Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Can We Separate Church And State? Or Church From Anything?
Can We Separate Church And State? Or Church From Anything?
Apr 15, 2026 5:52 PM

Thomas Jefferson believed that the practice of one’s faith should not be impinged upon by one’s government. He wrote of this in a letter or address to the Danbury Baptist Association:

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions,” he wrote, “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.”

Many American wrongly believe that this idea of the “separation between Church and State” appears in our Constitution or the Declaration of Independence. This has led to all sorts of issues, including the current tangle of the HHS mandate, forcing employers to pay for medications and procedures they find morally repugnant. “But,” the ill-informed cry, “you must! There is a separation of Church and State! Your faith cannot enter the public arena!”

OnFaith’s Jon Meachem has a short, elegant discussion on this.

On this Fourth of July, however, if you think of anything at all having to do with the uniqueness of American liberty, think of this: that the Founders of the nation whose Declaration of Independence we celebrate successfully found an answer to an ancient problem by erecting that wall of separation between church and state while recognizing that there could be no wall between religion and politics any more than there could be a wall between economics and politics or geography and politics.

Here’s one way to think about that tradition. The two great founding documents — the Declaration and the Constitution — are very different when viewed through the prism of religious thought and practice. Jefferson’s Declaration grounds our fundamental human rights in the divine — as gifts of the “Creator.” The original Constitution, on the other hand, mentions religion only twice: once to ban religious tests for federal office and again in the most utilitarian of ways, dating the document “in the Year of Our Lord 1787.” As a practical matter, we have lived our national life with an awareness and appreciation of religion and with a vigilant regard for the principle, articulated by Jefferson, that faith is “a matter which lies solely between Man and his God.” And so it should be.

Read “One Way to Think about America’s Unique Liberty” at OnFaith.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Rev. Sirico on defending the free market
Why should we care about human dignity, creativity and flourishing? Why value human creativity? Why even believe that human beings possess dignity and rights? As Rev. Robert Sirico writes in the Washington Times, the free market system assumes, rather than defends, the value of all these things—something easy to miss because most of us share these sentiments. The religious foundation with which I was imbued as a child, and to which I returned after a spell in the wilderness of...
Bob Dylan wins Nobel Prize in Literature
When Bob Dylan wrote, “The Times They Are A Changin’,” I doubt he had the Swedish Academy in mind. Nevertheless, by awarding him the 2016 Nobel Prize in Literature the Academy has made a bold statement for a change in the way songwriting is viewed as literature. Many people have plained that there were many more worthy potential recipients. But let’s face the facts: Bob Dylan won, and they lost. He likely didn’t even know he peting. (Reportedly, he was...
Video: Rev. Sirico On The Podesta Emails
Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President of the Acton Institute, joined host Neil Cavuto on Fox News Channel’s The Cost of Freedomthis morning to discuss the ments about conservative Catholics and Evangelicals by Hillary Clinton campaign manager John Podesta and other campaign staffers in a recently released batch of hacked emails from Wikileaks. You can watch the interview below. ...
Trump is the lewd American male
The implosion of Donald Trump’s campaign is a reminder that at the end of the day, character matters more than professional success or mitments. At the beginning of the second presidential debate Donald apologized again for the ments recorded during a private discussion with Billy Bush in 2005 in which he boasted of romantically pursuing married women and groping others. In his apology, he referred to that discussion as regular “locker room talk.” In other words, Trump believes he is...
Video: Paul Bonicelli on Evangelicals and the 2016 Election
Acton Institute Director of Programs and Education Paul Bonicelli joined host Juliet Dragoson WZZM 13 News in Grand Rapids, Michigan yesterday to discuss the choice facing evangelical voters in the ing 2016 presidential election. You can watch the interview below. ...
Principles for a Christian understanding of economics
Many Christians assume that the Bible has nothing at all to say about economics, says Albert Mohler. But a biblical worldview actually has a great deal to teach us about economic matters. Mohler notesthat while the Christian worldview does not demand or promote a particular economic system, there are several principles that should guide our thinking: 6. A Christian economic understanding rewards initiative, industry and investment. Initiative, industry and investment are three crucial words for the Christian’s economic and theological...
7 Figures: How young Americans view socialism, communism, and capitalism
The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation recently released its annual report on U.S. attitudes towards socialism. Here are seven figures you should know from the survey: 1. The percentage of millenials who are unfamiliar with: Mao Zedong (42 percent), Che Guevara (40 percent), Vladimir Lenin (33 percent), Karl Marx (32 percent), Vladimir Putin (18 percent), Joseph Stalin (18 percent). 2. Among those familiar, at least a quarter have favorable impressions of Guevara (37 percent), Marx (34 percent), and Lenin (25...
How to read a supply curve
Note: This is the sixthpost in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Last week we took a deeper look into the demand curve, examining how to read the demand curve, how demand curves shift, and consumer surplus. This week we want to take a closer look at the supply curve and what it reveals to us. And in this next video from Marginal Revolution University we consider the factors that shift the supply curve. How do technological innovations, input...
Hurricane Matthew: disaster relief becoming the permanent model
Hurricane Matthew e and gone, but it has left one country, Haiti, in ruins. Just like in the aftermath of many disasters, we will see a flood of emergency aid and disaster relief pour into this country; Many have good intentions and a strong desire to help. This is a good thing. It’s important that people rally around each other in times of need. The problem arises when this es the permanent model. This is the core theme of a...
Sed contra: Taxation is theft
Over at the Libertarian Christian Institute, Jamin Hübner engages my reflection on taxation and Sam Gregg’s book, For God and Profit, with his sed contra: “But what if the ‘taxation is theft’ creed is consistent with both Christian and libertarian ideas, and that all things considered, taxation really is theft? And what if we’re simply misreading or misappropriating the New Testament? This wouldn’t be fortable or popular conclusion to draw, but it might be the case nevertheless.” Hübner accuses me...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved