Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Anti-Semitism and Britain’s Labour Party
Anti-Semitism and Britain’s Labour Party
Dec 31, 2025 7:17 AM

Britain’s 2019 General Election is unusual for many reasons. It’s not odd for British religious leaders to express their views about what they think their congregants should consider before they go to the polls. But the entire country was taken aback late last month when Britain’s mild-mannered Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis (who heads what’s called the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth) published a public letter in the London Times in which he effectively advised people not to vote for the British Labour Party.

What’s extraordinary about this is much of Britain’s Jewish population have traditionally voted for Labour and have done so for a long time. Chief Rabbi Mirvis stated, however, that “a new poison” had entered the Labour party, one which had been “sanctioned from the very top.” That can only be seen as a reference to the leader of British Labour, Jeremy Corbyn. He is by far the most left-wing leader of the British Labour party since Michael Foot.

The poison which has permeated Labour’s bloodstream is anti-Semitism. In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Britain became a relatively safe refuge for Jews fleeing persecution and bigotry. Many have risen to the highest ranks in British politics, law, culture merce.

A good example was the Conservative Member of Parliament, Sir Keith Joseph (later Lord Joseph of Portsoken). The son of Sir Samuel Joseph, a Lord Mayor of London, Sir Keith was elected a Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford, in 1946. This is one of the most sought-after academic accolades at Oxford. It is earned through fierce petition and examinations. Politically-speaking, Joseph is famous for having paved the intellectual way for the free market revolution that occurred on the British right and inside the Conservative Party in the 1970s and 1980s. On the other side of politics, the former leader of Britain’s Labor Party, Ed Miliband, had a Polish Jewish mother who survived the Shoah and a Belgian Jewish father who fled to Britain in World War II.

Anti-Semitism of one form or another is, alas, present to some degree in most Western societies. But until now, it’s most vivid expression throughout the United Kingdom was via Sir Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists, a movement which operated on the fringes of British politics in the 1930s.

Now, however, the cancer of anti-Semitism appears firmly ensconced on the left—especially the hard left—of British politics. It es across in the form of extremely harsh anti-Israel rhetoric which turns out to be thoroughly laced with some of the old nasty tropes about Jewish influence merce and politics.

People in Britain, including British Jews, of all political persuasions have long held a variety of views about Israel. That’s not the issue. The problem ranges from the association of some prominent Labour politicians and activists—including Corbyn himself—with a variety of groups that regularly deploy anti-Semitic language, ments by prominent Labour political figures that are hard to read as anything but anti-Semitic.

Labour, not surprisingly, has denied that the problem is as far reaching as some are suggesting, even though Corbyn himself has acknowledged “that anti-Semitism has occurred in pockets within the Labour Party.” The Chief Rabbi of Britain and the Commonwealth, by contrast, say that it is a real problem and is concerned at the apparent failure of Labour’s leaders to tackle the problem with the seriousness it deserves. In any case, it is a sad state of affairs that a country which has such a long history of tolerance in the right sense of that word finds one important segment of its political spectrum struggling with the one of the oldest and most reprehensible of prejudices.

Featured image: Sophie Brown [CC BY-SA 4.0]

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
3 books to help you think and talk about politics without practicing politics
When people talk about politics, they are usually discussing passions and interests, often with a whole lot of passion and interest. This is why prohibitions exist in polite society against talking about politics. Political discussions about issues, parties, or candidates are often performative recitations of opinion: yesterday’s knowledge, right or wrong, applied to today’s situation. These debates can be engaging, enraging, or enjoyable. It is this sort of politics that, as Henry Adams observed, “as a practice, whatever its professions,...
Acton Line podcast: The biggest problems of national conservatism
In recent years, a rift has opened within American conservatism, a series of divisions animated in part by the 2016 presidential election and also by a right concern with an increasingly progressive culture. Among these divisions is a growing split between self-professing liberal and illiberal conservatives as some on the right scramble to give explanation for a culture which has e hostile to civil society and traditional institutions, most notably the family. One movement which has grown out of this...
Bloomberg and Sanders are both wrong about money in politics
Super Tuesday – the single day in the U.S. presidential primaries with the most delegates at stake – e and gone, and so have quite a few presidential candidates. Former South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) both dropped out before Tuesday and endorsed former Vice President Joe Biden. After lackluster performances on Tuesday, both former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and his debate nemesis, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, have dropped out, as well. The...
Hubris old and new
Adam MacLeod, a law professor at Faulkner University in Alabama, wrote a couple of years ago in the New Boston Post of “chronological snobbery,” the idea that “moral knowledge progresses inevitably, such that later generations are morally and intellectually superior to earlier generations, and that the older the source the more morally suspect that source is.” We don’t have to look too hard to see how widespread this attitude is now. No other age has had the hubris of ours....
Bernie Sanders’ pagan view of charity
Bernie Sanders holds a pagan view of charity. I mean that not in a pejorative but in a denotative sense: Sanders’ preference for government programs over private philanthropy echoes that of ancient pagan rulers. Sanders, a democratic socialist, has said that private charity should not exist, because it usurps the authority of the government. Sanders voiced this antipathy at a United Way meeting shortly after being elected mayor of Burlington in 1981. The New York Times reported: “I don’t believe...
Acton Commentary: Liberty for AOC but not for thee
During a congressional hearing late last week, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez likened Christians who refuse to perform medical procedures that violate their religious beliefs to Klansmen, segregationists, and slaveholders. But in this week’s Acton Commentary, Rev. Gregory Jensen writes that it is the congresswoman who shares the Jim Crow tactics of using the government to deny other people their inalienable rights. In a video clip that went viral, AOC, a democratic socialist, said that Christians lack the right to live according to...
As it turns out, Lake Erie does not have ‘rights’
Last week, a federal district court judge in Ohio declared that the city of Toledo’s move to establish a Lake Erie Bill of Rights, or LEBOR, was invalid. Judge Jack Zouhary put it this way: Frustrated by the status quo, LEBOR supporters knocked on doors, engaged their fellow citizens, and used the democratic process to pursue a well-intentioned goal: the protection of Lake Erie. As written, however, LEBOR fails to achieve that goal. This is not a close call. LEBOR...
The Green New Deal sits on a throne of lies
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez intended the Green New Deal to cement her position as the intellectual leader of the democratic socialist movement, but even passing scrutiny caused the $93 trillion proposal to fade into obscurity. In an attempt to revive her signature plan, the New York congresswoman read the entire text of the bill during a ponderous speech before the House of Representatives. More than a year may have passed since the plan’s critics snickered at its proposals to end air travel...
For Roger Scruton, philosophy and culture were inseparable
It’s almost two months since the death of perhaps the twentieth century’s most important conservative philosopher, Sir Roger Scruton, but discussion of the significance of his work and life continues to occupy a great deal of space in journals, opinion pieces and on the airwaves. Like many others, I have found myself looking again at many of Scruton’s great books, such as his classic “The Meaning of Conservatism” (1980), the very reflective “England: An Elegy” (2000) and the aesthetic arguments...
Clayton Christensen: ‘If you take away religion, you can’t hire enough police’
The Founding Fathers understood, in the words of John Adams, that “we have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion.” An Ivy League professor recently heard the same conclusion repeated by a Chinese Marxist. “I had no idea how critical religion is to the functioning of democracy,” the economist told Clayton Christensen. Christensen, who died last month at the age of 67, taught business administration at Harvard Business School and served...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved