Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Bishops: The Equality Act will destroy Christians’ careers
Bishops: The Equality Act will destroy Christians’ careers
May 2, 2026 3:41 PM

The bishops of the world’s oldest Christian church have condemned the proposed “Equality Act” – not just based on its threat to religious liberty – but also the danger it poses to Christians’ ability to make a living. The “Equality Act” could bar faithful Christians from serving their fellow citizens and improving the lives of people from all sexual orientations.

The foundations of the Eastern Orthodox Church stretch back to apostolic times. In this country, the jurisdictions coordinate their work through the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the United States of America. The Assembly has rightly cautioned its faithful against the so-called Equality Act.

The Equality Act (H.R. 5) would amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act to add sexual orientation and gender identity to its list of as protected classes. Unlike most other groups protected by the law, neither condition is immutable nor innate. Although lawmakers si n 1964 certainly had no conception of granting special rights to these groups, Justice Neil Gorsuch’s ruled that the law’s definition of “sex” applied to them, anyway, in Botock v. Clayton County.

The Equality Act would go beyond his decision. Gorsuch noted that questions of religious liberty and the exact terms of how these newly discovered rightly apply would have to be thrashed out in court through subsequent litigation, and religious institutions retain robust conscience rights protections.

This proposed law obliterate conscience rights For the first time ever, the bill would exempt itself from the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) – asserting that sexual rights trump religious rights and barring Christian (or traditional Jewish and Muslim) believers from defending themselves from government intrusion and costly civil lawsuits.

The act radically expands the definition of “public modation,” explicitly including battered women’s shelters. An abusive boyfriend or potential rapist could avail himself of its terms to gain unguarded access to his ex-girlfriend – or his next victim.

Of course, the measure will give biological males access to female restrooms, showers, and dorm rooms. It forces girls pete against males in sports, costing women scholarships and their attendant opportunity for advancement. And the bill could overrule Christians’ faith-based objections to participating in an abortion, declaring respect for life discriminates based on “pregnancy status.”

“This is not a good-faith attempt to peting interests. It is an attempt by one side to grab all the disputed territory and to crush the other side,” said University of Virginia law professor Douglas Laycock, who supports same-sex marriage.

The Orthodox Church has spoken out against this violation of the Constitution. The bishops’ statement begins by noting, correctly, that “the principle of human equality has its origins in Christianity.” However, the Equality Act “would erode religious liberty for both individuals and organizations, including Orthodox Christian jurisdictions, parishes, and faithful.”

While the statement notes that religious ministries and nonprofits will be “directly and negatively affected” by the Equality Act, it incorporates the threat posed to the economic lives of the laity.

“[T[he expansive nature of the [Equality] Act would affect the lives and careers of many thousands of religious people in America, including Orthodox faithful,” it notes.

This affirmation is important, legally and theologically. Legally, it recognizes the harassment campaign of lawfare leveled by pressure groups against Christianflorists,bakers, andphotographers, among many other professional individuals who cannot in good conscience participate in a same-sex ceremony without scruple of sin.

Theologically, it recognizes that the gifts that we offer one another in the workplace contribute to our sanctification, as do moments of family life or other devotions. Any licit activity that Christians undertake is capable of redemption. Work life is spiritual life, if we open every moment of our lives to the influence and blessing of the Holy Spirit: To use the precise Greek term, even the most minor decision aids the process of theosis.

Aside from the numerous other harms this bill would impose, no government should seek to curtail holy and beneficial efforts of service and love – to circumscribe our sanctification. Those who propose such a course reveal less their love of sexual minorities than their malice toward believers.

The full text of the bishops’ statement follows:

Statement of the Executive Committee on the Proposed Equality Act

We, the Executive Committee of the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the United States of America, affirm that all human beings should be treated with dignity and respect, as all are made in the image of God. Indeed, the principle of human equality has its origins in Christianity and is enshrined in the Constitution of the United States, which rightly prescribes that every person must receive equal treatment under the law.

Consequently, we are deeply concerned about the proposed federal “Equality Act,” which would erode religious liberty for both individuals and organizations, including Orthodox Christian jurisdictions, parishes, and faithful. The supporters of this Act, in their desire to promote equality, ultimately infringe upon the religious liberty of Americans to live according to their faith – a right protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Throughout the United States, Orthodox jurisdictions and parishes have ministries, organizations, and facilities through which they provide many beneficial services to the public. All of these ministries, organizations, and facilities would be directly and negatively affected by the “Equality Act” as written. Furthermore, the expansive nature of the Act would affect the lives and careers of many thousands of religious people in America, including Orthodox faithful. All of this is in addition to the broader impact that the Act would have on American society, moving it further away from the traditional and normative moral and ethical foundations, as well as deepening painful divisions that already exist in the country.

As Orthodox Christian bishops, charged by our Savior Jesus Christ to shepherd His flock, we will continue to uphold and proclaim the moral teachings of the Church. We call upon all Orthodox Christians to remain firm in the Orthodox Faith. We also call upon our nation’s civic leaders to uphold, and not infringe upon, the religious freedom guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, and to continue to extend the protections afforded by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
New books update
Bringing to your attention two recent publications by Journal of Markets & Morality contributors: The first is Less Than Two Dollars a Day: A Christian View of World Poverty aand the Free Market, by Kent Van Til, published by Eerdmans. The second is Economics in Christian Perspective: Theory, Policy, and Life Choices, by Victor Claar and Robin Klay, published by InterVarsity. Based on a quick perusal, I guess that the latter entry is a little more sanguine about the achievements...
John Chrysostom, On Wealth and Poverty, Part 3
Readings in Social Ethics: John Chrysostom, On Wealth and Poverty, part 3 of 3. There are six sermons in this text, based on the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus. This post deals with the third and final pair. The first four sermons dealt directly with Chrysostom’s exegesis of the parable of Lazarus and the rich man. These latter two sermons were given on different occasions. References are to page numbers. Sermon 6: The es after an earthquake has...
An Even Greater Society?
John Edwards formally kicked off his poverty tour in New Orleans’s Lower Ninth Ward this week and of course blamed the president for the government’s mishandling of the Hurricane Katrina disaster. Edwards also played up symbolism by visiting some of the samel cities Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert Kennedy visited during their famed poverty tours. Edwards may not significantly differ from other Democratic front runners for the White House, although some say he is the only candidate with a...
Speaking of ‘Priestly’ Science
Speaking of the “priestly” voice of science, Given all the atheist militancy raising a ruckus lately, I suppose it isn’t too surprising that I am stumbling upon more regular and more baldly dismissive declarations these days about the ineradicable patibility of science and religion among Science’s self-appointed Elite Champions online. I’ve been a perfectly convinced and rather cheerfully nonjudgmental atheist for well over twenty years at this point, but I must say that I think it is arrant nonsense to...
Without A Prayer
I would say I met Jeremy Jerschina by chance on the campus of Calvin College, except that nothing ever happens by chance on the very Reformed sidewalks, hallways, and parking lots of Calvin College. So I’ll say I met him by Providence. Jeremy was visiting from New Jersey as a prospective Calvin student, to study Philosophy or Theology or something in the humanities. He struck me as being extremely well-read, genuine, and sensitive to the call of God on his...
Everything Old is New Again
Here’s an interesting report from the Media Research Center’s Business & Media Institute on the cyclical nature of media coverage on the issue of climate change. We all know about the global cooling craze of the 1970’s, but who knew that the issue goes back more than a century? It was five years before the turn of the century and major media were warning of disastrous climate change. Page six of The New York Times was headlined with the serious...
John Chrysostom, On Wealth and Poverty, Part 2
Readings in Social Ethics: John Chrysostom, On Wealth and Poverty, part 2 of 3. There are six sermons in this text, based on the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus. This post deals with the second pair. References are to page numbers. Sermon 3: A summary and introduction to the series of sermons: “The parable of Lazarus was of extraordinary benefit to us, both rich and poor, teaching the latter to bear their poverty with equanimity, and not allowing...
The Problem of Equality
Samuel Gregg examines the nature of equality in democratic society. “Though Tocqueville held that democracy’s emergence was underpinned by the effects of the Judeo-Christian belief in the equality of all people in God’s sight, he perceived a type munal angst in democratic majorities that drove them to attempt to equalize all things, even if this meant behaving despotically,” he writes. Read mentary here. ...
OK, Let’s Review
How do you “end poverty” in the developing world? Well, certainly not by promoting a “poverty agenda” that has proven to be a failure again and again. The two items below both appeared yesterday. The first is from a review of “The Elephant and the Dragon,” a book by Robyn Meredith, a Hong Kong-based correspondent for Forbes magazine. The second is from mentary by the chairman of Microsoft India in the Wall Street Journal (reg. req’d). As Ms. Meredith prehensive,...
Connecting ‘Creation Care’ and Economics
In a recent CT column, David P. Gushee, Graves Professor of Moral Philosophy at Union University, writes, “I am ing convinced that creation care and what we evangelicals usually call “stewardship” are basically the same thing.” That’s precisely why Acton prefers the term “environmental stewardship” to “creation care.” But this connection between stewardship and care for the environment means something else too. Gushee concludes that “economic and environmental stewardship go together, hand in glove. Perhaps this rediscovery will motivate us...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved