Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Build yourself, build society
Build yourself, build society
May 2, 2026 8:22 AM

One of Christ’s best-known parables is the Parable of the Talents, but its familiarity disguises just how strange and unsettling its message is. It is a parable of a master who departs on a journey and entrusts three servants, each according to his ability, with his property. Each receives five, two, or one talent(s), respectively.

The ablest servant departed, immediately put the money to work, and doubled his master’s talents. The servant entrusted with two talents did the same. But the servant entrusted with one talent, supposing his master to be a hard man who reaps where he does not sow, fearfully hid his talent in a hole in the ground. When the master returned, mended the first two servants, “Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master” (Matthew 25:23). The master punished the wicked and slothful servant, taking his talent and giving it to the ablest servant saying:

The one who has will be given more,and he will have more than enough. But the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken from him. And throw that worthless slave into the outer darkness,where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matt. 25:29-30).

It seems like a strange parable, because is runs counter to the egalitarian spirit of the age by entrusting the ablest servants with more wealth. This is unsettling, because it is a parable of judgment, reminding us that our actions in this life have eternal ramifications no matter how small our responsibilities.

In his essay, “It’s Time to Build,” entrepreneur, investor, and software engineer Marc Andreessen writes that the tragic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic are a sort of judgment for unprepared Western institutions:

Many of us would like to pin the cause on one political party or another, on one government or another. But the harsh reality is that it all failed — no Western country, or state, or city was prepared — and despite hard work and often extraordinary sacrifice by many people within these institutions. So the problem runs deeper than your favorite political opponent or your home nation.

Part of the problem is clearly foresight, a failure of imagination. But the other part of the problem is what we didn’t *do* in advance, and what we’re failing to do now. And that is a failure of action, and specifically our widespread inability to *build*.

In Andreessen’s estimation, we have been wicked and slothful servants. Rather than take what we have inherited and build upon it, we have fearfully hidden our talents in the ground. His analysis of the Western world’s placency echoes much of the analysis in economist Tyler Cowen’s The Complacent Class: The Self-Defeating Quest for the American Dream: We are working harder than ever to avoid change rather than doing the difficult work required to embrace it.

He points out that this is not a problem caused by the COVID-19 pandemic but one simply brought into starker relief by it. It has been a persistent problem in housing, healthcare, and education. In spheres of life most fundamental to human flourishing, we have privileged the passions and interests of the political, economic, and cultural status quo over facing our problems:

The problem is desire. We need to *want* these things. The problem is inertia. We need to want these things more than we want to prevent these things. The problem is regulatory capture. We need to want panies to build these things, even if incumbents don’t like it, even if only to force the incumbents to build these things. And the problem is will. We need to build these things.

Andreessen’s entire piece is well worth reading. Toward the end, he gives us a sort of vocational examination of conscience:

Every step of the way, to everyone around us, we should be asking the question, what are you building? What are you building directly, or helping other people to build, or teaching other people to build, or taking care of people who are building?

Our own lives and work can be rendered fruitless by fear like the wicked and slothful servant’s. It is easy to be consumed by criticism or spend our time devaluing and dismissing others. Take these difficult times and turn them into times for building something, because “the Lord is not slow concerning his promise,as some regard slowness, but is being patient toward you, because he does not wishfor anyto perish but for all e to repentance” (II Peter 3:9).

Quinn CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
‘The world has never been less bad’
A new interactive tool shows that men, women, and families from around the world have a lot more similarities than differences. With the U.S. presidential election, confusion over Brexit, and seemingly crumbling international relationships, 2016 feels like it’s been months and months of anger, resentment, and disharmony. Americans—and non-Americans too—are feeling like we have nothing mon with anyone anymore. It’s worth taking a moment to look at the data and realize that just isn’t true. Gapminder recently launched a new...
Why coffee tasting matters to God
Does the work of a coffee buyer have an impact that stretches on into eternity? Does coffee tasting matter to God? In a new video from Chapel Hill Bible Church, coffee taster and buyer Jeff McArthur shares how he came to see the deeper meaning of his work, both in the day-to-day trades and exchanges with his customers munity and in the relational ripple effects that reach on into the broader economic order. “I feel like sometimes God has us...
Radio Free Acton: Benjamin Domenech On The Roots And Rise Of American Populism
On this edition of Radio Free Acton, Jordan Ballor – Acton Research Fellow, Director of Publishing, and Executive Editor of the Journal of Markets and Morality – talks with Benjamin Domenech, publisher of The Federalist, about the current populist moment in American politics, the roots of American populism, and what the possible es of the current populist uprising may be for the United States. For more from Ben Domenech, be sure to check out The Federalist Radio Hour, and subscribe...
Samuel Gregg: The ‘phony war’ between Catholics and libertarians
“Supporting markets as the economic arrangements most likely to help promote human flourishing doesn’t necessarily mean you accept libertarian philosophical premises” says Acton Institute Director of Research Samuel Gregg in an essaypublished today at Public Discourse. es in response to “Koch Brothers Latest Target: Pope Francis,”an Oct. 14article written by John Gehring at the American Prospect that claims the Acton Institute is part of a larger network of organizations behind “a decidedly different message than Pope Francis does when es...
Is it possible for the church to be apolitical?
Weary and wary from the Religious Right’s checkered history of unhealthy political alliances, many pastors and churches have opted for disengagement altogether. Or the illusion of disengagement, that is. As Andrew Walker reminds us, “It is impossible for churches to be apolitical because Jesus is a King. He isn’t a pious emblem to tuck away into our hearts with no earthly effect.” The Gospel we preach is inherently political. Indeed, as Walker continues,“Jesus is Lord” is “the most political statement...
Why Doug (like other low-income Americans) doesn’t trust authority
This weekend Saturday Night Live had a sketch that set the Internet abuzz and had Slate asking whetherthe skit was the “most astute analysis of american politics in 2016.” The setup was “Black Jeopardy!”,a recurring bit on SNL that normally pits two lower-class black contestants against a wealthier and/or well-educated white contestant who is clueless about African-American perspectives on race and culture. Thistime, though,the white guy is a working-class (presumed)Trump supporter named Doug(played by Tom Hanks)—who isn’t as out of...
Does the equilibrium model work in the real world?
Note: This is the seventhpost in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. In previous videos in this series from Marginal Revolution University we learned how prices reach equilibrium and how the market works like an invisible hand coordinating economic activity. In the next couple of videos you’ll see why the equilibrium price (he market price where the quantity of goods supplied is equal to the quantity of goods demanded) is the only stable price and whether this model works...
In defense of sweatshops (and proximate justice)
A recent study of Ethiopian workers released last week by the US National Bureau of Economics Research found “sweatshops” were unpleasant, risky, and paid even less than self-employment in the informal sector. But, the researchers also found, countries were still better off than not having those jobs at all. AsMichael J. Coren of Quartz writes, By encouraging mass hiring in the economy, even low-wage factories could lift everyone’s wages. Fewer desperate peting for jobs meant employers must pay more for...
Samuel Gregg interviewed on new book ‘For God and Profit’
Samuel Gregg, director of research at Acton Institute, was recently interviewed by Carl E. Olson of Catholic World Report about his new book For God and Profit. Gregg is a frequent contributor to CWR on the topics of political economy, economic history, ethics in finance, and natural law theory. The first question asked of Gregg was “Is it fair to say that Church teaching about money and economics is widely misunderstood and often misrepresented? If so, what are some of...
Trump and Clinton are wrong: free trade helps the poor
Imagine if Donald Trump made a campaign promise that he would lower the pay of every American, but would ensure that the poorest 10 percent have their pay lowered the most. Would you vote for him then? Or imagine if Hillary Clinton said she would increase inflation substantially to make the economy more “fair” for everyone. Would she win your support? Neither candidate has made such a claim—at least not directly. TheAmerican people would immediate reject such harmful economic policies,and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved