Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
America’s meat industry needs more freedom, less federal control
America’s meat industry needs more freedom, less federal control
Apr 26, 2025 1:02 AM

Returning authority to the states for meat processing would bolster freedom, strengthen our political system, and spur more innovation across agriculture and enterprise.

Read More…

In the early 17th century, Calvinist philosopher Johannes Althusius put a distinctly Christian spin on earlier concepts of political subsidiarity. Althusius visualized civil bodies as not parts of a whole, but critical plete entities in themselves. Each body, or association, has a vocation to which it is divinely called, and each is meant to work together with other associations in symbiotic relationships.

Two hundred years later, Abraham Kuyper used the term “sphere sovereignty” to refer to the independence of each of these associations, and to the “limited and specific role” to which government has been assigned by God. To Kuyper, as well as Althusius, the role of the state was to protect the independence of each sphere, and to secure the contracts made between them.

Why does this distinction matter? Well, it strikes at the core of American politics.

Specifically, we see a vivid lack of subsidiarity in the meat processing industry, where mandates from the very top of government have suffocated ranchers and processors for decades.

In the name of “public safety” and “maintaining consumer confidence,” the government has created an artificial oligopoly in this industry, thereby creating intrinsic discrimination against small business. Ever since Congress passed the Wholesome Meat Act of 1967, under the Lyndon Johnson administration, all meat processing has been overseen by federal USDA guidelines. Certified inspectors must oversee every animal slaughtered, every slice of meat processed, and the finished cuts of meat themselves. Through the stringent HACCP regulations instituted in 1997, every meat processor must also create expensive safety plans for every single cut of meat.

The cost of these plans has been estimated at $13,540 per plan for small processors. Moreover, the original cost of bringing buildings up to new sanitation codes was a shocking $266,800 apiece. The safety issues of note are primarily those suffered by massive meat processors, while the price of pliance has been larger for the small plants.

The economic results of these costs has been an uppercut to munities, small meat processors, and consumers. Rural families surrounded by cows and pigs can’t purchase a pound of ground beef from their farming neighbor unless it was slaughtered at an officially inspected facility, which, as a side effect of regulation, often only accept bulk orders of animals from large farmers. Small meat processors have been forced out of business and the market has consolidated as a result, to the point where only four panies control 80% of the market.

Put simply, subsidiarity has been crushed in this industry, and it has had economy-wide ramifications.

We should remember that our nation is a constitutional republic, not a democracy, and that in itself is a check on majority rule laid by our founders. Further, a key political principle of subsidiarity is built into the U.S. Constitution in the Tenth Amendment, which guarantees a broad swath of rights to states as protections from federal tyranny.

In Federalist Paper 45, James Madison elaborated on the need for this amendment. “The powers reserved to the several States,” he writes, “will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.”

Moreover, this ideal of a limited federal government was not some short-term concession to arrogant state delegations in the 1780s. Neither was the federal government given all authority over health issues, such as meat-borne pathogens. The reservation of powers to the states was a direct philosophical descendant of Christian subsidiarity, and it was included in the Constitution to ensure efficient and just politics. One recent paper outlines four main advantages of allowing most lawmaking to occur at the state level:

Regional variation in preferencesCompetition for taxpayers and businessesExperimentation to develop the best set of rulesLower monitoring costs

Thankfully, when es to the meat processing industry, all political hope is not lost. A bipartisan coalition has emerged, spearheaded by Congressmen and Senators from Kentucky and Maine that have worked together to sponsor the Processing Revival and Intrastate Meat Exemption (PRIME) Act in each of the last four Congresses. The PRIME Act would return jurisdiction over meat destined for in-state sale to the state itself.

All four benefits of state governance listed above e to pass under the PRIME Act. States could develop the best codes for their regions, tailored to each level of processor size. Competition would certainly increase, as small ranchers and processors alike would get more opportunity to sell their goods. Instead of a stagnant, national set of rules, states could foster creativity and innovation in policy to figure out the best balance between consumer safety and economic freedom. With more innovative rules would e a lessening of burdensome regulations, allowing cheaper costs across the board for meat.

The PRIME Act might not be a panacea, but it would be a major boost of freedom for our political system, the economies of rural America, and every consumer who cares about their meat.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
How to Love Liberty More Than a Libertarian Economist
I have a deep and abiding love for liberty—which is why I find myself so often in disagreement with libertarians. Libertarians love liberty too, of course, but they tend to love liberty a bit differently. I love liberty in an earthy, elemental way. I love liberty because I need it—like I need air and food—for human flourishing. In contrast, the libertarians I’ve encountered tend to love liberty primarily as an abstraction. Indeed, the most ideologically consistent libertarians I know seem...
Lord Acton and the Power of the Historian
Looking through my back stacks of periodicals the other day I ran across a review in Books & Culture by David Bebbington, “Macaulay in the Dock,” of a recent biography of Thomas Babington Macaulay. The essay takes its point of departure in Lord Acton’s characterization of Macaulay as “one of the greatest of all writers and masters, although I think him utterly base, contemptible and odious.” As Bebbington writes, “Acton, a towering intellectual of the later 19th century, was at...
Italy’s Tax Man Takes Aim at the Vatican
Kishore Jayabalan, the Acton Institute’s Rome office director, was interviewed by the Zenit news agency in an article titled, “Is Taxing the Church a Real Solution for Italy?” In the article, Jayabalan discusses the history of the Italian state and its imposition of property taxes on the Roman Catholic Church’s land holdings, residences and non-profit businesses. Sometimes in the past, particularly under Napoleonic rule and before the Lateran Pacts, the institution of property tax was often a subject of state...
Is Work a Curse?
Is work a curse, a result of mankind’s fall from grace? Not according to the Book of Genesis. As Hugh Whelchel, Executive Director of the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, explains, what Adam was called to do in the garden is what we are still called to do in our work today: Humanity was created by God to cultivate and keep God’s creation, which included developing it and protecting it. You see, we were created to be stewards of...
Let’s Change Hearts and Minds (and Laws, Too)
Few clichés are so widespread within the evangelical subculture, says Matthew Lee Anderson, as the notion that our witness must be one of “changing hearts and minds.” In careful hands, the idea is at best ambiguous. At worst it reinforces the sort of interior-oriented individualism that allows for and perpetuates a blissful naivete about how institutions and structures shape our dispositions and thoughts. In less than careful hands, the phrase drives a wedge between law and culture by attempting to...
Integral Human Development
The Journal of Markets & Morality is planning a theme issue for the Spring of 2013: “Integral Human Development,” i.e. the synthesis of human freedom and responsibility necessary for the material and spiritual enrichment of human life. According to Pope Benedict XVI, Integral human development presupposes the responsible freedom of the individual and of peoples: no structure can guarantee this development over and above human responsibility. (Caritas in Veritate 17) There is a delicate balance between the material and the...
Obamacare’s Religious Rubes
The White House has a plan to mobilize prayer vigils in front of the Supreme Court in defense of Obamacare. It was reported that the administration met with leaders at non-profit organizations and religious officials who support the new health care law. The court takes up the constitutional test of the health care mandate in a couple of weeks. The mandate has now been challenged in 26 states. Cue the same stale big government religious prophets who confuse statism and...
Constitutional Cases and the Four Cardinal Virtues
Should virtue be a consideration in judicial decisionmaking? Indiana Law Professor R. George Wright makes an intriguing argument for why the four cardinal virtues could be useful in interpreting constitutional cases: Judges typically decide constitutional cases by referring to one or more legal precedents, rules, tests, principles, doctrines, or policies. This Article mends supplementing this standard approach with fully legitimate and appropriate attention to what many cultures have long recognized as the four basic cardinal virtues of practical wisdom or...
Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Threat to Freedom
Over at the Liberty Law Blog, there is an excellent post titled “Ronald Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Dialogue of Liberty” by Alan Snyder. Snyder delves into the influence Chambers had on Reagan and how their worldviews differed as well. Many conservatives and scholars felt Chambers’ prediction that the West was on the losing side of history in the battle against Marxism collapsed after the fall of the Iron Curtain and the Soviet Union. For many, the ideas of Chambers...
How to Steal a Bike in New York City
Edmund Burke didn’t really say it, but it still rings true: All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. In a test of this maxim, filmmaker Casey Neistat tries to steal his own bike in several locations around New York City and finds that most people do nothing about it—even when it’s done right in front of a police station. I recently spent a couple of days conducting a bike theft experiment, which...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved