Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Bernie Sanders, AOC would ‘cure’ COVID-19 with ‘short-term’ socialism
Bernie Sanders, AOC would ‘cure’ COVID-19 with ‘short-term’ socialism
Jul 14, 2025 3:51 PM

California Governor Gavin Newsom raised eyebrows last week when he told Bloomberg News that he sees the global coronavirus pandemic as an “opportunity” for “reimagining a progressive era as it pertains to capitalism.” As if to flesh out this notion Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and socialists on both sides of the Atlantic have unveiled multi-trillion-dollar programs suggesting that the best antidote to COVID-19 is short-term socialism.

Sanders’ operatives made one last push to breathe life into his presidential campaign by promoting his “Emergency Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic.” His platform would seize upon the coronavirus to radically empower the federal government to regiment the economic life of the American people.

NEWS>>Bernie calls for the boldest legislation ever written in modern history. /cFzfKbEYNi

— Joe Calvello (@the_vello) April 3, 2020

Sanders’ plan calls for taxpayers to “cover all health care treatment” for all U.S. residents—not merely coronavirus-related healthcare and not merely for U.S. citizens—“for free.”

No one will be laid off, because the federal government will “provide direct payroll costs for small and medium sized businesses to keep workers employed until this crisis has passed.” Furthermore, anyone who “needs to stay home” during this time will remain employed at full salary. However, should someone manage to lose a job, unemployment insurance will pay 100 percent of wages up to $75,000 a year for everyone, including the self-employed.

On top of remaining employed with no salary reduction, every American will receive an additional $2,000 a month.

The plan cancels all student loan debt and makes all colleges and trade schools “free.” No foreclosures or utility disconnects would take place, regardless of the reason bills were not paid. His plan also contains a provision allowing the government to seize “empty or vacant lodging”—a proposal introduced by then-British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn in 2018.

In essence, this would enroll all Americans in an allegedly temporary Medicare for All, Jobs for All, College for All, Housing for All, and Universal Basic e.

“We must respond to this unprecedented challenge with the boldest measures,” said Sanders’ campaign co-chair Nina Turner. In the progressive thesaurus, “boldest” is a synonym for “most expensive.” Sanders’ allies say this will cost $2 trillion, but less sympathetic sources place the price tag closer to $10 trillion or $18 trillion a year.

The senator’s fellow travelers have repeated his call for socialize the economy as a “temporary” measure. Last month, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez toldThe Intercept‘s podcast that lawmakers need to focus on providing “things like mortgage and rent and student loan debt moratoriums, making sure that we’re getting cash into people’s hands, ensuring” that anyone who receives medical care will be “financially okay.” She concluded that “we need both debt moratorium and universal basic e right now.”

Clearly, “bold” plans do not require creative or innovative thinking. If these proposals sound familiar, they should. They have long been planks in the platform of Sanders and his confederates on the Left, which they roll out in response to every crisis.

AOC included many of ponents in her Green New Deal, which she described as a “wartime-level, just economic mobilization plan” to fight an allegedly apocalyptic crisis. The congresswoman’s former chief of staff proved more ing. Saikat Chakrabarti confessed toThe Washington Post that AOC’s office did not consider the sweeping economic plan an environmental policy at all. “We really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing,” he said.

His admission provides a vital insight: The “crisis” is only a selling point for a broader, deeper, and more centralizing agenda. ponents, determined long in advance, can be molded to the necessities of the moment. Widespread fear and deferral to experts empowers statists to ram through a realignment they know will prove permanent, because “temporary” federal programs so rarely remain temporary. (Indeed, national emergencies often take on a life of their own.)

The CDC itself is a case in point. The federal agency was founded on July 1, 1946, to fight malaria in the American South. “As the organization took root deep in the South, once known as the heart of the malaria zone, CDC Founder Dr. Joseph Mountin continued to advocate for public health issues and to push for CDC to extend its responsibilities to municable diseases,” the CDC’s website states.

Some statesmen warned about the threat bureaucratic mission creep poses to liberty. “No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear,” said Ronald Reagan. “Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see on this earth!”

Thus, the Left’s desire to capitalize on the emergency, which is at work on both sides of the Atlantic. Tim Worstall of the UK-based Adam Smith Institute writes:

There are armies out there, all waving the little plans they’ve long had and insisting they are the solution to this specific problem. One example being John McDonnell:

We pay for it by introducing an immediate windfall tax on the banks and finance sector that we bailed out when they brought about the crisis more than a decade ago. Combining this with a wealth tax on the richest within our society and a tax on multinationals, we can demonstrate – just as the current government has demonstrated – that when we need the resources, they can always be found.

Coronavirus here is simply an excuse for McDonnell would mend those three sets of taxation to cure hangnails. The same is true of the latest [Emmanuel] Saez and [Gabriel] Zucman proposal:

This column proposes the creation of a progressive, time-limited, European-wide progressive wealth tax assessed on the net worth of the top 1% richest individuals.

Saez and Zucman have been proposing a progressive wealth tax to solve such minor problems as Elizabeth Warren’s political career. Coronavirus is again just an excuse to hang it upon.

Perhaps the most benign construction one can put on the Left’s promoting the same platform in response to every crisis is that we are creatures of habit, an endorsement of Burkean conservatism. However, there is more at work.

Democratic socialists advance the same “solutions” to every catastrophe in part because they are economic determinists. They believe that if society dismantles the putatively unjust structures of modern capitalism, peace inevitably ensues. Fix the ownership of private goods, they argue, and you fix everything.

The Judeo-Christian tradition holds that the human person cannot be reduced to economic inputs. Both the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures teach that “man does not live by bread alone.” God created human beings for liberty, without which they cannot exercise their higher calling to live out their own destiny. America’s Founding Fathers so understood this that they wrote into our foundational documents the truth that people “are, and of right ought to be free.”

To enable this liberty, God gave human persons a variety of gifts. The most necessary at this critical juncture in our national history are the wisdom to find a cure to a pandemic, the creativity to respond to an emergency without destroying our economic life, and the prudence not to hand the government “temporary” authority that will never be rescinded.

Johnson. CC BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Review: Billy Graham and the Rise of the Republican South
Explaining the realignment of American Southern politics is often a favorite area of study among historians and scholars. A region that was once dominated by yellow dog Democrats, has for the most part continued to expand as a loyal region for the Grand Old Party. Among the earliest and mon narrative among liberal historians and writers is the belief that the realignment in the South had to do with a backlash against desegregation. Steven P. Miller in his new book...
Potential and the Peace Prize
In his book Elements of Justice (reviewed in the Journal of Markets & Morality here), University of Arizona philosophy and economics professor David Schmidtz introduces the idea of desert not simply as pensatory notion, but also as including a promissory aspect. That is, what we deserve isn’t always about only what we have done. There might be a real sense in which what we do after an opportunity provides a kind of retroactive justification for having been given a chance....
The Economics Nobel
My response to the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Economics to Elinor Ostrom and Oliver Williamson was published on National Review Online: Unlike a certain other Nobel Prize, the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel actually requires evidence of substantial achievement. Mere aspirations and lofty rhetoric count for nothing. This year’s Nobel Prize in Economics has been given to two economists, Elinor Ostrom and Oliver Williamson, who have deepened our understanding of economic governance....
Healthcare and Catholics: True and False Arguments
This week’s Acton Commentary: Healthcare reform – it’s one of those causes almost everyone favors, but which almost automatically produces sharp arguments when we ask what it means and how it might be realized. You would have had to be living in a cave for the past eight months to be unaware that Americans are deeply divided on this matter, and that the division runs clean through the middle of munities. That includes Catholic America. Of course, there are a...
What hath Vienna to do with Colorado Springs?
Working as we do here at the intersection between economics and theology, the relationship between various kinds of classically liberal, libertarian, Austrian, and other economic modifiers and religion in general and Christianity in particular is in constant view. Sometimes the conversation is friendly, sometimes not so much. Sometimes the differences are less apparent, sometimes more. Once in awhile a piece will appear on the Acton site or from an Acton writer that brings this discussion to the fore. Last mentary...
America’s Uncontrolled Debt and Spending is the Real ‘Waterloo’
In mentary this week, “America’s Uncontrolled Debt and Spending is the Real ‘Waterloo,’” I offer the well known point that debt and spending threatens our liberty and prosperity. It is ing very evident that it will be up to citizens to demand accountability from their lawmakers, as I mentioned. What has been tried before has not worked. In terms of liberty, Thomas Jefferson declared, “The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground.” What...
Capitalism is Not Based on Greed
In a new essay at The American, Jay Richards explains why capitalism isn’t based on greed. In Acton’s first documentary, The Call of the Entrepreneur, Richards along Rev. Robert Sirico, Sam Gregg, Michael Novak and others touch on this matter in making the moral case for the free economy. ...
Journal of Markets & Morality, Spring 2009
We’re happy to announce that the latest print issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality is available online. The Spring 2009 issue includes a noteworthy study by Alan T. Y. Chan and Shu-kam Lee. In “Christ and Business Culture: Another Classification of Christians in Workplaces According to an Empirical Study in Hong Kong,” Chan and Lee outline four types of Christians at work: Christian soldiers, panic followers, strugglers, and Sunday Christians. Following the classification, Chan and Lee “develop a...
Catholics and Health Care
The Detroit News published mentary on Catholics and health care reform in today’s newspaper. A slightly longer version of the article will appear in tomorrow’s Acton News & Commentary: Catholic America is about as divided about health care reform as the rest of the country. But there are a small number of non-negotiables for Catholics that principally concern any provisions that facilitate or encourage the intentional termination of innocent human life or diminish existing conscience exemptions. These issues dwarf everything...
Kling on Conservatism and Authority
Arnold Kling continued last week’s conversation about the relationship between conservatism and libertarianism over at EconLog. Kling’s analysis is worth reading, and he concludes that the divide between conservatives and libertarians has to do with respect (or lack thereof) for hierarchical authority. Kling does allow for the possibility of a “secular conservative…someone who respects the learning embodied in traditional values and beliefs, without assigning them a divine origin.” I’m certainly inclined to agree, and I think there are plenty of...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved