Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Book Review: ‘Disinherited: How Washington is Betraying America’s Young’
Book Review: ‘Disinherited: How Washington is Betraying America’s Young’
Jan 9, 2026 9:30 AM

Things aren’t looking good for millennials. Tied up in the “American dream” is an assumption that you’ll do better than your parents, but those of us between the ages of 18 and 34 are predicted to be the first generation to actually do worse financially. Time Magazine recently boiled down some depressing figures from a U.S. Census Bureau report. According to the article, “millennials are worse off than the same age group in 1980, 1990 and 2000″ when looking at median e, leaving home, employment, and poverty.

In Disinherited: How Washington is Betraying America’s Young, Diana Furchtgott-Roth and Jared Meyer systematically explain how current policies and laws are hurting the youngest workers. This book isn’t simply a rant against the baby boomers and Washington, instead it is a carefully thought-out, heavily researched examination of the concerns that millennials face and what can be done to eliminate these issues. One of my favorite quotes from the book summarizes the theme: “Time and time again, Washington has shown its unwillingness to tackle the main moral and economic issues facing the nation. The longer our leaders delay, the harder it will be to undo the damage wrought by economic policies that are betraying America’s young.”

Disinherited is broken down into four parts: “Stealing from the Young to Enrich the Old,” “Keeping Young People Uneducated,” “Regulations that Cripple the Young,” and “Where To from Here?” The chapters are a healthy mix of stats and figures, charts, and anecdotal evidence. For example, a chapter on problems in primary and secondary education, while it backs up points with numbers, offers a lot more anecdotal evidence and interviews with specific individuals than some other chapters. I prefer more of this evidence, but more numbers-oriented people will certainly be satisfied as well.

Something I really appreciated is that the authors are careful to avoid ad hominem attacks. While the subject of the book is how the young of America are at a disadvantage, it does not blame an entire generation of baby boomers, nor specific politicians, or even any one political party. When talking about specific policies, it does name names, but never accuses these politicians of malicious intent, nor does Disinherited personally attack them. In the introduction to the book, the authors say that “while the problem is bipartisan in nature, the solution is, too.” The book accurately lists issues e from both sides of the aisle, again, focusing on the issues, instead of specific people or parties. It does not praise the current administration, but does acknowledge that it “inherited problems.” Bad policies e from good hearts, not spiteful or self-serving intentions. Too often emotional subjects, like many of those found in the book, bring out nasty language and accusatory statements. The authors understand that many of these policies hurting e from genuinely good hearts and people who, unfortunately, did not foresee the long term consequences of their policies.

The chapters each have a consistent layout of problem, cause, and solution. I was the most interested in chapter 4, titled “Drowning in College Debt.” It offers a good example of how Furchtgott-Roth and Meyer lay out each chapter.

They start with a problem: young people are graduating with exorbitant debt—averaging $25,000—and have to put off milestones like starting a family, buying a house… etc.

They go into the multifaceted cause of this crisis: Government spending on “Pell grants, student loans, and tax credits” was initially intended to make education easier for e students, but may have actually raised the cost of higher education for everyone. Creating more financial aid has enabled schools to raise tuitions and government loans with low rates and high acceptance have increased the demand for a higher education. Many high school counselors do not encourage students to attend trade schools munity colleges. There is an extremely high emphasis put onto following your passions, regardless of considering the labor market demand of someone with that skillset. Certainly, students should be allowed to pursue their dreams, but with a clear understanding of what life after graduation will look like.

After dropping all this unhappy information, the chapter does suggest some solutions. It began by describing Berea College, a school with no tuition. Students all have to work a certain number of hours, but can pletely debt free. The chapter also discusses the reforms to financial aid that President Obama has called for—aid received would be directly tied to the institution’s ranking, giving the institution proper incentives: “The ranking would be based on their tuition costs, scholarships awarded, outstanding loan debts, graduation and transfer rates, and graduates’ earnings and career prospects.” Also suggested was amending interest rates for student loans:

Currently the same interest rate of 4.66 percent for direct undergraduate loans applies to everyone regardless of future career prospects. Tying the rate paid to past academic performance—in high munity college, or university—would provide an incentive for students to pick schools that better fit their skills, potential, and ability to pay. The rate should also depend on what major students select, because choice of major correlates with repayment potential.

Whether you agree or not with the authors’ suggested causes and solutions to the problems, they give solid reasoning why they came up with what they did. They pull information from many different sources, not just one organization or even one ideology. Their graphs are clearly labeled with sources cited.

While there is a lot of data and research, Disinherited is a fairly easy and short read at 128 pages. The introduction to the book is tremendously helpful as it summarizes each chapter in one paragraph. If you don’t have time to read the entire book or if there are only one or two subjects you’re interested in, it’s worth reading the introduction and then skipping to the chapter you need. However, I mend reading it all because there were a lot of issues I learned about that I never would have discovered on my own. The book deals with a lot of unhappy themes and sometimes seems very negative about the current state of America, but Meyer and Furchtgott-Roth do mon sense solutions to each problem they address, never leaving the pletely without hope.

Disinherited: How Washington is Betraying America’s Young is available from Encounter Books on May 12.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Is the Government Ever Big Enough?
Can the government ever be too big? How much spending is enough spending? And if there can be too much spending, where is that point? “When was the last time you heard a liberal politician say, ‘Yeah, we solved that social ill. We’re just going to close up that government agency now, zero out the budget and move on to another problem,'” asks William Voegeli, Senior Editor of the Claremont Review of Books. In the video below, Voegeliexplains why our...
To Reduce Human Trafficking, Increase Economic Freedom
Trafficking in persons is estimated to be one of the top-grossing criminal industries in the world (behind illegal drugs and arms trafficking), with traffickers profiting an estimated $32 billion every year. So what can be done to end this scourge? A recent report from the Heritage Foundation mends an oft-overlooked solution: adopting policies that promote economic freedom. A close examination of human trafficking and the principles of economic freedom—especially strong rule of law—reveals the robust connections between these two desirable...
U.S. House unanimously passes bill declaring Islamic State guilty of genocide
UPDATE: (3/17/16) United States: Islamic mitted genocide against Christians, Shi’ites. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry: “The fact is that Daesh kills Christians because they are Christians. Yazidis because they are Yazidis. Shi’ites because they are Shi’ites,” Kerry said, referring to the group by an Arabic acronym, and accusing it of crimes against humanity and of ethnic cleansing. Video of Secretary Kerry giving his statement on the Islamic State is now included at the bottom of this post. ✶✶✶✶✶ In...
Shareholder Activists Drop Religious Pretext
Religious shareholder activist group As You Sow released its 2016 Proxy Preview last week, and it’s a doozy. Tellingly, AYS has dropped religious faith as a rationale for its climate-change and anti-lobbying efforts. From the panying press release: More 2016 shareholder proposals than ever before address climate change — pared with 82 in 2015. Of the resolutions, 22 ask energy extractors and suppliers to detail how the warming planet will affect their operations and how they will respond if governments...
Feel the Romantic Bern
“Do voters have a mitment problem’ with Bernie Sanders?” asks Dylan Pahman in this week’s Acton Commentary. So why would someone who seems really to want to be President (unlike candidates who appear to be using their campaigns to promote a book, for example) tell Americans he’s a socialist when half the country says they wouldn’t vote for one? How does that serve his interest? Shouldn’t it hurt his electability? The full text of the essay can be found here....
Video: A Gentleman’s Debate – Distributism vs. Free Markets with Jay Richards and Joseph Pearce
On February 18th, the Acton Institute was pleased to e Jay Richards and Joseph Pearce to our Mark Murray Auditorium for an exchange on two distinct ideas on economics: Distributism vs. Free Markets. The gentleman’s debate was moderated by Acton Institute President Rev. Robert A. Sirico. Joseph Pearce, writer in residence at Aquinas College in Nashville, Tennessee, and Director of the college’s Center for Faith and Culture, argued in favor of distributism; Jay Richards,Assistant Research Professor School of Business and...
Breaking: City of Grand Rapids drops property tax dispute against Acton
Acton Building located in downtown Grand Rapids’ Heartside District A two-year dispute between the Acton Institute and the City of Grand Rapids over the non-profit’s exempt status under state property tax law is over, with Acton emerging the victor. In 2014, the City rejected Acton’s request for a tax exemption on its building, parking areas, and personal property at 98 E. Fulton. Acton purchased the property in 2012 and spent much of the next year renovating the property. An appeal...
Audio: Todd Huizinga Talks Global Governance and the New Totalitarian Temptation
Todd Huizinga, Acton’s Director of International Outreach, joined host John J. Miller of National Reviewto discuss his new book,The New Totalitarian Temptation, on the Bookmonger Podcastat Ricochet.They discussed the problems afflicting the European Union, the potential Exit of the UK from the EU, and whether or not the United States faces the same problems with unaccountable government that bedevil Europe. You can listen to the podcast here. If you find the topic interesting, you can join us tomorrow here at...
Elon Musk on the Problem with Regulators
“Most of economics can be summarized in four words: ‘People respond to incentives,’” says economist Steven E. Landsburg. “The rest mentary.” When governments create a regulation, they are creating an incentive for individuals and businesses to respond in a particular way. But the people who create the regulations —government regulators — also respond to incentives. As Elon Musk, the CEO of Space X and Tesla Motors, explains, There is a fundamental problem with regulators. If a regulator agrees to change...
Explainer: What You Should Know About GMOs and Mandatory Food Labeling
Last year, the House passed a bill to preempt states from imposing mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food (GMOs). But as Daren Bakst notes, “While it looked like the Senate was going to follow suit, in the last minute, the new Senate bill would actually effectively mandate the labeling of genetically engineered food.” “In the Senate bill, there would be a national mandatory labeling requirement unless the Secretary of Agriculture determines that there has been substantial participation by labeled foods...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved