Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Belief Without Action: Becoming a Shell of Who You Are
Belief Without Action: Becoming a Shell of Who You Are
Jan 27, 2026 4:47 PM

“The Constitution protects your right to believe and worship, not force your beliefs on others.” That’s a response Acton received via Twitter regarding a blog post on the HHS Mandate. This type of statement is a typical one in our society: you can believe whatever you want, but don’t force your beliefs on anyone else. Religious belief and worship should be a wholly private affair; bringing your beliefs into the public square constitutes “forcing” them onto others.

In the latest issue of Faith and Justicefrom Alliance Defending Freedom, twelve women talk about what happened when this very scenario happened to them. As nurses working at University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey elective surgery unit, these women were told by their employer that they must assist in elective abortions. Despite an employment clause that said nurses were exempt from this except in emergency situations if they believed abortions were immoral, the hospital stood its ground, and the nurses were told they would lose their jobs. Their union declined to help. A lawsuit was filed on behalf of the nurses.

Amid all the tension, threats, and growing media coverage, the judge in the case stunned everyone by suddenly announcing, in a preliminary hearing, that a settlement had been reached.

“We had gotten everything [the 12 nurses] requested,” Stratis [Demetrios Stratis, one of the nurses’ attorneys] says. “We’d gotten the hospital to agree not to force them to perform these abortions. There would be no retaliatory measures against them…

One of the nurses, Beryl Otieno Ngoje, said the case took a toll on her, but saw no other option but to stand up for her beliefs: “You go against what you believe, what are you? What’s left? Just a shell of what you are.”

The First Amendment states, in part: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. It is clear that the Framers of the Constitution were not merely concerned with our beliefs but our actions, the free exercise of our religious beliefs. The Obama Administration continues to try to force employers to pay for abortifacients and sterilizations, regardless of moral and religious objections. That would require many business owners to go against their beliefs. If one person’s religious beliefs and the free exercise thereof are not safe, then no one’s are.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
PBS to Air ‘First Freedom: The Fight for Religious Liberty’
Groberg Films has produced “First Freedom: the Fight for Religious Liberty”, which will be airing on local PBS stations during the month of December. The film is described as portraying the “radical” break America’s Founding Fathers made from religion-by-law to a society that depended upon the morality of its citizenry. Noting that this was a “fundamental shift in human history”, the film seeks to portray the establishment of freedom of religion as a fundamental human right. A preview of the...
Video: Sirico on Ayn Rand’s ‘false gospel’
Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico appeared in a a video interview released yesterday by Catholic News Service, following a press conference in Rome last week held to introduce his new book “Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for the Free Economy” to the local media. CNS Rome bureau chief Frank Rocca interviewed Siricoregarding his own moral defense of market economics and asked his opinion of the libertarian novelist and intellectual Ayn Rand, whose philosophy of objectivism and rational-self...
Commentary: Government Subsidies Not So Sweet for Health
How can we trust a government to tell us what’s best for our healthcare when it’s subsidizing a corn industry that produces a food additive researchers believe may be tied to rising levels of obesity and disease? Anthony Bradley looks at a new study that raises moral questions about the consequences of the corn subsidy.The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publicationshere. Government Subsidies Not So Sweet for Health...
Cardinal O’Brien on Religious Liberty
Cardinal Edwin F. O’Brien, Grand Master of the Knights of the Holy Sepulcher, talks about the need for vigilance in defending religious liberty around the world. ...
The FAQs: What is the Fiscal Cliff?
What is the “fiscal cliff”? The term “fiscal cliff”, which is believed to have originated in Congressional testimony by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, refers to the substantial changes to tax and spending policies that are scheduled to automatically take effect in January 2013. The changes are intended to significantly reduce the federal budget deficit. What are the tax and spending policies that will change? Several major tax provisions are set to expire at year’s end: The 2001/2003 Bush tax...
Integrating Evangelism and Social Action Across Culture
In the recent issue of Reject Apathy, an off-shoot publication of RELEVANT Magazine, Tim Hoiland explores what he believes to be a tension between “serving justice” and “saving souls”: This [young] generation’s passion for justice is, without doubt, something to celebrate. It’s a breathtaking sign that the Spirit is at work, leading young men and women into lives marked by the reigning belief that all of life matters to God, not just the parts we might call “spiritual.” But in...
The Catholicity of Subsidiarity
Earlier this week we noted that Patrick Brennan posted a paper, “Subsidiarity in the Tradition of Catholic Social Doctrine,” which unpacks some of the recent background and implications for the use of the principle in Catholic social thought. As Brennan observes, “Although present in germ from the first Christian century, Catholic social thought began to emerge as a unified body of doctrine in the nineteenth century….” Brennan goes on to highlight the particularly Thomistic roots of the doctrine of subsidiarity,...
Michael Miller in Legatus Magazine: ‘Community, liberty and freedom’
Acton’s Director of Media, Michael Matheson Miller, discusses the current state of American thought on state, Church, family and liberty in Legatus Magazine. He focuses on the work of two Frenchmen: Alexis de Tocqueville and Jean Jacques Rousseau. Many of the differences can be boiled down to what we mean munity. Rousseau’s vision munity is what the sociologist Robert Nisbet called the munity.” For Rousseau, the two main elements of society are the individual and the state. All other groups...
Subsidiarity in the Tradition of Catholic Social Doctrine
Patrick McKinley Brennan, a professor at Villanova University School of Law, has a new paper that considers the place subsidiarity in the tradition of Catholic Social Doctrine: Subsidiarity is often described as a norm calling for the devolution of power or for performing social functions at the lowest possible level. In Catholic social doctrine, it is neither. Subsidiarity is the fixed and immovable ontological principle according to which mon good is to be achieved through a plurality of social forms....
Obama Administration’s Misjudgement of the Nation’s Conscience
Currently, there are forty cases against the Obamacare HHS mandate. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 requires employers to provide, as employee health care, “preventative services” such as abortion and sterilization. John Daniel Davidson, in First Things, says that the president and his administration have grossly misjudged this entire situation. In Davidson’s view, the administration “in their conceit” seemed to think that millions of Americans would simply put aside their deeply held religious and moral convictions and play along with...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved