
An encyclical on China and the US?
Sen. Marco Rubio’s recent speech on capitalism and mon good, taking its point of departure in Rerum Novarum, has gotten a good bit of coverage. Yesterday he delivered remarks at the National Defense University and opened with these words: This morning I am honored to speak here at the National Defense University to discuss the defining geopolitical relationship of this century: the one between the United States and China. Unfortunately, I was unable to find a papal encyclical on this...
A bait and switch at Peter’s Pence?
The Wall Street Journal’s recent article on the Vatican’s main charitable appeal landed like a bombshell this week. And it didn’t help that we’re in the midst of the holiday giving season. The Roman Catholic Church conducts an annual collection known as Peter’s Pence, which is touted as supporting mercy ministries and serving those most in need. Shockingly, the Journal has reported that for at least the last five years “as little as 10%” of the approximately $55 million raised...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved