Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
AOC’s blacklist has no place in the workplace
AOC’s blacklist has no place in the workplace
Jan 11, 2026 5:14 PM

Economists and ethicists agree: A worker should be evaluated by the job he does, not his political views. But the more politicized life es, the greater the chance petent employee will lose his or her job because of his private political views. Politicians like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez propose blacklisting their political foes, potentially including tens of millions of people, over politics. In an Orwellian twist of fate, the best employees may be fired precisely because they perform their job to the best of their ability.

An example appears to be playing out in the firing of Portsmouth, Virginia, Police Chief Angela Greene. As I wrote recently at FEE.org:

The town’s progressive leadershipfiredAngela Greene after she pressed charges against rioters who decapitated andpulled downa Confederate statue,striking a middle-aged black manin the head. The injury left the man atose, caused him toflatline twiceas hisbrainswelled dangerously, and required months of therapy to teach him towalk and talk again. City officials fired Greene on [last]Monday morning, a little more than two months after placing her on paid leave. She said she plans to sue.

There is more to the story. One of the people Greene crossed happens to be State Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth, a 28-year incumbent and the present president pro tempore of the Virginia state Senate.

Body camera footage of the June 10 protest shows Sen. Lucas telling Chief Greene that a connection in city government had authorized the mob to vandalize the Confederate statue (although it is not clear that a politician can unilaterally repeal laws against vandalism and destruction of property). Then-Portsmouth City Manager Lydia Pettis “Patton just gave permission though me. You need to give her a call,” Lucas told Greene.

“I’m telling you, you can’t arrest them,” Lucas instructed police. “You can’t stop them. This is city property.”

Greene tried to call Patton, who did not respond. “I had no other alternative but to await confirmation or denial from city leaders in order to prevent a false arrest or incite the crowd, who were told they could damage the property by an elected official,” Greene said. The police force froze in uncertainty because of political leaders’ nonfeasance.

After the protest turned tragic, Patton denied giving Lucas permission to vandalize the statue. If true, Sen. Lucas appears to have lied to a police officer, a Class 1 misdemeanor under Virginia state law. Instead of prosecuting her, Patton pinned the blame for the accident squarely on Greene for failing to prevent demonstrators from tearing down the statue. At the same time, city officials made it clear they would not press charges against the vandals for the unauthorized property destruction, which left a black man with permanent, life-altering injuries.

Greene then exercised her legal duty to charge more than a dozen people, including Lucas, with violating the law. It was her job, Greene explained. “I vowed to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and promised to faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent upon me, to the best of my ability,” she said. “As the head of the primary law enforcement agency in the City of Portsmouth, it is my obligation to investigate all crimes that have occurred, and when probable cause exists, present that evidence for the prosecution, which is what was done in this matter.”

For her trouble, city officials placed Greene on months-long, paid leave before firing her last Monday. Her colleagues promptly rushed to her defense. “The decision to terminate Chief Greene’s employment, made and announced by [new] Portsmouth City Manager Lavoris Pace, was unbelievable and unjust,” the Fraternal Order of Police said in a statement reported late last week. “No one was held responsible mitting a crime which resulted in destructive property damage and a citizen being severely injured.”

The same day the city terminated Greene, Portsmouth Commonwealth’s Attorney Stephanie Morales dropped the charges against Lucas, et. al. Former Gov. Terry McAuliffe turned the tables and accused Greene of engaging in a “despicable political persecution.”

Greene’s ouster did not satisfy some local leaders, who now demand that the city investigate any remaining police officers who helped prepare these charges – as instructed by their boss, Chief Greene. Their only apparent crime is demanding equal justice apply to a popular, powerful politico; defending the sanctity of property rights; and performing their duties without partiality.

Their plight is our plight. Potentially millions more Americans will lose their vocations, if political leaders get their way. As the FEE article notes, a number of national political figures including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have suggested that Trump administration alumni – or possibly anyone who voted for the sitting president – should never hold another job.

The FEE article details five reasons employment discrimination harms society. Two of these points illustrate how viewpoint discrimination hurts the would-be employer, including a summary of the groundbreaking work of economist Gary S. Becker. The article concludes:

For economic as well as philosophical and moral reasons, we should oppose viewpoint discrimination in secular education and employment. … Among [our unalienable] rights is the right to be judged on our performance, not our political orthodoxy.

You can read the whole article here.

The ability to work allows people to use their God-given gifts to serve others, meet the needs of society, and support themselves and their families. The free market honors this undertaking, crowns it with abundance, and multiplies the opportunities for mutual service. Politics constricts, rations, and denies these opportunities in the service of ideological – or, more often, starkly personal – ends. If political leaders can deny justice to law enforcement, none of us will remain unscathed.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Tyler Cowen’s “State Capacity Libertarianism”: A Straussian Reading
On a recent episode of the excellent podcast Conversations with Tyler the economist Tyler Cowen reflected on the direction his and co-author Alex Tabarrok’s blog Marginal Revolution has taken over the last ten years: [I]n 2009 I was still experimenting in some fresh way with blogging as a new medium and what it meant. In some ways the blog was better then for that reason. Whereas now, Marginal Revolution, it’s a bit like, well, the Economist magazine plus a dose...
Gertrude Himmelfarb: Teacher of the Free and Virtuous Society
Since the passing of Gertrude Himmelfarb I have been reflecting on just how much she taught me through her voluminous historical scholarship. In this week’s Acton Line Podcast I interviewed Yuval Levin, Resident Scholar and Director of Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies at AEI, who was also her student. Levin’s recent essay in the National Review, “The Historian as Moralist,” is the best introduction I have ever read to Himmelfarb’s intellectual project, her major works, and her lasting influence. My...
How California’s new ‘gig-work’ law threatens local artists
Capitalism is routinely castigated as an enemy of the arts, with much of the criticism pointed toward monsters of profit and efficiency. Others fret over more systemic features, worried mercialization and consumerism will inevitably detach artists from healthy creative contexts. Among progressives, such arguments are quickly paired with vague denunciations of “corporate greed” and advocacy for “corrective” or “protective” policies, from cultural subsidies to wage controls to “artist lofts” and beyond. The irony, of course, is that such solutions have...
Richard Reinsch on Rubio’s ‘materialistic’ industrial policy
Last November, my colleague Dan Hugger ments by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) about his desire for mon good capitalism” informed by Roman Catholic social teaching. Generally speaking, this is an aspiration that many at the Acton Institute share, but the specifics of what that would look like are where the real differences lie. At the least, this demonstrates how people of good will, of the same (or similar) religious and ethical tradition, can still have divergent opinions about policy. Shared...
Alejandro Chafuen in Forbes: Corruption, not globalization, is to blame for poverty
When discussing globalization, advocates of the free economy usually start by stressing the large number of people who have risen out of extreme poverty in the last three decades. This period of poverty reduction showed a parallel growth in globalization. But it has not been even. Those who try to prove that we are living in the best of times usually use monetary statistics – they count the number and percentage of people who earn less than $1.90 per day....
What are the unintended consequences of economic nationalism?
Protectionist policies are, on the surface, attractive. Through state means, they promise to protect industries and workers as well as boost a country’s industrial production. But like most top-down solutions, there’s a catch; the government has a knowledge deficiency. “No one knows what technological innovation or entrepreneurial insight will upend the present economic landscape in America—or any other country,” explains Samuel Gregg in an article in Law & Liberty. “Nor can such developments be anticipated by economic nationalist policies.” Evidence...
Things are getting (even) worse for religious believers in China
There’s more depressing news from China. Its Religious Affairs Office has announced that, not only must all religious organizations get state approval for any activity they undertake, they are also expected to “spread the principles and policies of the Chinese Communist Party.” Given the basic irreconcilabilities between, say, small “o” orthodox Christianity and the philosophy of Chinese Communism – which, after all, includes a mitment to atheism – this can only be seen as an escalation in the Chinese regime’s...
Acton Line podcast: Remembering Gertrude Himmelfarb with Yuval Levin
On this week’s episode, we pay tribute to Gertrude Himmelfarb who passed away last Monday, December 30th, at the age of 97. Gertrude Himmelfarb was a historian and leading intellectual voice in conservatism. Throughout her career, she wrote many books about Victorian history, morality and contemporary culture. The New York Post named her one of America’s greatest minds, and the National Review called her the “paragon of intellectual plishment.” What did her work contribute to the conservative movement and how...
The NHS: Lie or we’ll fine you
The former UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Nigel Lawson oncesaid that “the NHS is the closest thing the English people have to a religion” – but as a new story shows, it is a religion that forces people to break the Ten Commandments. Certain British citizens must lie to the government or face a punishing fine for telling the truth. One person to suffer this fate is a domestic abuse survivor and single parent who did not want to deceive...
Doug Bandow: China exports its ‘social credit’ system to Venezuela
China’s social credit system seeks to tie each individual’s credit rating and privileges to his support for the Communist regime. Venezuela’s socialist dictator, Nicolás Maduro, has moved to import “perhaps the creepiest tool of repression” to his own country, writes Doug Bandow in this week’s Acton Commentary. Bandow, a senior rellow at the Cato Institute and former special assistant to President Ronald Reagan, writes that the metastasizing Big Brother program proves that government surveillance is an integral feature of socialism:...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved