Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
An All-American Asteroid City
An All-American Asteroid City
Jan 11, 2026 1:36 AM

Wes Anderson, known for his self-conscious, tableaux-laden tales of arch strangeness, e home to America after sojourning the world. What he has discovered here is a country many miss.

Read More…

During his past decade or so of directing, Wes Anderson has done his darnedest to make audiences forget he’s an American. His most recent films have been set in elaborately imagined fictional versions of Budapest (2014’s The Grand Budapest Hotel), Japan (2018’s Isle of Dogs), and France (2021’s The French Dispatch). Anderson has even adopted the lifestyle of an expatriate; born and raised in Texas, the 54-year-old filmmaker has long considered Paris his base of operations.

None of this would matter were it not for the fact that Anderson’s best films always reflected where he was from rather than where he was going. Bottle Rocket (1996) and Rushmore (1998) not only took place in the Lone Star State but savored the tiny emblems of the American way of life, like science fairs and firecrackers, and relished a wide variety of distinctively American types—from Owen Wilson’s hard-charging would-be con in Bottle Rocket to Jason Schwartzman’s resourceful high-schooler and Bill Murray’s midlife-crisis-addled businessman in Rushmore.

In his recent films, though, Anderson has seemed less and less the kid with big dreams from Texas and more and more the auteur with big budgets living in Paris—a trend, happily, broken in his latest film, Asteroid City, which unfolds in the filmmaker’s inimitably fanciful vision of the American Southwest in the 1950s. Although it was photographed on locations and stages in Spain, the film represents in every other way an aggressive return to home turf.

Like Ferde Grofé’s Grand Canyon Suite, George Balanchine’s Stars and Stripes, and Leonard Bernstein’s On the Town, Asteroid City is the work of someone who unambiguously loves America. This time, Anderson’s usual spray of cultural references have a particularly homespun quality: there’s talk of telescopes and stargazing, picnic suppers of chili and frankfurters, Tupperware containers and stacks of flapjacks. Characters say things like “Holy Toledo.” Much of the pretension has gone out of him.

As presented in the movie, Asteroid City (pop. 87) is itself a testament to a pioneer spirit that still prevailed at midcentury. Springing up around a crater at the town’s center are the signs of an advanced civilization confident in itself—namely, ours: a ing motor court, cozy cottages, an observatory, a diner. The color scheme is in pleasing pastels; the surfaces are glossy and glistening. Most everything looks new and shiny, including the soda machines and the gas station. In envisioning a town built from scratch during the Space Age, Anderson has found the perfect application for his meticulous, overly polished visual style.

Among the outsiders beckoned to Asteroid City to partake in a Junior Stargazer event are the Steenbeck family—or its remnants. War photographer Augie Steenbeck (Schwartzman, in one of his most substantial roles in an Anderson film since Rushmore) is the sole surviving parent to his teenage son (and Stargazer participant) Woodrow (Jake Ryan) and three young daughters named Andromeda, Pandora, and Cassiopeia (Ella, Gracie, and Willan Faris).

Grizzled, bearded, stoical Augie has resisted telling his children the news of their unwell mother’s demise until their arrival in Asteroid City. “You’re saying our mother died three weeks ago?” Woodrow asks his father. “Did you already know, Woodrow?” Augie asks his son in the same tone a parent might use to ask a child if he had begun to have doubts about Santa Claus. Even so, Anderson is a firm believer in the resourcefulness of children—a theme in one of his favorite films and biggest influences, Francois Truffaut’s Small Change. The Steenbeck sisters improvise a burial service in the desert sand for their dear departed mother, whose remains are housed in a Tupperware container.

Coursing through the film is an entirely ecumenical expression of religious sentiment. The Steenbeck children must e by their instinct to bury the dead through their frequently mentioned Episcopalian upbringing. Meanwhile, a pretty elementary school teacher named June (Maya Hawke) has in her charge a gaggle of rowdy youngsters e to Asteroid City by bus and who make a mild mockery of the act of saying grace by thanking the Lord for all the elements of a sandwich: the onions, the relish, the pickles … Even movie star Midge Campbell (Scarlett Johansson, who is both chipper and dissipated) regards her profession as something of a calling. When she inveigles Augie to rehearse a scene with her, she urges him to draw upon his own increasingly bereft state of mind.

We might assume that Anderson is making antagonists of religion and science, but in the film’s conception, science is about the pursuit of something as grand, unpredictable, and unknowable as any god. “If you wanted to lead a nice, quiet, peaceful life, you picked the wrong time to be born,” General Grif Gibson (Jeffrey Wright) tells the Junior Stargazers in a rat-a-tat speech that places the Space Age in the context of two world wars and a century that e to be known as America’s own.

Asteroid City taps into that spirit of American self-confidence. After a flying saucer manned by a moody alien wreaks havoc with the Junior Stargazer proceedings, the military whips itself into a panic by imposing a quarantine and ordering medical and psychological testing. But the residents of and visitors to Asteroid City remain hopeful and curious about their visitor from another planet. The singing cowboy Montana (Rupert Friend) tells the children that if the alien turns out to be a “dirty dog,” the armed forces will take care of everything—“and they haven’t lost a war yet.” Before giving an already-planned astronomy lesson, June confesses, “I suspect that some of our information about the solar system may no longer pletely accurate,” but she proceeds anyway. A boy prays “Our alien who art in heaven”; a hoedown ensues. Notes Augie’s well-to-do father-in-law Stanley (Tom Hanks): “I’m in no hurry. I like the desert. I like aliens.” That’s the spirit. We are a peaceable people.

Hotly debated has been Anderson’s choice to frame this narrative as a “play-within-a-film”—that is, the events described above are not supposed to have actually happened but are instead a visualization (in color and in widescreen) of a play called Asteroid City written by playwright Conrad Earp (Edward Norton). The events of the story are interspersed with segments from a black-and-white TV show purporting to recount the evolution and production of the “play”; Bryan Cranston is the Edward R. Murrow–like host.

Some may argue that this framework is unnecessary and, technically speaking, it is. At the same time, it’s tempting to regard the many scenes of the “play” taking shape—scenes of Earp writing, of the actors improvising, of understudies ing leads—as Anderson’s apologia for his own acts of creation. He has faced much criticism and considerable parody for his increasingly self-referential, self-involved films, but in showing us how a work of fiction—specifically, theone that we are es into existence, he is telling us that such works matter. At one point, the “actors” repeat the words “You can’t wake up if you don’t fall asleep” as a kind of incantation; by the film’s logic, “falling asleep” is akin to getting lost in a story, and “waking up” is like finishing that story with a better understanding of life or love or the stars above.

Asteroid City is the most charming, expressive, and personal film Anderson has made in years. How else to describe a movie in which the arrival of a being from outer space is met by an elementary school student making a model flying saucer

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The hermeneutical spiral
Mr. Phelps takes issue with my characterization of Stanley Fish’s position as amounting “to a philosophical denial of realism.” Let me first digress a bit and place ment within the larger context of my post. My identification of a position that “words and texts have no meaning in themselves” is really just an aside within the larger and more important question about what measure of authority authorial intent has in the interpretation of documents, specifically public documents like the Constitution....
ExTORTion
S. T. Karnick over at The Reform ments on a recent suit filed against DuPont over Teflon, claiming that “DuPont lied in a massive attempt to continue selling their product.” Karnick observes that abuse of the tort system is rampant, in part because “it has been perverted into a proxy for the criminal justice system: a means of punishing supposed wrongdoers through the use of a weaker standard of proof—preponderance of the evidence instead of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”...
The school of fish
The recent blogpost by my colleague Jordan Ballor discusses an op-ed written by law professor Stanley Fish. I am more familiar with Stanley Fish from his days as a literary theorist, and perhaps a quick review of a younger Fish will contribute to the conversation. Fish is known for, among other things, an idea of literary interpretation he called munities’ that suggests meaning is not found in the author, nor in the reader, but in munity in which the text...
Seeing the trees, missing the forest
The United Nations has released a report on the ongoing upheavals in Zimbabwe, where tyrant Robert Mugabe has been punishing his political opponents under the guise of “cleaning up” the country’s cities. The effect of Operation Murambatsvina (meaning either “Operation Restore Order” or “Operation Drive Out Trash,” depending on who’s translation you believe) has been to leave some 700,000 people homeless, jobless, or both. A downloadable copy of the UN report is available here. While the report does illuminate the...
Labor unions and free association
The Service Employees International Union and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters have broken away from the plaining that the federation has focused too much on political activism in the face of declining union membership and influence. Dr. Charles Baird was a featured guest on yesterday’s edition of Kresta in the Afternoon on Ave Maria Radio, discussing Catholic perspectives on unionism and whether the modern American labor union movement patible with church teachings. Dr. Baird is Chair of the Department of...
Close call on CAFTA
Close at Home The House of Representatives voted early this morning (12:03 am) to approve the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) after weeks of intense lobbying on both sides. The final vote was a close 217-215. My predictions: somehow, any dip in employment (if there is one) in the next six months will somehow be linked to CAFTA by its detractors. Detractors will attempt to take the moral high ground in American politics in ’06 and ’08, and even...
Animal cruelty?
I’m not quite sure what to make of this local story: “Four people are charged for their alleged involvement in killing two bald eagles.” The details of the alleged crimes are as follows: “Prosecutors say two teenagers shot the eagles in the Muskegon State Game Area with a .22 caliber rifle in April 2004 and then chopped them up with a hatchet.” Since the bald eagle, one of the nation’s revered symbols, is an endangered animal, it is protected by...
CAFTA/Culture of Life: enemies?
John Paul II gave us all a tremendous gift by endorsing the terms Culture of Life and Culture of Death. But as with all great gifts, we must guard these terms carefully so as not to wear them out with misuse, robbing them of their relevance. Unfortunately, this is precisely what is happening in the current debate over CAFTA. A group called Catholics for Faithful Citizenship (PDF) claims the following: “Clearly, supporting CAFTA is inconsistent with upholding a culture of...
Great debate
Foreign Policy hosts this exchange on environmental issues and economics. Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, gets the first word and Bjørn Lomborg, adjunct professor at the Copenhagen Business School, gets the last word. ...
Textual interpretation
A week ago Stanley Fish, a law professor at Florida International University, wrote an op-ed in The New York Times about the principles of constitutional interpretation, especially as represented by Justice Antonin Scalia. Fish takes issue especially with the notion that the text can have meaning “as it exists apart from anyone’s intention.” Fish essentially denies that texts are things that can have meanings in themselves, and it amounts to a philosophical denial of realism. Part of Fish’s problem is...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved