Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Biden defers some Hong Kong deportations, acknowledging human rights crisis under Communist Chinese rule
Biden defers some Hong Kong deportations, acknowledging human rights crisis under Communist Chinese rule
Jul 14, 2025 3:44 PM

The Chinese Communist Party’s National Security Laws outlaws any action that qualifies as dangerous to the security of China or as an attempt of secession. The NSL extended its reach from the Chinese Communist regime to the former British colony, Hong Kong, when it went into effect there in June 2020. Since then, Hong Kong citizens’ freedoms have been smothered by CCP’s insatiable quest for absolute control.

Read More…

Hong Kong, once a haven for those seeking to escape the Chinese Communist Party’s iron fist, has seen a rapid deterioration of freedom in recent months. Media and business mogul Jimmy Lai’s arrest and the breakup of his pro-democracy newspaper, Apple Daily, are just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the CCP’s forceful decimation of free speech and silencing dissent.

Former President Donald Trump was very critical of Communist China. Now, the Biden administration has also spoken out publicly on this human rights crisis. On Aug. 5, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, under President Biden, offered a “safe haven” to Hong Kong citizens residing in the U.S. due to the ever-restrictive National Security Laws, or NSLs, enforced by China in Hong Kong.

Biden urged the Department of Homeland Security to implement a “deferral of movement” for up to 18 months for some Hong Kongese due to what the president described as “foreign policy reasons.”

The vast majority of Hong Kongese residing in the United States would qualify for the offer, with the administration’s push for refuge falling under the Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) program; one that can be renewed indefinitely by a sitting U.S. president.

“By unilaterally imposing on Hong Kong the Law of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) on safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the PRC has undermined the enjoyment of rights and freedoms in Hong Kong,” the White House said in Thursday’s press release.

To further ensure Hong Kong resident’s well-being, especially while living in the U.S., Biden directed the Department of Homeland Security to “take appropriate measures to authorize employment for non-citizens whose removal has been deferred.”

Biden’s es after Hong Kong’s recent crackdown on assembly and speech due to legislation under the country’s NSLs. Over 100 Hong Kong politicians, protesters, and pro-democracy advocates have been taken into custody on NSL-related charges.

The CCP’s NSL outlaws any action that qualifies as dangerous to the security of China or as an attempt of secession. The NSL extended its reach from the Chinese Communist regime to the former British colony, Hong Kong, when it went into effect there in June 2020. Since then, Hong Kong citizens’ freedoms have been smothered by CCP’s insatiable quest for absolute control.

The White House said the safe haven decision shows the United States “will not stand idly by as the PRC breaks its promises to Hong Kong and the munity.” The Biden administration stressed that the PRC continually erodes the rule of law in Hong Kong.

After the U.S. imposed sanctions on Chinese officials, China retaliated with sanctions of their own – against U.S. citizens.

According to the South China Post, Chinese spokeswoman Hua mented: “The so-called memorandum blatantly defames and attacks the law of China on safe-guarding National Security in Hong Kong and China’s Hong Kong policy,” saying that the White House’s actions are an example of “vile behavior.”

Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska offered bipartisan support for bating Hong Kong’s increasing inhumane treatment of its citizens. “It is a step in the right direction,” Sasse remarked. However, he added that the U.S should “go further” – that Washington “should offer full asylum to Hong Kongers who flee Chairman Xi’s brutal oppression.”

In an article released on Friday, The Wall Street Journal suggested that President Biden should also urge Beijing to “release such Hong Kongers as publisher Jimmy Lai and others who have been imprisoned merely for supporting freedom and democracy.”

It’s an important point: If the United States does not publicly stand behind courageous activists who sacrifice their life as a visible sign of supporting the ideals of a free society, then who will?

While the U.S. finally opens its doors to Hong Kongers, allowing an 18-month deferment on deportation, Hong Kong entrepreneur and pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai is spending 14 months in prison for participating in a pro-democracy protest. In April 2021, Lai was charged with colluding with foreign forces under the NSL.

As the CCP expedited control and promulgated strict adherence to government rule, Jimmy Lai had multiple opportunities to flee Hong Kong and find safety in Great Britain. He could have very well found a safe haven in another country, like most Hong Kongers are fortunately experiencing now in the U.S.

But Lai remained in Hong Kong.

He has no regrets, and accepted his fate as a sacrifice for the sake of democracy in his country, in which he found his financial success.

Lai was ready, saying he was “prepared for prison,” upon his arrest.

In the CCP’s government and media, Lai is a traitor and a troublemaker. In the eyes of those Hong Kong citizens who courageously promote democracy and a free society, Lai is a hero.

The CCP tries to make examples out of the protestors they arrest. Lai and other pro-democracy advocates use their arrest and imprisonment as a stage to showcase that truth and freedom are worth fighting for.

The United States is the latest nation to offer a safe haven to those fleeing Communist regimes, but the inherent virtuousness of a democratic society founded on liberty will soon be forgotten lest we forget those who voluntarily stay behind, offering their lives in the fight for a better future for their home and for future generations e.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Economics Nobel
My response to the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Economics to Elinor Ostrom and Oliver Williamson was published on National Review Online: Unlike a certain other Nobel Prize, the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel actually requires evidence of substantial achievement. Mere aspirations and lofty rhetoric count for nothing. This year’s Nobel Prize in Economics has been given to two economists, Elinor Ostrom and Oliver Williamson, who have deepened our understanding of economic governance....
Review: Billy Graham and the Rise of the Republican South
Explaining the realignment of American Southern politics is often a favorite area of study among historians and scholars. A region that was once dominated by yellow dog Democrats, has for the most part continued to expand as a loyal region for the Grand Old Party. Among the earliest and mon narrative among liberal historians and writers is the belief that the realignment in the South had to do with a backlash against desegregation. Steven P. Miller in his new book...
Kling on Conservatism and Authority
Arnold Kling continued last week’s conversation about the relationship between conservatism and libertarianism over at EconLog. Kling’s analysis is worth reading, and he concludes that the divide between conservatives and libertarians has to do with respect (or lack thereof) for hierarchical authority. Kling does allow for the possibility of a “secular conservative…someone who respects the learning embodied in traditional values and beliefs, without assigning them a divine origin.” I’m certainly inclined to agree, and I think there are plenty of...
Journal of Markets & Morality, Spring 2009
We’re happy to announce that the latest print issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality is available online. The Spring 2009 issue includes a noteworthy study by Alan T. Y. Chan and Shu-kam Lee. In “Christ and Business Culture: Another Classification of Christians in Workplaces According to an Empirical Study in Hong Kong,” Chan and Lee outline four types of Christians at work: Christian soldiers, panic followers, strugglers, and Sunday Christians. Following the classification, Chan and Lee “develop a...
America’s Uncontrolled Debt and Spending is the Real ‘Waterloo’
In mentary this week, “America’s Uncontrolled Debt and Spending is the Real ‘Waterloo,’” I offer the well known point that debt and spending threatens our liberty and prosperity. It is ing very evident that it will be up to citizens to demand accountability from their lawmakers, as I mentioned. What has been tried before has not worked. In terms of liberty, Thomas Jefferson declared, “The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground.” What...
What hath Vienna to do with Colorado Springs?
Working as we do here at the intersection between economics and theology, the relationship between various kinds of classically liberal, libertarian, Austrian, and other economic modifiers and religion in general and Christianity in particular is in constant view. Sometimes the conversation is friendly, sometimes not so much. Sometimes the differences are less apparent, sometimes more. Once in awhile a piece will appear on the Acton site or from an Acton writer that brings this discussion to the fore. Last mentary...
Potential and the Peace Prize
In his book Elements of Justice (reviewed in the Journal of Markets & Morality here), University of Arizona philosophy and economics professor David Schmidtz introduces the idea of desert not simply as pensatory notion, but also as including a promissory aspect. That is, what we deserve isn’t always about only what we have done. There might be a real sense in which what we do after an opportunity provides a kind of retroactive justification for having been given a chance....
Capitalism is Not Based on Greed
In a new essay at The American, Jay Richards explains why capitalism isn’t based on greed. In Acton’s first documentary, The Call of the Entrepreneur, Richards along Rev. Robert Sirico, Sam Gregg, Michael Novak and others touch on this matter in making the moral case for the free economy. ...
Healthcare and Catholics: True and False Arguments
This week’s Acton Commentary: Healthcare reform – it’s one of those causes almost everyone favors, but which almost automatically produces sharp arguments when we ask what it means and how it might be realized. You would have had to be living in a cave for the past eight months to be unaware that Americans are deeply divided on this matter, and that the division runs clean through the middle of munities. That includes Catholic America. Of course, there are a...
Catholics and Health Care
The Detroit News published mentary on Catholics and health care reform in today’s newspaper. A slightly longer version of the article will appear in tomorrow’s Acton News & Commentary: Catholic America is about as divided about health care reform as the rest of the country. But there are a small number of non-negotiables for Catholics that principally concern any provisions that facilitate or encourage the intentional termination of innocent human life or diminish existing conscience exemptions. These issues dwarf everything...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved