Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Bolsonaro’s first 6 months
Bolsonaro’s first 6 months
Jan 18, 2026 8:35 PM

Jair Bolsonaro pleted his first 6 months as the president of Brazil. After nearly being killed by a socialist militant during his campaign and a surprising victory in the 2018 elections, the conservative politician has, against the odds, plished what few people could have imagined. In fact, a year ago, few were those who could have predicted Bolsonaro’s presidency. Nonetheless, Bolsonaro faces a troubled political scenario, an inheritance left by 14 years of leftist government.

Bolsonaro has, so far, kept promises he made during his campaign. As part of his platform, he promised to repair anti-market foreign policies, implemented by past presidents. On his first international trip as president, he met with President Trump in the White House to discuss trade, after which the United States gave support for Brazil’s entrance into the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). “Brazil and the United States have never been closer than they are right now,” President Trump declared after the meeting

June 28 marked yet another international victory, when Mercosul –the South American trade bloc consisting of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay– reached the biggest agreement in its history with the European Union. Classified by Bolsonaro as “historic”, the agreement is predicted to generate an investment of $87.5 billion in Brazil in the next 15 years. This agreement has been deliberated on for 20 years, and was supported by the Brazilian Minister of Foreign Affairs Ernesto Araujo and the Minister of Economics Paulo Guedes, who, both appointed by Bolsonaro, played crucial roles in the execution of the agreement.

While Bolsonaro has considerable authority in dictating foreign policy, his sovereignty in domestic affairs differs greatly. In its first six months, it’s e obvious that the executive branch has a large obstacle to clear: Congress. Brazil’s Congress is mitted to barricading Bolsonaro’s executive agenda.

Bolsonaro has a peculiar method of doing politics. He despises what he calls “old politics,” in which politicians form alliances to exchange favors that generate mutual benefit for the parties involved. Instead, Bolsonaro intends to create a transparent political scene where politicians act according to their preferences and ideologies. Unfortunately, this method is unworkable in Brazilian politics.

Brazil’s Congress is dominated by the group popularly called “centrão” (meaning, big center) which consists of politicians without a set principle of ideals, who are primarily motivated by gaining political power. The “centrão” does a disservice to Brazilian politics, only acting according to potential for personal gain. In this scenario, Bolsonaro’s abandonment of “old politics” leaves the government isolated, unable to gain the necessary support to pass their proposals. In reality, Bolsonaro has a very tense relationship with Congress, and heated debates with the House of Representatives President Rodrigo Maia— the face of the “centrão”—have e constant in the past few months.

As a consequence, reforms proposed by the government get stuck in Congress. The most important of them is the Pension Reform bill, proposed by Paulo Guedes and expected to save billions of dollars in government spending. It is considered the main priority in the government’s agenda, seeking to fix an outdated policy that increases national debt. In short, the reform is suffering serious resistance by leftist and centrist politicians and will be highly modified from its original form before passed. The good news is that after 5 months of negotiation, the third version of the reform is being voted on in the House of Representatives this week. Optimistic congressmen expect it to be approved in the lower house and face its last stage of negotiation in the Senate.

The Pension Reform is not the only case in which Congress has served as a barrier to Bolsonaro’s proposals. On June 18, Brazil’s Senate suspended Bolsonaro’s decree signed in May which facilitated the acquisition of guns by truck drivers and landowners. Loosening gun laws was yet mitment made by Bolsonaro during his campaign, which generated huge indignation by some of his electors. Lastly, the famous “anti crime package” formulated by the Minister of Justice Sergio Moro and inspired by United States legislation is slowly being processed in Congress. The package seeks to increase the enforcement of the rule of bating crime and corruption – two of the main problems faced in the country.

As if Congress was not enough opposition for Bolsonaro, the Supreme Court has also been involved in controversy lately. Dominated by progressively leaning justices mainly appointed during the years of left wing government, the Supreme Court restricts Bolsonaro’s conservatism. In a very questionable string of events that occurred in early June, the Supreme Court decided to criminalize discrimination against gay and transgender individuals. In a 8-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that people suffering discrimination based on their sexual orientation will now be protected by anti-racism laws until Congress decides to pass rules specifically defending LGBT rights. Bolsonaro displayed his irritation with the decision, stating that the Supreme Court is overruling Congress and “legislating”, which is not the role of the judiciary. In reality, Bolsonaro’s view of the Supreme Court is so skeptical that he has debated increasing the number of justices to balance its political ideologies.

Those who had imagined that Bolsonaro’s victory in the 2018 elections would drastically change the Brazilian political scenario by itself were mistaken. The problem is deeper than many people had thought. However, there is a reason to be optimistic: Bolsonaro is on the right path. His foreign policy demonstrates that he has the right intentions to make Brazil a prosperous country. Unfortunately, a nation that has been governed by leftist ideologies for 14 years does not change “from night to day” as the popular Brazilian saying goes. In the current moment, patience is key. Bolsonaro’s administration will have 4 years to promote the necessary changes. Instead of looking at Bolsonaro’s first 6 months as a frustrated attempt to reform the country, Brazilians should see this period as a light at the end of the tunnel. For the first time in the century, Brazil has an active executive power dedicated to transforming the country.

Featured image: Home page photo published under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International:

During a state visit by Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, several agreements were made, as well as the military agreements, which shortly after the visit, President Trump designated Brazil on the list of the major allies outside NATO

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Physical capital and diminishing returns
Note: This is post #81 in a weekly video series on basic economics. How did Germany and Japan achieve record economic growth following World War II? A primary reason is physical capital. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Alex Tabarrok explains two specific concepts that deal with physical capital and the success of Germany and Japan. The first is the iron logic of diminishing returns which states that, for each new input of capital, there is less and less...
Winners of 2018 Mini-Grants on Free Market Economics
The Acton Institute Mini-Grants on Free Market Economics program accepts proposals from faculty members at colleges, seminaries, and universities in the United States and Canada in order to promote the scholarship and teaching of market economics. This program allows for collaboration between faculty from different universities, as well as help future leaders to emerge, strengthen, and expand the existing network of scholars within economics. Entrants may submit proposals in two broad categories: course development and faculty scholarship. Here is plete...
France’s 200 roads to serfdom
One of Europe’s most robust welfare states may be proving that government intervention and true social solidarity are inimical forces. Many economic interventionists on both sides of the Atlantic cite the Catholic social teaching of “solidarity” – or, at least, their own conception of it – to justify far-reaching government policies of wealth confiscation and redistribution. The British philosopher Julian Baggini wrote in The Guardian that “Tax Freedom Day” should be celebrated as “Social Solidarity Day.” But heavy-handed government policy...
6 Quotes: Free Expression, Religious Freedom, and the Masterpiece Cakeshop Ruling
Earlier today the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the most important religious freedom case of the year. Despite being a win for the bakery and its owner, Jack Phillips, the future implications of this case for religious liberty are rather narrow in scope. “In this case the adjudication concerned a context that may well be different going forward in the respects noted above,” said the Court. “However later cases raising these...
Want to ‘change the world’? Embrace the glories of economic scale
As the latest crop of college graduates enters the workforce, many ing fully loaded with grandiose plans for “social transformation,” “giving back to munities,” and “making a difference.” Unfortunately, such phrases have e slippery slogans based on a cultural imagination that is far too narrow in its basic assumptions. Whether spurred along by the idealism of college professors, the hurrahs of mencement speeches, or the hedonistic calls of cultural tropes (“follow your passion!”), today’s youth are often clouded with a...
6 Quotes: G.K. Chesterton on freedom and virtue
Yesterday was the 144th birthday of G.K. Chesterton. In his honor, here are six quotes by the great British writer on freedom and virtue. On defending virtue: “The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.” On modern freedom: “Most modern freedom is at root fear. It is not so much that we are too bold to endure rules; it is rather that we are too timid to endure responsibilities.” On courage:...
How eschatology transforms our economic action
As the church continues to navigate the challenges of the modern economy, we’ve seen a renewed recognition of the “earthiness” of our God-given callings—embracing the mundane and material aspects of our daily work and rejecting the “sacred-secular divide.” Yet in our earnest efforts to e more “earthly minded” for heavenly good, we face new temptations toward a different sort of lopsidedness. In an article for FULLER Studio, Vincent Bacote reminds us of this risk, recognizing the need for balance and...
Unemployment as economic-spiritual indicator — May 2018 report
Series Note: Jobs are one of the most important aspects of a morally functioning economy. They help us serve the needs of our neighbors and lead to human flourishing both for the individual and munities. Conversely, not having a job can adversely affect spiritual and psychological well-being of individuals and families. Because unemployment is a spiritual problem, Christians in America need to understand and be aware of the monthly data on employment. Each month highlight the latest numbers we need...
Why tariffs and protectionism makes Americans poorer
Earlier today President Trump imposed tariffs on imported steel (25 percent) and aluminum (10 percent) from the European Union, Canada and Mexico. Not surprisingly, the tariffs triggered immediate retaliation from U.S. allies against American businesses and farmers. “This is protectionism, pure and simple,” said Jean-Claude Junker, president of the European Commission.Junker is correct. The tariffs are are a form of protectionism that is frequently proposed by populists and Democrats. But what is wrong with protectionism? The short answer is that...
6 facts about the brewing U.S.-EU trade war
Late last week, President Donald Trump announced he would impose steel and aluminum tariffs against U.S. allies across the transatlantic sphere. Here are the facts you need to know: President Trump applied a 25 percent tariff on steel and a 10 percent tariff on aluminum against the European Union, as well as NAFTA trade partners Canada and Mexico. The tariffs, originally targeting China in March on the grounds of national security, contained an exemption for U.S. allies. Last Thursday, Trump...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved