Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Build yourself, build society
Build yourself, build society
Mar 14, 2026 6:55 AM

One of Christ’s best-known parables is the Parable of the Talents, but its familiarity disguises just how strange and unsettling its message is. It is a parable of a master who departs on a journey and entrusts three servants, each according to his ability, with his property. Each receives five, two, or one talent(s), respectively.

The ablest servant departed, immediately put the money to work, and doubled his master’s talents. The servant entrusted with two talents did the same. But the servant entrusted with one talent, supposing his master to be a hard man who reaps where he does not sow, fearfully hid his talent in a hole in the ground. When the master returned, mended the first two servants, “Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master” (Matthew 25:23). The master punished the wicked and slothful servant, taking his talent and giving it to the ablest servant saying:

The one who has will be given more,and he will have more than enough. But the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken from him. And throw that worthless slave into the outer darkness,where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matt. 25:29-30).

It seems like a strange parable, because is runs counter to the egalitarian spirit of the age by entrusting the ablest servants with more wealth. This is unsettling, because it is a parable of judgment, reminding us that our actions in this life have eternal ramifications no matter how small our responsibilities.

In his essay, “It’s Time to Build,” entrepreneur, investor, and software engineer Marc Andreessen writes that the tragic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic are a sort of judgment for unprepared Western institutions:

Many of us would like to pin the cause on one political party or another, on one government or another. But the harsh reality is that it all failed — no Western country, or state, or city was prepared — and despite hard work and often extraordinary sacrifice by many people within these institutions. So the problem runs deeper than your favorite political opponent or your home nation.

Part of the problem is clearly foresight, a failure of imagination. But the other part of the problem is what we didn’t *do* in advance, and what we’re failing to do now. And that is a failure of action, and specifically our widespread inability to *build*.

In Andreessen’s estimation, we have been wicked and slothful servants. Rather than take what we have inherited and build upon it, we have fearfully hidden our talents in the ground. His analysis of the Western world’s placency echoes much of the analysis in economist Tyler Cowen’s The Complacent Class: The Self-Defeating Quest for the American Dream: We are working harder than ever to avoid change rather than doing the difficult work required to embrace it.

He points out that this is not a problem caused by the COVID-19 pandemic but one simply brought into starker relief by it. It has been a persistent problem in housing, healthcare, and education. In spheres of life most fundamental to human flourishing, we have privileged the passions and interests of the political, economic, and cultural status quo over facing our problems:

The problem is desire. We need to *want* these things. The problem is inertia. We need to want these things more than we want to prevent these things. The problem is regulatory capture. We need to want panies to build these things, even if incumbents don’t like it, even if only to force the incumbents to build these things. And the problem is will. We need to build these things.

Andreessen’s entire piece is well worth reading. Toward the end, he gives us a sort of vocational examination of conscience:

Every step of the way, to everyone around us, we should be asking the question, what are you building? What are you building directly, or helping other people to build, or teaching other people to build, or taking care of people who are building?

Our own lives and work can be rendered fruitless by fear like the wicked and slothful servant’s. It is easy to be consumed by criticism or spend our time devaluing and dismissing others. Take these difficult times and turn them into times for building something, because “the Lord is not slow concerning his promise,as some regard slowness, but is being patient toward you, because he does not wishfor anyto perish but for all e to repentance” (II Peter 3:9).

Quinn CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Armstrong on government and charity
John H. Armstrong tackles the question, “How Should Government Deal with Poverty?” He writes, “A regular argument made, at least from some evangelical political voices from the political left, is to cite numerous Old Testament texts about poverty and then suggest that one of the central concerns of a just government is to solve the problems associated with poverty.” He cuts to the heart of such fallacious reasoning, recognizing “No one who has an ounce passion disagrees that Christians should...
Feel-good hybrid hype
Richard Burr has an mentary in the Weekly Standard on the growing — and for some reasons puzzling — popularity of hybrid vehicles. Puzzling because these things don’t get the promised gains in fuel economy and don’t seem to work very well. Imagine buying a Chevy Impala or a Toyota Camry and being told that you can’t run the air conditioner on high. Or you need lessons from the dealer on how to brake the vehicle in order to recharge...
Everyone is valuable
An excellent post by Bryan Caplan at EconLog examines the intentions of eugenics against the actual effects of the implementation of such policies. His point? “Even if genetics explained ALL differences in success, many policies that raise average genetic quality would backfire.” The reason is the Law of Comparative Advantage, or the reality that “trade between two people or groups increases total production even if one person or group is worse at everything.” Read the whole post for his proof,...
Discerning threats to marriage
Bill Robinson at The Huffington Post says that the real “enemies of marriage” consists of “those who treat it as modity, a temporary merger, a corporate buyout,” citing the impending fourth divorce of billionaire Ron Perelman. In typically overblown fashion, Robinson asks, “Where are the Defense of Marriage Nazis when marriage is actually under assault? Why aren’t they boycotting Revlon? Is it possible billionaires and celebs are undermining this sacred institution more than ‘the gays’? David Hasselhoff, Babyface, and Christina...
The Church as ‘hinge point’
A couple of weeks ago, I noted the amazing “just do it” outpouring passion in response to the wildfires in the Central Plains. My small home town in Oklahoma was among those areas burned or seriously damaged by the fires. Since Nov. 1, more than 363,000 acres, 220 structures and four deaths have been attributed to these wildfires. Much of the destruction has occurred on Indian trust lands within such areas as the Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muskogee Creek and Seminole tribal...
Sprawl not so bad
Robert Brueggman of the University of Illinois-Chicago offers a contrarian take on suburban sprawl in US News and World Report. I’m not as relativistic as Brueggman is with respect to the aesthetic question: A lot of suburban shopping centers, highways, and neighborhoods are ugly—or at least boring—and don’t deserve to be preserved in the longterm. (Yes, a lot of urban buildings, highly respected by the architectural elite, are also ugly, in my opinion.) But Brueggman makes good points about the...
Christ and the culture wars
Mark your calendars: The Institute for the Study of Christianity and Culture at Michigan State University is hosting a conference on April 7-8 with the keynote address to be given by Dr. Randall Balmer, Ann Whitney Olin Professor, Barnard College, Columbia University. From the conference site: “Dr. Balmer will be giving a lecture and a panel discussion on the topic of his ing book Taking the Country Back: How the Religious Right is Winning the Culture Wars.” There will also...
A Catholic alternative to Europe’s ‘third way’
Proponents of social democracies claim that a large role for the state is important in tempering the profit motive of capitalism and creating a more humane and cultured state. Free markets, they argue, result in an inhumane and disintegrated society, while the social democracy models of Europe protect the weak and create social cohesion. Yet these proponents rarely question whether the reality of Europe today bears this out. Even a cursory examination of European and American life reveals that the...
Super-size government
“The political left in America is emerging victorious,” writes Patrick Chisholm, and its true because “the era of big government is far from over. Trends are decidedly in favor of that quintessential leftist goal: massive redistribution of wealth.” Over the past two decades, “Republicans’ capture of both Congress and the White House was, understandably, a demoralizing blow to the left. But the latter can take solace that “Republican” is no longer synonymous with spending restraint, free markets, and other ideals...
Does American charity cheat the tax man?
A Stanford expert on philanthropy argues that tax-deductible American charity is actually a government subsidy and that philanthropy is not ‘redistributive’ enough. Acton’s Karen Woods points out (obvious to most) that helping the needy is not the exclusive domain of the state. “The real problem with government ‘charity’ is that government takes a ‘one size fits all’ approach to the problem of poverty,” Woods writes. Read mentary here. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved