Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Baltimore Mom: Abusive Or Responsible?
Baltimore Mom: Abusive Or Responsible?
Jan 18, 2026 7:43 AM

There was some water cooler talk here in the office the other day as the video of the Baltimore mom went viral. That’s the mother who recognized her son as one of the rioters, and slapped him about the head with some degree of ferocity, then put him in the car and took him home.

The mother has since been identified as Toya Graham, who happened upon her son, brick in hand, when she realized school had let out early due to the riots. Graham had forbidden her son the night before from going to the area where the riots were taking place, and he promised he would not. When she realized he was not at home, she went looking for him.

Some of the coffee klatsch questions raised:

Was the mom being abusive?If mom was abusive, and the son was raised in an abusive atmosphere, did that lead him to being a willing participant in a violent protest?If that were your kid, what would you have done?

Social media is split: Mom was abusive, and in a different setting would likely be brought up on charges. Others hail her as “mom of the year.” From USA Today:

“Hypocrisy of the law, she should be arrested for assault, battery and child abuse,” said one tweet by a user identified as @cotrial.

Others questioned why anyone would condone or celebrate her actions.

“Tired of hearing about this Baltimore ‘Mom of the Year,’ ” said a tweet under the handle @DaAnGrYASiAN. “If she raised her son better, she wouldn’t have needed to do that.”

Was the mother justified in her reaction? Should she have first attempted to reason with her son, telling him to put the brick down, join her at the local coffee shop and they could discuss his feelings regarding the situation?

Corporal punishment of children is, of course, a subject on debate. What was once considered “normal” is now considered abusive (and much of what once passed as “discipline” certainly should be considered abusive.) Does a swift slap to a diapered bottom constitute abuse, however? More to the point here, if your child were in a dangerous situation (say, a riot) would you, as a parent, not do anything in your power to remove that kid from said situation?

I’m sure a lot of office break rooms were buzzing this week about the same thing. I can only speak for myself: I would have done the same thing as the mom in Baltimore. Graham and her son spoke to CNN’s Anderson Cooper:

I said, ‘You weren’t brought up like this,’ ” Graham said.

He’s not a perfect child, but he’s also not a thug, she said.

The 16-year-old boy said he understood that his mother was there looking out for him.

“She didn’t want me to get in trouble (with the) law. She didn’t want me to be like another Freddie Gray,” he said, referring to the 25-year-old man who died of a severe spinal injury after being arrested by Baltimore police.

According to the best science available, teens’ brains are not fully developed, and don’t typically pletely until they are in their mid-twenties. (We need to take into account individual differences, cultures and many other factors, but this statement holds true in most cases.) While teens can be very smart, they also tend to act much more emotionally and impulsively than adults. Their brains are often under hormonal “assault,” and the teen brain simply does not process the link between personal behavior and likely es very well.

If my toddler wandered out into the path of a car, would I yank him back to safety? Of course. If I walked in on a boy sexually assaulting my daughter would I pull him off in a manner that could be interpreted as violent? You bet. If my teen were in the middle of a riot, brick in hand, would I get him out of there, forcefully if necessary? Yup.

I do not justify abuse towards a child (and it was clear from the video that, at least in this instance, the boy was not hurt), but sometimes parenting is by “any means necessary,” and in this case, I side with the mom.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Rev. Robert Sirico: ‘Hobby Lobby’s Liberty, and Ours’
on concerns about liberty in the U.S., spurred on by the recent Supreme Court ruling regarding Hobby Lobby and the HHS mandate. Sirico wonders why we are spending so much time legally defending what has always been a “given” in American life: religion liberty. While the Hobby Lobby ruling is seen as a victory for religious liberty, Sirico is guarded about where we stand. Many celebrated the Supreme Court’s June 30 ruling on Hobby Lobby. But let’s not get ahead...
The Importance of Freedom of the Church
The first kind of religious freedom to appear in the Western world was “freedom of the church.” Although that freedom has been all but ignored by the Courts in the past few decades, its place in American jurisprudence is once again being recognized. Notre Dame law professor Richard Garnett explains how we should think about and defend the liberty of religious institutions: To embrace this idea as still-relevant is to claim that religious institutions have a distinctive place in our...
ISIS Actively ‘Recruits’ Girls And Women Online
In an ugly twist on the world of online dating scams, ISIS (the Islamic terrorist group responsible for much evil in places like Syria and Iraq) is now actively recruiting girls and women in the West to join their cause. Jamie Detmer reports that ISIS is now using social media to seek out females who want to join the cause, mainly by stressing the domestic life that supports it. The propaganda usually eschews the gore and barbaric images often included...
Social Justice: ‘Checking on my Privilege’
Peter Johnson, External Relations Officer at Acton, recently wrote an article for the Institute for Religion and Democracy’s series mentaries on social justice. This series explains what social justice is and examines what it means for Christians in light of the Gospel and natural law. Acton’s Dylan Pahman wrote the first article in this series by defining social justice. Johnson’s piece, Checking On My Privilege (And, Yes, It’s Still There) is the second in the series: The suggestion that the...
Why It’s Time to Defend the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
Before I try to convince you that Katha Pollitt is dangerously wrong, let me attempt to explain why her opinion is significant. Pollitt was educated at Harvard and the Columbia School of the Arts and has taught at Princeton. She has won a National Magazine Award for Columns and Commentary, an NEA grant, a Guggenheim Fellowship, and a National Book Critics Circle Award. She is, in other words, the kind of politically progressive pundit whose opinions, when originally expressed, are...
How a Study on Hurricanes Proved Bastiat’s Broken Window Fallacy
After 6,712 cyclones, typhoons, and hurricanes the evidence is clear: Bastiat was right all along. In 1850, the economic journalist Frédéric Bastiat introduced the parable of the broken window to illustrate why destruction, and the money spent to recover from destruction, is not actually a net benefit to society (see the video at the end of this post for an explanation of the broken window fallacy). For most people the idea that destruction doesn’t help society would seem too obvious...
Radio Free Acton: 500 Years of Reformation
2017 will mark the 500th Anniversary of Martin Luther’s posting of his 95 Theseson the door of Wittenberg Castle Church, the event that would eventually lead to what we now know as the Protestant Reformation. In anticipation of this very significant anniversary, churches, seminaries, colleges, and many other organizations have begun the process of examining the events leading up to and flowing out from the reformations of that time, and a great deal of those organizations have joined together to...
Now Available: ‘The System Has a Soul’ by Hunter Baker
Christian’s Library Press has now released The System Has a Soul: Essays on Christianity, Liberty, and Political Life by Hunter Baker, a collection of reflections on the role and relevance of Christianity in our societal systems. You can order your copy here. Challenging the notion that such systems are inevitably ordered by the plex machinery of state power and corporate strategy,” Baker reminds us of the role of the church in culture and political life. Rather than simply deferring to...
U.S. Supreme Court Reverses Autocam Ruling
A few weeks ago, Hobby Lobby made waves when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the arts and crafts chain in its lawsuit against the Health and Human Services Contraception Mandate. West Michigan manufacturer, Autocam, has been engaged in a similar legal fight. John Kennedy, owner of Autocam, stated that his and his family’s Roman Catholic faith “is integral to Autocam’s corporate culture” and the Affordable Care Act’s requirement to provide contraceptives andabortifacients was a violation of their...
Tony Dungy and Heresy
In this week’s Acton Commentary Hunter Baker wonders why are so-called progressives eager to use political power to “correct” the thinking of those they disagree with: You may not have realized it, but Tony Dungy is a heretic. Does the former football player, coach and now TV analyst hold beliefs that are considered heretical by his fellow Christians? No. But his recent doubts about Michael Sam as an NFL player (you’ll recall Sam as the All American college athlete who...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved