Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Belief Without Action: Becoming a Shell of Who You Are
Belief Without Action: Becoming a Shell of Who You Are
Dec 25, 2025 7:12 PM

“The Constitution protects your right to believe and worship, not force your beliefs on others.” That’s a response Acton received via Twitter regarding a blog post on the HHS Mandate. This type of statement is a typical one in our society: you can believe whatever you want, but don’t force your beliefs on anyone else. Religious belief and worship should be a wholly private affair; bringing your beliefs into the public square constitutes “forcing” them onto others.

In the latest issue of Faith and Justicefrom Alliance Defending Freedom, twelve women talk about what happened when this very scenario happened to them. As nurses working at University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey elective surgery unit, these women were told by their employer that they must assist in elective abortions. Despite an employment clause that said nurses were exempt from this except in emergency situations if they believed abortions were immoral, the hospital stood its ground, and the nurses were told they would lose their jobs. Their union declined to help. A lawsuit was filed on behalf of the nurses.

Amid all the tension, threats, and growing media coverage, the judge in the case stunned everyone by suddenly announcing, in a preliminary hearing, that a settlement had been reached.

“We had gotten everything [the 12 nurses] requested,” Stratis [Demetrios Stratis, one of the nurses’ attorneys] says. “We’d gotten the hospital to agree not to force them to perform these abortions. There would be no retaliatory measures against them…

One of the nurses, Beryl Otieno Ngoje, said the case took a toll on her, but saw no other option but to stand up for her beliefs: “You go against what you believe, what are you? What’s left? Just a shell of what you are.”

The First Amendment states, in part: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. It is clear that the Framers of the Constitution were not merely concerned with our beliefs but our actions, the free exercise of our religious beliefs. The Obama Administration continues to try to force employers to pay for abortifacients and sterilizations, regardless of moral and religious objections. That would require many business owners to go against their beliefs. If one person’s religious beliefs and the free exercise thereof are not safe, then no one’s are.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Debunking the ‘Eat Local’ Myth
An op-ed in today’s NYT by James E. McWilliams, “Food That Travels Well,” articulates some of the suspicions I’ve had about the whole “eat local” phenomenon. It seems to me that duplicating the kind of infrastructure necessary to sustain a great variety of food production every hundred miles or so is grossly inefficient. Now some researchers in New Zealand have crunched some numbers that seem to support that analysis: Incorporating these measurements into their assessments, scientists reached surprising conclusions. Most...
The Transfiguration of Our Lord
Mt. Tabor In much of the Christian world today, the great feast of the Transfiguration of Our Lord memorated (Matt. 17:1-9). In the Eastern Church, as Fr. Seraphim Rose observed, it is customary to “offer fruits to be blessed at this feast; and this offering of thanksgiving to God contains a spiritual sign, too. Just as fruits ripen and are transformed under the action of the summer sun, so is man called to a spiritual transfiguration through the light of...
Romney’s Religion
Michael Gerson’s “What Matters About Romney’s Religion” in today’s Washington Post: There is a long tradition of American leaders who believe that religion is so personal it shouldn’t even affect their private lives. But this rigid separation between religious conviction and public policy lies outside the main current of American history. Abraham Lincoln’s theology, while hardly orthodox, was not his “own private affair.” “Nothing stamped with the divine image and likeness,” he asserted, “was sent into the world to be...
Lord Acton on Literature
Picking up on the themes of the importance of narrative from recent weeks, I pass along this worthy saying of Lord Acton: “Government rules the present. Literature rules the future.” ...
“We Doubt, We’re Out, Get Used to It”
Hey everybody, Richard Dawkins is selling T-shirts! Get ’em while they’re hot! One of my favorite bloggers, Allahpundit (who just happens to be an athiest himself), calls this “…a new stage in the transformation of ‘new atheism’ from rational argument to aggrieved identity group,” and has this to say about the t-shirts themselves Some of menters call this sort of thing evangelical atheism but a moron with a scarlet “A” on his chest really isn’t trying to convert you. He’s...
Acton Media Update
Dr. Jay Richards made an appearance on the Steve Deace show yesterday on central Iowa’s 50,000 watt blowtorch of a radio station, WHO in Des Moines. The topic of conversation was climate change, and you can listen to the interview by clicking right here (3.2 mb mp3 file). More: Jay also put in an appearance on Knucklehead Radio today on the same topic. You can listen to that one right here (2.5 mb mp3 file). ...
‘I Am Not Afraid of Death’
Alexander Solzhenitsyn Der Spiegel has published a far ranging interview with Alexander Solzhenitsyn in which the great writer “discusses Russia’s turbulent history, Putin’s version of democracy and his attitude to life and death.” It is very much worth the read. Once again, e away from an encounter with Solzhenitsyn’s thought and marvel at his courage, his dedication to his art, and the almost indestructible quality of this man, now 88. In the current Religion & Liberty, I reviewed the new...
Economics and Happiness
Chuck Colson locates the perennial problem of human unhappiness with the inability to perceive where happiness es from. There’s the economic argument that while “increased prosperity can’t make you happy, it can, ironically, contribute to unhappiness,” an argument which Colson says, “doesn’t tell us anything about what makes people happy in the first place. Thus, it can’t tell us why increased prosperity doesn’t translate into increased happiness.” As I’ve noted before, the economic argument is helpful for locating a source...
Bulgaria embraces flat tax and freedom
The speaker for the Seventeenth Acton Institute Annual Dinner is former Estonian Prime Minister, Dr. Mart Laar. One of the economic reforms Laar implemented in Estonia was a flat tax. After what was described as a brilliant economic turnaround, other countries have followed Estonia’s lead on flat tax policies and free market policies in general. Russia, Ukraine, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Romania, and Macedonia also have flat taxes for e. The country of Bulgaria is now introducing a flat tax rate...
Questions for Dr Gregg
Australian blogger Barney Zwartz, writing for the Australian newspaper The Age, tracks down intrepid research director Sam Gregg, who participated in a Melbourne book launching for Catholic Social Teaching and the Market Economy. After noting that “it seems counter-intuitive to me to consider market-theorist heroes such as Maggie Thatcher and Ronald Reagan friends of the poor,” Zwartz asks: Is Dr Gregg right? Is a market economy the primary tool for addressing poverty, are other economic approaches better, or are there...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved