Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Boris Johnson emphasizes transatlantic links, optimistic post-Brexit future (video)
Boris Johnson emphasizes transatlantic links, optimistic post-Brexit future (video)
Jan 3, 2025 10:58 PM

Despite a series of setbacks on the most important political issues of his day, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson still envisions a free, innovative future that links the transatlantic sphere in prosperity. He recently outlined his vision of a post-Brexit future that will unleash the creativity and wealth-creating powers of citizens on both sides of the Atlantic.

Johnson made surprisingly forward-looking and optimistic remarks shortly after the Supreme Court of the UK ruled his decision to prorogue Parliament “unlawful.”

The prime minister, while undoubtedly crestfallen, sounded upbeat while addressing a group of U.S. and Canadian businessmen in New York City on Tuesday.

He began by discussing how transatlantic “fusion” led to the flourishing of the U.S. and UK. American and British inventors contributed to the subway system – or “the tube,” as it’s known in London – the steel veins of both cities.

He still insisted the UK would leave the European Union on October 31, although Parliament has passed legislation seeking to bar him from doing so without a withdrawal deal.

At that point, he said, “We intend to be more global, more outward looking, mitted to the rest of the world than ever before.”

“And we’re going to take advantage of all the freedoms that Brexit can give,” he said, citing “new tax allowances for investment,” “enterprise zones,” petitive tax rates,” and “better” (read: fewer) regulations.

A free trade deal with the U.S. would further this alliance, he said, although he specified that he does not “want our NHS to be on the table” for negotiations. Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn has accused Johnson of wanting to privatize the nation’s flailing healthcare system, a position that is considered politically toxic.

With that exception, Johnson saw goods and services flowing freely between North American and UK ports.

“It’s absolutely absurd that there should be tariffs in the UK on Californian wine – heavy tariffs – or that British shoppers should pay over the odds for Florida orange juice,” he said. But it is equally “absurd” that most Americans have “gone decades without eating a morsel of British lamb, or beef – let alone haggis.”

At the same time, “the U.S. military are banned from buying British tape measures – as though there were some kind of general prejudice still against British rulers of all kinds.”

Johnson, who has a knack for explaining economic concepts, cogently described why this is a future to embrace: “Free trade is the best and fastest way to increase the prosperity of both our peoples.”

History shows that free markets and greater prosperity empower people to use their God-given talents to support themselves while creating wealth. People who make more money have lower divorce rates, are less likely to suffer violent crime, and are eight times more likely to earn a college degree.

You can watch his remarks below:

Editorial use only.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
A stamp for Che? Guevara ignored economics and human nature
At a minimum, one may see the West’s disconnect from economics reflected in Che Guevara’s immortalized visage, which adorns everything from college dorm rooms to a new stamp issued by the Republic of Ireland. (You can see a picture of the honor here.) The most familiar image of Guevara, who was born in Argentina to a father of part-Irish ancestry, entered the public canon through the hand of Irish artist Jim Fitzpatrick. The Irish post office chose to fete Guevara,...
Samuel Gregg: Ideas, intellectuals and the free economy
In another round of conservative debate on the virtues — or vices — of the market economy, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg published a new piece at Public Discourse in which he takes on the critiques of writer Matthew McManus. MacManus’ criticisms were written in reply to an earlier piece in which Gregg addresses the growing criticisms of a free economy by editors and writers at First Things magazine. In Gregg’s article, Capitalism, Conservatives, and the Intellectuals: A Reply to...
Does bundling benefit social welfare?
Note: This is post #53 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Bundling refers to when two or more goods are sold together as a package. Cable TV is a prime example of bundling. What if there was no bundling and you had to pay for Cable TV by channel rather than purchasing channels in bundles? Would you end up paying more or less? In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Alex Tabarrok explains the benefits of bundling....
3 Reasons income tax cuts (almost) always benefit the wealthy
Death and taxes may be the only certainties in life, but there is a close third: e tax cuts mostly benefit e workers. As Congress discusses tax reform, the debate about who will benefit from tax cuts is back in the news. And many people are concerned with how the changes will favor high e earners. Even President Trump has promised that the reforms won’t give wealthy Americans a massive tax cut. The reality is that there is almost no...
Sin taxes: The ‘nudge’ that benefits terrorism
Richard Thaler won the Nobel Prize for describe how even small economic incentives can affect behavior. One of those nudges, high “sin taxes,” has helped finance terrorism and organized crime. Sin taxes played some role in his winning the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences this week. The Nobel Committee that awarded Thaler’s prize in economics noted, “The insights of behavioral economics can also be used to inform more traditional policy interventions, for example the taxation of ‘sinful goods,’” adding...
How close are we to ending extreme poverty?
Today is the 25th anniversary of the declaration by the UN General Assembly designating October 17 as the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty. The World Bank defines extreme poverty as living on less than $1.90 per person per day. How close are we to eliminating that level of poverty? Closer than you may think. From the beginning of human history until about 1970, there were more people living in extreme poverty than people who were not. But around...
Christian education is not safe
“Each generation needs to re-own the rationale for Christian education,” says philosopher James K.A. Smith, “to ask ourselves ‘Why did we do this?’ and ‘Should we keep doing this?’” In answering such questions, Smith notes, “it might be helpful to point out what Christian education is not”: First, Christian education is not meant to be merely “safe” education. The impetus for Christian schooling is not a protectionist concern, driven by fear, to sequester children from the big, bad world. Christian...
The ‘nudge’ that separated families
Richard Thaler, the co-author of Nudge, has won the Nobel Prize for his contributions to behavioral economics. While he decides how best to spend his $1.1 million in prize money, less prosperous families are paying the price for government policies advancing economic paternalism. Thaler suggested in a 2012 New York Times op-ed that the United States follow Europe’s lead in raising the price of gasoline in order to preserve the environment. Hiking the gas tax would be a more efficient...
Economic man is a myth, but ‘nudging’ is a distraction
The University of Chicago’s Richard Thaler recently won the Nobel Prize for his contributions in behavioral economics, much of which centers on challenging rational choice theory. “Renowned for his use of data to observe and predict how people behave in the real world,” writes Derek Thompson, “Thaler’s career has been a lifelong war on Homo economicus, that mythical species of purely rational hominids who dwell exclusively in the models of classical economic theory.” Victor Claar has helpfully summarized Thaler’s work...
Protectionism is economic suicide
The most charitable assumption you can make about people who support tariffs and other forms of protectionism is that they are economically illiterate. But if they are able to demonstrate they understand the economics of protectionism and still support such policies, then we are justified in assuming they don’t care about harming their neighbor. This binary choice may sound overly simplistic—after all, aren’t most policy plex?—but it really is that clear-cut. As Mark J. Perry explains, It’s a scientifically and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved