Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Bernie Sanders’s workers wanted $15 an hour—so he cut their hours
Bernie Sanders’s workers wanted $15 an hour—so he cut their hours
Feb 2, 2026 12:43 AM

On Friday I mentioned the ongoing labor dispute between the workers and management of Bernie Sanders’s presidential campaign. The longtime advocate of raising the federal minimum to $15 an hour is finding that it’s easy plain about greedy employers until you e the one having to make payroll.

Presidential campaigns are labor intensive and require an army of low-skilled workers who are willing to work long hours performing rote and mundane task. But as Sanders has discovered, paying for such labor can be expensive.

Sanders initially agreed to hire many of his union workers at a salary of $36,000. For a 40-hour workweek that salary equates to an hourly wage of $17.31, well above the proposed $15 minimum wage. But when the workers are putting in 60 hours a week—as almost all campaign staffers do—their hourly wage drops to $11.54.

Federal law requires that if a salaried worker earns less than $47,476 a year (an hourly wage of $22.83) and works more than 40 hours a week, they must be paid overtime. Overtime pay is set at not less than 1.5 times the regular pay rate after 40 hours of work in a workweek. If Bernie’s workers were to put in 60-hour weeks they are eligible for an extra $25.19 per hour for the extra 20 hours, an additional $27,008 a year. That would bring their total yearly salary to $63,008.

But for most full-time workers, salary is merely part of their pensation That is true for Bernie’s employees. According to the Washington Post, under the current arrangement, the Sanders’s campaign pays all premiums for salaried employees making $36,000 or less per year. Those making more are covered at a rate of 85 percent.

Bernie’s campaign manager Faiz Shakir offered to raise the pay to $42,000 annually and extend the workweek to six days, but the workers balked because the increase would put them into the pay bracket where they would have to pay 15 percent of their healthcare premiums.

While the labor dispute is still ongoing, management has found an obvious solution—cut worker hours. As Shakir said, “As these discussions continue, we are limiting hours so no employee is receiving less than $15 for any hours worked.” But that’s not what the workers appear to want. They seem willing to put in the extra work because they need the extra money. But the minimum pay ($15 an hour) for 60 hours of work is more than Sanders can afford—or, at least, is willing to pay.

For years, those of us who have warned about the harms of minimum wage have warned that increasing the rate would lead to reductions in workers hours. That wouldn’t happen, said Fight for $15 advocates. Now, their socialist champion is showing that it certainly will happen because it’s happening in his own campaign.

“When theproblemswith a government mandated minimum wageare so obviousthat even a socialist’s campaign can’t help but acknowledge them,” says Eric Boehm, “it should probably make you wonder if Sanders the politician is being willfully ignorant about one of his centerpiece proposals.” Unfortunately, this lesson in economic reality won’t be a teaching moment for Sanders or his supporters. Instead, it’ll be used as another example of why free enterprise can’t work and why the government needs to take over even more of the economy. After all, if we can’t trust a wealthy socialist to pay his own employees a “living wage” how can we expect “fairness” from the capitalists?

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
PBR: The Faith-Based Initiative
Last week’s National Prayer Breakfast featured a speech by President Obama which was his most substantive address concerning the future of the faith-based initiative since his Zanesville, Ohio speech of July 2008. In the Zanesville speech, then-candidate Obama discussed “expansion” of the faith-based initiative, and some details were added as Obama announced his vision for the newly-named Office for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. The announced priorities of the office are fourfold: The Office’s top priority will be munity groups an...
More on ‘The Moral Bankruptcy Behind the Bailouts’
“Government budgets are moral documents,” is the often quoted line from Jim Wallis of Sojourners and other religious left leaders. Wallis also adds that “When politicians present their budgets, they are really presenting their priorities.” There is perhaps no better example of a spending bill lacking moral soundness than the current stimulus package being debated in the U.S. Senate. In mentary this week, “The Moral Bankruptcy Behind the Bailouts,” I offer clear reasons how spending more does not equate to...
America’s Secular Challenge
I’ve been reading America’s Secular Challenge by NYU professor and president of the Hudson Institute Herb London. The book is essentially an extended essay about how elite, left-wing secularism undercuts America’s traditional strengths of patriotism and religious faith during a time when the nation can ill afford it. The assault on public religion and love of es in a period when America faces enemies who have no such crisis of identity and lack the degree of doubt that leaves us...
PBR: Monsma and Carlton-Thies Speak Out
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” As part of Christianity Today’s Speaking Out (web-only) feature, Stephen V. Monsma and Stanley Carlson-Thies, of Calvin College’s Henry Institute and the Center for Public Justice respectively, address the future of the faith-based initiative under President Obama. Monsma and Carlton-Thies outline five “encouraging signs” and one “major concern.” The encouraging signs include the naming of the office executive director (Joshua DuBois) and advisory council (including “recognized evangelicals”...
Of Men, Mountains, and Mining
Here’s a brief report from The Environmental Report on mountain-top removal mining, and the increasing involvement of religious groups weighing in on the question. One of these groups is Christians for the Mountains. A quote by the group’s co-founder Allen Johnson was noteworthy, “We cannot destroy God’s creation in order to have a temporal economy.” One other thing that struck me about the interview is that the AmeriCorp involvement smacks of “rebranding” secular environmentalism. Add the magic words “creation care”...
PBR: Socialism Tyrannizes
In response to the question, “What is wrong with socialism?” In answering this question we could point to the historical instances of socialist regimes and their abhorrent record on treatment of human beings. But the supporters of socialism might just as well argue that these examples are not truly relevant because each historical instance of socialism has particular contextual corruptions. Thus, these regimes have never really manifested the ideal that socialism offers. So on a more abstract or ideal level,...
Debunking the New Deal
It’s long been my contention that the mythology surrounding the New Deal in large swaths of the popular imagination plays an ongoing, important, and harmful role in politics and policy debate. For that reason, I e periodic attempts to debunk the myth. Jonah Goldberg offers a perceptive and enlightening perspective on New Deal historiography and its current uses and abuses. Unlike Daniel Gross (cited by Goldberg), I don’t care whether the analyst is an historian, economist, policy wonk, or journalist,...
Kaarlgard Declares ‘Failure of Morality, Not Capitalism’
In a Forbes blog post titled “Failure of Morality, Not Capitalism,” Rich Kaarlgard counters the critics of supply-side capitalism by pointing to an absence of morality. Kaarlgard declares: Many people do blame capitalism for bringing us to this low moment in the economy. Do they have a point? They do if capitalism, as they define it, is devoid of any underlying morality. True enough, it is hard to see any underlying morality when one surveys the present carnage caused by...
Dr. Andrew Abela Receives 2009 Novak Award
Maltese-American marketing professor, Dr. Andrew Abela, is the winner of the Acton Institute’s 2009 Novak Award. Dr. Abela’s main research areas include consumerism, marketing ethics, Catholic Social Teaching, and internal munication. Believing that anti-free market perspectives seem to dominate discussion about the social impact of business, Dr. Abela is working to explore Christian ethics further to show how these issues can be resolved more humanely and effectively through market-oriented approaches. To aid this work, Dr. Abela is currently preparing a...
PBR: A Genuine Challenge to Religious Liberty
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Jordan Ballor kindly asked me to offer a few words in response to this question, as I made it an area of expertise during the previous Administration. I’ve been working up to writing something more formal, but I’ll begin by thinking aloud here, as well as at my my home blog. Without further ado, here’s what I posted over there: By now, you’ve probably heard about the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved