Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
America’s founding vision must be retrieved
America’s founding vision must be retrieved
Mar 20, 2026 8:27 AM

Grand Rapids, my home for the last 30 years, a tranquil and polite place, has recently experienced demonstrations and violence like other American cities. A lot of confusion and pain abound. A few weeks ago, protests for George Floyd and his deathat the hands of Minneapolis police officers saw groups attacking the police station and local businesses. How do we begin to make sense of this?

It is important that I begin by acknowledging the reality of racial prejudice. Given its obviousness it is odd that it should need to be acknowledged by anyone, but I have seen too many conservatives who attempt to qualify its reality for fear that in doing so they give ground to progressive forces seeking their own agendas. But it’s clear to me that it is not a coincidence that Black men continue to be brutalized. These actions occur not just at the hands of police, but at the hands of others animated by racial hatred. The fact that this holds true for people of color generally, of both sexes and many ethnicities, and is intolerable, in no way undermines my conservative/classical liberal principles. Ignoring this reality is not acceptable —precisely because of those principles. In fact, I see in those principles a way to move forward and heal wounds.

At the American founding there was a contradiction most wrenchingly revealed in the institution of slavery. How could a society predicated on inalienable rights, endowed and possessed not by virtue of law or government or race, but by human nature itself, tolerate human bondage?

Many today will claim that the Founders’ philosophy itself is to blame due its protection of private property, the vision of limited government rooted in a religious culture that holds its institutions together. These ideas and the institutions they engendered are not a mistake. They are a necessity, now more than ever. In fact, the weakening of these institutions is at the root of the chaos we are witnessing.

George Floyd’s bined with the demonstrations and the violence that at times have resulted, place squarely on the table questions about our society’s values. If this can be a moment of clarification, that will be a good thing. If not, the cycle of resentment, polarization and destruction will continue. How can we move forward as a society that is vibrant, engaging, inclusive, productiveand peaceful?

The potential for healing was seen the next day here in Grand Rapids. Early Sunday morning, following Saturday’s destruction, I drove downtown and circled the area where the violence had taken place. The streets of downtown were filled with people, many of whom would normally have been in church. They brought brooms, shovelsand trucks. They brought pizzas and coffee. By eight in the morning, they had already cleared much of the debris. I am unaware of any organized effort that produced this. There were no press conferences to call attention to what people were doing, and no leaders to speak out; no sign-up lists.

The culture that tolerates racism or promotes violence represents one vision of what social engagement might look like. A destructive vision. It is Marx’s taxonomy, and it is as ancient as Original Sin. It is the easiest thing in the world to destroy something. To buildis another matter altogether.

This other, creative vision sees free human cooperation as the means by which people can flourish together, munitiesand e resilient, precisely because of the differences in knowledge and perspective.

The society that destroys, that confiscates, that seeks to only redistribute but never to create is ultimately a destructive society.

However, a society, a moral culture, that can spontaneously inspire people e out on a Sunday morning with brooms and buckets to clean up the mess is one that can endure and prosper. It emerges when people believe in law and private property.

It is a culture that protests insults to human dignity and resists the encroachments of government and the militarization of its police. It is a society that presumes that first neighbors act when there is need, not calling upon higher government to be the central actor. It is a society that holds hope for the future by the value it places on human life, property, and social cooperation. And it depends on the participation from all people with varied talents, knowledge, and backgrounds. That is the society which we must make a reality for the next generation. It is the vision of America’s founding, and it must be retrieved.

The article originally appeared in The Detroit News on June 20, 2020

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The world is getting better, but the Enlightenment (alone) won’t save us
Global poverty is on the decline. Innovation and exploration continue to accelerate. Freedom and opportunity are expanding across the world. Meanwhile, political pundits and chin-stroking “experts” continue to preach of our impending doom. Why so much pessimism in a prosperous age? “I have found that intellectuals hate progress and intellectuals who call themselves ‘progressive’ really hate progress,” says Steven Pinker, author of the new book, Enlightenment Now. “Now, it’s not that they hate the fruitsof progress, mind you…It’s the ideaof...
‘Global trade is not a gunfight at the O.K. Corral’
Some mental images are especially vivid. One phrase stands out in the war of words preceding the brewing U.S.-EU trade war. “Global trade is not a gunfight at the O.K. Corral,” said French finance minister Bruno Le Maire last Thursday, after President Trump imposed new tariffs on steel and aluminum. The most famous shoot-out in the Old West has been immortalized in the 1957 film of the same name, as well as numerous other Hollywood vehicles. To my mind, none...
How eschatology transforms our economic action
As the church continues to navigate the challenges of the modern economy, we’ve seen a renewed recognition of the “earthiness” of our God-given callings—embracing the mundane and material aspects of our daily work and rejecting the “sacred-secular divide.” Yet in our earnest efforts to e more “earthly minded” for heavenly good, we face new temptations toward a different sort of lopsidedness. In an article for FULLER Studio, Vincent Bacote reminds us of this risk, recognizing the need for balance and...
Radio Free Acton redux: John Stonestreet doesn’t want to talk about sex
On this remastered episode of Radio Free Acton, we revisit an interview we had with John Stonestreet, President of the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. We examine the major contributions of Christianity to western culture, try to figure out if there’s a reasonable system of thought that could replace it in our society, and explore a bit of what the secular left has replaced Christianity with. Spoiler alert: it’s sex. Check out these additional resources on this week’s podcast topics:...
Are Orthodox Christians naturally statists?
A recent study concluded that members of the Eastern Orthodox Church, the second-largest church in Christendom, are likely to support left-wing economic policies. But that does not mean, says Krassen Stanchev in this week’s Acton Commentary, that Orthodox Christians are naturally statists: It is probably true that historically Orthodox countries (the study lumps in believers and non-believers alike) would fall into the group of those supporting greater government intervention in the economy. This has been the case in the last...
Spain’s unelected socialist government has plans for the Church
“Someone who has never won an election is now prime minister of the government,” said outgoing prime minister Mariano Rajoy, as he turned over his office to the head of the nation’s Socialist Party, Pedro Sánchez. After Rajoy’s center-Right party, the People’s Party, had been caught benefiting from kickbacks, Sánchez called a no-confidence vote. Under Spanish parliamentary laws, instead of calling a new election, the party introducing the no-confidence vote names the prime minister’s successor within the motion. Pedro Sánchez...
Kuyper Conference: Faith, Freedom and Education
Last month the Acton Institute co-sponsored the 2018 Kuyper Conference hosted by Calvin College & Seminary. Acton’s support of the conference included the organization of a panel discussion on “Faith, Freedom, and Education,” which featured Harry Van Dyke of Redeemer University College, Charles L. Glenn of Boston University, and Beth Green of Cardus. Kevin den Dulk of Calvin College moderated the discussion, which included some parisons and lessons for today. The video of the session is now available: The Abraham...
Physical capital and diminishing returns
Note: This is post #81 in a weekly video series on basic economics. How did Germany and Japan achieve record economic growth following World War II? A primary reason is physical capital. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Alex Tabarrok explains two specific concepts that deal with physical capital and the success of Germany and Japan. The first is the iron logic of diminishing returns which states that, for each new input of capital, there is less and less...
Bad economic news hits people harder than good news
From the perspective of well-being, is it better to win $100 or to not lose $100? If you assume that winning is obviously better, you’ve probably never been in a casino. Almost anyone who has gained and lost similar sums of money gambling knows that losing hurts more. Humans seem to be hard-wired for what is called loss aversion. Loss aversion, a concept in cognitive psychology first identified by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, can be summed up as “losses...
Explainer: What you should know about the Right to Try Act
Last week, Congress passed and the president signed into law the “Right to Try Act,” legislation President Trump had touted in his previous State of the Union address. Here is what you should know about the new law. What is “Right to Try”? Right To Try is the concept that terminally ill Americans should be able to try medicines that have passed Phase 1 of the FDA approval process and remain in clinical trials but are not yet on pharmacy...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved