Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Bishops: The Equality Act will destroy Christians’ careers
Bishops: The Equality Act will destroy Christians’ careers
Mar 27, 2026 11:37 AM

The bishops of the world’s oldest Christian church have condemned the proposed “Equality Act” – not just based on its threat to religious liberty – but also the danger it poses to Christians’ ability to make a living. The “Equality Act” could bar faithful Christians from serving their fellow citizens and improving the lives of people from all sexual orientations.

The foundations of the Eastern Orthodox Church stretch back to apostolic times. In this country, the jurisdictions coordinate their work through the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the United States of America. The Assembly has rightly cautioned its faithful against the so-called Equality Act.

The Equality Act (H.R. 5) would amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act to add sexual orientation and gender identity to its list of as protected classes. Unlike most other groups protected by the law, neither condition is immutable nor innate. Although lawmakers si n 1964 certainly had no conception of granting special rights to these groups, Justice Neil Gorsuch’s ruled that the law’s definition of “sex” applied to them, anyway, in Botock v. Clayton County.

The Equality Act would go beyond his decision. Gorsuch noted that questions of religious liberty and the exact terms of how these newly discovered rightly apply would have to be thrashed out in court through subsequent litigation, and religious institutions retain robust conscience rights protections.

This proposed law obliterate conscience rights For the first time ever, the bill would exempt itself from the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) – asserting that sexual rights trump religious rights and barring Christian (or traditional Jewish and Muslim) believers from defending themselves from government intrusion and costly civil lawsuits.

The act radically expands the definition of “public modation,” explicitly including battered women’s shelters. An abusive boyfriend or potential rapist could avail himself of its terms to gain unguarded access to his ex-girlfriend – or his next victim.

Of course, the measure will give biological males access to female restrooms, showers, and dorm rooms. It forces girls pete against males in sports, costing women scholarships and their attendant opportunity for advancement. And the bill could overrule Christians’ faith-based objections to participating in an abortion, declaring respect for life discriminates based on “pregnancy status.”

“This is not a good-faith attempt to peting interests. It is an attempt by one side to grab all the disputed territory and to crush the other side,” said University of Virginia law professor Douglas Laycock, who supports same-sex marriage.

The Orthodox Church has spoken out against this violation of the Constitution. The bishops’ statement begins by noting, correctly, that “the principle of human equality has its origins in Christianity.” However, the Equality Act “would erode religious liberty for both individuals and organizations, including Orthodox Christian jurisdictions, parishes, and faithful.”

While the statement notes that religious ministries and nonprofits will be “directly and negatively affected” by the Equality Act, it incorporates the threat posed to the economic lives of the laity.

“[T[he expansive nature of the [Equality] Act would affect the lives and careers of many thousands of religious people in America, including Orthodox faithful,” it notes.

This affirmation is important, legally and theologically. Legally, it recognizes the harassment campaign of lawfare leveled by pressure groups against Christianflorists,bakers, andphotographers, among many other professional individuals who cannot in good conscience participate in a same-sex ceremony without scruple of sin.

Theologically, it recognizes that the gifts that we offer one another in the workplace contribute to our sanctification, as do moments of family life or other devotions. Any licit activity that Christians undertake is capable of redemption. Work life is spiritual life, if we open every moment of our lives to the influence and blessing of the Holy Spirit: To use the precise Greek term, even the most minor decision aids the process of theosis.

Aside from the numerous other harms this bill would impose, no government should seek to curtail holy and beneficial efforts of service and love – to circumscribe our sanctification. Those who propose such a course reveal less their love of sexual minorities than their malice toward believers.

The full text of the bishops’ statement follows:

Statement of the Executive Committee on the Proposed Equality Act

We, the Executive Committee of the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the United States of America, affirm that all human beings should be treated with dignity and respect, as all are made in the image of God. Indeed, the principle of human equality has its origins in Christianity and is enshrined in the Constitution of the United States, which rightly prescribes that every person must receive equal treatment under the law.

Consequently, we are deeply concerned about the proposed federal “Equality Act,” which would erode religious liberty for both individuals and organizations, including Orthodox Christian jurisdictions, parishes, and faithful. The supporters of this Act, in their desire to promote equality, ultimately infringe upon the religious liberty of Americans to live according to their faith – a right protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Throughout the United States, Orthodox jurisdictions and parishes have ministries, organizations, and facilities through which they provide many beneficial services to the public. All of these ministries, organizations, and facilities would be directly and negatively affected by the “Equality Act” as written. Furthermore, the expansive nature of the Act would affect the lives and careers of many thousands of religious people in America, including Orthodox faithful. All of this is in addition to the broader impact that the Act would have on American society, moving it further away from the traditional and normative moral and ethical foundations, as well as deepening painful divisions that already exist in the country.

As Orthodox Christian bishops, charged by our Savior Jesus Christ to shepherd His flock, we will continue to uphold and proclaim the moral teachings of the Church. We call upon all Orthodox Christians to remain firm in the Orthodox Faith. We also call upon our nation’s civic leaders to uphold, and not infringe upon, the religious freedom guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, and to continue to extend the protections afforded by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Clear thinking on immigration
Andrew Yuengert, the author of Inhabiting the Land – The Case for the Right to Migrate, the Acton study on immigration, looks at the current debate and debunks mon misconceptions. “The biggest burdens from immigration are not economic – they are the turmoil caused by the large numbers of illegal immigrants,” Yuengert writes. Read mentary here. ...
Acton scholars on the immigration debate
Two Acton scholars, Andrew Yuengert and Fr. Paul Hartmann, were interviewed on “The World Over” (EWTN Studios) last Friday, April 28, about the Catholic response to immigration rights. Yuengert, author of the Acton monograph “Inhabiting the Land,” emphasizes the dignity of the human person as a foundation for looking at the issues surrounding immigration. Yuengert says that the “right to migrate” is not an absolute right, but to prevent people from assisting immigrants in need is immoral. e because they...
The long arm of corruption
As the immigration debate mentators dig deeper in the search for the “sources of the problem.” Many have rightly pointed out that a healthier Mexican economy would alleviate the need that spurs many Mexicans to seek financial recourse across the border. Whatever one’s views on the current debate, we ought to be able to agree that a more prosperous Mexico would be beneficial for everyone. But then others have correctly noted that talk about the Mexican economy is really a...
Coercing charity
This section from Reinhold Niebuhr’s Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics strikes me as quite true: The coercive factors, in distinction to the more purely moral and rational factors, in political relations can never be sharply differentiated and defined. It is not possible to estimate exactly how much a party to a social conflict is influenced by a rational argument or by the threat of force. It is impossible, for instance, to know what proportion...
Subsidiarity in action
In January, I wrote about the Central Plains wildfires as a very personal crisis in my Oklahoma hometown. I underscored the importance of subsidiarity, which is the idea that a central authority should perform only those tasks which cannot be handled effectively at a more immediate or local level. I’ve now had opportunity to practice subsidiarity in Oklahoma. And I can tell you, it’s harder to do than to talk or write about in the abstract. The preceding months of...
Improving Catholic education
For Catholics, few doubt the importance of quality Catholic secondary education. However, many know that the current state of Catholic secondary education in America leaves much to be desired. The question that naturally rises is “what can concerned people do to enact serious improvement?” The Acton Institute offers at least one solution. The Catholic High School Honor Roll is a unique evaluation system that assesses the overall quality of Catholic high schools based on academic excellence, Catholic identity, and civic...
Ecobits
Two quick bits for your Tuesday: – Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? CRC says so! – Is “steady state ecological economics” the answer to environmental and economic woes? [also, a quick thanks to Jordan for inviting me to join the PowerBlog team.] Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? But the three organizations CRC singles out have an agenda that goes beyond education and is the equivalent of lobbying, Kendall contends. FREE, for example, describes itself...
Faith-based funding politicizes religion
Rev. Robert A. Sirico looks at the Bush Faith-Based Initiative following the departure of Jim Towey, who headed the office. “I would far rather see a president rally people to give more to charity than rally voters to support government programs that go to religious organizations, and to create incentives and lessen penalties when they do give,” Rev. Sirico writes. Read Rev. mentary here. ...
Religious liberty in Japan
For the past several decades in the United States many parents have gravitated toward one extreme or the other in terms of allowing religion in public schools. It is generally understood these days that our public school system is not a religious organization, and should not promote one religion as a state religion, over others. Of course, this does not mean that morality or other ideas that call on the revelation of religion cannot be taught, but we try to...
Spelling relief II
Jordan pretty well covered the territory in his earlier post on gas prices. But with the silliness from both Republicans and Democrats ongoing, it can’t hurt to suggest two additional sensible treatments of the subject: Thomas Nugent on National Review Online, and Jerry Taylor of the Cato Institute on Fox News. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved