Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Bishops: The Equality Act will destroy Christians’ careers
Bishops: The Equality Act will destroy Christians’ careers
Jan 30, 2026 4:10 PM

The bishops of the world’s oldest Christian church have condemned the proposed “Equality Act” – not just based on its threat to religious liberty – but also the danger it poses to Christians’ ability to make a living. The “Equality Act” could bar faithful Christians from serving their fellow citizens and improving the lives of people from all sexual orientations.

The foundations of the Eastern Orthodox Church stretch back to apostolic times. In this country, the jurisdictions coordinate their work through the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the United States of America. The Assembly has rightly cautioned its faithful against the so-called Equality Act.

The Equality Act (H.R. 5) would amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act to add sexual orientation and gender identity to its list of as protected classes. Unlike most other groups protected by the law, neither condition is immutable nor innate. Although lawmakers si n 1964 certainly had no conception of granting special rights to these groups, Justice Neil Gorsuch’s ruled that the law’s definition of “sex” applied to them, anyway, in Botock v. Clayton County.

The Equality Act would go beyond his decision. Gorsuch noted that questions of religious liberty and the exact terms of how these newly discovered rightly apply would have to be thrashed out in court through subsequent litigation, and religious institutions retain robust conscience rights protections.

This proposed law obliterate conscience rights For the first time ever, the bill would exempt itself from the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) – asserting that sexual rights trump religious rights and barring Christian (or traditional Jewish and Muslim) believers from defending themselves from government intrusion and costly civil lawsuits.

The act radically expands the definition of “public modation,” explicitly including battered women’s shelters. An abusive boyfriend or potential rapist could avail himself of its terms to gain unguarded access to his ex-girlfriend – or his next victim.

Of course, the measure will give biological males access to female restrooms, showers, and dorm rooms. It forces girls pete against males in sports, costing women scholarships and their attendant opportunity for advancement. And the bill could overrule Christians’ faith-based objections to participating in an abortion, declaring respect for life discriminates based on “pregnancy status.”

“This is not a good-faith attempt to peting interests. It is an attempt by one side to grab all the disputed territory and to crush the other side,” said University of Virginia law professor Douglas Laycock, who supports same-sex marriage.

The Orthodox Church has spoken out against this violation of the Constitution. The bishops’ statement begins by noting, correctly, that “the principle of human equality has its origins in Christianity.” However, the Equality Act “would erode religious liberty for both individuals and organizations, including Orthodox Christian jurisdictions, parishes, and faithful.”

While the statement notes that religious ministries and nonprofits will be “directly and negatively affected” by the Equality Act, it incorporates the threat posed to the economic lives of the laity.

“[T[he expansive nature of the [Equality] Act would affect the lives and careers of many thousands of religious people in America, including Orthodox faithful,” it notes.

This affirmation is important, legally and theologically. Legally, it recognizes the harassment campaign of lawfare leveled by pressure groups against Christianflorists,bakers, andphotographers, among many other professional individuals who cannot in good conscience participate in a same-sex ceremony without scruple of sin.

Theologically, it recognizes that the gifts that we offer one another in the workplace contribute to our sanctification, as do moments of family life or other devotions. Any licit activity that Christians undertake is capable of redemption. Work life is spiritual life, if we open every moment of our lives to the influence and blessing of the Holy Spirit: To use the precise Greek term, even the most minor decision aids the process of theosis.

Aside from the numerous other harms this bill would impose, no government should seek to curtail holy and beneficial efforts of service and love – to circumscribe our sanctification. Those who propose such a course reveal less their love of sexual minorities than their malice toward believers.

The full text of the bishops’ statement follows:

Statement of the Executive Committee on the Proposed Equality Act

We, the Executive Committee of the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the United States of America, affirm that all human beings should be treated with dignity and respect, as all are made in the image of God. Indeed, the principle of human equality has its origins in Christianity and is enshrined in the Constitution of the United States, which rightly prescribes that every person must receive equal treatment under the law.

Consequently, we are deeply concerned about the proposed federal “Equality Act,” which would erode religious liberty for both individuals and organizations, including Orthodox Christian jurisdictions, parishes, and faithful. The supporters of this Act, in their desire to promote equality, ultimately infringe upon the religious liberty of Americans to live according to their faith – a right protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Throughout the United States, Orthodox jurisdictions and parishes have ministries, organizations, and facilities through which they provide many beneficial services to the public. All of these ministries, organizations, and facilities would be directly and negatively affected by the “Equality Act” as written. Furthermore, the expansive nature of the Act would affect the lives and careers of many thousands of religious people in America, including Orthodox faithful. All of this is in addition to the broader impact that the Act would have on American society, moving it further away from the traditional and normative moral and ethical foundations, as well as deepening painful divisions that already exist in the country.

As Orthodox Christian bishops, charged by our Savior Jesus Christ to shepherd His flock, we will continue to uphold and proclaim the moral teachings of the Church. We call upon all Orthodox Christians to remain firm in the Orthodox Faith. We also call upon our nation’s civic leaders to uphold, and not infringe upon, the religious freedom guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, and to continue to extend the protections afforded by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Free Market Isn’t About Being Christian
Matthew Tuininga, at Christian in America, attended Acton University last week, and came away with a number of insights regarding government, religion and economics. Chief among his insights is this: Christians should not argue for a free market or capitalist society because Scripture or the Church has given us such a system. Rather, the moral case for a free market and for capitalism depends to a significant degree on the fact that it works. Principle, in that sense, is inseparable...
Deavel’s Review of Defending the Free Market
David Paul Deavel has a fine review of Rev. Robert Sirico’s Defending the Free Market over at National Review Online. Deavel notes: What makes Sirico’s defense of a free economy all the stronger is his consistent acknowledgment that a functioning free market neither immanentizes the eschaton, making heaven on earth, nor makes a society virtuous or whole. Freedom of economic (and other) action is not the goal of society — acting virtuously in freedom is. And the intellectual and spiritual...
From Success to Service
In my Acton Commentary this week, “Good Work Never Ends,” I look at the example of two local personalities, John Izenbaard of Kalamazoo, Michigan, and Fred Carl Hamilton of Wyoming, Michigan, to argue that “the good work of service to others ought never end as long as we live.” Izenbaard in particular is a striking example of perseverance in serving others. The 90 year-old Izenbaard has been working at Hoekstra’s True Value Hardware for 74 years, and has no plans...
New Orthodox Christian Arts Journal
The Holy Ascension Choros Source: Over at the Holy Protection Hummus and Pizza Parlor (perhaps my favorite name for a website/anything ever), S. Patrick O’Rourke recently announced the Orthodox Arts Journal which “publishes articles and news for the promotion of traditional Orthodox liturgical arts.” From the journal’s homepage: TheJournalcovers visual arts, music,liturgical ceremony and texts, and relevant art history and theory. The Journal presentsthese topicstogether tohighlight theunified witness of the arts to the beauty of the Kingdom of God andto...
New ‘Defending the Free Market’ Trailer
A new trailer for Rev. Robert Sirico’s Defending the Free Market has been released. An excerpt of the book focused on 9/11, socialism, and capitalism is read by the author, shown below. Visit the official site for Defending the Free Market to read a free chapter, or order the book from Amazon here. ...
Commentary: Reclaiming Fear
Perhaps no other adjective better captures the American political climate than fearful, says Andrew Knot in this week’s Acton Commentary (published May 25). “The past decade has witnessed a spike in fear-driven politics, at least accusations of such. ing election appears no different,” he adds. The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publications here. Reclaiming Fear byAndrew Knot The march toward the 2012 presidential election inevitably brings a heightened...
The Tyranny of Scientific Consensus
As might be expected, the question of “scientific consensus” and its presumptive role in shaping our public and ecclesial policy was raised in the context of a decision by the Christian Reformed Church to make a formal public statement regarding climate change. Jason E. Summers notes in an insightful piece addressing plexities of scientific authority in our modern world that “scientific claims have substantial bearing on many public issues. But unless the nature of these claims and the basis for...
Good Intentions Are Insufficient
From ’s es this story about pany Capital Bikeshare, a business which rents bikes to people throughout the D.C. metropolitan area. Sounds like a cool idea, but why is it getting taxpayer support? Capital Bikeshare, which rents bikes at more than 165 outdoor stations in the Washington D.C. area, serves highly educated and affluent whites.There’s nothing wrong with that, of course, except that the program has received $16 million in government subsidies, including over $1 million specifically earmarked to “address...
Calvin Coolidge and the Wet Blanket Movement
In his recent post on our greatest modern president, Ray Nothstine notes that Calvin Coolidge has deep relevancy for today given the mammoth federal debt and the centralization of federal power. “Coolidge took limiting federal power and its reach seriously,” says Nothstine. Nothstine’s post (and his recent Acton Commentary) reminded me of the 1926 essay, “Calvin Coolidge: Puritan De Luxe.”The liberal journalist Walter Lippmanwrote an unintentionally beautiful tribute to the patron saint of small-government conservatism that provides an outline for...
Distinguishing Happiness from Pleasure
In light of Joe Carter’s post on the meaning of the pursuit of happiness earlier today, I thought it would be interesting to bring up the important distinctions between pleasure and happiness. Over in the New Republic, economic historian, Deirdre N. McCloskey writes about the philosophical and economic differences: The knock-down argument against the 1-2-3 studies of es from the philosopher’s (and the physicist’s) toolbox: a thought experiment. “Happiness” viewed as a self-reported mood is surely not the purpose of...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved