Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Biden defers some Hong Kong deportations, acknowledging human rights crisis under Communist Chinese rule
Biden defers some Hong Kong deportations, acknowledging human rights crisis under Communist Chinese rule
Nov 3, 2025 12:19 AM

The Chinese Communist Party’s National Security Laws outlaws any action that qualifies as dangerous to the security of China or as an attempt of secession. The NSL extended its reach from the Chinese Communist regime to the former British colony, Hong Kong, when it went into effect there in June 2020. Since then, Hong Kong citizens’ freedoms have been smothered by CCP’s insatiable quest for absolute control.

Read More…

Hong Kong, once a haven for those seeking to escape the Chinese Communist Party’s iron fist, has seen a rapid deterioration of freedom in recent months. Media and business mogul Jimmy Lai’s arrest and the breakup of his pro-democracy newspaper, Apple Daily, are just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the CCP’s forceful decimation of free speech and silencing dissent.

Former President Donald Trump was very critical of Communist China. Now, the Biden administration has also spoken out publicly on this human rights crisis. On Aug. 5, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, under President Biden, offered a “safe haven” to Hong Kong citizens residing in the U.S. due to the ever-restrictive National Security Laws, or NSLs, enforced by China in Hong Kong.

Biden urged the Department of Homeland Security to implement a “deferral of movement” for up to 18 months for some Hong Kongese due to what the president described as “foreign policy reasons.”

The vast majority of Hong Kongese residing in the United States would qualify for the offer, with the administration’s push for refuge falling under the Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) program; one that can be renewed indefinitely by a sitting U.S. president.

“By unilaterally imposing on Hong Kong the Law of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) on safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the PRC has undermined the enjoyment of rights and freedoms in Hong Kong,” the White House said in Thursday’s press release.

To further ensure Hong Kong resident’s well-being, especially while living in the U.S., Biden directed the Department of Homeland Security to “take appropriate measures to authorize employment for non-citizens whose removal has been deferred.”

Biden’s es after Hong Kong’s recent crackdown on assembly and speech due to legislation under the country’s NSLs. Over 100 Hong Kong politicians, protesters, and pro-democracy advocates have been taken into custody on NSL-related charges.

The CCP’s NSL outlaws any action that qualifies as dangerous to the security of China or as an attempt of secession. The NSL extended its reach from the Chinese Communist regime to the former British colony, Hong Kong, when it went into effect there in June 2020. Since then, Hong Kong citizens’ freedoms have been smothered by CCP’s insatiable quest for absolute control.

The White House said the safe haven decision shows the United States “will not stand idly by as the PRC breaks its promises to Hong Kong and the munity.” The Biden administration stressed that the PRC continually erodes the rule of law in Hong Kong.

After the U.S. imposed sanctions on Chinese officials, China retaliated with sanctions of their own – against U.S. citizens.

According to the South China Post, Chinese spokeswoman Hua mented: “The so-called memorandum blatantly defames and attacks the law of China on safe-guarding National Security in Hong Kong and China’s Hong Kong policy,” saying that the White House’s actions are an example of “vile behavior.”

Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska offered bipartisan support for bating Hong Kong’s increasing inhumane treatment of its citizens. “It is a step in the right direction,” Sasse remarked. However, he added that the U.S should “go further” – that Washington “should offer full asylum to Hong Kongers who flee Chairman Xi’s brutal oppression.”

In an article released on Friday, The Wall Street Journal suggested that President Biden should also urge Beijing to “release such Hong Kongers as publisher Jimmy Lai and others who have been imprisoned merely for supporting freedom and democracy.”

It’s an important point: If the United States does not publicly stand behind courageous activists who sacrifice their life as a visible sign of supporting the ideals of a free society, then who will?

While the U.S. finally opens its doors to Hong Kongers, allowing an 18-month deferment on deportation, Hong Kong entrepreneur and pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai is spending 14 months in prison for participating in a pro-democracy protest. In April 2021, Lai was charged with colluding with foreign forces under the NSL.

As the CCP expedited control and promulgated strict adherence to government rule, Jimmy Lai had multiple opportunities to flee Hong Kong and find safety in Great Britain. He could have very well found a safe haven in another country, like most Hong Kongers are fortunately experiencing now in the U.S.

But Lai remained in Hong Kong.

He has no regrets, and accepted his fate as a sacrifice for the sake of democracy in his country, in which he found his financial success.

Lai was ready, saying he was “prepared for prison,” upon his arrest.

In the CCP’s government and media, Lai is a traitor and a troublemaker. In the eyes of those Hong Kong citizens who courageously promote democracy and a free society, Lai is a hero.

The CCP tries to make examples out of the protestors they arrest. Lai and other pro-democracy advocates use their arrest and imprisonment as a stage to showcase that truth and freedom are worth fighting for.

The United States is the latest nation to offer a safe haven to those fleeing Communist regimes, but the inherent virtuousness of a democratic society founded on liberty will soon be forgotten lest we forget those who voluntarily stay behind, offering their lives in the fight for a better future for their home and for future generations e.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
LeBron James repeats communist China’s party line
In last week’s Acton Commentary I expressed my hope that LeBron James wouldn’t just shut up and dribble in the wake of NBA appeasement and a coordinated sports media blackout regarding the protest movement in Hong Kong. As an NBA all-time great, plished businessman, and outspoken activist he was uniquely positioned to stand up for Hong Kong even if it meant standing up to the NBA, team owners, munist regime in China, and the NBA’s Chinese sponsors. I had not...
The Chicago Black Sox and baseball’s rule of law
Sports have already been an Acton topic in the past week, so another sports story can’t hurt: 100 years ago this month was the 1919 World Series between the Chicago White Sox and Cincinnati Reds, infamous ever since for the “Black Sox” scandal, in which eight members of the heavily favored Chicago team accepted money from gamblers to throw the series to Cincinnati. The series ended on October 9, 1919, though the reckoning for players involved in the scheme was...
Acton Line podcast: Communist China dunks on NBA; Robert Doar on poverty in America
On October 4, Daryl Morey, manager of the Houston Rockets, posted a tweet that included the words “Fight for Freedom, Stand with Hong Kong.” Afterwards, China severed several partnerships they had with the Rockets in retaliation, leading Morey to delete his tweet and apologize for it and also prompting missioner Adam Silver to issue a statement declaring that the NBA does not regulate the speech of its players. Since then, however, the NBA has made attempts to appease China. So...
FAQ: Queen’s Speech 2019
On Monday, October 14, 2019, Queen Elizabeth II opened a new session of the UK Parliament by delivering her 65th “Queen’s Speech.” Here are the facts you need to know. What is a Queen’s (or King’s) Speech? At the start of a new session of Parliament, the reigning Sovereign delivers a speech setting out the government’s agenda for the ing legislative session. Ceremonial elements date back centuries. Who writes the Queen’s Speech? Ironically, the Queen’s Speech is not written by...
A Nobel for a technocratic approach to poverty
In this week’s Acton Commentary, Victor Claar looks at the work of the three economists awardedthe 2019 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences. Claar, associate professor of economics at Florida Gulf Coast University and an Acton affiliate scholar, says “economists are quite divided on this year’s prize” given to Abhijit Banerjee,Esther DufloandMichael Kremer. As an economist I can tell you that we adore unexpected, counterintuitive results like the ones for textbooks and meals. And researchers like Banerjee, Duflo, and Kremer...
Rev. Richard Turnbull: Brexit deal, last step before freedom?
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has negotiated a new agreement to leave the European Union on October 31. A British observer, who has read the plan, says it embodies a significant improvement over the deal former PM Theresa May saw defeated thrice by historic margins in Parliament. “Overall, these improvements represent a real step in the direction of free trade and hence are to be ed,” writes Rev. Richard Turnbull, in a new essay written for the Acton Institute’s Religion...
Lord Acton and the two types of nationalism
Kai Weiss, Research Fellow at the Austrian Economics Center, has a new essay on Law and Liberty exploring Lord Acton’s thoughts on nationalism: A little-known 1862 work calledNationalityby Lord Acton can perhaps shed new light, too, on the topic. For Acton, there are two types of nationality: the one of 1688, the other of 1789, i.e., English or French nationalism, which “are connected in name only, and are in reality the opposite extremes of political thought.” French nationalism arose during...
Book review: ‘Apostles of Empire: The Jesuits and New France’
In a new piece published at The Catholic World Report, Acton’s Samuel Gregg reviews “Apostles of Empire: The Jesuits and New France,” by Bronwen McShea, Associate Research Scholar with Princeton University’s James Madison Program. In “Apostles of Empire,” McShea details the history of Jesuit missionary efforts that took place in North America during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries and brings attention to how the Jesuits’ missionary efforts were coupled with the advancement of French political and economic ambitions. Gregg writes:...
Corporate America’s bet on China
In Dan Hugger’s most recent post about the controversy surrounding the NBA’s visit to China, he identifies the crux of the issue: “If even the mildest form of expression of solidarity can provoke the People’s Republic of China to such draconian action as to imperil the well-being of NBA players, why play in China at all?” When I first heard LeBron James’ criticism of Daryl Morey, like many others I thought James was concerned about potential or actual investment from...
Fact check: 5 facts about the fourth Democratic debate of 2019
The largest number of candidates to date filled the stage at Otterbein University in Westerville, Ohio, for the fourth Democratic presidential debate last night. They offered a number of statements and assessments that bear further scrutiny. 1. Which will benefit workers more: A Universal Basic e or $15 minimum wage? Senator Cory Booker: Ihope that my friend, Andrew Yang, e out for this – doing more for workers than UBI [Universal Basic e] would actually be just raising the minimum...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved