Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Burden Bearing and Biblically Based Healthcare
Burden Bearing and Biblically Based Healthcare
Apr 21, 2026 10:23 PM

Over the past year, public discussion about the Affordable Care Act has led many Christians to question the proper roles of government and business in providing healthcare. Too often, though, the question left unexamined is what role the church should have in responding to the medical needs of munity.

Throughout the history of the church, Christians have been actively involved in the provision and funding of health and medical resources. But for the past 50 years, these functions have been treated as political problems reserved for the state rather than matters to be addressed by the church.

Some Christians though, are beginning to reassert this biblically mandated role by participating in health care sharing ministries (HCSM). HCSMs are not panies, but nonprofit religious organizations that help members pay for medical treatments.

As the Alliance of Health Care Sharing Ministries explains, “A health care sharing ministry (HCSM) provides a health care cost sharing arrangement among persons of similar and sincerely held beliefs. HCSMs are not-for-profit religious organizations acting as a clearinghouse for those who have medical expenses and those who desire to share the burden of those medical expenses.”

Although the plans differ in details, their basic premise is to apply Galatians 6:2, “Bear one another’s burdens, and thus fulfill the law of Christ” to medical costs. HCSMs are similar to health insurance programs in that members send a monthly check — a “share” rather than a “premium”– either to the plan administrators or directly to those the plan designates with “needs.” The members also agree to send cards and letters or to pray for those members who are sick or injured.

The plans also require a degree of accountability and impose strict limits on treatment, restrictions that often would be illegal under regulations that apply to conventional insurance programs. Unlike traditional health panies that undertake a contractual transfer of risk in exchange for payment, HCSMs are not guaranteed in any way and are exempt from government regulation.

Because of this, some critics contend that HCSMs are essentially unlicensed health insurers operating without regulation or public accountability. “These plans function just like health insurance, but they operate in a regulatory black hole,” said Mila Kofman, an assistant research professor at Georgetown University’s Health Policy Institute. “There is no accountability, no oversight, and the people who participate have no protection.”

This type of rigid adherence to political thinking poses a stumbling block to the search for biblical-based solutions to social problems. Politically minded Christians, though, present an even greater challenge. Liberal Christians, for instance, tend to believe the primary agent in issues of “social justice” is the state, and that the church’s role is merely to baptize the conscious of government. Conservative Christians, in contrast, often argue the “private sector” (i.e., private corporations) is the responsible agent and that the church’s contribution is merely to provide a “safety net” to catch the poor. Neither side of the spectrum, however, appears to believe that “bearing one another’s burdens” transcends socio-economic lines or is applicable to all Christians in the church. This needs to change.

Healthcare sharing ministries are certainly not the only possible solution for meeting the health needs of believers. And while the plans appear to provide a partial solution, they still require the ability to the individual to fund their “share” of the burden. That’s not always an option for the poor in our midst.

Still, these ministries offer fresh ways of looking at the issue. They also raise important questions about why we do not start with biblical, rather than political, presuppositions when addressing these questions. Hopefully, the recent problems in implementation of the Affordable Care Act and the inability of the private sector to keep costs under control will help lead us to realize that creative solutions are needed. Perhaps in the near future Christians may even realize that healthcare issues are best addressed by munity of believers rather than by political parties.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Acton Commentary: The New Mortgage Fraud — Kick ’Em When They’re Down
The mortgage fraudsters are back, but this time they’re preying on people struggling to keep their homes out of foreclosure. In mentary, Kelsey VanOverloop looks at how the “Foreclosure e-on works and what homeowners can do to avoid the serious consequences of dealing with an unethical lender. VanOverloop describes the fraudulent schemes: Today’s mortgage fraudster preys on the vulnerable, those who have run out of options and are desperate for help. They seek out people known to have fallen on...
Karen Laub-Novak, RIP
The Acton Institute, and I personally, have lost one of our most enduring and earliest friends in the peaceful (and I am told, beautiful – if such a word can be used) death of Karen Laub-Novak, wife of our long-time collaborator and mentor Michael Novak. During the time I lived in Washington, D.C., some 25 years ago, the Novak dinner table became a veritable salon of the free society. As Michael would be mixing up his magical Manhattans (where I...
Jaffa on How Marx May Win After All
This from a new mon Knowledge interview with Harry Jaffa: The society of the future is one in which the moral distinction that is based upon the Judeo-Christian and Greek traditions will dissolve. We are moving into a Communist world; we are moving into the world that Marx wanted without knowing it and without having the kind of revolution that Marx predicted and thought was necessary. For example, the President always talks about our values. What does [President Obama] mean...
More Health Care Reform
Since it appears the health care reform debate isn’t going away any time soon (and, just maybe, has moved in a positive direction from where it started several months ago–e.g., one of the most dangerous proposals, the public option, is itself in danger), we’ll keep pressing the issue. Two recent articles of interest: David Goldhill in The Atlantic. Outstanding exposition of the dysfunctions of American health care and which policies will ameliorate rather than exacerbate them. It’s imperative that we...
Radio Free Acton: Perspectives on Health Care Reform, Part 2
This week Radio Free Acton continues its discussion on healthcare reform. Dr. Donald P. Condit and Dr. Kevin Schmiesing are back, along with host Marc VanderMaas, to talk about alternatives to the current health care proposal and ideas for reforming the system in ways that will both increase the availability of care for all who need it and make economic sense. [audio: If you are not already subscribed to this podcast, here’s the link you’ll want to use to have...
On Calvinism and Capitalism
I don’t much like the term Calvinism. I think it is historically unhelpful, and in general prefer to use something like Reformed theology or speak about the Reformed confessions, depending on the particular context. And I don’t much like the term capitalism, preferring instead to discuss the market economy, or perhaps, in light of the results below, free enterprise. But while popular and intellectual usage certainly prefers the use of the former term (even if it often is caricatured or...
Socialism in America
A great deal has been made in recent weeks about Ronald Reagan‘s critique of nationalized or socialized health care from 1961: We can go back a bit further, though, and take a look at an intriguing piece from 1848, a dialogue on socialism and the French Revolution and the relationship of socialism to democracy, which includes Alexis de Tocqueville‘s critique of socialism in general. One interesting note is that Tocqueville identifies one of the mon to all forms of socialism...
Prioritized Giving
There’s more evidence that amidst the economic downturn people are ing more careful and intentional about the kinds of charities they fund. We’ve seen that those likely to continue to flourish are those that have cultivated a “family-like” connection with their donors. Often more local charities do well in this kind of climate. And, of course, the focus of the charity matters, too. Robert J. Samuelson reports (HT: Theolog) that charitable giving was down $308 billion in 2008, and will...
Acton Commentary: Imagine You Are a Doctor
Hunter Baker examines the push for the “public option” — the creation of a government backed insurance system — as part of health care reform in mentary. Baker takes an interesting approach at examining the push for a public option by dropping his readers into the life of a doctor, articulating the stress and sacrifice of the job: Imagine that you are a physician. You have made it through four years of college on a steady diet of biology, chemistry,...
Book Review: How to Argue Like Jesus
I recently finished How to Argue Like Jesus (Crossway, 2009) by Joe Carter (The Evangelical Outpost, First Thoughts) and John Coleman. I would have loved to have had this book to assign during the 13 years I taught position and rhetoric. So many of my fellow evangelicals think rhetoric is a dirty word, as in “That’s just a bunch of rhetoric.” But as this primer makes clear, Jesus was a master of rhetoric, a master of principled persuasion. Happily, How...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved