Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Burden Bearing and Biblically Based Healthcare
Burden Bearing and Biblically Based Healthcare
Mar 27, 2026 3:06 PM

Over the past year, public discussion about the Affordable Care Act has led many Christians to question the proper roles of government and business in providing healthcare. Too often, though, the question left unexamined is what role the church should have in responding to the medical needs of munity.

Throughout the history of the church, Christians have been actively involved in the provision and funding of health and medical resources. But for the past 50 years, these functions have been treated as political problems reserved for the state rather than matters to be addressed by the church.

Some Christians though, are beginning to reassert this biblically mandated role by participating in health care sharing ministries (HCSM). HCSMs are not panies, but nonprofit religious organizations that help members pay for medical treatments.

As the Alliance of Health Care Sharing Ministries explains, “A health care sharing ministry (HCSM) provides a health care cost sharing arrangement among persons of similar and sincerely held beliefs. HCSMs are not-for-profit religious organizations acting as a clearinghouse for those who have medical expenses and those who desire to share the burden of those medical expenses.”

Although the plans differ in details, their basic premise is to apply Galatians 6:2, “Bear one another’s burdens, and thus fulfill the law of Christ” to medical costs. HCSMs are similar to health insurance programs in that members send a monthly check — a “share” rather than a “premium”– either to the plan administrators or directly to those the plan designates with “needs.” The members also agree to send cards and letters or to pray for those members who are sick or injured.

The plans also require a degree of accountability and impose strict limits on treatment, restrictions that often would be illegal under regulations that apply to conventional insurance programs. Unlike traditional health panies that undertake a contractual transfer of risk in exchange for payment, HCSMs are not guaranteed in any way and are exempt from government regulation.

Because of this, some critics contend that HCSMs are essentially unlicensed health insurers operating without regulation or public accountability. “These plans function just like health insurance, but they operate in a regulatory black hole,” said Mila Kofman, an assistant research professor at Georgetown University’s Health Policy Institute. “There is no accountability, no oversight, and the people who participate have no protection.”

This type of rigid adherence to political thinking poses a stumbling block to the search for biblical-based solutions to social problems. Politically minded Christians, though, present an even greater challenge. Liberal Christians, for instance, tend to believe the primary agent in issues of “social justice” is the state, and that the church’s role is merely to baptize the conscious of government. Conservative Christians, in contrast, often argue the “private sector” (i.e., private corporations) is the responsible agent and that the church’s contribution is merely to provide a “safety net” to catch the poor. Neither side of the spectrum, however, appears to believe that “bearing one another’s burdens” transcends socio-economic lines or is applicable to all Christians in the church. This needs to change.

Healthcare sharing ministries are certainly not the only possible solution for meeting the health needs of believers. And while the plans appear to provide a partial solution, they still require the ability to the individual to fund their “share” of the burden. That’s not always an option for the poor in our midst.

Still, these ministries offer fresh ways of looking at the issue. They also raise important questions about why we do not start with biblical, rather than political, presuppositions when addressing these questions. Hopefully, the recent problems in implementation of the Affordable Care Act and the inability of the private sector to keep costs under control will help lead us to realize that creative solutions are needed. Perhaps in the near future Christians may even realize that healthcare issues are best addressed by munity of believers rather than by political parties.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
NYT freak show
A New York Times editorial today argues that spreading concerns about the ethical validity of chimeras (human-animal hybrids) are unfounded. Here is a summary of the argument: 1) Strange and disturbing possibilities are more like science-fiction than real science. These “should not distract us from ing more mundane experiments with chimeras that will be needed to advance science.” 2) This is just the next logical progression. There’s no real substantive difference between transplanting organs or tissues and splicing genes. 3)...
‘Hokey Religions and Ancient Weapons’
This es from Han Solo, which pretty well sums up his critique of Jedi knights in the Star Wars saga, “Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side.” I also wonder whether it might be apt in describing the sometimes contemptuous relationship between scientific progress and religion (Christianity in particular), as the guiding pragmatic ethos of naturalism wars against orthodox Christian belief. Forbes has posted a slideshow giving reviews of the various technologies...
Review Acton books
Interested in reading and reviewing various publications for your blog? Head on over to Mind & Media, a blog-based book reviewing service. The Acton Institute has placed three titles from the Lexington Books Studies in Ethics & Economics series, edited by Acton director of research Samuel Gregg. One of the books is Within the Market Strife: American Catholic Economic Thought from Rerum Novarum to Vatican II, by Acton research fellow Kevin Schmiesing. e a reviewer ...
Mistaken mastectomy
According to the AP, Molly Akers has filed a lawsuit against the University of Chicago Hospitals, seeking more than $200,000 in damages for the pain, suffering and lost wages she suffered when her healthy right breast was surgically removed. The mistake was the result of a lab mix-up, and in a statement released on NBC’s Today Show, the hospital expressed regret for the mistake. Akers’ lawyer, Bob Clifford, is using the case as an opportunity to speak against proposed tort...
Big story on small loans
Today’s Christian Science Monitor has a story on the increasing use of micro-loans by Christian aid and development groups. According to the story, “Religious organizations are increasingly adopting the Talmudic sentiment that the noblest form of charity is helping others to dispense with it.” Ron Sider, in the twentieth anniversary edition of his book, Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger, strongly endorses the use of micro-loans as a means of getting desperately needed capital to those who need it...
Old Europe’s new despotism
Noting the celebration of the 200th anniversary of the birth of Alexis de Tocqueville, Samuel Gregg analyzes the current situation in Europe. “Tocqueville’s vision of ‘soft-despotism’ is thus one of arrangements that mutually corrupt citizens and the democratic state,” and clear signs of this ‘soft-despotism’ are emerging, contends Gregg. Read the full text here. ...
The flawed fast food tax
Fast Food Tax Redux As I alerted you to more than three weeks ago, Detroit mayor Kwame Kilpatrick has proposed a 2% tax on fast food restaurants, in a vain attempt to cover the city’s fiscal woes. Here’s a sneak preview to this week’s ANC feature, “The Flawed Fast Food Tax,” in which I conclude: As a rule, governments should not seek quick and temporary fixes to structural budget problems. Sin taxes like the fast food tax are quick fixes...
The moral imperative of our time?
In his “Bad Economics, Bad Public Policy and Bad Theology,” columnist Raymond Keating makes the case on OrthodoxyToday.org that the Religious Left offers “assorted biblical passages that speak of aiding the poor, the necessity for charity and justice, or other vague generalities, and then simply assert that these quotations support the particulars of their big government philosophy. Of course, this ranks as either ignorant or disingenuous from a theological standpoint.” Keating examines resurgent activism by liberal/leftist religious leaders on environmental...
‘Kyoto is Doomed’
Iain Murray at Tech Central Station writes that the EU is going to have a lot of trouble meeting its obligations under the Kyoto Protocol, and this could have disastrous economic effects. He writes of recent statements from Spanish officials: This is a clear indication that at least one government has realized that Kyoto brings a severe economic cost with it, contrary to the protestations of the European Commission and Kyoto boosters around the world. Murray concludes, “The reality, then,...
Game review: Food Force
The United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) has found a new way to get the word out about its efforts. Food Force is a free downloadable video game (for the PC and Mac) designed by the WFP, in which the users will “Play the game, learn about food aid, and help WFP work towards a world without hunger.” Within the context of the fictional nation of Sheylan, the player embarks on a series of missions intended to give users a...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved