Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
April Fools and April 15th
April Fools and April 15th
Jul 28, 2026 7:57 PM

Just in time for April 1st and April 15th, let’s talk about taxes.

On April 1st, the excise tax on cigarettes was increased dramatically—from $.39 to $1.01 per pack. It’s fitting that this occurred on April Fools’ Day, since it served to break President Obama’s campaign pledge not to increase “any form of” taxes on any family making less than $250,000 per year.

Independent of breaking a campaign promise, such a tax is attractive for non-smokers since the costs are imposed on other people and it reduces a harmful behavior.

But the tax is troubling on several levels. First, what are the limits to the government’s paternalism in the consumption of a legal product? Second, to the extent that people reduce their smoking, this will undermine state tax revenues based on tobacco (by an estimated $1 billion)—in a time of already strained budgets. Third, taxes reduce economic activity and jobs, by definition—not a good idea during a recession.

But I want to focus on one final aspect: since smokers are disproportionately e, is it fair to increase taxes in such a regressive manner on the poor? And if Democrats are seen as defenders of the poor, why are they increasing their taxes? These are great questions—and ones that should be asked more often, because the government imposes all sorts of taxes on the poor.

Many of these burdens are indirect. Corporate e taxes are borne by consumers as higher prices; property taxes are borne by tenants as higher rent. Environmental regulations and “card-check” legislation would increase costs for firms and thus, increase prices for consumers and drive away jobs overseas. A wide variety of trade restrictions on food and clothing serve to dramatically increase the basic costs of living.

But here’s the biggie: federal payroll taxes. e families rarely pay any significant federal e tax”—the tax on e that we celebrate on April 15th. And they face modest state and county e taxes. Meanwhile, they’re hammered by the 15.3% federal payroll tax on e. Every dollar earned by the lower and middle classes is exposed to payroll taxes; there are no deductions or exemptions.

A family at the poverty line is nowhere near paying federal e taxes—and in many states, will not pay state e taxes either. (Unfortunately, a working poor family in Indiana pays hundreds of dollars per year.) Even an upper-middle e family like mine loses more than twice as much money to federal payroll pared to federal, state, and county e bined!

It’s amazing that payroll taxes receive so little attention given the staggering burden they place on workers, especially those in the lower and middle classes. Why are they ignored? Two reasons. First, half of their burden is hidden as the employer’s share of the tax. (Don’t be fooled; we pay that half too—in the form of lower wages pensation. Do you think gas stations pay the gas tax for you?) Second, because it is withheld from our paychecks and we never file a 1040, we tend to overlook it, despite its amazing bulk.

This April 15th, feel free to toss a few choice words at the Tax Man. But make sure to spend some time looking at your pay stub and thinking about payroll taxes.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Chart of the Week: The Fragmented Federal Welfare System
The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service estimates that there are currently over 80 federal programs that provide food, housing, healthcare, job training, education, energy assistance, and cash to e Americans. How do they fit together to serve the poor? During a hearing on Tuesday about better coordinating welfare programs to serve families in need, the chairman of theHouse Ways and Means Human Resources mittee provided the following chart (click to enlarge). Confused? You’re not the only one. As Rep.Charles Boustany (R-LA)...
Radio Free Acton: Jay Nordlinger On The Children of Monsters
Jay Nordlinger speaks at the Acton Lecture Series This week on Radio Free Acton, National Review Senior Editor Jay Nordlinger joins the podcast to talk about his latest book,Children of Monsters: An Inquiry Into the Sons and Daughters of Dictators, a book I enjoyed enough to create the “Radio Free Acton 5 Star Award of Excellence” in order to have an award to bestow upon it. Nordlinger joined us here at Acton on October 29 to deliver an Acton Lecture...
Housing Alone Doesn’t End Homelessness
Homelessness seems like it should be one of the most straightforward social problems to solve. The obvious solution would be to simply give people in need a place to live. Getting people off the street and into shelter is certainly be beneficial. And in the winter months it can even save lives. But does providing housing end homelessness? Unfortunately, asKevin C. Corinth explains,housing people who are homeless doesn’t necessarily reduce the number of people who are homeless over the long...
Russell Kirk and Christian Humanism
Russell Kirk Writing for the Morning Sun, Acton’s frequent contributor Bruce Walker, discusses Russell Kirk, calling him a “Christian Humanist.” Walker argues that not only was Kirk a talented writer, but he also understood other Christian humanists and was able to clarify some of their works and theories: Kirk may not have been the first, but was the scholar best able to identify [T. S.] Eliot’s nameless targets in the poem “The Hollow Men” as H.G. Wells, Bernard Shaw and...
Video: Jay Nordlinger On The Children Of Monsters
On October 29th, the Acton Institute was pleased to e author and National Review Senior Editor Jay Nordlinger to the Mark Murray Auditorium as part of the 2015 Acton Lecture Series. Nordlinger’s address shared the title of his latest book,Children of Monsters:An Inquiry into the Sons and Daughters of Dictators, which examines the varied fates of the children of some of the 20th century’s most notorious dictators. We’re pleased to present the video of Nordlinger’s talk here on the PowerBlog....
Paul Ryan on the ‘Poverty Industrial Complex’
Due to a surprising series of events, Wisconsin congressman Paul Ryan is nowSpeaker of the House. Given the range of interparty disruptions that preceded the event, many are wondering what, if anything, he might plish. Those questions won’t be answered anytime soon, but if Ann Coulter’s recent criticismsoffer any clue, his views on poverty alleviation area good appetizer tohis broader vision for the country. More recently, Ryan embarked on a series of on-site visits in poor neighborhoods, learning how local...
Review: That’s a Great Question
A couple of months ago Arkansas’ Secretary of State rejected the request from the Universal Society of Hinduism to erect a statue on state capitol grounds. A good friend from college, himself a Hindu, sent me an email asking me what I thought about it. What could I say? It seemed patiently unfair: Arkansas had approved a monument for the Ten Commandments on state grounds, but rejected the Hindu organization’s privately funded statue. miserated with my friend, saying only that...
Welcome to Cuba: Where doctors earn less than taxi drivers
In Cuba, taxi drivers earn far more than doctors, raking in more money in one day than a doctor will make in an entire month. The reason? Unlike most of the Cuban economy, taxi licenses are privately held and wages are not set by the state. Johnny Harris explains: Although Cuba offers fewopportunities for private enterprise — outside of itssprawling black market, that is — the number of self-employed workers has slowly grown in recent years. Seven years after Raul...
The FAQs: China’s ‘One-Child’ Policy
What was China’s “one-child” policy? In an attempt to limit population growth, China implemented a policy in the late 1970s that forbid families from having more than one child (there were, however, no penalties for multiple births, such as twins or triplets). Over the years, though, numerous exceptions have been allowed and by 2007 the policy only restricted 35.9 percent of the population to having one child. What is the new policy? Starting next March, a change to current family...
Yes, New York Times, for Christians Scripture Is Indeed the Rule of Law
“If any of you has a dispute with another, do you dare to take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the Lord’s people?” The Apostle Paul asked the church in Corinth. “Or do you not know that the Lord’s people will judge the world?” Paul continues, And if you are to judge the world, are you petent to judge trivial cases? Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved