Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Archbishop: California church singing ban reminiscent of ‘persecutions in the USSR’
Archbishop: California church singing ban reminiscent of ‘persecutions in the USSR’
Jan 21, 2026 2:05 AM

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s decision to ban singing inside churches — and in some cases, to close churches outright — is ringing some unpleasant bells.

The government’s “infringement of our religious rights” reminds his flock of “the era of godless persecutions in the USSR,” says a leader of the Russian munity.

As Americans returned to their workplaces after celebrating the Fourth of July holiday on July 6, the state of California rolled out a new “guidance” requiring all churches and other places of worship to cease indoor singing.

One week later, on July 13, the governor intensified those regulations. In addition to closing all indoor dining in California, he ordered that counties which have been on the state’s monitoring list for three consecutive days are “required to shut down” all malls, fitness centers, and “worship services” — which are listed just before “protests.”

As of this writing, the order applies to 30 of the state’s 58 counties.

Archbishop Kyrill of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia is joined by pastors from a variety of Christian traditions in saying that the government order infringes on their religious liberty.

The state says the singing ban is necessary to stop the spread of COVID-19 – and its terms are not negotiable.

“Even with adherence to physical distancing, convening in a congregational setting of multiple different households to practice a personal faith carries a relatively higher risk for widespread transmission of the COVID-19 virus, and may result in increased rates of infection, hospitalization, and death, especially among more vulnerable populations,” the original document which banned church singing says.

“Places of worship must therefore discontinue indoor singing and chanting activities,” it continues. (Emphasis added.)

The government regulation effectively makes it impossible for Eastern Orthodox Christians and Byzantine Catholics to celebrate their worship services properly. Not only the Divine Liturgy but every liturgical service in the Eastern Christian tradition is sung or chanted – a sign of the tradition’s ancient roots. Before the liturgical changes of the Second Vatican Council, celebration of the Traditional Latin Mass was divided into “high Mass” (which was sung or chanted) and “low Mass” (which was spoken). The Eastern Orthodox tradition has no equivalent to a “Low Mass.”

In an open letter to Gov. Newsom, Abp. Kyrill – who leads the Diocese of Western America from his cathedral in San Francisco – says the Orthodox Church willingly canceled services for months to obey the state’s state-at-home order, “even though [Christians] were deprived of the reverent Divine Services of Great Lent and the joyous celebration of the Triumph of the Holy Resurrection.”

But he sees a deep hypocrisy at work when pares the state’s decree for “places of worship” and its treatment of Black Lives Matter protests.

Gov. Newsom – who says he maintains a Roman Catholic identity but “maybe I should let go of it” – promised his COVID-19 response would be guided exclusively by “science” and “data.” Yet he praised and encouraged crowded mass protests devoid of social distancing and replete with chanting.

Abp. Kyrill highlights this “contradiction in that mass protests take place everywhere, at which absolutely all precautions are violated with impunity. Yet, liturgical singing performed during the Divine Services and while observing all of the rules, is forbidden.”

“This is open discrimination, hypocrisy and the infringement of our religious rights, prompting us to recall the era of godless persecutions in the USSR,” he writes.

The California government directive bears no signature and specifies no penalties for pliance – yet. But the state says that may ing.

A spokesperson for the California Department of Public Health told that “Californians are being encouraged” to obey the administrative decree “without the threat of fines and citations as the first course of action.” Another representative of the state government told ABC News the guidance “has the same authority as all of CDPH’s other guidance, directives, and orders, which the governor has ordered residents to heed.”

The California Catholic Conference said it would obey the government’s directive on how to conduct its worship life. “The churches are just trying to keep people safe and are working within those guidelines to do so,” a spokesman said.

But the leaders of many other Christian backgrounds vow resistance to a government order that banishes singing, an action that beautifies church services and which some see as a necessary part of Christian worship. Pastor Paul Chappell of the 9,000-member Lancaster Baptist Church in the Los Angeles area, says his church will ignore the guidance.

“The word of God determines how we worship, not Sacramento,” he says.

Scholars say that the wording of the directive also raises First Amendment concerns that the state is directing the church to worship in specific ways.

“By using mandatory language for some religious activities, while discretionary for others, the health department has demoted the importance of certain church activities as opposed to others and is in turn governing the church in the area of worship, which government may not do,” said Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel. “The state has no authority to direct the manner and form of worship. It is beyond petence and the authority of the state to bansinging and chanting in houses of worship.”

The state will face legal challenges if it tries to enforce the order. The American Center for Law and Justice, the Center for American Liberty, and other legal nonprofits have said they will sue if the state goes too far.

The full text of the letter reads as follows:

An open letter to the honourable Gavin Newsom, Governor of California from His EminenceKyrillArchbishop of San Francisco and Western Americain light of the decree issued by the Governor of Californiathat forbids choral singing in churches.

Your Excellency,

I hereby express my protest against the recent prohibition of liturgical singing in houses of worship, which is an infringement of the rights and religious freedoms of the clergy and faithful of the Western American Diocese of the Russian Diaspora, the other Local Orthodox Churches, performing their ministry in this state, as well as other religious bodies.

During the years of Soviet rule, when the Russian Orthodox Church was subjected to persecution, Russian émigrés and their prising the Russia Church Abroad, came to the United States of America and other countries overseas, in order to freely confess their Orthodox Faith, to freely perform Divine Services, to observe the feast days, fasts and all the customs established by the Orthodox Church. In this manner, they followed the example of the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, who sought the possibility of freely confessing their faith.

From the very beginning of the current global outbreak of the coronavirus the clergy and faithful of our Diocese, desiring to preserve the health of the population and stop the spread of the coronavirus, and respecting those in power, rigorously strove to adhere to all the standard norms and restrictions introduced by local health authorities. Even though they were deprived of the reverent Divine Services of Great Lent and the joyous celebration of the Triumph of the Holy Resurrection, our parishioners were sympathetic to our directives, attending our churches “virtually.” However, we now observe a contradiction in that mass protests take place everywhere, at which absolutely all precautions are violated with impunity. Yet, liturgical singing performed during the Divine Services and while observing all of the rules, is forbidden. This is open discrimination, hypocrisy and the infringement of our religious rights, prompting us to recall the era of godless persecutions in the USSR.

Nonetheless, we will continue to pray with gratitude “for this land, its authorities and armed forces,” and “for this city, every city and country and all who in faith dwell therein.” Yet, at the same time, we will defend the rights of our clergy and our parishioners who possess full citizenship in the United States of America.

+KYRILL

Archbishop of San Francisco and Western America

Secretary of the Synod of Bishops of the Russian Church Abroad

July 2020

domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Audio: Sirico on Subsidiarity, Free Enterprise & the 2010 Elections
Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico took to the airwaves this morning in Chicago on WVON’s Launching Chicago with Lenny McAllister to discuss today’s elections across the country from a Christian perspective. You can listen to the interview using the audio player below, and don’t forget to follow Rev. Sirico on Twitter right here. And don’t forget to vote! [audio: ...
More on Putting Politics in its Place
Last week Jordan Ballor and I offered short addresses to the crowd that gathered for Acton on Tap in Grand Rapids. This is an essay that closely mirrors ments from the event. It’s a sermon of sorts, and a personal testimonial too. — — — — — — Remarks on the “Limit of Politics” for Acton on Tap: I love elections. Elections produce drama, conflict, and intrigue. It produces statements like this by the former Louisiana governor and federal convict...
‘A’ for Austerity: The New Scarlet Letter
I introduced this week’s Acton Commentary yesterday with some thoughts about “The Audacity of Austerity.” In today’s “‘A’ for Austerity: The New Scarlet Letter,” I take to task the attitude embodied by Paul Krugman’s vilification of proponents of austerity measures. Most recently Krugman called such advocates “debt moralizers,” implicitly drawing the connection between austerity measures and “puritanical” virtues like thrift. In this Krugman follows in the spirit of Nathaniel Hawthorne, who indeed has much to answer for in forming the...
Video: More Highlights from the Acton Institute’s 20th Anniversary Celebration
On October 21st at Acton’s 20th Anniversary Dinner, Richard M. DeVos – Co-Founder of Amway Corporation with his friend Jay Van Andel – was presented with the 2010 Faith and Freedom Award. Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, cited DeVos for his “decades-long exemplary leadership in business, his dedication to the promotion of liberty, his courage in maintaining and defending the free and virtuous society, and his conviction that the roots of liberty and the...
A Tale of Two Europes
A new article from Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg published today in Acton News & Commentary. Sign up for the free, weekly email newsletter here. +++++++++ A Tale of Two Europes By Samuel Gregg The word “crisis” is usually employed to indicate that a person or even an entire culture has reached a turning-point which demands decisions: choices that either propel those in crisis towards renewed growth or condemn them to remorseless decline. These dynamics of crisis are especially pertinent...
Speaking of a Principled Basis for Limited Government
My recent posts on politics and austerity and this week’s Acton Commentary refer to a principled basis for limited government. I speak of “the limits of government rooted in a rich and variegated civil society.” Here’s a good statement of that basis from Lord Acton: There are many things government can’t do – many good purposes it must renounce. It must leave them to the enterprise of others. It cannot feed the people. It cannot enrich the people. It cannot...
Video: Sirico on Christian Anthropology (and some thoughts on Election 2010)
Another election e and gone, and once again the balance of power has significantly shifted in Washington, D.C. and statehouses across America. Tuesday’s results are, I suppose, a win for fans of limited government, in that a Republican House of Representatives will make it more difficult for President Obama and his Democrat colleagues in the Congress to enact more of what has been a very statist agenda. But even with the prospect of divided government on the horizon, we who...
What Difference Does This Election Make for Religious Hiring Rights?
Stanley Carlson-Thies, president of the Institutional Religious Freedom Alliance, writes in the Nov. 4 IRFA Newsletter: The races haven’t all even been decided yet, and, given the big changes, it will take considerable time for new directions to be settled, so it is far too soon to try to guess how the November 2nd voting will affect national policy. Just a few quick thoughts: Two notable changes in Congress to the benefit of institutional religious freedom: Dan Coats, who served...
Chicago Event: How Ideology Destroys Biblical Ecumenism
For those PowerBlog readers in the Chicago area, I’ll be in town next Tuesday for a luncheon where I’ll be discussing the topic, “How Ideology Destroys Biblical Ecumenism.” The event is sponsored by the Chicago-based ministry ACT 3 and will be held at St. Paul United Church of Christ, 118 S. First Street, Bloomingdale, IL. The event will begin at 11:45am (Tuesday, November 9) and you can register for the luncheon at the ACT 3 website. The point of departure...
Audio: Sirico Discusses Election 2010
Tuesday was a momentous day in American politics, Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico was called upon mentate on the results of the mid-term elections yesterday a couple of times: Guest host Sheila Liaugminas invited Father Sirico ment on the e of the election and the impact of the Catholic vote on the results for The Drew Mariani Show on Relevant Radio. Listen via the audio player below: [audio: Sirico also mentary on the Ave Maria Radio Network, joining host...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved