Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Build yourself, build society
Build yourself, build society
Feb 25, 2026 9:25 AM

One of Christ’s best-known parables is the Parable of the Talents, but its familiarity disguises just how strange and unsettling its message is. It is a parable of a master who departs on a journey and entrusts three servants, each according to his ability, with his property. Each receives five, two, or one talent(s), respectively.

The ablest servant departed, immediately put the money to work, and doubled his master’s talents. The servant entrusted with two talents did the same. But the servant entrusted with one talent, supposing his master to be a hard man who reaps where he does not sow, fearfully hid his talent in a hole in the ground. When the master returned, mended the first two servants, “Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master” (Matthew 25:23). The master punished the wicked and slothful servant, taking his talent and giving it to the ablest servant saying:

The one who has will be given more,and he will have more than enough. But the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken from him. And throw that worthless slave into the outer darkness,where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matt. 25:29-30).

It seems like a strange parable, because is runs counter to the egalitarian spirit of the age by entrusting the ablest servants with more wealth. This is unsettling, because it is a parable of judgment, reminding us that our actions in this life have eternal ramifications no matter how small our responsibilities.

In his essay, “It’s Time to Build,” entrepreneur, investor, and software engineer Marc Andreessen writes that the tragic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic are a sort of judgment for unprepared Western institutions:

Many of us would like to pin the cause on one political party or another, on one government or another. But the harsh reality is that it all failed — no Western country, or state, or city was prepared — and despite hard work and often extraordinary sacrifice by many people within these institutions. So the problem runs deeper than your favorite political opponent or your home nation.

Part of the problem is clearly foresight, a failure of imagination. But the other part of the problem is what we didn’t *do* in advance, and what we’re failing to do now. And that is a failure of action, and specifically our widespread inability to *build*.

In Andreessen’s estimation, we have been wicked and slothful servants. Rather than take what we have inherited and build upon it, we have fearfully hidden our talents in the ground. His analysis of the Western world’s placency echoes much of the analysis in economist Tyler Cowen’s The Complacent Class: The Self-Defeating Quest for the American Dream: We are working harder than ever to avoid change rather than doing the difficult work required to embrace it.

He points out that this is not a problem caused by the COVID-19 pandemic but one simply brought into starker relief by it. It has been a persistent problem in housing, healthcare, and education. In spheres of life most fundamental to human flourishing, we have privileged the passions and interests of the political, economic, and cultural status quo over facing our problems:

The problem is desire. We need to *want* these things. The problem is inertia. We need to want these things more than we want to prevent these things. The problem is regulatory capture. We need to want panies to build these things, even if incumbents don’t like it, even if only to force the incumbents to build these things. And the problem is will. We need to build these things.

Andreessen’s entire piece is well worth reading. Toward the end, he gives us a sort of vocational examination of conscience:

Every step of the way, to everyone around us, we should be asking the question, what are you building? What are you building directly, or helping other people to build, or teaching other people to build, or taking care of people who are building?

Our own lives and work can be rendered fruitless by fear like the wicked and slothful servant’s. It is easy to be consumed by criticism or spend our time devaluing and dismissing others. Take these difficult times and turn them into times for building something, because “the Lord is not slow concerning his promise,as some regard slowness, but is being patient toward you, because he does not wishfor anyto perish but for all e to repentance” (II Peter 3:9).

Quinn CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Reed’s classic piece on Hoover, FDR, and the Great Depression
Brief excerpts from Lawrence Reed’s classic 1981 article on the Great Depression, published in The Freeman and now republished by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy (which I just received in the mail)… Reed divides the GD into four phases: To properly understand the events of the time, it is appropriate to view the Great Depression as not one, but four consecutive depressions rolled into one. Professor Hans Sennholz has labeled these four “phases” as follows: the business cycle; the...
Acton Commentary: Bad News for Latin America
A wave of financial protectionism is embedded in much of the stimulus legislation and bailout measures that have been adopted in Europe and America in recent weeks. One result of these ill-advised moves will be a dramatic reduction in private capital flows to emerging markets in 2009. “Among the biggest losers will be Latin American nations,” warns Samuel Gregg in mentary. Read mentary at the Acton website ment on it here. ...
PBR: Governmental Accountability and Transparency?
In response to the question, “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” Does the ARRA mark the dawn of a new era of government accountability, from a government “of the people, by the people, for the people”? President Obama seems to think so. He says as much in a video statement tied to the launch of Recovery.gov, “a website that lets you, the taxpayer, figure out where the money from the American Recovery and...
PBR: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) is poised to be signed into law after weeks of wrangling. Since we know that “budgets are moral documents,” then spending and stimulus bills must be as well. So this week’s PowerBlog Ramblings question is: “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” Ramble on… Ramblings: Do We Need a New New Deal?Something for NothingDangerous Deficit SpendingGovernmental Accountability and Transparency? ...
PBR: Dangerous Deficit Spending
In response to the question, “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” One of the gravest moral issues related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is the matter of dangerous deficit spending. Anybody plugged into our nation’s financial crisis is likely aware of the unsustainable spending path of not just the federal government, but individual states as well. Because many states have balanced budget amendments, they are not entitled to run deficits, so...
Divorcing Marriage
A staggering piece by Stephen Baskerville in Touchstone… I’ve written at length that marriage has been damaged much moreso by divorce than by calls for (or movements toward) “same-sex” marriage. Baskerville expands on that and discusses the initial “grand experiment” on marriage– the policies behind the move toward easier divorce. G. K. Chesterton once observed that the family serves as the principal check on government power, and he suggested that someday the family and the state would confront one another....
PBR: Something for Nothing
In response to the question, “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” The ARRA makes clear that we have not learned one great moral lesson: You can’t have something for nothing. Or, among economists, there’s no such thing as a free lunch. I’m not even sure that anybody is seriously arguing that most of the items contained in this bill constitute “stimulus.” Congress can genuinely stimulate the economy in two ways: decreasing taxes and...
Acton Commentary: The Abracadabra Stimulus Plan
In this week’s Acton Commentary, Anthony Bradley exposes the “legislative incantations” designed to artificially create consumer demand (where none exists) via the stimulus bill. “Real needs must be permitted to create real demand, and thus truly sustainable jobs,” he writes. Read mentary at the Acton Institute website and share your feedback here. ...
More on Historical Hoosier Eugenics
A little more than a year ago, I wrote a really nice piece on this topic— on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the nation’s first eugenics law (in Indiana). Now, more historical context from Jesse Walker at Reason… In 1888, a social reformer named Oscar McCulloch delivered a speech in Buffalo titled “The Tribe of Ishmael: A Study in Social Degradation.” Indianapolis, McCulloch declared, had been infected by a “pauper ganglion,” a depraved clan that survived “by stealing,...
PBR: Do We Need a New New Deal?
In response to the question, “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” Perhaps the most effective historical trope in pushing through the massive stimulus package on Capitol Hill has been the notion that if only the New Deal of the 1930s hadn’t had to wait more than three years for the election of FDR, the Great Depression might have been avoided. But have you ever wondered why the Great Depression persisted for so long?...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved